, Volume 60, Supplement 1, pp 29–35 | Cite as

Quality of Wine Grape Cultivars Grown in Czech Republic

  • Martin KrálEmail author
  • Martina Ošťádalová
  • Jana Pokorná
  • Bohuslava Tremlová
  • Eliška Rohrerová
  • Marek Šnirc
  • Tomáš Fekete
Original Article


This research aims to make an analysis of significant parameters in wine grape from Czech Republic. It was evaluated pH, content of sugar, ascorbic acid, titratable acidity, total phenolic content and texture properties. For analyzes 5 samples of wine grape were used, harvested during the three periods. The results show that during the ripening of wine grapes there were changes of selected qualitative parameters, particularly of total polyphenols, sugar and some varieties of wine grape also ascorbic acid (significantly in the variety ’Grüner Veltliner’, ’Chardonnay’, ’Pinot Blanc’). Pronounced changes qualitative parameters were among wine grapes harvested the 1st and 2nd seasons. Changes in textural properties also occurred during the harvest and for most varieties between 2nd and 3rd period of harvest. The PCA grouped chemical parameters of wine grape in independent sets and can be used as assessment tool of wine cultivars.


Vitis vinifera L. Harvest Chemical composition Textural properties PCA 

Qualität von Keltertraubensorten aus der Tschechischen Republik


Vitis vinifera L. Weinlese Chemische Zusammensetzung Textureigenschaften PCA 



This work was supported by IGA No. 210/2016/FVHE project.

Conflict of interest

M. Král, M. Ošťádalová, J. Pokorná, B. Tremlová, E. Rohrerová, M. Šnirc and T. Fekete declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. Addinsoft (2016) XLSTAT, Analyse de données et statistique avec MS Excel. Addinsoft, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. ALA website. Accessed 4 April 2017
  3. AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis, 14th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagchi D, Bagchi M, Stohs SJ, Das DK, Ray SD, Kuszynski CA, Joshi SS, Pruess HG (2000) Free radicals and grape seed proanthocyanidin extract: Importance in human health and disease prevention. Toxicology 148:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Battista F, Tomasi D, Porro D, Caicci F, Giacosa S, Rolle L (2015) Winegrape berry skin thickness determination: comparison between histological observation and texture analysis determination. Ital J Food Sci 27:136–141Google Scholar
  6. Bergqvist J, Dokoozlian NK, Ebisuda N (2001) Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the Central San Joaquin Valley of California. Am J Enol Vitic 52:1–7Google Scholar
  7. Bindon KA, Dry PR, Loveys BR (2008) The interactive effect of pruning level and irrigation strategy on grape berry ripening and composition in Vitis viniferaL. Cv. Shiraz. S Afr J Enol Vitic 29:71–78Google Scholar
  8. Bureau SM, Razungles AJ, Baumes RL (2000) The aroma of Muscat of Frontignan grapes: effect of the light environment of vine or bunch on volatiles and glycoconjugates. J Sci Food Agric 80:2012–2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns J, Gardner PT, O’Neil J, Crawford S, Morecroft I, McPhail DB, Duthie GG (2000) Relationship among antioxidant activity, vasodilation capacity, and phenolic content of red wines. J Agric Food Chem 48(2):220–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canals R, Llaudy MC, Valls J, Canals JM, Zamora F (2005) Influence of ethanol concentration on the extraction of color and phenolic compounds from the skin and seeds of Tempranillo grapes at different stages of ripening. J Agric Food Chem 53:4019–4025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Condurso C, Cincotta F, Tripodi G, Sparacio A, Giglio D, Sparla S, Verzera A (2016) Effects of cluster thinning on wine quality of Syrah cultivar (Vitis vinifera L.). Eur Food Res Technol 242(10):1719–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coombe BG, Iland PG (2004) Grape berry development and winegrape quality. In: Dry PR, Coombe BG (eds) Viticulture, vol 1. Winetitles, Adelaide, pp 210–248Google Scholar
  13. Dai ZW, Ollat N, Gomès E et al (2011) Ecophysiological, genetic, and molecular causes of variation in grape berry weight and composition: a review. Am J Enol Vitic 62:413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delgado R (2004) Changes in phenolic composition of grape berries during ripening in relation to vineyard nitrogen and potassium fertilisation rates. J Sci Food Agric 84:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deloire A (2011) The concept of berry sugar loading. Wynboer 257:93–95Google Scholar
  16. Esteruelas E, González-Royo N, Kontoudakis A, Orte A, Cantos A, Canals JM, Zamora F (2015) Influence of grape maturity on the foaming properties of base wines and sparkling wines (Cava). J Sci Food Agric 95:2071–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO (2013) Faostat, Rome. Accessed 10 June 2013Google Scholar
  18. Giacosa S, Marengo F, Guidoni S, Rolle L, Hunter JJ (2015) Anthocyanin yield and skin softening during maceration, as affected by vineyard row orientation and grape ripeness of Vitis viniferaL. cv. Shiraz. Food Chem 174:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorelik S, Ligumsky M, Kohen R, Kanner J (2008) A novel function of red wine polyphenols in humans: Prevention of absorption of cytotoxic lipid peroxidation products. FASEB J 22:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haselgrove L, Botting D, Van Heeswijck R, Hoj PB, Dry PR, Ford C, Iland PG (2000) Canopy microclimate and berry composition: the effect of bunch exposure on the phenolic composition of Vitis vinifera L cv. Shiraz grape berries. Aust J Grape Wine Res 6:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hollecker L, Pinna M, Filippino G, Scrugli S, Pinna B, Argiolas F, Murru M (2009) Simultaneous determination of polyphenolic compounds in red and white grapes grown in Sardinia by high performance liquid chromatography-electron spray ionisation-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1216(15):3402–3408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson DI, Lombard PB (1993) Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality—A review. Am J Enol Vitic 44:409–430Google Scholar
  23. Král M, Ošťádalová M, Tremlová B (2017) Effect of storage on textural and sensory properties of Czech apple cultivars. Erwerb Obstbau 59(39–43):1–5Google Scholar
  24. Kuhn N, Guan L, Dai ZW, Wu BH, Lauvergeat V, Gomès E, Li S, Godoy F, Arce-Johnson P, Delrot S (2013) Berry ripening: recently heard through the grapevine. J Exp Bot 65(16):4543–4559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lambert C, Richard T, Renouf E, Bisson J, Waffo-Téguo P, Bordenave L, Ollat N, Mérillon J, Cluzet S (2013) Comparative analyses of Stilbenoids in canes of major Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. J Agric Food Chem 61(47):11392–11399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Letaief H, Rolle L, Zeppa G, Gerbi V (2008) Assessment of grape skin hardness by a puncture test. J Sci Food Agric 88:1567–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Locatelli M, Travaglia F, Coïsson J, Bordiga M, Arlorio M (2015) Phenolic composition of Nebbiolo grape (Vitis vinifera L.) from Piedmont: characterization during ripening of grapes selected in different geographic areas and comparison with Uva Rara and Vespolina cv. Eur Food Res Technol 242(7):1057–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lorrain B, Chira K, Teissedre PL (2011) Phenolic composition of Merlot and Cabernet-Sauvignon grapes from Bordeaux vineyard for the 2009-vintage: Comparison to 2006, 2007 and 2008 vintages. Food Chem 126(4):1991–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luykx DM, Van Ruth SM (2008) An overview of analytical methods for determining the geographical origin of food products. Food Chem 107(2):897–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marais J, Calitz F, Haasbroek PD (2001) Relationship between microclimatic data, aroma component concentrations and wine quality parameters in the prediction of Sauvignon Blanc wine quality. S Afr J Enol Vitic 22:22–26Google Scholar
  31. Milosavljević M (1998) Biotehnika vinove loze. Izdavačka kuća “Draganić” Zemun, Beograd, pp. 139–140Google Scholar
  32. Le Moigne M, Maury C, Bertrand D, Jourjon F (2008) Sensory and instrumental characterisation of Cabernet Franc grapes according to ripening stages and growing location. Food Qual Prefer 19:220–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Natella F, Ghiselli A, Guidi A, Ursini F, Scaccini C (2001) Red wine mitigates the postprandial increase of LDL susceptibility to oxidation. Free Radic Biol Med 30:1036–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O-Marques J, Reguinga R, Laureano O, Ricardo-da SJM (2005) Changes in grape seed, skin and pulp condensed tannins during berry ripening: effect of fruit pruning. Cienc Tec Vitiv 20(1):35–52Google Scholar
  35. Obreque-Slier E, Pena-Neira A, Lopez-Solis R, Zamora-Marin F, Ricardo-daSilva JM, Laureano O (2010) Comparative study of the phenolic composition of seeds and skins from Carmenere and Cabernet Sauvignon grape varieties (Vitis vinifera L.) during ripening. J Agric Food Chem 58:3591–3599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peppi CM, Fidelibus MW, Dokoozlian N (2006) Abscisic acid application and concentration affect firmness, pigmentation, color of ‘Flame Seedless’ grapes. HortScience 41:1440–1445Google Scholar
  37. Ranganna S (1997) Hand book of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products, 2nd edn. Tata McGraw-Hill, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  38. Rolle L, Letaief H, Gerbi V (2007) Application of texture analysis for the evaluation of the wine grape quality. In: Proceedings of the XXXth OIV World Congress of Vine and Wine BudapestGoogle Scholar
  39. Rolle L, Río Segade S, Torchio F, Giacosa S, Cagnasso E, Marengo F, Gerbi V (2011) Influence of grape density and harvest date on changes in phenolic composition, phenol extractability indices, and instrumental texture properties during ripening. J Agric Food Chem 59(16):8796–8805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rolle L, Siret R, Segade SR, Maury C, Gerbi V, Jourjon F (2012) Instrumental texture analysis parameters as markers of table-grape and wine-grape quality: a review. Am J Enol Vitic 63:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Río Segade S, Giacosa S, Gerbi V, Rolle L (2011) Berry skin thickness as main texture parameter to predict anthocyanin extractability in winegrapes. LWT Food Sci Technol 44:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sano A, Uchida R, Saito M, Shioya N, Komori Y, Tho Y, Hashizume N (2007) Beneficial effects of grape seed extract on malondialdehyde-modified LDL. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 53:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sato A, Yamada M (2003) Berry texture of table, wine, and dual-purpose grape cultivar quantified. HortScience 38:578–581Google Scholar
  44. Spayd SE, Tarara JM, Mee DL, Ferguson JC (2002) Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot berries. Am J Enol Vitic 53:171–182Google Scholar
  45. Talcott ST, Howard LR, Brenes CH (2000) Antioxidant changes and sensory properties of carrot puree processed with and without periderm tissue. J Agric Food Chem 48:1315–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Teissedre PL, Frankel EN, Waterhouse AL, Peleg H, German JB (1996) Inhibition of in vitro human LDL-oxidation by phenolic antioxidants from grapes and wines. J Sci Food Agric 70:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Teixeira A, Martins V, Noronha H, Eiras-Dias J, Gerós H (2014) The first insight into the metabolite profiling of grapes from three Vitis vinifera L. cultivars of two controlled appellation (DOC) regions. Int J Mol Sci 15(3):4237–4254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang ZP, Deloire A, Carbonneau A, Federspiel B, Lopez F (2003) Study of sugar phloem unloading in ripening grape berries under water stress conditions. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 37:213–222Google Scholar
  49. Zouid I, Siret R, Jourjon F, Mehinagic E, Rolle L (2013) Impact of grapes heterogeneity according to sugar level on both physical and mechanical berries properties and their anthocyanin extractability at harvest. J Texture Stud 44:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Král
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martina Ošťádalová
    • 1
  • Jana Pokorná
    • 1
  • Bohuslava Tremlová
    • 1
  • Eliška Rohrerová
    • 1
  • Marek Šnirc
    • 2
  • Tomáš Fekete
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and EcologyUniversity of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Evaluation and Processing of Animal Products, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food SciencesSlovak University of AgricultureNitraSlovakia
  3. 3.Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, SlovakUniversity of AgricultureNitraSlovakia

Personalised recommendations