Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 219–234 | Cite as

Do hedgerows influence the natural biological control of woolly apple aphids in orchards?

  • Ainara Peñalver-CruzEmail author
  • Diego Alvarez
  • Blas Lavandero
Original Paper


The provision of refuges for natural enemies could be a key aspect for the management of the woolly apple aphid [Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann, 1802)] (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in apple orchards. The present study assesses the effects of Pyracantha coccinea (Rosaceae) (firethorn) adjacent to apple orchards as this extra-orchard habitat would positively affect the abundance of natural enemies and control of E. lanigerum. Abundances were evaluated for the pest, the parasitoid, Aphelinus mali (Haldeman, 1851) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) (during two seasons) and generalist predators (only during the second season). The assessments were conducted at different distances from P. coccinea located at the edge of the apple orchards. Additionally, parasitism rates by A. mali were examined using a categorical and two quantitative methods. Results indicate that P. coccinea hedges promoted an early colonization by A. mali in apple orchards especially during the first season. However, parasitism rates by A. mali were not affected at the beginning of the season, but as the season progressed, the rates increased on the apple trees in comparison with the hedges. Additionally, during the second season, the interaction between certain natural enemies had a stronger effect on the population growth rates of E. lanigerum in orchards with P. coccinea compared to control orchards. Based on these results, we conclude that P. coccinea hedges may promote the early colonization by A. mali in the orchards and have a positive effect on the abundance of spiders, but had no effect on coccinelid, carabids, earwigs and syrphids.


Woolly apple aphid Aphelinus mali Eriosoma lanigerum Generalist predators Parasitism Apple orchards 



The authors very much thank Artzai Jauregui Solano for his assistance in the field work. Also, the authors would like to thank Cinthya Villegas for her advice during the process of the experiments and all orchard owners for providing us with the access to their apple orchards.


This study was funded by the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (Fondecyt) Postdoctoral Grant No. 3160233 and by Fondecyt Regular Grant No. 1140632.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Supplementary material

10340_2019_1153_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (10 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 10 kb)
10340_2019_1153_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (21 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 20 kb)
10340_2019_1153_MOESM3_ESM.tif (33.2 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (TIFF 33974 kb)


  1. Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:19–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altieri MA, Schmidt LL (1986) The dynamics of colonizing arthropod communities at the interface of abandoned, organic and commercial apple orchards and adjacent woodland habitats. Agric Ecosyst Environ 16:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asante SK (1995) Functional responses of the European earwig and two species of coccinellids to densities of Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Aust Entomol Soc 34:105–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asante SK, Danthanarayana W (1993) Sex ratios in natural populations of Aphelinus mali (Hym.: Aphelinidae) in relation to host size and host density. Entomophaga 38:391–403. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Begg GS, Cook SM, Dye R et al (2016) A functional overview of conservation biological control. Crop Prot 97:145–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianchi FJJA, van Wingerden WKRE, Griffioen AJ et al (2005) Landscape factors affecting the control of Mamestra brassicae by natural enemies in Brussels sprout. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107:145–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T (2006) Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1715–1727. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackman RL, Eastop VF (2006) Volume 1: host lists and keys? In: Blackman RL, Eastop VF (eds) Aphids on the world’s herbaceous plants and shrubs. The Natural History Museum, Wiley, Hoboken, pp 1–1024Google Scholar
  9. Budenberg WJ (1990) Honeydew as a contact kairomone for aphid parasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 55:139–148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A et al (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen H, Horowitz AR, Nestel D, Rosen D (1996) Susceptibility of the woolly apple aphid parasitoid, Aphelinus mali (Hym.: Aphelinidae), to common pesticides used in apple orchards in Israel. Entomophaga 41:225–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corbett A, Rosenheim JA (1996) Impact of a natural enemy overwintering refuge and its interaction with the surrounding landscape. Ecol Entomol 21:155–164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowgill SE, Wratten SD, Sotherton NW (1993) The effect of weeds on the numbers of hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) adults and the distribution and composition of their eggs in winter wheat. Ann Appl Biol 123:499–515. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Moraes CM, Lewis WJ, Paré PW et al (1998) Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 393:570–573. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Villalobos AE, Vázquez DP, Martin JL (2010) Soil disturbance, vegetation cover and the establishment of the exotic shrub Pyracantha coccinea in southern France. Biol Invasions 12:1023–1029. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Derocles SAP, Le Ralec A, Besson MM et al (2014) Molecular analysis reveals high compartmentalization in aphid-primary parasitoid networks and low parasitoid sharing between crop and noncrop habitats. Mol Ecol 23:3900–3911. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Duarte GT, Santos PM, Cornelissen TG et al (2018) The effects of landscape patterns on ecosystem services: meta-analyses of landscape services. Landsc Ecol 33:1247–1257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duflot R, Daniel H, Aviron S et al (2018) Adjacent woodlands rather than habitat connectivity influence grassland plant, carabid and bird assemblages in farmland landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 27:1925–1942. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eilenberg J, Hajek A, Lomer C (2001) Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control. Biocontrol 46:387–400. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erb M, Foresti N, Turlings TCJ (2010) A tritrophic signal that attracts parasitoids to host-damaged plants withstands disruption by non-host herbivores. BMC Plant Biol 10:1–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geiger F, Wäckers FL, Bianchi FJJA (2009) Hibernation of predatory arthropods in semi-natural habitats. Biocontrol 54:529–535. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giller KE, Beare MH, Lavelle P et al (1997) Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function. Appl Soil Ecol 6:3–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillespie MAK, Gurr GM, Wratten SD (2016) Beyond nectar provision: the other resource requirements of parasitoid biological control agents. Entomol Exp Appl 159:207–221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gontijol LM, Cockfield SD, Beers EH (2012) Natural enemies of woolly apple aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Washington state. Environ Entomol 41:1364–1371. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grez AA, Torres C, Zaviezo T et al (2010) Migration of coccinellids to alfalfa fields with varying adjacent vegetation in Central Chile. Cienc e Investig Agrar 37:111–121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gurr GM, Liu J, Read DMY et al (2011) Parasitoids of Asian rice planthopper (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) pests and prospects for enhancing biological control by ecological engineering. Ann Appl Biol 158:149–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrison XA, Donaldson L, Correa-Cano ME, Evans J, Fisher DN, Goodwin CED, Robinson BS, Hodgson DJ, Inger R (2018) A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology. PeerJ 6:e4794. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Helsen H, Vaal F, Blommers L (1998) Phenology of the common earwig Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) in an apple orchard. Int J Pest Manag 44:75–79. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horton DR, Lewis TM (2000) Seasonal distribution of Anthocoris spp. and Deraeocoris brevis (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae, Miridae) in orchard and non-orchard habitats of Central Washington. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:476–485.;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Howard LO (1929) Aphelinus Mali and its travels. Ann Entomol Soc Am 22:341–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lamb RJ, Wellington WG (1975) Life history and population characteristics of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), at Vancouver, British Columbia. Can Entomol 107:819–824. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol 45:175–201. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lavandero B, Wratten S, Hagler J, Jervis M (2004) The need for effective marking and tracking techniques for monitoring the movements of insect predators and parasitoids. Int J Pest Manag 50:147–151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lavandero B, Wratten S, Shishehbor P, Worner S (2005) Enhancing the effectiveness of the parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum (Helen): movement after use of nectar in the field. Biol Control 34:152–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lavandero B, Figueroa CC, Franck P, Mendez A (2011) Estimating gene flow between refuges and crops: a case study of the biological control of Eriosoma lanigerum by Aphelinus mali in apple orchards. PLoS ONE 6:e26694. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Leroy P, Capella Q, Haubruge E (2009) L’impact du miellat de puceron au niveau des relations tritrophiques entre les plantes-hôtes, les insectes ravageurs et leurs ennemis naturels. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 13:325–334Google Scholar
  37. Letourneau DK, Jedlicka JA, Bothwell SG, Moreno CR (2009) Effects of natural enemy biodiversity on the suppression of arthropod herbivores in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:573–592. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Letourneau DK, Allen SGB, Kula RR et al (2015) Habitat eradication and cropland intensification may reduce parasitoid diversity and natural pest control services in annual crop fields. Elem Sci Anth 3:000069. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lordan J, Alegre S, Gatius F et al (2015a) Woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum Hausmann ecology and its relationship with climatic variables and natural enemies in Mediterranean areas. Bull Entomol Res 105:60–69. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lordan J, Alegre S, Moerkens R et al (2015b) Phenology and interspecific association of Forficula auricularia and Forficula pubescens in apple orchards. Span J Agric Res 13:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mehrnejad MR, Copland MJW (2006) Behavioral responses of the parasitoid Psyllaephagus pistaciae (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) to host plant volatiles and honeydew. Entomol Sci 9:31–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miliczky ER, Horton DR (2005) Densities of beneficial arthropods within pear and apple orchards affected by distance from adjacent native habitat and association of natural enemies with extra-orchard host plants. Biol Control 33:249–259. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miliczky E, Horton DR (2007) Natural enemy fauna (Insecta, Araneae) found on native sagebrush steppe plants in eastern Washington with reference to species also found in adjacent apple and pear orchards. Pan-Pac Entomol 83:50–65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moerkens R, Leirs H, Peusens G, Gobin B (2009) Are populations of European earwigs, Forficula auricularia, density dependent? Entomol Exp Appl 130:198–206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mols PJM, Boers JM (2001) Comparison of a Canadian and a Dutch strain of the parasitoid Aphelinus mali (Hald) (Hym., Aphelinidae) for control of woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum (Haussmann) (Hom., Aphididae) in the Netherlands: a simulation approach. J Appl Entomol 125:255–262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nicholas AH, Spooner-Hart RN, Vickers RA (2005) Abundance and natural control of the woolly aphid Eriosoma lanigerum in an Australian apple orchard IPM program. Biocontrol 50:271–291. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ortiz-Martínez SA, Ramírez CC, Lavandero B (2013) Host acceptance behavior of the parasitoid Aphelinus mali and its aphid-host Eriosoma lanigerum on two Rosaceae plant species. J Pest Sci 86:659–667. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pan W (2001) Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics 57:120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Computer programme. Accessed 5 Oct 2018
  51. Rand TA, Tylianakis JM, Tscharntke T (2006) Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. Ecol Lett 9:603–614. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Raymond L, Ortiz-Martínez SA, Lavandero B (2015) Temporal variability of aphid biological control in contrasting landscape contexts. Biol Control 90:148–156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rega C, Bartual AM, Bocci G et al (2018) A pan-European model of landscape potential to support natural pest control services. Ecol Indic 90:653–664. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rojas S (2005) Control biológico de plagas en Chile: historia y avances. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA), Ministerio de Agricultura, Gobierno de Chile, ChileGoogle Scholar
  55. Schmidt MH, Tscharntke T (2005) The role of perennial habitats for Central European farmland spiders. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:235–242. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Short BD, Bergh JC (2004) Feeding and egg distribution studies of Heringia calcarata (Diptera: Syrphidae), a specialized predator of woolly apple aphid (Homoptera: Eriosomatidae) in Virginia apple orchards. J Econ Entomol 97:813–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simon S, Bouvier JC, Debras JF, Sauphanor B (2010) Biodiversity and pest management in orchard systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:139–152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Soler R, Harvey JA, Kamp AFD et al (2007) Root herbivores influence the behaviour of an aboveground parasitoid through changes in plant-volatile signals. Oikos 116:367–376. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Symondson WOC, Sunderland KD, Greenstone MH (2002) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annu Rev Entomol 47:561–594. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A et al (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity: ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tylianakis JM, Didham RK, Wratten SD (2004) Improved fitness of aphid parasitoids receiving resource subsidies. Ecology 85:658–666. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Veres A, Petit S, Conord C, Lavigne C (2013) Does landscape composition affect pest abundance and their control by natural enemies? A review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 166:110–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wearing CH, Attfield BA, Colhoun K (2010) Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 38:255–273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. White AJ, Wratten SD, Berry NA, Weigmann U (1995) Habitat manipulation to enhance biological control of Brassica pests by hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae). J Econ Entomol 88:1171–1176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Woltz JM, Isaacs R, Landis DA (2012) Landscape structure and habitat management differentially influence insect natural enemies in an agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 152:40–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou H, Yu Y, Tan X et al (2014) Biological control of insect pests in apple orchards in China. Biol Control 68:47–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ et al (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratorio de Control Biológico, Instituto de Ciencias BiológicasUniversidad de TalcaTalcaChile

Personalised recommendations