European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 127, Issue 4, pp 301–313 | Cite as

Estimating decomposition rate constants for European tree species from literature sources

Original Paper

Abstract

Coarse woody debris (CWD) is an important substrate in forests, provides habitat for a multitude of organisms and is also a sink and a source for nutrients and carbon. To assess the dynamics of this substrate equations to describe the course of decomposition have been developed. They can also be used to describe the release of carbon from dead wood into the atmosphere. Unfortunately few equations have been parameterised for European conditions, although there is a need to estimate the dynamics of CWD in this region. Therefore, a method (termed the LB-method) was invented to estimate suitable decomposition rate constants (DRC) from sources published in the CWD Global Database by systematically comparing features and conditions of the area and species of interest with the information given with the published equations. The DRC were weighed according to these comparisons and then sorted by the weight assigned to them. From the resulting distribution a plausible DRC for the region and species of interest was estimated. The LB-method was compared to results from a study on Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) decomposition in Thuringia, Germany, and to results from an expert elicitation on DRC for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany. In both cases the method gave results within the confidence interval of the respective study used for comparison. Both methods are suitable for the estimation of preliminary DRC until more accurate constants can be derived by research. While the focus in this study was on density loss the method can be applied to other dead wood features (e.g. volume), and should be applicable to other regions of the world where information is also scarce.

Keywords

Coarse woody debris Decomposition Disturbance Carbon sequestration Kyoto reporting Marrakesh Accords 

References

  1. Alban DH, Pastor J (1993) Decomposition of aspen, spruce, and pine boles on two sites in Minnesota. Can J For Res 23(9):1744–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott DT, Crossley DA Jr (1982) Woody litter decomposition following clear-cutting. Ecology 63(1):35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber BL, van Lear DH (1984) Weight loss and nutrient dynamics in decomposing woody Loblolly pine logging slash. Soil Sci Am J 48:906–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beneke C (2002) Totholzanfall in einem Buchenaltbestand im Nationalpark Hainich/Thüringen. Diplomarbeit, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, 105 pGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchette RA (1995) Degradation of the Lignocellulose complex in wood. Can J Bot 73:S999–S1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boddy L (1983) Carbon dioxide release from decomposing wood: effect of water content and temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 15(5):501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boddy L (2001) Fungal community ecology and wood decomposition process in angiosperms: from standing tree to complete decay of coarse woody debris. Ecol Bull 49:43–56Google Scholar
  8. Boddy L, Swift MJ (1984) Wood decomposition in an abandoned beech and oak coppiced woodland in SE England. III: decomposition and turnover of twigs and branches. Holarct Ecol 7(2):229–238Google Scholar
  9. Brown PM, Shepperd WD, Mata SA, McClain DL (1998) Longevity of wind thrown logs in a subalpine forest of central Colorado. Can J For Res 28(6):932–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown S (2002) Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environ Pollut 116(3):363–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Busse MD (1994) Downed bole-wood decomposition in lodgepole pine forests of central Oregon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58(1):221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christensen O (1977) Estimation of standing crop and turnover of dead wood in a Danish oak forest. Oikos 28:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cline SP, Sollins P, Verhoeven T, Cromack K Jr (1981) Comparative decomposition of coarse woody debris in western Oregon: snags, fallen boles, stumps, and roots. Bull Ecol Soc Am 62:113Google Scholar
  14. Currie WS, Nadelhoffer KJ (2002) The imprint of land-use history: Patterns of carbon and nitrogen in downed woody debris at the Harvard Forest. Ecosystems 5(5):446–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Vries BWL, Kuyper TW (1988) Effect of vegetation type on decomposition rates of wood in Drenthe, The Netherlands. Acta Bot Neerl 37(2):307–312Google Scholar
  16. Ecke F, Löfgren O, Hörnfeldt B, Eklund U, Ericsson P, Sörlin D (2001) Abundance and diversity of small mammals in relation to structural habitat factors. Ecol Bull 49:165–171Google Scholar
  17. Edmonds RL, Marra JL (1999) Decomposition of woody material: nutrient dynamics, invertebrate/fungi relationships, and management in Northwest forests. In: Proceedings: Pacific Northwest forest and rangeland soil organism symposium, pp 68–79Google Scholar
  18. Erickson HE, Edmonds RL, Peterson CE (1985) Decomposition of logging residues in Douglas-fir, western hemlock, Pacific silver fir, and ponderosa pine ecosystems. Can J For Res 15:914–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fahey TJ (1983) Nutrient dynamics of aboveground detritus in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) ecosystems, southeastern Wyoming. Ecol Monogr 53(1):51–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fahey TJ, Stevens PA, Hornung M, Rowland P (1991) Decomposition and nutrient release from logging residue following conventional harvest of Sitka spruce in north Wales. Forestry 64(3):289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forest Product Laboratory (1999) Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. USDA Forest Service, Madison, FPL-GTR-113, 463 pGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster JR, Lang GE (1982) Decomposition of red spruce and balsam fir boles in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. Can J For Res 12:617–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fridman J, Walheim M (2000) Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. For Ecol Manage 131(1–3):23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ganjegunte GK, Condron LM, Clinton PW, Davis MR, Mahieu N (2004) Decomposition and nutrient release from radiata pine (Pinus radiata) coarse woody debris. For Ecol Manage 187(2–3):197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham RL, Cromack K (1982) Mass, nutrient content, and decay rate of boles in rain forests of Olympic National Park. Can J For Res 12:511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hale CM, Pastor J (1998) Nitrogen content, decay rates, and decompositional dynamics of hollow versus solid hardwood logs in hardwood forests of Minnesota, USA. Can J For Res 28(9):1276–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harmon ME (1982) Decomposition of standing dead trees in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Oecologia 52:214–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harmon ME, Chen H (1991) Coarse woody debris dynamics in two old-growth ecosystems. BioScience 41(9):604–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15:133–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harmon M, Harmon J (2004) Coarse woody debris global database. Oregon State University, Corvallis, ORGoogle Scholar
  31. Harmon M, Harmon J, Rock J (2005) Coarse woody debris global database—online version. Corvallis OR, Potsdam D. http://afoludata.jrc.it/carboinvent/cidb_cwdgdb.cfm
  32. Harmon ME, Krankina ON, Sexton J (2000) Decomposition vectors: a new approach to estimating woody detritus decomposition dynamics. Can J For Res 30(1):76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. IPCC (1996) Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories—Reporting Instructions (vol 1)Google Scholar
  34. IPCC (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, 617 pGoogle Scholar
  35. Jenny H, Gessel SP, Bingham FT (1949) Comparative study of decomposition rates of organic matter in temperate and tropical regions. Soil Sci 68:419–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson EA, Greene DF (1991) A method for studying dead bole dynamics in Pinus-Contorta Var Latifolia—Picea-Engelmannii forests. J Veg Sci 2(4):523–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jonsell M, Nordlander G, Ehnström B (2001) Substrate associations of insects breeding in fruiting bodies of wood-decaying fungi. Ecol Bull 49:173–194Google Scholar
  38. Kahl T (2003) Abbauraten von Fichtentotholz (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). M.Sc. thesis, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 98 pGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim CS, Sharik TL, Jurgensen MF (1996) Canopy cover effects on mass loss, and nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics from decomposing litter in oak and pine stands in northern Lower Michigan. For Ecol Manage 80(1–3):13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Knigge W, Schulz H (1966) Grundriss der Forstbenutzung. Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg, 584 pGoogle Scholar
  41. Korpel S (1995) Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten. G. Fischer, Stuttgart, 310 pGoogle Scholar
  42. Krankina ON, Harmon ME (1994) The impact of intensive forest management on carbon stores in forest ecosystems. World Resour Rev 6(2):161–177Google Scholar
  43. Krankina ON, Harmon ME (1995) Dynamics of the dead wood carbon pool in northwestern Russian Boreal forests. Water Air Soil Pollut 82(1–2):227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kruys N, Jonsson BG, Stahl G (2002) A stage-based matrix model for decay-class dynamics of woody debris. Ecol Appl 12(3):773–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laiho R, Prescott CE (1999) The contribution of coarse woody debris to carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles in three Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Can J For Res 29:1592–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laiho R, Prescott CE (2004) Decay and nutrient dynamics of coarse woody debris in northern coniferous forests: a synthesis. Can J For Res 34(4):763–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mackensen J, Bauhus J (1999) The decay of coarse woody debris. Australian Greenhouse Office 6, 41 pGoogle Scholar
  48. Mackensen J, Bauhus J (2003) Density loss and respiration rates in coarse woody debris of Pinus radiata, Eucalyptus regnans and Eucalyptus maculata. Soil Biol Biochem 35(1):177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. MacMillan PC (1988) Decomposition of coarse woody debris in an old-growth Indiana forest. Can J For Res 18:1353–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mäkinen H, Hynynen J, Siitonen J, Sievänen R (2006) Predicting the decomposition of Scots pine, Norway spruce, and birch stems in Finland. Ecol Appl 16(5):1865–1879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maser C, Anderson RG, Cromack K, Williams JT, Martin RE (1979) Dead and down woody material. In: Thomas JW (ed) Wildlife habitats in managed forests, vol 553. The Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington USDA Forest Service, Washington, pp 78–95Google Scholar
  52. Mattson KG, Swank WT, Waide JB (1987) Decomposition of woody debris in a regenerating, clear-cut forest in the Southern Appalachians. Can J For Res 17:712–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McNulty SG (2002) Hurricane impacts on US forest carbon sequestration. Environ Pollut 116:S17–S24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Means JE Jr, Cromack K, MacMillan PC (1985) Comparison of decomposition models using wood density of Douglas-fir logs. Can J For Res 15:1092–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Müller-Using SI (2005) Totholzdynamik eines Buchenbestandes im Solling. Beese F, Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Reihe A. Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme 193, 175 pGoogle Scholar
  56. Næsset E (1999) Decomposition rate constants of Picea abies logs in southeastern Norway. Can J For Res 29(3):372–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Norden B, Ryberg M, Gotmark F, Olausson B (2004) Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaf forests. Biol Conserv 117(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44(2):322–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Prescott CE (1997) Effects of clearcutting and alternative silvicultural systems on rates of decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in a coastal montane coniferous forest. For Ecol Manage 95(3):253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rouvinen S, Kuuluvainen T, Karjalainen L (2002) Coarse woody debris in old Pinus sylvestris dominated forests along a geographic and human impact gradient in boreal Fennoscandia. Can J For Res 32(12):2184–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sander B (2002) Post-fire structure and decomposition dynamics of coarse woody material in the western Canadian boreal forest. Ph.D., University of Alberta Edmonton, 101 pGoogle Scholar
  62. Schäfer M (2002) Zersetzung der sturmgeworfenen Buchenstämme. In: Willig J (ed) Naturwaldreservate in Hessen 8—Weiherskopf. Natürliche Entwicklung von Wäldern nach Sturmwurf, vol 38. J. D. Sauerländer’s Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 49–60Google Scholar
  63. Schowalter TD, Zhang YL, Sabin TE (1998) Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of oak Quercus spp. logs after five years of decomposition. Ecography 21(1):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shorohova EV, Shorohov AA (2001) Coarse woody debris dynamics and stores in a boreal virgin spruce forest. Ecol Bull 49:129–135Google Scholar
  65. Siitonen J, Penttilä R, Kotiranta H (2001) Coarse woody debris, polyporus fungi and saproxylic insects in an old-growth spruce forest in Vodlozero National Park, Russian Karelia. Ecol Bull 49:231–242Google Scholar
  66. Sippola AL, Siitonen J, Kallio R (1998) Amount and quality of coarse woody debris in natural and managed coniferous forests near the timberline in Finnish Lapland. Scand J For Res 13(2):204–214Google Scholar
  67. Swift MJ (1977) The ecology of wood decomposition. Sci Prog 64:175–199Google Scholar
  68. Swift MJ, Healey IN, Hibberd JK, Sykes JM, Bampoe V, Nesbitt ME (1976) The decomposition of branch-wood in the canopy and floor of a mixed deciduous woodland. Oecologia 26:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tarasov ME, Birdsey RA (2001) Decay rate and potential storage of coarse woody debris in the Leningrad region. Ecol Bull 49:137–147Google Scholar
  70. Thürig E, Palosuo T, Bucher J, Kaufmann E (2005) The impact of windthrow on carbon sequestration in Switzerland: a model-based assessment. For Ecol Manage 210:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wirth C (2000) Der Einfluß von Feuer auf den Kohlenstoffhaushalt sibirischer Kiefernwälder (Pinus sylvestris L.) unter biogeochemischen und populationsbiologischen Aspekten. Ph. D., Universität Bayreuth Bayreuth, 260 pGoogle Scholar
  72. Yavitt JB, Fahey TJ (1982) Loss of mass and nutrient changes of decaying woody roots in lodgepole pine forests, southeastern Wyoming. Can J For Res 12:745–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yin X (1999) The decay of forest woody debris: numerical modeling and implications based on some 300 data cases from North America. Oecologia 121:81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Rock
    • 1
  • Franz-W. Badeck
    • 1
  • Mark E. Harmon
    • 2
  1. 1.Global Change and Natural Systems DepartmentPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchPotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Forest SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations