Advertisement

Erwerbs-Obstbau

, Volume 60, Supplement 1, pp 71–77 | Cite as

Changes in Phenolic Compounds Profile and Anthocyanin Content of cv. Cabernet Sauvignon (V. vinifera L.) Induced by Different Doses of Foliar Oak Applications with Urea

  • Demir KokEmail author
Original Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Phenolic compounds and anthocyanins had pivotal roles on wine grape quality. In order to enhance contents of these substances, several techniques have been applied to grapevines. In recent years, there has been an increasing concern about using of foliar oak applications for improving wine grape quality. In this study, it was used a low concentration (0.6%) of urea for increasing efficiency of different doses of oak applications. For this aim, it was benefited from different doses of foliar oak applications with or without urea, including: 0 ppm oak (Oa), 1250 ppm oak (Oa), 2500 ppm (Oa), 5000 ppm (Oa), 0 ppm oak (Oa) + 0.6% Urea (Ur), 1250 ppm oak (Oa) + 0.6% Urea (Ur), 2500 ppm oak (Oa) + 0.6% Urea (Ur), 5000 ppm oak (Oa) + 0.6% Urea (Ur). Although yield and wine grape quality characteristics were favorably affected by increasing doses of oak applications; urea added oak applications were especially found to be more effective for both characteristics. As a result, application of 5000 ppm oak (Oa) + 0.6% Urea (Ur) led to best results in terms of yield and wine grape characteristics of cv. Cabernet Sauvignon.

Keywords

Vitis vinifera L. Wine grape Foliar oak application Foliar urea application Phenolic compounds Anthocyanins 

Veränderungen bei phenolischen Inhaltsstoffen und des Anthocyananteils bei der Rebsorte ‘Cabernet Sauvignon‘ (V. vinifera L.) durch die Blattapplizierung von Eichenextrakt mit Harnstoff in unterschiedlicher Dosierung

Schlüsselwörter

Vitis vinifera L. Weinrebe Blattapplizierung mit Eichenextrakt Blattapplizierung mit Harnstoff Phenolverbindungen Anthocyane 

Notes

Conflict of interest

D. Kok declares that he has no competing interests.

References

  1. Amone K, Simonetti-Bryan J (2013) Pairing with the masters: a definitive guide to food and wine. Delmar, New York. ISBN 978-1-111-54384-6Google Scholar
  2. Bell SJ, Henschke PA (2005) Implications of nitrogen nutrition for grapes, fermentation and wine. Aust J Grape Wine Res 11(3):242–295Google Scholar
  3. Botes MP (2009) Evaluation of parameters to determine optimum ripeness in Cabernet Sauvignon grapes in relation to wine quality. Master thesis, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, p 111Google Scholar
  4. Bouzas-Cid Y, Portu J, Perez-Alvarez EP, Gonzalo-Diago A, Garde-Cerdan T (2016) Effect of vegetal ground cover crops on wine anthocyanin content. Sci Hortic 211:384390Google Scholar
  5. Butzke CE (2010) Winemaking problems solved. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooke GM (2004) Making table wine at home. Agriculture and natural resources. Publication 21434. University of California, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  7. Coombe BG, Dundon RJ, Short AW (1980) Indices of sugar-acidity as ripeness criteria for wine grapes. J Sci Food Agric 31:495–502Google Scholar
  8. Delgado R, Martin P, Del Alamo M, Gonzalez MR (2004) Changes in the phenolic composition of grape berries during ripening in relationship to vineyard nitrogen and potassium fertilisation rates. J Sci Food Agric 84:623–630Google Scholar
  9. Downey MO, Dokoozlian NK, Krstic MP (2006) Cultural practice and environmental impacts on the flavonoid composition of grapes and wine. A review of recent research. Am J Enol Vitic 57:257–268Google Scholar
  10. Gougoulias N (2010) Study on phenolics and antioxidant activity of selected wines from some Greek Aegean Sea islands. Oxid Commun 33(1):167–174Google Scholar
  11. Gougoulias N, Masheva L (2010) Effect of gibberellic acid (GA3) on polyphenols content and antioxidative activity of some table grape varieties. Oxid Commun 33:652–660Google Scholar
  12. Janick J, Paull RE (2008) The encyclopaedia of fruit and nuts. Cambridge University Press, Reading. ISBN 978-0-85199-638-7Google Scholar
  13. Kok D (2011) Influences of pre and post-verasion cluster thinning treatments on grape composition variables and monoterpene levels of Vitis vinifera L. Cv. Sauvignon Blanc. J Food Agric Environ 9(1):22–26Google Scholar
  14. Kok D (2016) Variation in total phenolic compounds, anthocyanin and monoterpene content of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ table grape variety (V. vinifera L.) as affected by cluster thinning and early and late period basal leaf removal treatments. Erwerbs-Obstbau 58:241–246Google Scholar
  15. Kok D (2017) Assessment of electrochemical attribute and monoterpene content of twelve aromatic grape cultivars (V. vinifera L.) grown under the ecological conditions of north-western Turkey. Oxid Commun 40(1-II):557–564Google Scholar
  16. Kok D, Bal E (2016) Seedless berry growth and bioactive compounds of cv. ‘Recel Uzümü’ (V. vinifera L.) as affected by application doses and times of pre-harvest thidiazuron. Erwerbs-Obstbau 58:253–258Google Scholar
  17. Kok D, Bal E (2017a) Compositional differences in phenolic compounds and anthocyanin contents of some table and wine grape (V. vinifera L.) varieties from Turkey. Oxid Commun 40(2):648–656Google Scholar
  18. Kok D, Bal E (2017b) Leaf removal treatments combined with kaolin film technique from different directions of grapevine’s canopy affect the composition of phytochemicals of cv. Muscat Hamburg (V. vinifera L.). Erwerbs-Obstbau.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0337-7 Google Scholar
  19. Kok D, Bal E, Celik S (2013) Influences of various canopy management techniques on wine grape quality of V. vinifera L. cv. Kalecik Karası. Bulg J Agric Sci 19(6):1247–1252Google Scholar
  20. Linskens HF, Jackson JF (1988) Wine analysis. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-642-83342-7Google Scholar
  21. Martinez-Gil AM, Garde-Cerdan T, Martinez L, Alonso GL, Salinas MR (2011) Effect of oak extract application to Verdejo grapevines on gape and wine aroma. J Agric Food Chem 59(7):3253–3263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Martinez-Gil AM, Garde-Cerdan T, Zalacain A, Pardo-Garcia AI, Salinas MR (2012) Applications of an oak extract on Petit Verdot grapevines. Influence on grape and wine volatile compounds. Food Chem 132(4):1836–1845Google Scholar
  23. Martinez-Gil AM, Angenieux M, Pardo-Garcia AI, Alonso GL, Ojeda H, Salinas MR (2013) Glycoside aroma precursors of Syrah and Chardonnay grapes after an oak extract application to the grapevines. Food Chem 138(2):956–965PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Packer L (2002) Handbook of antioxidants. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. ISBN 978-0-8247-0547-5Google Scholar
  25. Pardo-Garcia AI, Martinez-Gil AM, Cadahia E, Pardo F, Alonso GL, Salinas M (2014) Oak extract application to grapevines as a plant biostimulant to increase wine polyphenols. Food Res Int 55:150–160Google Scholar
  26. Portu J, Gonzalez-Arenzana L, Hermosin-Gutierrez I, Santamaria P, Garde-Cerdan T (2015) Phenylalanine and urea foliar applications to grapevine: effect on wine phenolic content. Food Chem 180:55–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Singleton VL, Timberlake CF, Kea L (1978) The phenolic cinnamates of white grapes and wine. J Sci Food Agric 29:403–410Google Scholar
  28. Soubeyrand E, Basteau C, Hilbert G, Van Leeuwen C, Delrot S, Gomes E (2014) Nitrogen supply affects anthocyanin biosynthetic and regulatory genes in grapevine cv. Cabernet Sauvignon berries. Photochemistry 103:38–49Google Scholar
  29. Stefano R di, Cravero MC (1991) Metodi per lo studio dei polifenoli dell’uva. Riv Vitic Enol 2:37–45Google Scholar
  30. Tokuşoğlu Ö, Hall CA (2010) Fruit and cereal bioactives: Sources, chemistry and application. CRC Press, Boca Raton. ISBN 978-1-4398-0667-8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agricultural Faculty, Department of HorticultureNamik Kemal UniversityTekirdagTurkey

Personalised recommendations