Testing prescribed fire as a tool to promote Scots pine Pinus sylvestris regeneration

  • Mark H. Hancock
  • Ron W. Summers
  • Andy Amphlett
  • Johanna Willi
Original Paper

Abstract

Techniques for encouraging natural tree regeneration are of increasing interest to managers of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris forests. We tested prescribed fire at a management scale, with deer present or excluded, as a means of increasing rates of Scots pine forest expansion on heathland. At a semi-natural pinewood in Scotland, ten experimental blocks were established, within range of pine seed-fall. Each block comprised four, 100 m2 plots. Two plots at each site were burnt and two fenced, allowing the effects of burning on pine regeneration to be measured at two levels of deer abundance. We monitored pine seedlings, seed-fall, deer dung and vegetation for 5 years following treatment. Differences in seedling detection rates between treatments were quantified using dummy seedlings, and analyses corrected accordingly. Mean new pine seedling establishment was 9.8 times higher on burnt ground than unburnt ground (confidence intervals 3.2–30). Differences were even more pronounced in a year of high seed-fall, and following fires with low rates of spread. Establishment rates varied strongly between experimental blocks. Exclusion of deer increased establishment rates, but only in the first 2 years after fire. There was evidence that both seedling survival, and cumulative recruitment of older (over 12 months) seedlings, were improved by prescribed burning. Our results support the use of prescribed fire as a tool to promote increased Scots pine seedling establishment. This technique is likely to give strong fine-scale variation in seedling densities, and so would most suit areas where a variable spatial pattern of regeneration is sought, for landscape or naturalness reasons.

Keywords

Burning Deer Cervidae Heather Calluna vulgaris Seedling establishment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the following to this study: J. D. Wilson, C. Legg, N. Cowie, J. Roberts and K. Duncan for ideas and support; D. Dugan, C. McClean, B. Moncrieff, A. MacAskill, R. Watson and I. Perks for organising and carrying out experimental treatments; S. Rao, G. Servant, G. Nisbet, H. Swift, R. Setchfield, R. Proctor and I. Hutson for data collection; S. Taylor for organising funding. Weather data for Aviemore were collected by the UK Met Office and supplied by the British Atmospheric Data Centre. Funding was provided by RSPB, and BP through the Scottish Forest Alliance.

Supplementary material

10342_2009_267_MOESM1_ESM.tif (301 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 1. Prescribed burning at an experimental site in spring 2002. A strip of vegetation has been ignited upwind of the burnt area (left) and heather within the strip is still burning (near camera) or nearly burnt (further from camera). The fire canes are visible in the burnt area and observations are under way. Two members of the management team and one of the attending machines can be seen behind the fire plot (TIFF 300 kb)
10342_2009_267_MOESM2_ESM.tif (303 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 2. An experimental block, four years after burning. The burnt area is in the foreground, with seed traps visible (TIFF 303 kb)
10342_2009_267_MOESM3_ESM.tif (350 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 3. A dummy (circled, left) and real (circled, right) Scots pine seedling have been photographed side by side. The coin is 27 mm in diameter. Dummy seedlings were placed at random locations, and were made in a range of sizes. The detection rate of dummy seedlings was used to estimate that of real ones (TIFF 350 kb)
10342_2009_267_MOESM4_ESM.tif (350 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 4. A well-established Scots pine seedling in burnt vegetation in May 2006 (TIFF 350 kb)
10342_2009_267_MOESM5_ESM.doc (40 kb)
Supplementary material (DOC 40 kb)

References

  1. Ackzell L (1993) A comparison of planting, sowing and natural regeneration for Pinus sylvestris (L.) in boreal Sweden. For Ecol Manage 61:229–245. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(93)90204-Z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amphlett A (2003) Contexts, developing ideas and emerging issues in the conservation management of RSPB Abernethy Forest Reserve. Bot J Scotl 55:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelstam P, Majewski P, Bondrup-Nielsen S (1995) West–east cooperation in Europe for sustainable boreal forests. Water Air Soil Pollut 82:3–11. doi: 10.1007/BF01182813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anglestam PK (1998) Maintaining and restoring biodiversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes. J Veg Sci 9:593–602. doi: 10.2307/3237275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anon (1994) Caledonian pinewood inventory. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  6. Anon (1995) Native pine woodlands costed habitat action plan. In: Biodiversity: the UK Steering Group report, vol. 2. Action plans. HMSO, London, pp 259–261Google Scholar
  7. Anon (2001) The muirburn code. Scottish Executive, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  8. Anon (2003) Sustainable forestry and European Union. Initiatives of the European Commission. European Commission, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  9. Anon (2006) The Scottish forestry strategy. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  10. Askew GR (1983) Two methods for evaluating spatial pattern in naturally regenerated loblolly pine stands. For Sci 29:514–518Google Scholar
  11. Atlegrim O, Sjoberg K (2003) Patterns of terricolous and field layer invertebrates along a boreal mire-forest gradient. Entomol Fenn 14:1–10Google Scholar
  12. Attiwill PM (1994) The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management. For Ecol Manage 63:247–300. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(94)90114-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beaumont D, Dugan D, Evans G, Taylor S (1995) Deer management and tree regeneration in the RSPB reserve at Abernethy forest. Scot For 49:155–161Google Scholar
  14. Béland M, Agestam E, Ekö PM, Gemmel P, Nilsson U (2000) Scarification and seedfall affects natural regeneration of Scots pine under two shelterwood densities and a clear-cut in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res 15:247–255. doi: 10.1080/028275800750015064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bonnicksen TM, Stone EC (1980) The giant sequoia-mixed conifer forests community characterised through pattern analysis as a mosaic of aggregations. For Ecol Manage 3:307–328. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(80)90031-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Booth TC (1984) Natural regeneration of the native pinewoods of Scotland. A review of principles and practice. Scot For 38:33–41Google Scholar
  17. Brown RT, Agee JK, Franklin JF (2004) Forest restoration and fire: principles in the context of place. Conserv Biol 18:903–912. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.521_1.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bruce M, Servant G (2003) Fire and pinewood ecology in Scotland: a summary of recent research at Glen Tanar Estate, Aberdeenshire. Scot For 57:33–38Google Scholar
  19. Burdon JJ, Wennström A, Müller WJ, Ericson L (1994) Spatial patterning in young stands of Pinus sylvestris in relation to snow blight pathogen Phacidium infestans. Oikos 71:130–136. doi: 10.2307/3546180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and inference. A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Byram GM (1959) Combustion of forest fuels. In: Davis KP (ed) Forest fire: control and use. MacGraw-Hill, New York, pp 61–89Google Scholar
  22. Cameron EJF (1995) Regeneration of existing pinewoods. In: Aldhous, JR (ed.) Our Pinewoods Heritage. Proceedings of a conference at culloden academy. Forestry commission, RSPB, Scottish Natural Heritage, Inverness, pp 155–164Google Scholar
  23. Carlisle A, Brown AHF (1968) Biological flora of the British Isles: Pinus sylvestris L. J Ecol 56:269–307. doi: 10.2307/2258078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davies GM (2006) Fire behaviour and impact on heather moorland. PhD Thesis, University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  25. Davies GM, Hamilton A, Smith A, Legg CJ (2008) Using visual obstruction to estimate fuel load and structure: the FuelRule technique. Int J Wildland Fire 17:380–389. doi: 10.1071/WF07021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dimbleby GW (1953) Natural regeneration of pine and birch on heather moor of north-east Yorkshire. Forestry 26:41–52. doi: 10.1093/forestry/26.1.41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dugan D (2004) Field layer management trials at Abernethy forest reserve: an update. Scot For 58:17–19Google Scholar
  28. Edwards I (1980) The conservation of the Glen Tanar pinewood, near Aboyne, Aberdeenshire. PhD thesis, Aberdeen UniversityGoogle Scholar
  29. Edwards C, Mason WL (2006) Stand structure and dynamics of four native Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) woodlands in northern Scotland. Forestry 79:261–277. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpl014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. French DD, Miller GR, Cummins RP (1996) Recent development of high-altitude Pinus sylvestris scrub in the northern Cairngorm mountains, Scotland. Biol Conserv 79:133–144. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00104-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fries C, Johansson O, Petterson B, Simonsson P (1997) Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structure in Swedish boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 94:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fröhlich M, Quedneau HD (1995) Statistical analysis of the distribution pattern of natural regeneration in forests. For Ecol Manage 73:45–57. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(94)03504-P CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gill RMA (1992) A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 3 Impact on trees and forests. Forestry 65:363–388. doi: 10.1093/forestry/65.4.363-a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gimingham CH (1972) Ecology of Heathlands. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Granström A (2001) Fire management for biodiversity in the European boreal forest. Scand J For Res Suppl 3:62–69. doi: 10.1080/028275801300090627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hancock MH (2008) An exceptional Calluna vulgaris die-back event at Abernethy forest, Scottish Highlands. Plant Ecol Divers 1:89–103. doi: 10.1080/17550870802260772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hancock M, Egan S, Summers R, Cowie N, Amphlett A, Rao S, Hamilton A (2005) The effect of experimental prescribed fire on the establishment of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris seedlings on heather Calluna vulgaris moorland. For Ecol Manage 212:199–213. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hannah L, Midgeley GF, Lovejoy T, Bond WJ, Bush M, Lovett JC, Scott D, Woodward FI (2002) Conservation of biodiversity in a changing climate. Conserv Biol 16:264–268. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00465.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henman DW (1961) Natural regeneration of Scots pine woods in the Highlands. Scot For 15:235–242Google Scholar
  40. Hester AJ, Edenius L, Buttenschon RM, Kuiters AT (2000) Interactions between forests and herbivores: the role of controlled grazing experiments. Forestry 73:381–391. doi: 10.1093/forestry/73.4.381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hille M, Den Ouden J (2004) Improved recruitment and early growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L) seedlings after fire and soil scarification. Eur J For Res 123:213–218. doi: 10.1007/s10342-004-0036-4 Google Scholar
  42. Jäderlund A, Norberg G, Zackrisson O, Dahlberg A, Teketay D, Dolling A, Nilsson M-C (1998) Control of bilberry vegetation by steam treatment—effects on seeded Scots pine and associated mycorrhizal fungi. For Ecol Manage 108:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson EA (1992) Fire and vegetation dynamics studies from the North American Boreal forest. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Kardell I (1986) Sowing, planting or natural regeneration? Sveriges Skogsvardforbunds Tidskr 84:3–15 (in Swedish, with English abstract)Google Scholar
  45. Kuuluvainen T (2002) Natural variability of forests as a reference for restoring and managing biological diversity in boreal Fennoscandia. Silva Fenn 36:97–125Google Scholar
  46. Kuuluvainen T, Rouvinen S (2000) Post-fire understorey regeneration in boreal Pinus sylvestris forest sites with different fire histories. J Veg Sci 11:801–812. doi: 10.2307/3236550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Laing SE, Buckland ST, Burns RW, Lambie D, Amphlett A (2003) Dung and nest surveys: estimating decay rates. J Appl Ecol 40:1102–1111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00861.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lampainen J, Kuuluvainen T, Wallenius TH, Karjalainen L, Vanha-Majamaa I (2004) Long-term forest structure and regeneration after wildfire in Russian Karelia. J Veg Sci 15:245–256. doi: 10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015[0245:LFSARA]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lehto J (1956) Studies on the natural reproduction of Scots pine on the upland soils of south Finland. Acta Forestalia Fenn 66:101–132 (in Finnish, with English abstract)Google Scholar
  50. Malcolm DC, Mason WL, Clarke GC (2001) The transformation of conifer forests in Britain—regeneration, gap size and silvicultural systems. For Ecol Manage 151:7–23. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00692-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mallik AU (2003) Conifer regeneration problems in boreal and temperate forests with Ericaceous understory: role of disturbance, seedbed limitation and keystone species change. Crit Rev Plant Sci 22:341–366. doi: 10.1080/713610860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mason WL, Hampson A, Edwards C (2004) Managing the Pinewoods of Scotland. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  53. McVean DN (1963) Ecology of Scots pine in the Scottish Highlands. J Ecol 51:671–686. doi: 10.2307/2257754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miles J, Kinnaird JW (1979) The establishment and regeneration of birch, juniper and Scots pine in the Scottish Highlands. Scot For 33:102–119Google Scholar
  55. Nixon C, Worrell R (1999) The potential for natural regeneration of conifers in Britain. Forestry Commission Bulletin 120, Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  56. Nystrand O, Granström A (2000) Predation on Pinus sylvestris seeds and juvenile seedlings in Swedish boreal forest in relation to stand disturbance by logging. J Appl Ecol 37:449–463. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00505.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Oleskog G, Sahlén K (2000) Effects of seedbed substrate on moisture conditions and germination of Pinus sylvestris seeds in a clearcut. Scand J For Res 15:225–236. doi: 10.1080/028275800750015046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Östlund L, Zackrisson O, Axelsson A-L (1997) The history and transformation of a Scandinavian boreal forest landscape since the 19th century. Can J Res 27:1198–1206Google Scholar
  59. Parlane S, Summers RW, Cowie NR, van Gardingen PR (2006) Management proposals for bilberry in Scots pine woodland. For Ecol Manage 222:272–278. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Parviainen J (1996) The impact of fire in Finnish forests in the past and today. In: Goldammer JG, Furyaev VV (eds) Fire in ecosystems of Boreal Eurasia. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 55–64Google Scholar
  61. Peterken GF (1996) Natural woodland. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Picozzi N, Catt DC, Moss R (1992) Evaluation of capercaillie habitat. J Appl Ecol 29:751–762. doi: 10.2307/2404485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Puettmann KJ, Ammer C (2007) Trends in North American and European regeneration research under the ecosystem management paradigm. Eur J For Res 126:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10342-005-0089-z Google Scholar
  64. Richardson D, Bond WJ (1991) Determinants of plant distributions: evidence from pine invasions. Am Nat 137:639–668. doi: 10.1086/285186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. SAS Inst (2000) SAS/STAT Users’ guide, version 8. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  66. Rodwell JS (1991) British plant communities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Sannikov SN, Goldammer JG (1996) Fire ecology and pine forests of northern Eurasia. In: Goldammer JG, Furyaev VV (eds) Fire in ecosystems of Boreal Eurasia. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 151–167Google Scholar
  68. Schimmel J, Granström A (1996) Fire severity and vegetation response in the boreal Swedish forest. Ecology 77:1436–1450. doi: 10.2307/2265541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shelton MG, Wittwer RF (1991) Effects of seedbed condition on natural shortleaf pine regeneration. In: Brissetter JC, Barnett JP (compilers) Proceedings of the Shortleaf Pine Regeneration Workshop, Little Rock, Arkansas, 29–31 October 1991. Southern Forest Experimental Station, New Orleans, pp. 124–139Google Scholar
  70. Steven HM, Carlisle A (1959) The native pinewoods of Scotland. Oliver & Boyd, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  71. Summers RW, Proctor R (2005) Timing of shedding seeds and cones, and production in different stands of Scots pines at Abernethy Forest, Scotland. Forestry 78:541–549. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpi047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Summers RW, Mavor RA, MacLennan AM, Rebecca GW (1999) The structure of ancient native pinewoods and other woodlands in the Highlands of Scotland. For Ecol Manage 119:231–245. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00515-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Summers RW, Wilkinson NI, Wilson ER (2008) Age structure and history of stand types of Pinus sylvestris in Abernethy forest, Scotland. Scand J For Res 23:28–37. doi: 10.1080/02827580701646513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Swanson FI, Franklin JF (1992) New forestry principles from ecosystem analysis of Pacific northwest forests. Ecol Appl 2:262–274. doi: 10.2307/1941860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sykes JM, Horrill AD (1981) Recovery of vegetation in a Caledonian pinewood after fire. Trans Bot Soc Edinb 43:317–325Google Scholar
  76. Sykes JM, Horrill AD (1985) Natural regeneration in a Caledonian pinewood: progress after eight years of enclosure at Coille Coire Chuilc, Perthshire. Arboricultural J 9:13–24Google Scholar
  77. Tegelmark DO (1998) Site factors as multivariate predictors of the success of natural regeneration in Scots pine forests. For Ecol Manage 109:231–239. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00255-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tipping R (1994) The form and fate of Scotland’s woodlands. Proc Soc Antiquaries Scot 124:1–54Google Scholar
  79. Tirén L (1974) On experiments in sowing pine and spruce seed in Northern Sweden. Meddelanden från Statens Skosforskningsinstitut 41(7):79–97 (in Swedish with English abstract)Google Scholar
  80. Vaartaja O (1950) On factors affecting the initial development of pine. Oikos 2:89–108. doi: 10.2307/3564664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vellak K, Paal J (1999) Diversity of bryophyte vegetation in some forest types in Estonia: a comparison of old unmanaged and managed forests. Biodivers Conserv 8:1595–1620. doi: 10.1023/A:1008927501623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vickers AD, Palmer SCF (2000) The influence of canopy cover and other factors upon the regeneration of Scots pine and its associated ground flora within the Glen Tanar National Nature Reserve. Forestry 73:37–49. doi: 10.1093/forestry/73.1.37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ward JS, Parker GR (1989) Spatial dispersion of woody regeneration in an old-growth forest. Ecol 70:1269–1279. doi: 10.2307/1938187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wennström U, Bergsten U, Nilsson JE (1999) Mechanised microsite preparation and direct seeding of Pinus sylvestris in boreal forests—a way to create desired spacing at low cost. New For 18:179–198. doi: 10.1023/A:1006506431344 Google Scholar
  85. Worthy F, Law R, Hulme PE (2006) Modelling the quantitative effects of pre- and post-dispersal seed predation in Pinus syvestris L. J Ecol 94:1201–1213. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01168.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yli-Vakkuri P (1961) Emergence and initial development of tree seedlings on burnt over forest land. Acta For Fenn 74:1–51Google Scholar
  87. Zackrisson O (1977) Influence of forest fires on the North Swedish boreal forest. Oikos 29:22–32. doi: 10.2307/3543289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zackrisson O, Nilsson MC, Dahlberg A, Jäderlund A (1997) Interference mechanisms in conifer-Ericaceae-feathermoss communities. Oikos 78:209–220. doi: 10.2307/3546287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark H. Hancock
    • 1
  • Ron W. Summers
    • 1
  • Andy Amphlett
    • 1
  • Johanna Willi
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Society for the Protection of BirdsInvernessUK

Personalised recommendations