, Volume 60, Supplement 1, pp 55–59 | Cite as

Influence of BAP Concentrations and Nutrient Medium Composition on In Vitro Regeneration of ‘Öküzgözü’ and ‘Boğazkere’ (Vitis vinifera L.) Cultivars

  • Hakan Yildirim
  • Gultekin OzdemirEmail author
Original Article


This study has been conducted with the aim to determine the type of nutrient medium that can be used in micropropagation studies for ‘Öküzgözü’ and ‘Boğazkere’ and to specify BAP concentrations. In the study where ejectors with a length of 0.7–0.8 cm that are obtained with single-node culture are used, it was focused on four different nutrient media such as MS, DKW, QL and WPM and on six different concentrations such as 0.2–0.4–0.6–0.8–1.0–1.5 mg l−1 BAP. Single-node suspension explants which will be used in initiating the culture, are taken into culture in MS nutrient medium and the nutrient medium is supported with 30 g l−1 sucrose, 6 g l−1 agar and 1 mg l−1 BAP. In the trial environment, parameters such as number of shoots, shoot length (cm), number of nodes and callus ratio have been investigated. For both grape varieties, the best outcome was obtained with MS nutrient medium with respect to number of shoots, shoot length, and number of nodes. These values were found as 4.66, 1.24 and 6.39 for ‘Öküzgözü’ variety respectively, whereas they are determined as 6.28, 1.15 and 6.81 for ‘Boğazkere’ variety respectively. In both grape varieties in DKW nutrient medium, starting from the 2nd week of culture, obscuration began to appear on the shoots and after this stage no other development has taken place.


‘Öküzgözü’ ‘Boğazkere’ In vitro BAP Nutrient medium 

Einfluss von BAP-Konzentrationen und Nährmedienzusammensetzung auf die in vitro Revitalisierung bei den Weinreben-Sorten Öküzgözü’ und ‘Boğazkere’ (Vitis vinifera L.)


‘Öküzgözü’ ‘Boğazkere’ In vitro BAP Nährmedium 


Conflict of interest

H. Yildirim and G. Ozdemir declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. Abido MAM, Hassanen ASA, Rayan GA (2013) In vitro propagation of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Muscat of Alexandria cv. For conservation of endangerment. Middle East J Sci Res 13:328–337Google Scholar
  2. Barlass M, Skene KGM (1978) In vitro propagation of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) from fragmented shoot apices. Vitis 17:335–340Google Scholar
  3. Driver JA, Kuniyuki AH (1984) In vitro propagation of Paradox walnut Juglans hindsi X Juglans regia rootstock. HortScience 19:507–509Google Scholar
  4. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension culture of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:15–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray D, Benton C (1991) In vitro micropropagation and plant establishment of muscadine Grape cultivars (Vitis rotundifolia). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 27:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harris RE, Stevenson JH (1982) In vitro propagation of Vitis. Vitis 21:22–32Google Scholar
  7. Jaskani MJ, Abbas H, Sultana R, Khan MM, Qasiml M, Khan IA (2008) Effect of growth hormones on micropropagation of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Perlette’. Botany 40:105–109Google Scholar
  8. Llyod G, McCown BH (1980) Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, (Kalmia latifolia) by use of shoot tip culture. Int Plant Prop Soc Comb Proc 30:421–427Google Scholar
  9. Mhatre M, Salunkhe CK, Rao PS (2000) Micropropagation of Vitis vinifera L.: towards an improved protocol. Sci Hortic 84:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mozafari A, Ghoraishi O, Ghaderi N, Javadi T (2016) Micropropagation of grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) on different basal media supplemented with benzyl adenine. Agric Conspec Sci 81(3):123–129Google Scholar
  11. Mukherjee P, Husain N, Misra SC, Rao VS (2010) In vitro propagation of a grape rootstock, deGrasset Vitis champinii Planch. Effects of medium compositions and plant growth regulators. Sci Hortic 126:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for the rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nitsch JP, Nitsch C (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science 163:85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ozden M, Demirer U, Gursodz S (2008) ‘Öküzgözü’ ve ‘Boğazkere’ (Vitis vinifera L.) üzüm çeşitlerinin yaprak eksplantlarından organogenesis yoluyla bitki rejenerasyonu. HR Ü ZF Dergisi 12(4):41–49Google Scholar
  15. Quoirin M, Lepoivre P (1977) Improved media for in vitro culture of Prunus species. Acta Hortic 78:437–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. San Pedro T, Peiro R, Villanova J, Olmos A, Gisbert C (2017) In vitro propagation of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Monastrell’. Electron J Biotechnol 27:80–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Skiada GF, Katerina G, Eleft herios PE (2010) Micropropagation of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Malagouzia’ and ‘Xinomavro’. Biology (Basel) 5:839–852Google Scholar
  18. Sudarsono PD, Goldy RG (1988) Effect of some growth regulators on in vitro culture of three Vitis rotundifolia cultivars. Hortic Sci 23:757Google Scholar
  19. Yildirim H, Ozdemir G, Calar N (2016) Effect of explant type on initiation of in vitro culture in ‘Öküzgözü’ and ‘Boğazkere’ grape varieties. Bahce J Ataturk Cent Hortic Res Inst 2016(2):607–611Google Scholar
  20. Zlenko VA, Troshin LP, Kotikov IV (1995) An optimised medium for clonal micropropagation of grapevine. Vitis 34:125–126Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agriculture Faculty Horticulture DepartmentInonu UniversityMalatyaTurkey
  2. 2.Agriculture Faculty Horticulture DepartmentDicle UniversityDiyarbakirTurkey

Personalised recommendations