Effects of seed quality and seed location on the removal of acorns and beechnuts
- 463 Downloads
We examine whether different guilds of foragers remove seeds differentially according to seed quality (seed size and insect infestation) and seed location (habitat and microhabitat) in a mixed oak-beech forest. Video recordings indicated that the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) was first to encounter seeds. Foragers preferred acorns to beechnuts, large to small size and sound to infested. Nevertheless, infested seeds were removed by rodents even when sound seeds were present. Seeds that were not preferred by scatter-hoarding rodents remained longer on the ground and were more vulnerable to predation and desiccation (4% moisture loss per day). However, seeds that were removed by scatter-hoarders were moved away from their mother trees (96%) and cached individually (32%), increasing their moisture content (3% per day). Buried seeds, simulating scatter-hoarding behavior, experienced only a 17% removal after 4 months. Seed removal differences among habitats were not due to habitat attributes but to the spatial distribution of rodent-preferred microhabitats. Thus, a significant lower seed removal was observed under the tree canopy with no shrubs. However, seed removal in forest gaps with deadwood cover was not significantly different from the preferred microhabitat (under shrub cover). In pure beech forests, seed removal by rodents only occurred under Ilex aquifolium (the only perennial cover) and under woody debris. This study concludes that seed quality and seed location determine the contribution of different removers (predators vs. dispersers), their seed selection and their removal speed, leading to different seed fates which will eventually affect tree regeneration.
KeywordsSeed size Insect infestation Scatter-hoarding Apodemus sylvaticus Fagus sylvatica Quercus
We would like to thank Steve B. Vander Wall for numerous suggestions and corrections, Christopher Moore for his English corrections and assistance with some of the figures, Mariana Fernández for valuable comments and help on data analysis and Jesús Alonso for his fieldwork assistance. Ramón Perea is supported by a PhD grant from Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. This study was funded by the project REGENFOR-CM (S2009AMB-1668) of Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid and the project AGL2006-00813 of the Spanish CICYT.
- Alonso J (2001) Inventario forestal del sitio natural de interés nacional Hayedo de Montejo de La Sierra, monte no 89 del C.U.P. El Chaparral y La Solana. Comunidad de MadridGoogle Scholar
- Crow TR (1988) Reproductive mode and mechanisms for self-replacement of northern red oak (Quercus-rubra)—a review. For Sci 34:19–40Google Scholar
- Den Ouden J, Jansen PA, Smit R (2005) Jays, mice and oaks: Predation and dispersal of Quercus robur and Q.petraea in North-western Europe. In: Forget PM, Lambert J, Vander Wall SB (eds) Seed fate. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 223–240Google Scholar
- Herrera CM (2002) Seed dispersal by vertebrates. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant-animal interactions. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 185–208Google Scholar
- Hulme PE, Kollmann J (2005) Seed predator guilds, spatial variation in post-dispersal seed predation and potential effects on plant demography. In: Forget PM, Lambert J, Vander Wall SB (eds) Seed fate. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 9–30Google Scholar
- Kelbel P (1999) Results of monitoring of carpophagus fauna on the European beech (Fagus sylvatica) in Slovakia. J For Sci 45:443–448Google Scholar
- Price MV, Joyner JW (1997) What resources are available to desert granivores: seed rain or soil seed bank? Ecology 78:764–773Google Scholar
- Suszka B, Tylkowski T (1980) Storage of acorns of the English oak (Quercus robur L.) over 1–5 winters. Arboretum Kórnickie 25:199–229Google Scholar