Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 251–260 | Cite as

Plant fertilization helps plants to compensate for aphid damage, positively affects predator efficiency and improves canola yield

  • Farnoush Fallahpour
  • Reza Ghorbani
  • Mehdi Nassiri-MahallatiEmail author
  • Mojtaba Hosseini
Original Paper


Fertilizers utilization does not only play an important role in increasing the crop yield, but also they may influence the plant nutritional quality, thereby it affects the ecological interactions between herbivores and their natural enemies. In a field study, the effect of nitrogen fertilization (0, 75, 150 and 225 kg N ha−1) on population of mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and predatory gall midge, Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), in canola (Brassica napus L.), as well as their interactive impact on the plant yield was investigated. The population of aphid and predator were positively affected by nitrogen fertilization; the maximum abundances of which were observed in plants with 150 and 225 kg N ha−1 applied. However, predator to prey ratio was lower in the highest N level in comparison with the moderate level. The maximum suppression of the aphid by the predator was also observed in the moderate N level. The interactive effect of nitrogen fertilizing and the predator presence positively influenced the canola grain yield. The lowest yield losses due to aphid infestation were observed in plants fertilized with 150 kg N ha−1 in the presence of the predator. In this fertilization level, the plants could compensate the aphid damage more than the other treatment levels; hence, they produced significantly more grain yield. These findings indicate that adequate plant nutrition can help plants compensate for aphid damage and also positively affect the predator efficiency, leading to an improvement in the canola yield.


Biological control Gall midge Mustard aphid Nitrogen fertilization Predator efficiency Tritrophic interactions 



This study was financially supported by the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran (Grant Number 3/20623).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures were approved by the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Research Ethics Charter, The Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran: 2575803/2012).


  1. Aqueel MA, Collins CM, Raza AM, Shehbaz M, Tariq M, Leather SR (2014) Effect of plant nutrition on aphid size, prey consumption and life history characteristics of green lacewing. Insect Sci 21(1):74–82CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Aslam M, Razaq M, Maalik A (2004) Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on population of mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi Kalt.) on different canola varieties. PJ Entomol 26:115–119Google Scholar
  3. Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlog P, Grzebisz W (2004) Effect of timing and nitrogen fertilizer application on winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.).I-growth dynamics and seed yield. J Agron Crop Sci 190:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman & Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blazhevski S, Kalaitzaki AP, Tsagkarakis AE (2018) Impact of nitrogen and potassium fertilization regimes on the biology of the tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta. Entomol Gen 37(2):157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blümel S (2004) Biological control of aphids on vegetable crops. In: Heinz KM, Van Driesche RG, Parrella MP (eds) Biocontrol in protected culture. Ball Publishing, Batavia, pp 297–312Google Scholar
  8. Bouchet AS, Laperche A, Bissuel-Belaygue C, Snowdon R, Nesi N, Stahl A (2016) Nitrogen use efficiency in rapeseed. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:18–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chau A, Heinz KM, Davies FTJ (2005) Influences of fertilization on Aphis gossypii and insecticide usage. J Appl Entomol 129:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Y, Ruberson JR, Olson DM (2008a) Nitrogen fertilization rate affects feeding, larval performance, and oviposition preference of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, on cotton. Entomol Exp Appl 126:244–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Y, Schmelz EA, Wäckers F, Ruberson JR (2008b) Cotton plant, Gossypium hirsutum L., defense in response to nitrogen fertilization. J Chem Ecol 34(12):1553–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi MY, Roitberg BD, Shani A, Raworth DA, Lee GH (2004) Olfactory response by the aphidophagous gall midge, Aphidoletes aphidimyza to honeydew from green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. Entomol Exp Appl 111:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cineros JJ, Godfrey LD (2001) Midseason pest status of the cotton aphid in California cotton: is nitrogen a key factor. Environ Entomol 30:501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daugherty MP (2011) Host plant quality, spatial heterogeneity, and the stability of mite predator–prey dynamics. Exp Appl Acarol 53:311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daugherty MP, Briggs CJ, Welter SC (2007) Bottom-up and top-down control of pear psylla (Cacopsylla pyricola): fertilization, plant quality, and the efficacy of the predator Anthocoris nemoralis. Biol Control 43:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denno RF, Peterson MA, Gratton C, Cheng J, Langellotto GA, Huberty AF, Finke DL (2000) Feeding induced changes in plant quality mediate interspecific competition between sap-feeding herbivores. Ecology 81:1814–1827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denno RF, Gratton C, Döbel H, Finke DL (2003) Predation risk affects relative strength of top-down and bottom-up impacts on insect herbivores. Ecology 84(4):1032–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Douglas AE (1993) The nutritional quality of phloem sap utilized by natural aphid populations. Ecol Entomol 18:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Douglas AE (2006) Phloem-sap feeding by animals: problems and solutions. J Exp Bot 57:747–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fallahpour F, Hosseini M, Ghorbani R, Nassiri Mahallati M (2013) The effect of canola fertilization on predation and development of Aphidoletes aphidimyza on Lipaphis erysimi. In: Conference of biological control in agriculture and natural resources, University of Tehran, 27–28 Aug 2013Google Scholar
  21. Fallahpour F, Ghorbani R, Nassiri Mahallati M, Hosseini M (2015) Demographic parameters of Lipaphis erysimi on canola cultivars under different nitrogen fertilization regimes. JAST 17:35–47Google Scholar
  22. FAO (Food and Agriculture organizations of the United Nations) (2018) FAOSTAT, agricultural production. Accessed 3 July 2018
  23. Francis F, Haubruge E, Hastir P, Gaspar C (2001) Effect of aphid host plant on development and reproduction of the third trophic level, the predator Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environ Entomol 30:947–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gan Y, Malhi SS, Brandt S, Katepa-Mupondwa F, Stevenson C (2008) Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen uptake of juncea canola under diverse environments. Agron J 100:285–295Google Scholar
  25. Gash AFJ (2012) Wheat nitrogen fertilization effects on the performance of the cereal aphid Metopolophium dirhodum. Agron J 2:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goggin FL (2007) Plant-aphid interactions: molecular and ecological perspectives. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:399–408CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamzei J, Soltani J (2012) Deficit irrigation of rapeseed for water-saving: effects on biomass accumulation, light interception and radiation use efficiency under different N rates. Agric Ecosyst Environ 155:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey JA (2005) Factors affecting the evolution of development strategies in parasitoid wasps: the importance of functional constraints and incorporating complexity. Entomol Exp Appl 117:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hocking PJ, Mason L (1993) Accumulation, distribution and redistribution of dry matter and mineral nutrients in fruits of canola (oilseed rape), and the effects of nitrogen fertilizer and windrowing. Aust J Agric Res 44:1377–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hocking PJ, Randall PJ, De Marco D (1997) The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertilizer: partitioning and mobilization of dry matter and nitrogen, and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crop Res 54:201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hosseini M, Ashouri A, Enkegaard A et al (2010) Plant quality effects on intraguild predation between Orius laevigatus and Aphidoletes aphidimyza. Entomol Exp Appl 135:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hosseini M, Ghorbani R, Nassiri Mahallati M, Fallahpour F (2014) Evaluation the effect of nitrogen fertilization of canola on performance and population growth rate of mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Hem.: Aphididae). Plant Pests Research 3:27–39Google Scholar
  33. Hunter MD, Price PW (1992) Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73:724–732Google Scholar
  34. Jandricic SE, Wraight SP, Gillespie DR, Sanderson JP (2016) Biological control outcomes using the generalist aphid predator Aphidoletes aphidimyza under multi-prey conditions. Insects 7(4):75. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jansson RK, Leibee GL, Sanchez CC, Lecrone SH (1991) Effect of nitrogen and foliar biomass on population parameter of cabbage insects. Entomol Exp Appl 61:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jensen K, Mayntz D, Toft S, Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ (2011) Nutrient regulation in a predator, the wolf spider Pardosa prativaga. Anim Behav 81:993–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kalule T, Wright DJ (2002) Tritrophic interactions between cabbage cultivars with different resistance and fertilizer levels, cruciferous aphids and parasitoids under field conditions. Bull Entomol Res 92:61–69PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Kamkar B, Daneshmand AR, Ghooshchi F, Shiranirad AH, Safahani Langeroudi AR (2011) The effects of irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on some agronomic traits of canola under a semiarid environment. Agric Water Manag 98(6):1005–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karungi J, Kyamanywa S, Ekbom B (2006) Comparison of the effect of market crop wastes and chemical soil fertility amendments on insect pests, natural enemies and yield of Brassica oleracea. Ann Appl Biol 149:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Khajehzadeh Y, Hasany Moghadam M, Baghery S, Keyhanian A (2009) Determination of economic injury level of Lipaphis erysimi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on canola var. Hayola 401 in Khuzestan. JESI 29:23–36Google Scholar
  41. Khajehzadeh Y, Malkeshi SH, Keyhanian AK (2010) Population fluctuation of canola aphids, biology of turnip aphid, Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. and efficiency of its natural enemies in canola fields of Khuzestan. Iran J Plant Prot Sci 41:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirkegaard JA, Spraguea SJ, Lilley JM, Mc Cormickb JI, Virgonab JM, Morrison MJ (2012) Physiological response of spring canola (Brassica napus) to defoliation in diverse environments. Field Crop Res 125:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ma BL, Herath AW (2016) Timing and rates of nitrogen fertilizer application on seed yield, quality and nitrogen-use efficiency of canola. Crop Pasture Sci 67:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malkeshi H, Ahmadi M, Saqaei AM et al (2004) Survey of cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae (L), population fluctuation and its dominant natural enemies. FAO web. Accessed 15 Sept 2018
  45. Malmir M, Shirani Rad AH, Khorgami A, Rashidi S (2013) Evaluation of different levels of nitrogen fertilizer on growth analysis in two springs Canola (B. napus L.). Euro J Exp Bio 3:95–101Google Scholar
  46. Maschinski J, Whitham TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am Nat 134:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Minkenberg OPJM, Fredrix MJJ (1989) Preference and performance of an herbivorous fly, Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae), on tomato plants differing in leaf nitrogen. Anna Entomol Soc Amer 8:350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moon DC, Rossi AM, Stiling P (2000) The effects of a biotical induced changes in host plant quality (and morphology) on a salt marsh plant hopper and its parasitoid. Ecol Entomol 25:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Narjary B, Adak T, Meena MD, Chakravarty NVK (2013) Population dynamics of mustard aphid in relation to humid thermal ratio and growing degree days. JAP 13:39–47Google Scholar
  50. Nevo E, Coll M (2001) Effect of nitrogen fertilization on Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae): variation in size, color, and reproduction. J Econ Entomol 94:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ode PJ (2006) Plant chemistry and natural enemy fitness: effects on herbivore and natural enemy interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 51:163–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ponder KL, Pritchard J, Harrington R, Bale JS (2000) Difficulties in location and acceptance of phloem sap combined with reduced concentration of phloem amino acids explain lowered performance of the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi on nitrogen deficient barley (Hordeum vulgare) seedlings. Entomol Exp Appl 97:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, Mc Pheron BAN, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Price PW, Denno RF, Eubanks MD, Finke DL, Kaplan I (2011) Insect ecology: behavior, populations and communities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rana JS (2009) Performance of Lipaphis erysimi (Homoptera: Aphididae) on different Brassica species in a tropical environment. J Pest Sci 78:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosenheim JA, Harmon JP (2006) The influence of intraguild predation on the suppression of a shared prey population: an empirical reassessment. In: Brodeur J, Boivin G (eds) Trophic and guild interactions in biological control. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  57. Rund RC (1984) Fertilizers. In: Williams S (ed) Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytic chemists, 14th edn. AOAC International, Arlington, pp 8–37Google Scholar
  58. Růžička Z, Havelka J (1998) Effects of oviposition-deterring pheromone and allomones on Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Eur J Entomol 95:211–216Google Scholar
  59. Sarfraz RM, Dosdall LM, Keddie AB (2009a) Bottom-up effects of host plant nutritional quality on Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and top-down effects of herbivore attack on plant compensatory ability. Eur J Entomol 106:583–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sarfraz M, Dosdall LM, Keddie BA (2009b) Host plant nutritional quality affects the performance of the parasitoid Diadegma insulare. Biol Control 51:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. SAS Institute (2013) SAS/ACCESS® 9.4. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  62. Schutz K, Bonkowski M, Scheu S (2008) Effects of Collembola and fertilizers on plant performance (Triticum aestivum) and aphid reproduction (Rhopalosiphum padi). Basic Appl Ecol 9:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sieling K, Kage H (2010) Efficient N management using winter oilseed rape. Agron Sustain Dev 30:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sinha R, Singh B, Rai PK, Kumar A, Jamwal S, Sinha BK (2018) Soil fertility management and its impact on mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Cogent Food Agric 4:1450941. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Staley JT, Girling RD, Stewart-Jones A, Poppy GM, Leather SR, Wright DJ (2011) Organic and conventional fertilizer effects on a tritrophic interaction: parasitism, performance and preference of Cotesia vestalis. J Appl Entomol 135:658–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stara J, Ourednickova J, Kocourek F (2011) Laboratory evaluation of the side effects of insecticides on Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseidae). J Pest Sci 84:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Talpur MA, Khuhro RD (2004) Relative occurrence and abundance of mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) and their predators on Rainbow and Oscar canola varieties. J Asia-Pac Entomol 7(2):215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tharranum M, Singh YP, Kandpal BK, Singh KK, Pandey AC (2017) Forewarning model development for mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi Kalt.) at Bharatpur and Hisar. J Agrometeorol 19:334–341Google Scholar
  69. Turlings TCJ, Benrey B (1998) Effects of plant metabolites on the behavior and development of parasitic wasps. Ecoscience 5:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Emden HF (1966) Studies on the relations of insect and host plant. III. A comparison of the reproduction of Brevicoryne brassicae and Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Brussels sprout plants supplied with different rates of nitrogen and potassium. Entomol Exp Appl 9:444–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van Emden HF, Harrington R (2007) Aphids as crop pests. CAB International, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Venzon M, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2001) Prey preference, intraguild predation and population dynamics of an arthropod food web on plants. Exp Appl Acarol 25:785–808CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Veromann E, Toome M, Kännaste A, Kaasik R, Copolovici L, Flink J, Kovács G, Narits L, Luik A, Niinemets Ü (2013) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on insect pests, their parasitoids, plant diseases and volatile organic compounds in Brassica napus. Crop Prot 43:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vidal MC, Murphy SM (2018) Bottom-up vs. top-down effects on terrestrial insect herbivores: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 21(1):138–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Walters KFA, Young JEB, Kromp B, Cox PD (2003) Management of oilseed rape pests. In: Alford DV (ed) Biocontrol of oilseed rape pests. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, pp 43–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yin W, Tao L, Xiao-kun L, Tao R, Ri-huan C, Jian-wei L (2015) Nutrient deficiency limits population development, yield formation, and nutrient uptake of direct sown winter oilseed rape. J Integr Agric 14(4):670–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zaller JG, Moser D, Drapela T, Schmöger C, Frank T (2009) Parasitism of stem weevils and pollen beetles in winter oilseed rape is differentially affected by crop management and landscape characteristics. Biol Control 54:505–514Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of AgricultureFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran
  2. 2.Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of AgricultureFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations