European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 131, Issue 3, pp 623–631 | Cite as

Effects of seed quality and seed location on the removal of acorns and beechnuts

  • Ramón Perea
  • Alfonso San Miguel
  • María Martínez-Jauregui
  • María Valbuena-Carabaña
  • Luis GilEmail author
Original Paper


We examine whether different guilds of foragers remove seeds differentially according to seed quality (seed size and insect infestation) and seed location (habitat and microhabitat) in a mixed oak-beech forest. Video recordings indicated that the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) was first to encounter seeds. Foragers preferred acorns to beechnuts, large to small size and sound to infested. Nevertheless, infested seeds were removed by rodents even when sound seeds were present. Seeds that were not preferred by scatter-hoarding rodents remained longer on the ground and were more vulnerable to predation and desiccation (4% moisture loss per day). However, seeds that were removed by scatter-hoarders were moved away from their mother trees (96%) and cached individually (32%), increasing their moisture content (3% per day). Buried seeds, simulating scatter-hoarding behavior, experienced only a 17% removal after 4 months. Seed removal differences among habitats were not due to habitat attributes but to the spatial distribution of rodent-preferred microhabitats. Thus, a significant lower seed removal was observed under the tree canopy with no shrubs. However, seed removal in forest gaps with deadwood cover was not significantly different from the preferred microhabitat (under shrub cover). In pure beech forests, seed removal by rodents only occurred under Ilex aquifolium (the only perennial cover) and under woody debris. This study concludes that seed quality and seed location determine the contribution of different removers (predators vs. dispersers), their seed selection and their removal speed, leading to different seed fates which will eventually affect tree regeneration.


Seed size Insect infestation Scatter-hoarding Apodemus sylvaticus Fagus sylvatica Quercus 



We would like to thank Steve B. Vander Wall for numerous suggestions and corrections, Christopher Moore for his English corrections and assistance with some of the figures, Mariana Fernández for valuable comments and help on data analysis and Jesús Alonso for his fieldwork assistance. Ramón Perea is supported by a PhD grant from Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. This study was funded by the project REGENFOR-CM (S2009AMB-1668) of Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid and the project AGL2006-00813 of the Spanish CICYT.


  1. Alonso J (2001) Inventario forestal del sitio natural de interés nacional Hayedo de Montejo de La Sierra, monte no 89 del C.U.P. El Chaparral y La Solana. Comunidad de MadridGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonal R, Muñoz A, Díaz M (2007) Satiation of predispersal seed predators: the importance of considering both plant and seed level. Evol Ecol 21:367–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Branco M, Branco C, Merouani H, Almeida MH (2002) Germination success, survival and seedling vigour of Quercus suber acorns in relation to insect damage. For Ecol Manage 166:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley Editorial, EnglandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawley MJ, Long CR (1995) Alternate bearing, predator satiation and seedling recruitment in Quercus robur L. J Ecol 83:683–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crow TR (1988) Reproductive mode and mechanisms for self-replacement of northern red oak (Quercus-rubra)—a review. For Sci 34:19–40Google Scholar
  7. Den Ouden J, Jansen PA, Smit R (2005) Jays, mice and oaks: Predation and dispersal of Quercus robur and Q.petraea in North-western Europe. In: Forget PM, Lambert J, Vander Wall SB (eds) Seed fate. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 223–240Google Scholar
  8. Gómez JM (2003) Spatial patterns in long-distance dispersal of Quercus ilex acorns by jays in a heterogeneous landscape. Ecography 26:573–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gómez JM, García D, Zamora R (2003) Impact of vertebrate acorn-and seedling-predators on a Mediterranean Quercus pyrenaica forest. For Ecol Manage 180:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gómez JM, Puerta-Piñeiro C, Schupp EW (2008) Effectiveness of rodents as local seed dispersers of Holm oaks. Oecologia 155:529–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gosling PG (1989) The effect of drying Quercus robur acorns to different moisture contents, followed by storage, either with or without imbibition. Forestry 62:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrera CM (2002) Seed dispersal by vertebrates. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant-animal interactions. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 185–208Google Scholar
  13. Herrera J (1995) Acorn predation and seedling production in a low-density population of cork oak (Quercus suber L.). For Ecol Manage 76:197–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hooper ER, Legendre P, Condit R (2004) Factors affecting community composition of forest regeneration in deforested, abandoned land in Panama. Ecology 85:3313–3326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hulme PE (1994) Post-dispersal seed predation in grasslands: its magnitude and sources of variation. J Ecol 82:645–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hulme PE, Borelli T (1999) Variability in post-dispersal seed predation in deciduous woodland: relative importance of location, seed species, burial and density. Plant Ecol 145:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hulme PE, Kollmann J (2005) Seed predator guilds, spatial variation in post-dispersal seed predation and potential effects on plant demography. In: Forget PM, Lambert J, Vander Wall SB (eds) Seed fate. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 9–30Google Scholar
  18. Hutchins HE, Hutchins SA, Liu BW (1996) The role of birds and mammals in Korean pine (Pinus koraensis) regeneration dynamics. Oecologia 107:120–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janzen D (1971) Seed predation by animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:465–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jensen TS, Nielsen OF (1986) Rodents as seed dispersers in a heath-oak wood succession. Oecologia 70:214–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelbel P (1999) Results of monitoring of carpophagus fauna on the European beech (Fagus sylvatica) in Slovakia. J For Sci 45:443–448Google Scholar
  22. Manson RH, Stiles EW (1998) Links between microhabitat preferences and seed predation by small mammals in old fields. Oikos 82:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muñoz A, Bonal R (2008) Seed choice by rodents: learning or inheritance? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:913–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pardo F, Gil L, Pardos JA (2004) Structure and composition of pole-stage stands developed in an ancient wood pasture in central Spain. Forestry 77:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perea R, San Miguel A, Gil L (2011) Leftovers in seed dispersal: ecological implications of partial seed consumption for oak regeneration. J Ecol 99:194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pérez-Ramos IM, Marañón T (2008) Factors affecting post-dispersal seed predation in two coexisting oak species: microhabitat, burial and exclusion of large herbivores. For Ecol Manage 255:3506–3514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pons J, Pausas JG (2007) Rodent acorn selection in a Mediterranean oak landscape. Ecol Res 22:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Price MV, Joyner JW (1997) What resources are available to desert granivores: seed rain or soil seed bank? Ecology 78:764–773Google Scholar
  29. Pulido FJ, Díaz M (2005) Regeneration of a Mediterranean oak: a whole-cycle approach. Ecoscience 12:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sonesson LK (1994) Growth and survival after cotyledon removal in Quercus robur seedlings, grown in different natural soil types. Oikos 69:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steele MA, Hadj-Chikh LZ, Hazeltine J (1996) Caching and feeding decisions by Sciurus carolinensis: responses to weevil-infested acorns. J Mammal 77:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Suszka B, Tylkowski T (1980) Storage of acorns of the English oak (Quercus robur L.) over 1–5 winters. Arboretum Kórnickie 25:199–229Google Scholar
  33. Valbuena-Carabaña M, González Martínez SC, Sork VL, Collada C, Soto A, Goicoechea PG, Gil L (2005) Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl. in central Spain. Heredity 95:457–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vander Wall SB (2001) The evolutionary ecology of nut dispersal. Bot Rev 67:74–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vander Wall SB, Kuhn KM, Beck MJ (2005) Seed removal, seed predation, and secondary dispersal. Ecology 86:801–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB, Whang YS (2005) Effects of seed size on dispersal distance in five rodent-dispersed fagaceous species. Acta Oecol 28:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xiao ZS, Jansen PA, Zhang ZB (2006) Using seed-tagging methods for assessing post-dispersal seed fate in rodent-dispersed trees. For Ecol Manage 223:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xiao ZS, Harris MK, Zhang ZB (2007) Acorn defenses to herbivory from insects: Implications for the joint evolution of resistance, tolerance and escape. For Ecol Manage 238:302–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramón Perea
    • 1
  • Alfonso San Miguel
    • 1
  • María Martínez-Jauregui
    • 1
  • María Valbuena-Carabaña
    • 1
  • Luis Gil
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento de Silvopascicultura, ETSI. MontesUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations