European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 211–218 | Cite as

Effects of shade on growth, biomass allocation and leaf morphology in European yew (Taxus baccata L.)

  • Philip M. Perrin
  • Fraser J. G. Mitchell
Original Paper


The impact of shade on the growth of European yew (Taxus baccata L.) saplings was investigated over a three-year period using artificial shading to simulate four different light regimes (3, 7, 27 and 100 % relative photosynthetic photon flux density, RPPFD). There was no mortality attributable to shading even under the 3 % RPPFD treatment. Increasing shade was positively associated with specific leaf area, leaf length, leaf width and total chlorophyll content, but negatively associated with plant height, stem diameter, total dry weight and root to leaf and shoot ratio. Discoloration of the foliage occurred in plants grown in 100 % RPPFD conditions (resulting in reduced growth rates) and those transferred to 100 % RPPFD conditions after being shade-acclimated for 2 years. Evidence suggests that T. baccata has the ability to regenerate beneath a lighter canopy but beneath denser canopies gap dynamics will play an important role in facilitating successful regeneration and this needs to be reflected in management of natural populations of this declining species.


Artificial shading Biomass allocation Leaf morphology Natural regeneration Taxus baccata 



This project was part of a wider investigation into the ecology of Taxus baccata funded by the National Parks and Wildlife Service of the Irish government. We would like to thank Dr. Steve Waldren and the staff of the Trinity College Botanic Garden for their assistance throughout the experiment and Prof. Michael B. Jones for comments on a draft of the manuscript. Two anonymous reviewers made many helpful suggestions.


  1. Awada T, Radoglou K, Fotelli MN, Constantinidou HIA (2003) Ecophysiology of seedlings of three Mediterranean pine species in contrasting light regimes. Tree Physiol 23:33–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brzeziecki B, Kienast F (1994) Classifying the life-history strategies of trees on the basis of the Grimean model. For Ecol Manage 69:167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bugała W (1978) Systematics and variability. In: Bialobok S (ed) The yew—Taxus baccata L. Foreign Scientific Publications Department of the National Center for Scientific, Technical and Economic Information, Warsaw, pp 15–31Google Scholar
  4. Czatoryski A (1978) Protection and conservation of yew. In: Bialobok S (ed) The yew—Taxus baccata L. Foreign Scientific Publications Department of the National Center for Scientific, Technical and Economic Information, Warsaw, pp 116–138Google Scholar
  5. Dhar A, Ruprecht H, Klumpp R, Vacik H (2006) Stand structure and natural regeneration of Taxus baccata at “Stiwollgraben” in Austria. Dendrobiology 56:19–26Google Scholar
  6. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa, 2nd edn. Scr Geobot 18:1–258Google Scholar
  7. European Commission (2007) Interpretation manual of European Union habitats—EUR27. DG Environment, European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  8. Farris E, Filigheddu R (2008) Effects of browsing in relation to vegetation cover on common yew (Taxus baccata L.) recruitment in Mediterranean environments. Plant Ecol 199:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. García D, Zamora R, Hódar JA, Gómez JM, Castro J (2000) Yew (Taxus baccata L.) regeneration is facilitated by fruity-fleshed shrubs in Mediterranean environments. Biol Conserv 95:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Givnish TJ (1988) Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:63–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall D, Rao K (1994) Photosynthesis, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Hallik L, Niinemets Ü, Wright IJ (2009) Are species shade and drought tolerance reflected in leaf-level structural and functional differentiation in Northern Hemisphere temperate woody flora? New Phytol 184:257–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill MO, Preston CD, Roy DB (2004) PLANTATT—attributes of British and Irish plants: status, size, life history, geography and habitats. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, HuntingdonGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofman J (1970) The changes in historical and contemporaneous distribution of yew in Bohemia from an ecological standpoint. Preslia 42:170–183Google Scholar
  15. Hulme PE (1996) Natural regeneration of yew (Taxus baccata L.): microsite, seed or herbivore limitation? J Ecol 84:853–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iszkuło G (2010) Success and failure of endangered tree species: low temperatures and low light availability affect survival and growth of European yew (Taxus baccata L.) seedlings. Pol J Ecol 58:259–271Google Scholar
  17. Iszkuło G, Boratyński A (2004) Interaction between canopy tree species and European yew Taxus baccata (Taxaceae). Pol J Ecol 52:523–531Google Scholar
  18. Iszkuło G, Boratyński A (2006) Analysis of the relationship between photosynthetic photon flux density and natural Taxus baccata seedlings occurrence. Acta Oecol 29:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iszkuło G, Boratyński A, Didukh Y, Romaschenko K, Pryazhko N (2005) Changes of population structure of Taxus baccata L. during 25 years in protected area (Carpathians, Western Ukraine). Pol J Ecol 53:13–23Google Scholar
  20. Iszkuło G, Lewandowski A, Jasinska AK, Dering M (2007) Light limitation of growth in 10-year-old seedlings of Taxus baccata L. (European yew). Pol J Ecol 55:827–831Google Scholar
  21. Kennedy S, Black K, O’Reilly C, Ní Dhubháin Á (2007) The impact of shade on growth, morphology and biomass allocation in Picea sitchensis, Larix × eurolepsis and Thuja plicata. New Forest 33:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan SR, Rose R, Haase DL, Sabin TE (2000) Effects of shade on morphology, chlorophyll concentration, and chlorophyll fluorescence of four Pacific Northwest conifer species. New Forest 19:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leuthold C (1980) Die ökologische und pflanzensoziologische Stellung der Eibe (Taxus baccata) in der Schweiz [The ecological and phytosociological position of the yew (Taxus baccata) in Switzerland]. Veröff Geobot Inst Eidg Tech Hochsh Stift Rübel Zür 67:1–224 (In German)Google Scholar
  24. Majer A (1981) The yew tree-rich beech forest of Bakony-Szentagal, western Hungary. Acta Bot Acad Sci Hung 27:53–104Google Scholar
  25. Melzack RN, Watts D (1980) Cold hardiness in the yew (Taxus baccata L.) in Britain. J Biogeogr 9:231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell FJG (1988) The vegetational history of the Killarney oakwoods, SW Ireland: evidence from fine spatial resolution pollen analysis. J Ecol 76:415–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchell FJG (1990) The impact of grazing and human disturbance on the dynamics of woodland in S.W. Ireland. J Veg Sci 1:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell AK (1998) Acclimation of Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia) foliage to sun and shade. Tree Physiol 18:749–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mysterud A, Østbye E (2004) Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) browsing pressure affects yew (Taxus baccata) recruitment within nature reserves in Norway. Biol Conserv 120:545–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Niinemets Ü (2010) A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol Res 25:693–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niinemets Ü, Valladares F (2006) Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate Northern Hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol Monogr 76:521–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perrin PM, Kelly DL, Mitchell FJG (2006) Long-term deer exclusion in yew-wood and oakwood habitats in southwest Ireland: natural regeneration and stand dynamics. For Ecol Manage 236:356–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Qu L, Ji D, Shi F, Sasa K, Koike T (2005) Growth and photosynthetic performance of seedlings of two larch species grown in shaded conditions. Eurasian J For Res 8:43–51Google Scholar
  34. Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Walters MB, Vanderklein DW, Buschena C (1998) Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal trees species grown in high and low light. Funct Ecol 12:327–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodwell JS (ed) (1991) British plant communities. Vol 1, Woodlands and scrub. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Schirone B, Ferreira RC, Vessella F, Schirone A, Piredda R, Simeone MC (2010) Taxus baccata in the Azores: a relict form at risk of imminent extinction. Biodivers Conserv 19:1547–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Semagina RN (1983) State of natural renewal of common yew (Taxus baccata) in Black Sea forests of the Caucasian reservation. Byull Mosk Ova Ispyt Prir Otd Biol 88:146–149Google Scholar
  38. Silvertown JW (1982) Introduction to plant population ecology. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith CJ (1980) Ecology of the English chalk. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Svenning J-C, Magård E (1999) Population ecology and conservation status of the last natural population of English yew Taxus baccata in Denmark. Biol Conserv 88:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas PA, Polwart A (2003) Taxus baccata L. Biological flora of the British Isles. J Ecol 91:489–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tittensor RM (1980) Ecological history of yew Taxus baccata L. in southern England. Biol Conserv 17:243–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Valladares F, Niinemets Ü (2008) Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:237–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watt AS (1926) Yew communities of the South Downs. J Ecol 14:282–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Welander NT, Ottoson B (1998) The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. For Ecol Manage 107:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wyka T, Robakowski P, Żytkowiak R (2008) Leaf age as a factor in anatomical and physiological acclimative responses of Taxus baccata L. needles to contrasting irradiance environments. Phytosynth Res 95:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botany, Trinity College DublinUniversity of DublinDublin 2Ireland
  2. 2.BEC Consultants Ltd., Ground Floor OfficesDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations