Advertisement

Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 315–327 | Cite as

Kaolin nano-powder effect on insect attachment ability

  • Gianandrea Salerno
  • Manuela ReboraEmail author
  • Alexander Kovalev
  • Elena Gorb
  • Stanislav Gorb
Original Paper
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

The present study investigates under controlled conditions the effect of kaolin particle film on reduction of insect attachment ability. Two economically important polyphagous insect pests characterized by different attachment devices were tested, the Southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) and the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). We performed traction force experiments with females pulling on treated (covered with kaolin particle film) and untreated (control) natural (leaf surfaces with different morphological traits) and artificial (hydrophilic and hydrophobic glass) surfaces. The data demonstrated that insect adhesion is heavily affected by kaolin particle film in both tested species. The degree of reduction of insect adhesion to the treated substrates compared with the untreated ones differed according to the kind of treated substrate owing to its initial wettability and morphology (presence of trichomes). To unravel the insect adhesion reduction mechanism of kaolin particle film, we evaluated the safety factor for females before and after walking on treated surfaces and analyzed under cryo-SEM the tarsal attachment devices of N. viridula and C. capitata after walking on treated surfaces. We observed contamination by the kaolin nanoflakes in both the smooth pads of the bug and the hairy pads of the fly. The present study can help to better understand the mechanism of action of kaolin particle film and can contribute to develop future physical control barriers against pest insects, particularly relevant owing to the need to reduce the negative impacts of pesticides on environment and human health.

Keywords

Particle film Natural product Bioadhesion Friction Southern green stink bug Mediterranean fruit fly 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Prof. Patrizia Sacchetti (Dipartimento di Scienze Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell’Ambiente, University of Firenze) for providing C. capitata and to Sementi Rosi S.R.L. for providing kaolin powder.

Funding

This study was funded by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology, EMBA COST Action CA15216, STSM Grant (ECOST-STSM-CA15216-41582).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Aschenbrenner A-K, Horakh S, Spring O (2013) Linear glandular trichomes of Helianthus (Asteraceae): morphology, localization, metabolite activity and occurrence. AoB Plants 5:plt028.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plt028 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkin DSJ, Hamilton RJ (1982) The effects of plant waxes on insects. J Nat Prod 45:694–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker JE, Fulton A, Evans KA, Powel G (2006) The effects of kaolin particle film on Plutella xylostella behaviour and development. Pest Manag Sci 62:498–504.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1191 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bostanian NJ, Racette G (2008) Particle film for managing arthropod pests. J Econ Entomol 101:145–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavalloro R, Girolami V (1969) Miglioramenti nell’allevamento in massa di Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann (Diptera, Trypetidae). Redia 51:315–327Google Scholar
  6. Cottrell TE, Wood BW, Reilly CC (2002) Particle film affects black pecan aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) on pecan. J Econ Entomol 95:782–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Aquino S, Cocco A, Ortu S, Schirra M (2011) Effects of kaolin-based particle film to control Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) infestations and postharvest decay in citrus and stone fruit. Crop Prot 30:1079–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniel C, Pfammatter W, Kehrli P, Wyss E (2005) Processed Kaolin as an alternative insecticide against the European pear sucker, Cacopsylla pyri (L.). J App Ent 129:363–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaume L, Gorb SN, Rowe N (2002) Function of epidermal surfaces in the trapping efficiency of Nepenthes alata pitchers. New Phytol 156:479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gindaba J, Wand SJE (2007) Do fruit sunburn control measures affect leaf photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in ‘Royal Gala’ apple? Environ Exp Bot 59:160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glenn DM, Puterka GJ (2005) Particle films: a new technology for agriculture. Hort Rev 31:1–44Google Scholar
  12. Glenn DM, Puterka GJ, Vanderzswet T, Byers RE, Feldhake C (1999) Hydrophobic particle films: a new paradigm for suppression of arthropod pests and plant diseases. J Econ Entomol 92:759–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glenn DM, Prado E, Erez A, McFerson J, Puterka GJ (2002) A reflective, processed-kaolin particle film affects fruit temperature, radiation reflection, and solar injury in apple. J Am Soc Hort Sci 127:188–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorb SN (2001) Attachment devices of insect cuticle. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2002) Attachment ability of the beetle Chrysolina fastuosa on various plant surfaces. Entomol Exp Appl 105:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2009) Functional surfaces in the pitcher of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata: a cryo-SEM approach. In: Gorb SN (ed) Functional surfaces in biology—adhesion related phenomena, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 205–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2013) Anti-adhesive surfaces in plants and their biomimetic potential. In: Fratzl P, Dunlop JWC, Weinkamer R (eds) Materials design inspired by nature: function through inner architecture. Royal Society of Chemistry, London, pp 282–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gorb EV, Kastner V, Peressadko A, Arzt E, Gaume L, Rowe N, Gorb SN (2004) Structure and properties of the glandular surface in the digestive zone of the pitcher in the carnivorous plant Nepenthes ventrata and its role in insect trapping and retention. J Exp Biol 207:2947–2963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorb EV, Voigt D, Eienbrode SD, Gorb SN (2008) Attachment force of the beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) on leaflet surfaces of mutants of the pea Pisum sativum (Fabaceae) with regular and reduced wax coverage. Arthropod Plant Interact 2:247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gorb EV, Hosoda N, Miksch C, Gorb SN (2010) Slippery pores: anti-adhesive effect of nanoporous substrates on the beetle attachment system. J Royal Soc Interface 7:1571–1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gorb EV, Purtov J, Gorb SN (2014) Adhesion force measurements on the two wax layers of the waxy zone in Nepenthes alata pitchers. Sci Rep 4:5154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorb EV, Hofmann P, Filippov AE, Gorb SN (2017) Oil adsorption ability of three dimensional epicuticular wax coverages in plants. Sci Rep 7:45483CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorb EV, Lemke W, Gorb SN (2019) Porous substrate affects a subsequent attachment ability of the beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). J R Soc Interface 16:20180696.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0696 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Granchietti A, Sacchetti P, Rosi MC, Belcari A (2012) Fruit fly larval trail acts as a cue in the host location process of the pupal parasitoid Coptera occidentalis. Biol Control 61:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jifon JL, Syvertsen JP (2003) Kaolin particle film applications can increase photosyntesis and water use efficiency of “Ruby Red” grapefruit leaves. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katsoyannos BI (1987) Response to shape, size and colour. In: Robinson AS, Hooper G (eds) Fruit flies: their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 307–321Google Scholar
  27. Knight AL, Unruh TR, Christianson BA, Puterka GJ, Glenn DM (2000) Effects of kaolin-based particle films on oblique banded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) (Lepidoptera Tortricidae). J Econ Ent 93:744–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kovalev A, Filippov AE, Gorb SN (2018) Critical roughness in animal hairy adhesive pads: a numerical modeling approach. Bioinspir Biomim 13:066004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lalancette N, Belding RD, Shearer PW, Frecon JL, Tietjen WH (2005) Evaluation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic kaolin particle films for peach crop, arthropod and disease management. Pest Manag Sci 61:25–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lapointe SL, Mckenzie CL, Hall DG (2006) Reduced oviposition by Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and growth enhancement of citrus by Surround particle film. J Econ Entomol 99:109–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lo Verde G, Caleca V, Lo Verde V (2011) The use of kaolin to control Ceratitis capitata in organic citrus groves. B Insectol 64:127–134Google Scholar
  32. Mazor M, Erez A (2004) Processed kaolin protects fruits from Mediterranean fruit fly infestations. Crop Prot 23:47–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(03)00169-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Melgarejo P, Martínez JJ, Hernández F, Martínez-Font R, Barrows P, Erez A (2004) Kaolin treatment to reduce pomegranate sunburn. Sci Hortic 100:349–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nateghi MF, Paknejad F, Moarefi M (2013) Effect of concentrations and time of kaolin spraying on wheat aphid. J Biol Environ Sci 7:163–168Google Scholar
  35. Pascual SN, Cobos G, Seris E, González-Núñez M (2009) Effects of processed kaolin on pests and non-target arthropods in a Spanish olive grove. J Pest Sci 83:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peisker H, Heepe L, Kovalev AE, Gorb SN (2014) Comparative study of the fluid viscosity in tarsal hairy attachment systems of flies and beetles. J R Soc Interface 11:20140752.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0752 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Peressadko AG, Gorb SN (2004) Surface profile and friction force generated by insects. In: Boblan I, Bannasch R (eds) First international industrial conference Bionik, 2004. Hannover Messe, HannoveGoogle Scholar
  38. Puterka GJ, Glenn DM, Sekutowski DG, Unruh TR, Jones SK (2000) Progress toward liquid formulations of particle films for insect and disease control in pear. Environ Entomol 29:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Puterka GJ, Glenn DM, Pluta RC (2005) Action of particle films on the biology and behavior of pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae). J Econ Entomol 98:2079–2088CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rebora M, Michels J, Salerno G, Heepe L, Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2018) Tarsal attachment devices of the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J Morphol 279:660–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Salerno G, Rebora M, Gorb EV, Kovalev A, Gorb SN (2017) Attachment ability of the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J Comp Physiol A 203:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salerno G, Rebora M, Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2018a) Attachment ability of the polyphagous bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) to different host plant surfaces. Sci Rep 8:10975CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Salerno G, Rebora M, Kovalev A, Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2018b) Contribution of different tarsal attachment devices to the overall attachment ability of the stink bug Nezara viridula. J Comp Physiol A 204:627–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salerno G, Rebora M, Piersanti S, Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2019) Mechanical ecology of fruit-insect adhesion in the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Pest Sci (submitted) Google Scholar
  45. Saour G (2005) Morphological assessment of olive seedlings treated with kaolin-based particle film and biostimulant. Adv Hortic Sci 19:193–197Google Scholar
  46. Saour G, Makee H (2004) A kaolin-based particle film for suppression of the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae Gmelin (Dip., Tephritidae) in olive groves. J Appl Entomol 128:28–31.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2003.00803.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Scholz I, Bückins L, Dolge L, Erlinghagen T, Weth A, Hischen F, Mayer J, Hoffmann S, Riederer M, Riedel M, Baumgartner W (2010) Slippery surfaces of pitcher plants: Nepenthes wax crystals minimize insect attachment via microscopic surface roughness. J Exp Biol 213:1115–1125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Silva CAD, Ramalho FS (2013) Kaolin spraying protects cotton plants against damages by boll weevil Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Pest Sci 86:563–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1998) Biometry. W.E. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Southwood R (1986) Plant surfaces and insects: an overview. In: Juniper B, Southwood R (eds) Insects and the plant surface. Edward Arnold Ltd, London, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  52. StatSoft Inc (2001) Statistica (data analysis software system), version 6. StatSoft Italia S.R.L., VigonzaGoogle Scholar
  53. Stork NE (1980) Experimental analysis of adhesion of Chrysolina polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a variety of surfaces. J Exp Biol 88:91–108Google Scholar
  54. Tacoli F, Mori N, Pozzebon A, Cargnus E, Da Vià S, Zandigiacomo P, Duso C, Pavan F (2017a) Control of Scaphoideus titanus with natural products in organic vineyards. Insects 8:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8040129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tacoli F, Pavan F, Cargnus E, Tilatti E, Pozzebon A, Zandigiacomo P (2017b) Efficacy and mode of action of kaolin in the control of Empoasca vitis and Zygina rhamni (Hemiptera: Cicadellide) in vineyards. J Econ Entomol 110:1164–1178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tacoli F, Cargnus E, Kiaeian Moosavi F, Zandigiacomo P, Pavan F (2019) Efficacy and mode of action of kaolin and its interaction with bunch-zone leaf removal against Lobesia botrana on grapevines. J Pest Sci 92:465–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Unruh TR, Knight AL, Upton J, Glenn DM, Puterka GJ (2000) Particle films for suppression of the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple and pear orchards. J Econ Entomol 93:737–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Villanueva RT, Walgenbach JF (2007) Phenology, management and effects of Surround on behavior of the apple maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae) in North Carolina. Crop Prot 26:1404–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vincent C, Hallman G, Panneton B, Fleurat-Lessard F (2003) Management of agricultural insects with physical control methods. Annu Rev Entomol 48:261–281.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112639 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Voigt D, Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2007) Plant surface—bug interactions: Dicyphus errans stalking along trichomes. Arthropod Plant Interact 1:221–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Voigt D, Schuppert JM, Dattinger S, Gorb SN (2008) Sexual dimorphism in the attachment ability of the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to rough substrates. J Insect Physiol 54:765–776CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wolff JO, Gorb SN (2012) Surface roughness effects on attachment ability of the spider Philodromus dispar (Araneae, Philodromidae). J Exp Biol 215:179–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhou Y, Robinson A, Steiner U, Federle W (2014) Insect adhesion on rough surfaces: analysis of adhesive contact of smooth and hairy pads on transparent microstructured substrates. J R Soc Interface 11:20140499CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Zurek DB, Gorb SN, Voigt D (2017) Changes in tarsal morphology and attachment ability to rough surfaces during ontogenesis in the beetle Gastrophysa viridula (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Arthropod Struct Dev 46:130–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e AmbientaliUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Chimica, Biologia e BiotecnologieUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological InstituteKiel UniversityKielGermany

Personalised recommendations