European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 130, Issue 1, pp 17–40 | Cite as

Canopy effects on vegetation caused by harvesting and regeneration treatments

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper reviews the primary effects of canopy on understorey vegetation to provide insight into the management of the canopy space to benefit tree regeneration. Site conditions, like nutrient and water availability, overstorey conditions, e.g. tree species, and canopy density, are important determinants of ground vegetation. An investigation of canopy effects is concerned about how the canopy trees modify site conditions. As canopy density may be deliberately modified during regeneration treatments, the effect of canopy density on individual species in the herbaceous layer and tree regeneration is important. This autecological perspective focuses on the successional traits of species to help understand species differences in fecundity, survival, density and growth. From a synecological perspective, the importance of successional traits for the outcome of competition between species arising from differences in canopy densities is highlighted. This review shows that moderately dense canopies may favour tree regeneration over aggressive shade-intolerant graminoids or forbs. This is particularly true for shade-tolerant and intermediate shade-tolerant tree species. To better understand and utilise this phenomenon, research should try to identify and isolate different canopy effects.

Keywords

Overstorey density Competition Niche partitioning Ground vegetation Regeneration Successional traits Overstorey manipulation 

References

  1. Abe M, Miguchi H, Honda A, Makita A, Nakashizuka T (2005) Short-term changes affecting regeneration of Fagus crenata after the simultaneous death of Sasa kurilensis. J Veg Sci 16:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abé S, Masaki T, Nakashizuka T (1995) Factors influencing sapling composition in canopy gaps of a temperate deciduous forest. Vegetatio 120:21–32Google Scholar
  3. Agestam E, Ekö P-M, Nilsson U, Welander NT (2003) The effects of shelterwood density and site preparation on natural regeneration of Fagus sylvatica in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manag 176:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ammer C (1996a) Impact of ungulates on structure and dynamics of natural regeneration of mixed mountain forests in the Bavarian Alps. For Ecol Manag 88:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ammer C (1996b) Konkurrenz um Licht—zur Entwicklung der Naturverjüngung im Bergmischwald. Forstliche Forschungsberichte München, Schriftenreihe der Universität München und der bayerischen forstlichen Versuchsanstalt No. 158Google Scholar
  6. Ammer C (2000) Untersuchungen zum Einfluss von Fichtenaltbeständen auf die Entwicklung junger Buchen. Berichte aus der Holz—und Forstwirtschaft, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 185 pGoogle Scholar
  7. Ammer C (2002) Response of Fagus sylvatica seedlings to root trenching of overstorey Picea abies. Scand J For Res 17:408–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ammer C (2003a) Growth and biomass partitioning of Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus robur L. seedlings in response to shading and small changes in the R/FR-ratio of radiation. Ann For Sci 60:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ammer C (2003b) Zum Einfluss waldbaulicher Massnahmen auf die Naturverjüngung eines Bergmischwaldes. BFW-Berichte 130:67–78Google Scholar
  10. Ammer C, Wagner S (2002) Problems and options in modelling fine root biomass of single mature Norway spruce trees at given points from stand data. Can J For Res 32:581–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ammer C, Mosandl R, El Kateb H (2002) Direct seeding of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) stands—effects of canopy density and fine root biomass on seed germination. For Ecol Manag 159:59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ammer C, Brang P, Knoke T, Wagner S (2004) I. Methoden zur waldbaulichen Untersuchung von Jungwüchsen. Forstarchiv 75(3):83–110Google Scholar
  13. Anderson RC, Loucks OL (1969) Herbaceous response to canopy cover, light intensity, and throughfall precipitation in coniferous forests. Ecology 50(2):255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Arias D, Calvo-Alvarado J, Dohrenbusch A (2007) Calibration of LAI-2000 to estimate leaf area index (LAI) and assessment of its relationship with stand productivity in six native and introduced tree species. For Ecol Manage 247:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Attiwill PM, Leeper GW (1987) Forest soils and nutrient cycles. Melbourne University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  16. Aubert M, Bureau F, Alard D, Bardat J (2004) Effect of tree mixture on the humic epipedon and vegetation diversity in managed beech forests (Normandy, France). Can J For Res 34:233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Augusto L, Dupouey JL, Ranger J (2003) Effects of tree species substitution on understory vegetation and environmental conditions in temperate forests. Ann For Sci 60:823–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Axelsson L, Klockare B, Sundqvist C (2006) Oak seedlings grown in different light qualities. Physiol Plant 45(4):378–392Google Scholar
  19. Balandier P, Collet C, Miller J, Reynolds P, Zedaker S (2006) Designing forest vegetation management strategies based on the mechanisms and dynamics of crop tree competition by neighbouring vegetation. Forestry 79:3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ballaré CL (1999) Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signalling mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci 4(3):97–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Banez G, Ggokusen K, Saito A (1999) Plasticity in the branching characteristics of four year old Quercus acutissima and Q. serrata seedlings in response to low light intensity and additional fertilizer. Bull Kyushu Univ For 80:27–39Google Scholar
  22. Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P (2008) Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 254:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Baritz R (2001) Humus forms in forests of the northern German lowlands. Academic Dissertation, Institute of Landscape Development, Technical University, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Barkman JJ (1992) Canopies and microclimate of tree species mixtures. In: Cannell MGR, Malcolm DC, Robertson PA (eds) The Ecology of Mixed-Species Stands of Trees. Special Publication 11 of the British Ecological Society, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, pp 181–188Google Scholar
  25. Bauhus J, Puettmann K, Messier C (2009) Silviculture for old-growth attributes. For Ecol Manage 258:525–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Beatty SW (1984) Influence of microtopography and canopy species on spatial patterns of forest understory plants. Ecology 65(5):1406–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Beniamino F, Ponge JF, Arpin P (1991) Soil acidification under the crown of oak trees. I. Spatial distribution. For Ecol Manage 40:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bens O, Wahl NA, Fischer H, Hüttl RF (2007) Water infiltration and hydraulic conductivity in sandy cambisols, impacts of forest transformation on soil hydraulic properties. Eur J Forest Res 126:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Beon M-S, Bartsch N (2003) Early seedling growth of pine (Pinus densiflora) and oaks (Quercus serrata, Q. mongolica, Q. variabilis) in response to light intensity and soil moisture. Plant Ecol 167:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bergstedt J, Milberg P (2001) The impact of logging intensity on field-layer vegetation in Swedish boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 154:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Bílek L, Remeš J, Zahradník D (2009) Natural regeneration of senescent even-aged beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands under the conditions of Central Bohemia. J For Sci 55(4):145–155Google Scholar
  32. Bisbee KE, Gower ST, Norman JM, Nordheim EV (2001) Environmental controls on ground cover species composition and productivity in a boreal black spruce forest. Oecologia 129:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Blennow K (1998) Modelling minimum air temperature in partially and clear felled forests. Agric For Meteorol 91:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Böcker L, Lochmann E (1977) Ergebnisse ökologischer und technologischer Untersuchungen zur Buchen-Naturverjüngung im Harz und Thüringer Becken. Sozialistische Forstwirtschaft 27(5):145–149Google Scholar
  35. Bolstad P, Gower ST, Isebrands JG, Dickson RE, Ceulemans R (1990) Estimation of leaf area index in fourteen southern Wisconsin forest stands using a portable radiometer. Tree Physiol 7:115–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bolte A, Bilke A (1998) Wirkung der Bodenbelichtung auf die Ausbreitung von Calamagrostis epigejos in den Kiefernforsten Noddeutschlands. Forst und Holz 53(8):232–236Google Scholar
  37. Brechtel HM (1962) Methodische Beiträge zur Ökologie der Überschirmung und Auflichtung einschichtiger Waldbestände. Schriftenreihe der Landesforstverwaltung Baden-Württemberg, No. 14, Baden-Württembergische Versuchs—und Forschungsanstalt—Sektion Ökologie, FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  38. Briggs JM, Knapp AK (1995) Interannual variability in primary production in tallgrass prairie: climate, soil moisture, topographic position and fire as determinants of aboveground biomass. Am J Bot 82(8):1024–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Brockway DG, Outcalt KW, Boyer WD (2006) Longleaf pine regeneration ecology and methods. In: Jose S, Jokela EJ, Miller DL (eds) The longleaf pine ecosystem: ecology, silviculture, and restoration. Springer, New York, pp 95–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Brown JMB (1951) Influence of shade on the height growth and habit of beech. Forestry commission report on forest research for 1951. HMSO, London, pp 41–45Google Scholar
  41. Brzeziecki B, Kienast F (1994) Classifying the life-history strategies of trees on the basis of the Grimian model. For Ecol Manage 69:167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Buczko U, Bens O, Fischer H, Hüttl RF (2002) Water repellency in sandy luvisols under different forest transformation stages in Northeast-Germany. Geoderma 109(12):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Burke DM, Elliott KA, Holmes SB, Bradley D (2008) The effects of partial harvest on the understory vegetation of southern Ontario woodlands. For Ecol Manage 255:2204–2212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Burschel P, Schmaltz J (1965) Die Bedeutung des Lichtes für die Entwicklung junger Buchen. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagd-Zeitung 136(9):193–210Google Scholar
  45. Burschel P, El Kateb H, Huss J, Mosandl R (1985) Die Verjüngung im Bergmischwald. Erste Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung in den ostbayerischen Kalkalpen. Forstw Cbl 104:65–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Burschel P, El Kateb H, Mosandl R (1992) Experiments in mixed mountain forests in Bavaria. In: Kelty MJ, Larson BC, Oliver CD (eds) The ecology and silviculture of mixed-species-forests. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 183–216Google Scholar
  47. Busing RT (1994) Canopy cover and tree regeneration in old-growth cove forests of the Appalachian Mountains. Vegetatio 115:19–27Google Scholar
  48. Canham CD (1988) Growth and canopy architecture of shade-tolerant trees: response to canopy gaps. Ecology 69(3):786–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Canham CD, Denslow JS, Platt WJ, Runkle JR, Spies TA, White PS (1990) Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate tropical forests. Can J For Res 20:620–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Canham CD, Finzi AC, Pacala SW, Burbank DH (1994) Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees. Can J For Res 24:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Chen J, Franklin JF, Spies TA (1992) Vegetation responses to edge environments in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecol Appl 2(4):387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Chrimes D, Nilson K (2005) Overstorey density influence on the height of Picea abies regeneration in northern Sweden. Forestry 78(4):433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Clark JS, Macklin E, Wood L (1998) Stages and spatial scales of recruitment limitation in southern Appalachian forests. Ecol Monogr 68(2):213–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Cole PG, Weltzin JF (2005) Light limitation creates patchy distribution of an invasive grass in eastern deciduous forests. Biol Invasions 7:477–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Collet C, Lanter O, Pardos M (2001) Effects of canopy opening on height and diameter growth in naturally regenerated beech seedlings. Ann For Sci 58:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Collet C, Lanter O, Pardos M (2002) Effects of canopy opening on the morphology and anatomy of naturally regenerated beech seedlings. Trees 16:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Collins B, Battaglia LL (2008) Oak regeneration in southeastern bottomland hardwood forest. For Ecol Manage 255:3026–3034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Collins BS, Picket STA (1987) Influence of canopy opening on the environment and herb layer in a northern hardwoods forest. Vegetatio 70:3–10Google Scholar
  59. Combes D, Sinoquet H, Varlet-Grancher C (2000) Preliminary measurement and simulation of the spatial distribution of the morphogenetically active radiation (MAR) within an isolated tree canopy. Ann For Sci 57:497–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Conrad B (2005) Regenerationsdynamik buchendominierter Laubwälder auf Kalkstandorten. Dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im BreisgauGoogle Scholar
  61. Coomes DA, Grubb PJ (2000) Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecol Monogr 70(2):171–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Curt T, Prévosto B (2004) Dimensional relationships of naturally established European beech trees beneath Scots pine and Silver birch canopy. For Ecol Manage 194:335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Dai X (1996) Influence of light conditions in canopy gaps on forest regeneration: a new gap light index and its application in a boreal forest in east-central Sweden. For Ecol Manage 84:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Davis MA, Wrage KJ, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Schaeffer T, Muermann C (1999) Survival, growth, and photosynthesis of tree seedlings competing with herbaceous vegetation along a water-light-nitrogen gradient. Plant Ecol 145:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Degen B, Gregorius H-R, Scholz F (1996) ECO-GENE, a model for simulation studies on the spatial and temporal dynamics of genetic structures of tree populations. Silvae Genetica 45(5/6):323–329Google Scholar
  66. Deleporte S, Tillier P (1999) Long-term effects of mineral amendments on soil fauna and humus in an acid beech forest floor. For Ecol Manage 118:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Denner M (2007) Auswirkungen des ökologischen Waldumbaus in der Dübener Heide und im Erzgebirge auf die Bodenvegetation. Ermittlung phytozönotischer Indikatoren für naturschutzfachliche Bewertungen. No. 29, Forstwissenschaftliche Beiträge TharandtGoogle Scholar
  68. Diaci J (2002) Regeneration dynamics in a Norway spruce plantation on a silver fir-beech forest site in the Slovenian Alps. For Ecol Manage 161:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Dobrowolska D (2008a) Effect of stand density on oak regeneration in flood plain forests in Lower Silesia, Poland. Forestry 81(4):511–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Dobrowolska D (2008b) Growth and development of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) regeneration and restoration of the species in the Karkonosze Mountains. J For Sci 54(9):398–408Google Scholar
  71. Dorland E, Willems JH (2006) High light availability alleviates the costs of reproduction in Ophrys insectifera (Orchidaceae). J Europäischer Orchideen 38(2):369–386Google Scholar
  72. Drever CR, Lertzman KP (2003) Effects of a wide gradient of retained tree structure on understory light in coastal Douglas-fir forests. Can J For Res 33:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Dumais D, Prévost M (2008) Ecophysiology and growth of advance red spruce and balsam fir regeneration after partial cutting in yellow birch-conifer stands. Tree Physiol 28:1221–1229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Ebrecht L, Schmidt W (2003) Nitrogen mineralization and vegetation along skidding tracks. Ann For Sci 60:733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Edelkraut KA (2003) Interacting effects of resources and competition on the growth of wetland plants. Dissertation ETH No. 15250, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  76. Ellenberg H (1939) Über Zusammensetzung, Standort und Stoffproduktion bodenfeuchter Eichen- und Buchen-Mischwaldgesellschaften Nordwestdeutschlands. Mitt Florist Soziol Arb gem Niedersachsen 5:3–135Google Scholar
  77. Ellenberg H (1988) Vegetation ecology of Central Europe (trans: Strutt GK). Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  78. Ellenberg H (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica XVIII, 2., verb. und erw. Aufl., Verlag Erich Goltze, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  79. Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. 5., stark veränd. u. verb. Aufl., Stuttgart, UTB für Wissenschaft: Botanik, Ökologie, Agrar—und Forstwissenschaften, GeographieGoogle Scholar
  80. Emborg J (1998) Understorey light conditions and regeneration with respect to the structural dynamics of a near-natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. For Ecol Manage 106:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Emmer M, Sevink J (1994) Temporal and vertical changes in the humus form profile during a primary succession of Pinus sylvestris. Plant Soil 167:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ericsson T (1995) Growth and shoot: root ratio of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability. Plant Soil 168–169:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ernst WHO (2004) Vegetation, organic matter and soil quality. In: Developments in Soil Science, vol 29. Elsevier, pp 41–98Google Scholar
  84. Falinski JB (1986) Vegetation dynamics in temperate lowland primeval forests. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  85. Fenner M (2000) Seeds—the ecology of regeneration in plant communities, 2nd edn. CABI, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ferrari JB, Sugita S (1996) A spatially explicit model of leaf litter fall in hemlock-hardwood forests. Can J For Res 26:1905–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Finzi AC, van Breemen N, Canham CD (1998a) Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8(2):440–446Google Scholar
  88. Finzi AC, Canham CD, van Breemen N (1998b) Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on pH and cations. Ecol Appl 8(2):447–454Google Scholar
  89. Fischer H, Bens O (2002) Artenkombination und assoziierte Artmerkmale der Bodenvegetation innerhalb einer unechten Eichen-Zeitreihe (Quercus petraea Liebl.). Allgemeine Forst- und Jagd-Zeitung 173(1):8–14Google Scholar
  90. Fischer H, Bens O, Hüttl RF (2002) Changes in humus form, humus stock and soil organic matter distribution caused by forest transformation in the North-Eastern lowlands of Germany. Forstw Cbl 121:322–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Fraterrigo JM, Turner MG, Pearson SM (2006) Interactions between land use, life history traits and understory spatial heterogeneity. Landsc Ecol 21:777–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Fuller RJ (2008) Forest management effects on carabid beetle communities in coniferous and broadleaved forests: implications for conservation. Insect Conserv Divers 1:242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Gaudio N, Balandier P, Marquier A (2008) Light-dependent development of two competitive species (Rubus idaeus, Cytisus scoparius) colonizing gaps in temperate forest. Ann For Sci 65:104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Gilbert B, Lechowicz MJ (2004) Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:7651–7656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Godefroid S, Koedam N (2004) The impact of forest paths upon adjacent vegetation: effects of the path surfacing material on the species composition and soil compaction. Biol Conserv 119:405–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Goldberg DE (1990) Components of resource competition in plant communities. In: Grace and Tilman (ed) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, pp 27–49Google Scholar
  97. Grant RH (1997) Partitioning of biologically active radiation in plant canopies. Int J Biometeorol 40(1):26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Grassi G, Minotta G, Tonon G, Bagnaresi U (2004) Dynamics of Norway spruce and silver fir natural regeneration in a mixed stand under uneven-aged management. Can J For Res 34(1):141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Gray AN, Spies TA (1997) Microsite controls on tree seedling establishment in conifer forest canopy gaps. Ecology 78(8):2458–2473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Greis I, Kellomäki S (1981) Crown structure and stem growth of Norway spruce undergrowth under varying shading. Silva Fennica 15(3):306–322Google Scholar
  101. Griffith TM, Sultan SE (2005) Shade tolerance plasticity in response to neutral vs. green shade cues in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. New Phytol 166:141–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester 417 pGoogle Scholar
  103. Grime JP, Jeffrey DW (1965) Seedling establishment in vertical gradients of sunlight. J Ecol 53(3):621–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Grimm V, Railsback SF (2005) Individual-based modeling and ecology. Princeton series in theoretical and computational biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 428Google Scholar
  105. Groot A (1999) Effects of shelter and competition on early growth of planted white spruce. Can J For Res 29:1002–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Güsewell S (2005) Nutrient resorption of wetland graminoids is related to the type of nutrient limitation. Ecology 19:344–354Google Scholar
  107. Haeupler H (2000) Biodiversität in Zeit und Raum—Dynamik oder Konstanz. Ber Reinhold-Tüxen-Ges 12Google Scholar
  108. Hahn K, Thomsen RP (2007) Ground flora in Suserup Skov: characterized by forest continuity and natural gap dynamics or edge-effect and introduced species? Ecol Bull 52:167–181Google Scholar
  109. Hannerz M, Hånell B (1997) Effects on the flora in Norway spruce forests following clearcutting and shelterwood cutting. For Ecol Manage 90:29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Hanssen KH (2003) Natural regeneration of Picea abies on small clear-cuts in SE Norway. For Ecol Manage 180:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Härdtle W, von Oheimb G, Westphal C (2003) The effects of light and soil conditions on the species richness of the ground vegetation of deciduous forests in northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein). For Ecol Manage 182:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Harmer R, Morgan G (2007) Development of Quercus robur advance regeneration following canopy reduction in an oak woodland. Forestry 80:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  114. Harrington TB (2006) Plant competition, facilitation, and other overstorey-understory interactions in longleaf pine ecosystems. In: Jose S, Jokela EJ, Miller DL (eds) The longleaf pine ecosystem: ecology, silviculture, and restoration. Springer, New York, pp 135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Harrington TB, Dagley CM, Edwards MB (2003) Above- and belowground competition from longleaf pine plantations limits performance of reintroduced herbaceous species. For Sci 49(5):681–695Google Scholar
  116. Hart SA, Chen HYH (2006) Understory vegetation dynamics of North American boreal forests. Crit Rev Plant Sci 25:381–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Heithecker TD, Halpern CB (2006) Variation in microclimate associated with dispersed-retention harvests in coniferous forests of western Washington. For Ecol Manage 226:60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Hester AJ, Miles J, Gimingham CH (1991) Succession from heather moorland to birch woodland. II. Competition between Vaccinium myrtillus, Deschampsia flexuosa and Agrostis capillaries. J Ecol 79:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Hofmeister J, Jaljevic M, Hosek J, Sádlo J (2002) Eutrophication of deciduous forests in the Bohemian Karst (Czech Republic): the role of nitrogen and phosphorus. For Ecol Manage 169:213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Hofmeister J, Hosek J, Modrý M, Rolecek J (2009) The influence of light and nutrient availability on herb layer species richness in oak-dominated forests in central Bohemia. Plant Ecol (in press)Google Scholar
  121. Holderegger R (1996) Effects of litter removal on the germination of Anemone nemorosa L. Flora 191:175–177Google Scholar
  122. Hunziker U, Brang P (2005) Microsite patterns of conifer seedling establishment and growth in a mixed stand in the southern Alps. For Ecol Manage 210:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Hutchinson GE (1978) An introduction to population ecology. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  124. Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat 104(940):501–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D (1999) Assessing forest canopies and understory illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry 72(1):59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Jobidon R, Cyr G, Thiffault N (2004) Plant species diversity and composition along an experimental gradient of northern hardwood abundance in Picea mariana plantations. For Ecol Manage 198:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Karlsson C (2000) Seed production of Pinus sylvestris after release cutting. Can J For Res 30:982–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Karlsson M (2001) Natural regeneration of broadleaved tree species in Southern Sweden. Effects of silvicultural treatments and seed dispersal from surrounding stands, Silvestra 196Google Scholar
  129. Kenk G (1988) Der Volumen—und Wertzuwachs im Stadium der natürlichen Verjüngung eines Kiefern—Tannen—Bestandes durch den Schirmkeilschlag in Langenbrand/Nordschwarzwald. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagd-Zeitung 159(8):154–164Google Scholar
  130. Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996) The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol 33:1441–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Kotowski W, van Andel J, van Diggelen R, Hogendorf J (2001) Responses of fen plant species to groundwater level and light intensity. Plant Ecol 155:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Kozlowski TT, Kramer PJ, Pallardy SG (1991) The physiological ecology of woody plants. Academic Press, San Diego, p 657Google Scholar
  133. Kramer PJ, Kozlowski TT (1979) Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  134. Kühlmann S, Heikkinen J, Särkkä A, Hjort U (2001) Relating abundance of ground vegetation species and tree patterns at local scale using ecological field theory. In: Proceedings of IUFRO 4.11, conference. University of Greenwich. [Online] http://cms1.gre.ac.uk/conferences/iufro/proceedings. Accessed 19 Sep 2009
  135. Kull O, Aan A (1997) The relative share of graminoid and forb life-forms in a natural gradient of herb layer productivity. Ecography 120:146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Küßner R (1991) Sukzessionale Prozesse in Fichtenbeständen (Picea abies) des Osterzgebirges—Möglichkeiten ihrer waldbaulichen Beeinflussung und ihre Bedeutung für einen ökologisch begründeten Waldumbau. Forstw Cbl 116:359–369Google Scholar
  137. Küßner R (1999) Ein auf Strahlungsmessungen basierendes Verfahren zur Bestimmung des Blattflächenindexes und zur Charakterisierung der Überschirmung in Fichtenbeständen—Methodische Untersuchungen und Anwendung in der waldbaulichen Praxis. Forstwissenschaftliche Beiträge Tharandt 5Google Scholar
  138. Küßner R, Reynolds PE, Bell FW (2000) Growth response of Picea mariana seedlings to competition for radiation. Scand J For Res 15:334–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Kuuluvainen T, Hokkanen TJ, Järvinen E, Pukkala T (1993) Factors related to seedling growth in a boreal Scots pine stand: a spatial analysis of a vegetation-soil system. Can J For Res 23:2101–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Landhäusser SM, Stadt KJ, Lieffers VJ (1996) Screening for control of a forest weed: early competition between three replacement species and Calamagrostis canadensis or Picea glauca. J Appl Ecol 33:1517–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Larcher W (2001) Ökophysiologie der Pflanzen—Leben, Leistung und Streßbewältigung der Pflanzen in ihrer Umwelt. 6, neubearb. Aufl., Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  142. Lee DW, Oberbauer SF, Johnson P, Krishnapilay B, Mansor M, Mohamad H, Yap SK (2000) Effects of irradiance and spectral quality on leaf structure and function in seedlings of two Southeast Asian Hopea (Dipterocarpaceae) species. Am J Bot 87:447–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Lehmann B (2007) Effekte einzelbaumweise eingemischter einheimischer Eichen in Wäldern der Gemeinen Kiefer (Pinus sylvestris L.) auf Standorten geringer Trophie und Wasserversorgung im Süden Brandenburgs. Dresden, Technical University, Fak. Forst-, Geo- und Hydrowissenschaften, Dissertation, 145 pGoogle Scholar
  144. Leicht SA, Silander JA Jr (2006) Differential responses of invasive Celastrus orbiculatus (Celastraceae) and native C. scandens to changes in light quality. Am J Bot 93:972–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Leonhardt B, Wagner S (2006) Qualitative Entwicklung von Buchen-Voranbauten unter Fichtenschirm. Forst und Holz 61(11):454–457Google Scholar
  146. Leps J, Smilauer P (2007) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 269 pGoogle Scholar
  147. Leuchner M, Menzel A, Werner H (2007) Quantifying the relationship between light quality and light availability at different phenological stages within a mature mixed forest. Agric For Meteorol 142:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Leuschner Ch, Hertel D, Coners H, Büttner V (2001) Root competition between beech and oak: a hypothesis. Oecologia 126(2):276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Lieffers VJ, Stadt KJ (1994) Growth of understory Picea glauca, Calamagrostis canadensis, and Epilobium angustifolium in relation to overstorey light transmission. Can J For Res 24:1193–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Lieffers VJ, Messier C, Stadt KJ, Gedron F, Comeau PG (1999) Predicting and managing light in the understory of boreal forests. Can J For Res 29:796–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Lindh BC, Muir PS (2004) Understory vegetation in young Douglas-fir forests: does thinning help restore old-growth composition? For Ecol Manage 192:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Liski J (1995) Variation in soil organic carbon and thickness of soil horizons within boreal forest stand—effect of tree implication for sampling. Silva Fennica 29(4):255–266Google Scholar
  153. Löf M, Karlsson M, Sonesson K, Welander TN, Collet C (2007) Growth and mortality in underplanted tree seedlings in response to variations in canopy closure of Norway spruce stands. Forestry 80(4):371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Lüpke Bv (1987) Einflüsse von Altholzüberschirmung und Bodenvegetation auf das Wachstum junger Buchen und Traubeneichen. Forstarchiv 58:18–24Google Scholar
  155. Lüpke Bv (1998) Silvicultural methods of oak regeneration with special respect to shade tolerant mixed species. For Ecol Manage 106:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Lüpke Bv (1982) Versuche zur Einbringung von Lärche und Eiche in Buchenbestände. Schriftenreihe der Forstlichen Fakultät der Uni Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt Göttingen, No 74, J.D. Sauerländer’s Verlag, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  157. Lüpke Bv, Hauskeller-Bullerjahn K (2004) Beitrag zur Modellierung der Jungwuchsentwicklung am Beispiel von Traubeneichen-Buchen-Mischverjüngung. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagd-Zeitung 175(4/5):61–69Google Scholar
  158. Lyr H, Hoffmann G, Dohse K (1963) Über den Einfluß unterschiedlicher Beschattung auf die Stoffproduktion von Jungpflanzen einiger Waldbäume. I. Mitteilung Flora-Allgemeine Botanische Zeitung (Jena) 152:291–311Google Scholar
  159. Lyr H, Hoffmann G, Engel W (1964) Über den Einfluß unterschiedlicher Beschattung auf die Stoffproduktion von Jungpflanzen einiger Waldbäume. II. Mitteilung Flora-Allgemeine Botanische Zeitung (Jena) 155:305–330Google Scholar
  160. Lyr H, Polster H, Fiedler H-J (1967) Gehölzphysiologie. Gustav Fischer Verlag, JenaGoogle Scholar
  161. Madsen P, Hahn K (2008) Natural regeneration in a beech-dominated forest managed by close-to-nature principles—a gap cutting based experiment. Can J For Res 38:1716–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Madsen P, Larsen B (1997) Natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) with respect to canopy density, soil moisture and soil carbon content. For Ecol Manage 97:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Mamolos AP, Veresoglou DS, Barbayiannis N (1995) Plant species abundance and tissue concentrations of limiting nutrients in low-nutrient grasslands: a test of competition theory. J Ecol 83:485–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Matlack GR, Litvaitis JA (1999) Forest edges. In: Hunter ML Jr (ed) Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  165. McClure JW, Lee TD, Leak WB (2000) Gap capture in northern hardwoods: patterns of establishment and height growth in four species. For Ecol Manage 127:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Meir P, Kruijt B, Broadmeadow M, Barbosa E, Kull O, Carswell F, Nobre A, Jarvis PG (2002) Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity to irradiance in tree canopies in relation to leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf mass per unit area. Plant Cell Environ 25:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Messaoud Y, Houle G (2006) Spatial patterns of tree seedling establishment and their relationship to environmental variables in a cool-temperate deciduous forest of eastern North America. Plant Ecol 185:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Mitamura M, Yamamura Y, Nokano T (2009) Large-scale canopy opening causes decreased photosynthesis in the saplings of shade-tolerant. Tree Physiol 29:137–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Mitscherlich G, Künstle E, Lang W (1967) Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Beleuchtungsstärke im Bestande. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagd-Zeitung 138(10):213–223Google Scholar
  170. Modrý M, Hubený D, Rejšek K (2004) Differential response of naturally regenerated European shade tolerant tree species to soil type and light availability. For Ecol Manag 188:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Mölder A, Schmidt W (2007) Relationship between herb layer biomass and tree layer diversity in deciduous forests. Verh Ges Ökol 37:52Google Scholar
  172. Mölder A, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Schmidt W (2008) Herb-layer diversity in deciduous forests: raised by tree richness or beaten by beech? For Ecol Manag 256:272–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Moola FM, Mallik AU (1998) Morphological plasticity and regeneration strategies of velvet leaf blueberry (Vaccinium myrtilloides Michx.) following canopy disturbance in boreal mixedwood forests. For Ecol Manage 111:35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Mosandl R.(1984) Löcherhiebe im Bergmischwald. Ein waldbauökologischer Beitrag zur Femelschlagverjüngung in den Chiemgauer Alpen. Forstl. Forsch.ber. München 61, 317 SGoogle Scholar
  175. Mosandl R (1991) Die Steuerung von Waldökosystemen mit waldbaulichen Mitteln—dargestellt am Beispiel des Bergmischwaldes. Mitteilungen aus der Staatsforstverwaltung Bayerns No. 46, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  176. Mosandl R, Kleinert A (1998) Development of oaks (Quercus petraea [MATT.] Liebl.) emerged from bird-dispersed seeds under old-growth pine (Pinus silvestris L.) stands. For Ecol Manage 106:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Mountford EP, Savill PS, Bebber DP (2006) Patterns of regeneration and ground vegetation associated with canopy gaps in a managed beechwood in southern England. Forestry 79(4):389–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Mrotzek R (1998) Wuchsdynamik und Mineralstoffhaushalt der Krautschicht in einem Buchenwald auf Basalt. Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Reihe A, No. 152, Selbstverlag des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme der Universität GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  179. Navrátil M, Špunda V, Marková I, Janouš D (2007) Spectral composition of photosynthetically active radiation penetrating into a Norway spruce canopy: the opposite dynamics of the blue/red spectral ratio during clear and overcast days. Trees Struct Funct 21:311–320Google Scholar
  180. Nelson CR, Halpern CB (2005) Edge-related responses of understory plants to aggregated retention harvest in the Pacific Northwest. Ecol Appl 15(1):196–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Newton AC, Dick JM, McBeath C, Leakey RRB (1996) The influence of R:FR ratio on the growth, photosynthesis and rooting ability of Terminalia spinosa Engl. and Triplochiton scleroxylon K. Schum. Ann Appl Biol 128(3):541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Nyland RD (2002) Silviculture, 2nd edn. Mc Craw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  183. O’Connell DA, Ryan PJ, McKenzie NJ, Ringrose-Voase AJ (2000) Quantitative site and soil descriptors to improve the utility of forest soil surveys. For Ecol Manage 138:107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Olff H (1992) Effects of light and nutrient availability on dry matter and N allocation in six successional grassland species. Oecologia 89:412–421Google Scholar
  185. Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics. Wiley, New York (Update edn)Google Scholar
  186. Örlander G, Karlsson Ch (2000) Influence of shelterwood density on survival and height increment of Picea abies advance growth. Scand J For Res 15:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Ovington JD (1965) Organic production, turnover and mineral cycling in woodlands. Biol Rev 40:295–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Pacala SW, Canham CD, Silander JA Jr, Kobe RK (1994) Sapling growth as a function of resources in a north temperate forest. Can J For Res 24:2172–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Pacala SW, Canham CD, Saponara J, Silander JA, Kobe RK, Ribbens E (1996) Forest models defined by field measurements: estimation, error analysis and dynamics. Ecol Monogr 66(1):1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Packer A, Clay K (2000) Soil pathogens and spatial patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree. Nature 404:278–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Pagès J-P, Pache G, Joud D, Magnan N, Michalet R (2003) Direct and indirect effects of shade on four forest tree seedlings in the French Alps. Ecology 84(10):2741–2750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Palik B, Mitchell RJ, Pecot S, Battaglia M, Pu M (2003) Spatial distribution of overstorey retention influences resources and growth of longleaf pine seedlings. Ecol Appl 13(3):674–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Paquette A, Bouchard A, Cogliastro A (2006) Survival and growth of under-planted trees: a meta-analysis across four biomes. Ecol Appl 16(4):1575–1589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Parent S, Messier C (1995) Effets d’un gradient de lumière sur la croissance en hauteur et la morphologie de la cime du sapin baumier régénéré naturellement. Can J For Res 25:878–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Petritan AM, von Lüpke B, Petritan IC (2007) Effects of shade on growth and mortality of maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) saplings. Forestry 80(4):397–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Pianka ER, Horn HS (2005) Ecology’s legacy from Robert MacArthur, Chap. 11. In: Cuddington K, Biesner B (eds) Ecological paradigms lost: routes of theory change. Elsevier and Academic Press, pp 213–232Google Scholar
  197. Ponge JF (2003) Humus forms in terrestrial ecosystems: a framework to biodiversity. Soil Biol Biochem 35:935–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Powell GW, Bork EW (2006) Aspen canopy removal and root trenching effects on understory vegetation. For Ecol Manage 230:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Pyšek P (1991) Biomass production and size structure of Calamagrostis villosa populations in different habitats. Preslia, Praha 63:9–20Google Scholar
  200. Pyšek P (1993) What do we know about Calamagrostis villosa? A review of the species behaviour in secondary habitats. Preslia, Praha 64(4):1–20Google Scholar
  201. Reader RJ, Bonser SP, Duralia TE, Bricker BD (1995) Interspecific variation in tree seedling establishment in canopy gaps in relation to tree density. J Veg Sci 6:609–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Ricard J-P, Messier C (1996) Abundance, growth and allometry of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) along a natural light gradient in a northern hardwood forest. For Ecol Manage 81:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. Rice KJ, Nagy ES (2000) Oak canopy effects on the distribution patterns of two annual grasses: the role of competition and soil nutrients. Am J Bot 87(11):1699–1706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Riegel GM, Miller RF, Krueger WC (1995) The effects of above ground and belowground competition on understory species composition in a Pinus ponderosa forest. For Sci 41:864–889Google Scholar
  205. Ritchie GA (1997) Evidence for red:far red signaling and morphogenetic growth response in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlings. Tree Physiol 17:161–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. Ritter E, Dalsgaard L, Einhorn KS (2005) Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. For Ecol Manage 206:15–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Roberts MR, Zhu L (2002) Early response of the herbaceous layer to harvesting in a mixed coniferous-deciduous forest in New Brunswick. Can For Ecol Manage 155:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Röhrig E, Bartsch N, Bv Lüpke (2006) Waldbau auf ökologischer Grundlage. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  209. Roloff A (2004) Bäume—Phänomene der Anpassung und Optimierung. Ecomed, Landsberg am LechGoogle Scholar
  210. Royo AA, Carson WP (2006) On the formation of dense understorey layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession. Can J For Res 36:1345–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Sakamaki Y, Ino Y (2002) Influence of shade timing on an Equisetum arvense L. population. Ecol Res 17:673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Schall P (1998) Ein Ansatz zur Modellierung der Naturverjüngungsprozesse im Bergmischwald der östlichen Bayerischen Alpen. Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Reihe A, Bd. 155Google Scholar
  213. Schmidt W (2005) Herb layer species as indicators of biodiversity of managed and unmanaged beech forests. For Snow Landsc Res 79:111–125Google Scholar
  214. Schmidt W, Weckesser M (2001) Struktur und Diversität der Waldvegetation als Indikatoren für eine nachhaltige Waldnutzung. Forst und Holz 56(15):493–498Google Scholar
  215. Schmidt-Vogt H (1972) Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung des Lichtfaktors bei Femelschlagverjüngung von Tannen-Buchen-Fichten-Wäldern im westlichen Hoch-schwarzwald. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 91:238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Schmitt J, Wulff RD (1993) Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition. Trends Ecol Evol 8:47–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  217. Schopfer P, Brennicke A (2006) Pflanzenphysiologie. 6. Aufl., Elsevier, Spektrum Akad., Heidelberg, 700 SGoogle Scholar
  218. Schulze K (1998) Wechselwirkungen zwischen Waldbauform, Bejagungsstrategie und der Dynamik von Rehwildbeständen. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of silviculture, University of Göttingen, 265 pGoogle Scholar
  219. Seidling W (2005) Ground floor vegetation assessment within the intensive (Level II) monitoring of forest ecosystems in Germany: chances and challenges. Eur J Forest Res 124:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Shibata M, Nakashizuka T (1995) Seed and seedling demography of four co-occurring Carpinus species in a temperate deciduous forest. Ecology 76(4):1099–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Shimatani K, Kimura M, Kitamura K, Suyama Y, Isagi Y, Sugita H (2007) Determining the location of a deceased mother tree and estimating forest regeneration variables by use of microsatellites and spatial genetic models. Popul Ecol 49:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Shropshire C, Wagner RG, Bell FW, Swanton CJ (2001) Light attenuation by early successional plants of the boreal forest. Can J For Res 31:812–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Silvertown JW, Charlesworth D (2001) Introduction to plant population biology, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  224. Silvertown JW, Doust JL (1997) Introduction to plant population biology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  225. Smith H (2000) Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants—an emerging synthesis. Nature 407:585–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Smith H, Whitelam GC (1997) The shade avoidance syndrome: multiple responses mediated by multiple phytochromes. Plant Cell Environ 20:840–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Sonohat G, Balandier P, Ruchaud F (2004) Predicting solar radiation transmittance in the understory of even-aged coniferous stands in temperate forests. Ann For Sci 61:629–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Staelens J, Nachtergale L, Luyssaert S, Lust N (2003) A model of wind-influenced leaf litterfall in a mixed hardwood forest. Can J For Res 33:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. Stoyan D, Wagner S (2001) Estimating the fruit dispersion of anemochorous forest trees. Ecol Modell 145(1):35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. Strandberg B, Kristiansen SM, Tybir K (2005) Dynamic oak-scrub to forest succession: effects of management on understory vegetation, humus forms and soils. For Ecol Manage 211:318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Strengbom J, Näsholm T, Ericson L (2004) Light, not nitrogen, limits growth of the grass Deschampsia flexuosa in boreal forests. Can J Bot 82:430–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. Stuefer JF, Huber H (1998) Differential effects of light quantity and spectral light quality on growth, morphology and development of two stoloniferous Potentilla species. Oecologia 117(1–2):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Suding KN, Goldberg DE (1999) Variation in the effects of litter and vegetation across productivity gradients. J Ecol 78:436–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. Suner A, Röhrig E (1980) Die Entwicklung der Buchennaturverjüngung in Abhängigkeit von der Auflichtung des Altbestandes. Forstarchiv 51:145–149Google Scholar
  235. Suzuki T, Jacalne DV (1986) Response of dipterocarp seedling to various light conditions under forest canopies. Bull For For Prod Res Inst No 336:19–34Google Scholar
  236. Ter-Mikaelian MT, Wagner RG, Shropshire C, Bell FW, Swanton CJ (1997) Using a mechanistic model to evaluate sampling designs for light transmission through forest plant canopies. Can J For Res 27:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. Thomasius H (1988) Stabilität natürlicher und künstlicher Waldökosysteme sowie deren Beeinflußbarkeit durch forstwirtschaftliche Maßnahmen. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift 43(1037–1043):1064–1068Google Scholar
  238. Thompson K, Grime JP (1979) Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J Ecol 67:893–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. Thomsen RP, Svenning J-C, Balsev H (2005) Overstorey control of understory species composition in a near-natural temperate broadleaved forest in Denmark. Plant Ecol 181:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  241. Tilman D, Wedin D (1991) Dynamics of nitrogen competition between successional grasses. Ecology 72:1038–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  242. Tischer A (2009) Untersuchungen zu Wirkungen eingemischter Sand-Birken (Betula pendula Roth) in Wäldern der Gemeinen Fichte (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) auf Oberbodenstruktur, Oberbodenfeuchte und Bodenvegetation. Masterarbeit, Inst. für Waldbau u. Forstschutz TharandtGoogle Scholar
  243. Tomita M, Hirabuki Y, Seiwa K (2002) Post-dispersal changes in the spatial distribution of Fagus crenata seeds. Ecology 83(6):1560–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. Tüxen R (1956) Die heutige potentielle Vegetation als Gegenstand der Vegetationskartierung. Angew Pflanzensoz 13:5–42Google Scholar
  245. Tyler G (1989) Interacting effects of soil acidity and canopy cover on the species composition of field-layer vegetation in Oak/Hornbeam Forests. For Ecol Manage 28:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. van Noordwijk M, Lawson G, Soumaré A, Groot JJR, Hairiah K (1996) Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementary. In: Ong CK, Huxley P (eds) Tree-crop interactions. CAB international, Wallingford, pp 319–363Google Scholar
  247. Vanmechelen L, Groenemans R, van Ranst E (1997) Forest soil condition in Europe—results of a large-scale soil survey. Forest soil coordinating centre, University of GhentGoogle Scholar
  248. Vanselow K (1949) Natürliche Verjüngung im Wirtschaftswald. Neumann Verlag, Radebeul und BerlinGoogle Scholar
  249. Vincke C, Breda N, Granier A, Devillez F (2005) Evapotranspiration of a declining Quercus robur (L.) stand from 1999 to 2001. I. Trees and forest floor daily transpiration. Ann For Sci 62:503–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  250. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea. How can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  251. Wagner RG (1993) Research directions to advance forest vegetation management in North America. Can J For Res 23:2317–2327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  252. Wagner S (1999) Ökologische Untersuchungen zur Initialphase der Naturverjüngung in Eschen-Buchen-Mischbeständen. Schriftenreihe der Forstlichen Fakultät der Uni Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt Göttingen Bd. 129, Sauerländer’s Verlag, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  253. Wagner S, Madsen P, Ammer C (2009) Evaluation of different approaches for modelling individual tree seedling height growth. Trees 23:701–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. Wälder K, Frischbier N, Bredemeier M, Näther W, Wagner S (2008) Analysis of layer humus mass variation in a mixed stand of European beech and Norway spruce: an application of structural equation modelling. Ecol Model 213:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  255. Wälder K, Näther W, Wagner S (2009) Improving inverse model fitting in trees—anisotropy, multiplicative effects, and Bayes estimation. Ecol Model 220:1044–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  256. Wallrup E, Saetre P, Rydin H (2006) Deciduous trees affect small-scale floristic diversity and tree regeneration in conifer forests. Scand J For Res 21:399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  257. Watt AS (1925) On the ecology of British beechwoods with special reference to their regeneration: II. Sections II and III: the development and structure of beech communities on the Sussex Downs continued. J Ecol 13(1):27–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  258. Wayne PM, Bazzaz FA (1993) Morning vs. afternoon sun patches in experimental forest gaps—consequences of temporal incongruency of resources to birch regeneration. Oecologia 94:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  259. Weisberg PJ, Hadorn C, Bugmann H (2003) Predicting understory vegetation cover from overstorey attributes in two temperate mountain forests. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 122:273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  260. Welander NT, Ottosson B (1998) The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. For Ecol Manag 107:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. Wild J, Neuhäuslová Z, Sofron J (2004) Changes of plant species composition in the Šumava spruce forests, SW Bohemia, since the 1970s. For Ecol Manage 187:117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  262. Wu H-I, Sharpe PJH, Walker J, Penridge LK (1985) Ecological field theory: a spatial analysis of resource interference among plants. Ecol Model 29:215–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. Xiao CW, Janssens IA, Curiel-Yuste J, Ceulemans R (2006) Variation of specific leaf area and upscaling to leaf area index in mature Scots pine. Trees Struct Funct 20(3):304–310Google Scholar
  264. Yamamoto S-I (2000) Forest gap dynamics and tree regeneration. Can J For Res 5(4):223–229Google Scholar
  265. York RA, Battles JJ, Heald RC (2003) Edge effects in mixed conifer group selection openings: tree height response to resource gradients. For Ecol Manage 179:107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  266. Zenner EK, Kabrick JM, Jensen RG, Peck JLE, Grabner JK (2006) Responses of ground flora to a gradient of harvest intensity in the Missouri Ozarks. For Ecol Manage 222:326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  267. Zerbe S (2003) The differentiation of anthropogenous forest communities: a synsystematical approach. Mitt Naturwiss Ver Steiermark 133:109–117Google Scholar
  268. Ziesche TM, Roth M (2008) Influence of environmental parameters on small-scale distribution of soil-dwelling spiders in forests: what makes the difference, tree species or microhabitat? For Ecol Manage 255:738–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dresden University of TechnologyDresden, TharandtGermany

Personalised recommendations