European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 131, Issue 4, pp 1117–1125 | Cite as

Effects of growth rates, tree morphology and site conditions on longevity of Norway spruce in the northern Swiss Alps

  • Elisabeth Rötheli
  • Caroline Heiri
  • Christof Bigler
Original Paper

Abstract

Longevity of trees is known to be associated with growth rates, but also with tree morphology and spatial influences. However, very little quantitative information is available on the effects of these biotic and abiotic influences on maximum ages of trees. The objectives of this study were to investigate the trade-off between longevity and growth rates of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and to quantify the effects of tree morphology and abiotic site conditions on longevity of this species. Data were collected along different topographical and climatic gradients in a 20 × 25 km study area in the northern part of the Swiss Alps (Glarus). The ages of the more than 100 sampled dead Norway spruces ranged between 50 and 367 years. Longevity of these trees was negatively related to tree growth, i.e. slow-growing trees tended to grow older than fast-growing trees. Tree height was positively associated with longevity for both upper and lower storey trees. Longevity of lower storey trees was increased with large crown diameter, but decreased with long crown length. Upper storey trees growing at higher altitude tended to get older than at lower altitude. We conclude that the combined effects of growth rates, variability in site conditions and different traits of tree morphology determine tree longevity of Norway spruce in the Swiss Alps. Because longevity is tightly linked to mortality rates of tree populations, our study may improve our understanding of long-term processes of forest dynamics under current and future climate.

Keywords

Norway spruce Radial growth rates Longevity Upper storey Lower storey Tree morphology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Jürg Walcher (Cantonal Forest Administration, Glarus) for the assistance in identifying the forest stands for field sampling and for providing access to the phyto-sociological map of the canton of Glarus. The reviewers are acknowledged for providing useful comments.

References

  1. Amann G (2004) Bäume und Sträucher des Waldes. Taschenbildbuch. Neumann-Neudamm, MelsungenGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt JD (1997) Adaptive intrinsic growth rate: an integration across taxa. Q Rev Biol 72:149–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backman G (1943) Wachstum und organische Zeit. Barth, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigler C, Bugmann H (2003) Growth-dependent tree mortality models based on tree rings. Can J For Res 33:210–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigler C, Bugmann H (2004) Predicting the time of tree death using dendrochronological data. Ecol Appl 14:902–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bigler C, Veblen TT (2009) Increased early growth rates decrease longevities of conifers in subalpine forests. Oikos 118:1130–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black B, Colbert AJ, Pederson N (2008) Relationship between radial growth rates and lifespan within North American tree species. Écoscience 15(3):349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brang P, Duc P (2002) Zu wenig Verjüngung im Schweizer Gebirgs-Fichtenwald: Nachweis mit einem neuen Modellansatz. Schweiz Z Forstwes 153(6):219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bugmann H, Bigler C (2011) Will the CO2 fertilization effect in forests be offset by reduced tree longevity? Oecologia 165:533–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark JS (2007) Models for ecological data. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawes MA, Hättenschwiler S, Bebi P, Hagedorn F, Handa IT, Körner C, Rixen C (2011) Species-specific tree growth responses to 9 years of CO2 enrichment at the alpine treeline. J Ecol 99:383–394Google Scholar
  12. Duncan RP (1989) An evaluation of errors in tree age estimates based on increment cores in Kahikatea (Dacrycarpus dacrydioides). NZ Nat Sci 16:31–37Google Scholar
  13. Faraway JJ (2006) Extending linear models with R: generalized linear mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman & Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox J, Monette G (1992) Generalized collinearity diagnostics. J Am Stat Assoc 87:178–183Google Scholar
  15. Franklin JF, Shugart HH, Harmon ME (1987) Tree death as an ecological process. Bioscience 37:550–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frehner M, Wasser B, Schwitter R (2005) Nachhaltigkeit und Erfolgskontrolle im Schutzwald. Wegleitung für Pflegemassnahmen in Wäldern mit Schutzfunktion, Vollzug Umwelt. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, BernGoogle Scholar
  17. Frey HU (1995) Waldgesellschaften und Waldstandorte im St. Galler Berggebiet. Veröff. Geobotanisches Institut ETH, Stiftung Rübel, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  18. Holmes RL (1983) Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bull 43:69–78Google Scholar
  19. Issartel J, Coiffard C (2011) Extreme longevity in trees: live slow, die old? Oecologia 165:1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keane RE, Austin M, Field C, Huth A, Lexer MJ, Peters D, Solomon A, Wyckoff P (2001) Tree mortality in gap models: application to climate change. Clim Chang 51:509–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kraft G (1884) Beiträge zur Lehre von den Durchforstungen, Schlagstellungen und Lichtungshieben. Klindworth’s Verlag, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  22. LaMarche VC Jr (1969) Environment in relation to age of bristlecone pines. Ecology 50:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Landis RM, Peart DR (2005) Early performance predicts canopy attainment across life histories in subalpine forest trees. Ecology 86:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lanner RM (2002) Why do trees live so long? Ageing Res Rev 1:653–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larson DW (2001) The paradox of great longevity in a short-lived tree species. Exp Gerontol 36:651–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leibundgut H (1976) Ergebnisse von Alters- und Wachstumsanalysen in einem Gebirgs-Fichtenwald. Beiheft Schweiz Z Forstwes 57:74–86Google Scholar
  27. Loehle C (1988) Tree life history strategies: the role of defenses. Can J For Res 18:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matthes U, Kelly PE, Larson DW (2008) Predicting the age of ancient Thuja occidentalis on cliffs. Can J For Res 38:2923–2931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitscherlich G (1970) Wald, Wachstum und Umwelt—Form und Wachstum von Baum und Bestand. J.D. Sauerländer’s Verlag, Frankfurt a. Main, FRGGoogle Scholar
  30. Molisch H (1929) Die Lebensdauer der Pflanze. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  31. Møller CM (1957) Über die Bedingungen für das Erreichen hohen Alters bei Waldbäumen. Forstw Cbl 76:355–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prodan M (1961) Forstliche Biometrie. BLV, München, Bonn, WienGoogle Scholar
  34. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  35. Reynolds DL, Burke KL (2011) The effect of growth rate, age, and chestnut blight on American chestnut mortality. Castanea 76:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rinn F (2003) TSAP-Win: User reference. Rinntech, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  37. Rinn F (2004) LINTAB 5: Jahrringmessgeräte. Rinntech, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  38. Rolland C, Petitcolas V, Michalet R (1998) Changes in radial tree growth for Picea abies, Larix decidua, Pinus cembra and Pinus uncinata near the alpine timberline since 1750. Trees-Struct Funct 13:40–53Google Scholar
  39. Ryan MG, Yoder BJ (1997) Hydraulic limits to tree height and tree growth. Bioscience 47:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sachs L, Hedderich J (2009) Angewandte Statistik: Methodensammlung mit R. 13. aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  41. Schulman E (1954) Longevity under adversity in conifers. Science 119:396–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schütz JP (2003) Waldbau I: Die Prinzipien der Waldnutzung und der Waldbehandlung. Skript zur Vorlesung Waldbau 1. Professur Waldbau. ETH Zürich, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  43. Stauffer HB (2008) Contemporary Bayesian and frequentist statistical research methods for natural resource scientists. Wiley and Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  44. Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA (1997) Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol 190:214–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ward LK (1982) The conservation of juniper: longevity and old age. J Appl Ecol 19:917–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wyckoff PH, Clark JS (2002) The relationship between growth and mortality for seven co-occurring tree species in the southern Appalachian Mountains. J Ecol 90:604–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabeth Rötheli
    • 1
    • 3
  • Caroline Heiri
    • 2
  • Christof Bigler
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Ecology, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Department of Environmental SciencesETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSLBirmensdorfSwitzerland
  3. 3.HinwilSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations