Eradication and containment of non-native forest insects: successes and failures
The problem of forest insect invasions is intensifying. Non-native forest insects are invading virtually every world region, and many are causing severe ecological and economic impacts. Biosecurity programs provide for intervention at various stages of the invasion process in order to mitigate the invasion problem. While preventing initial arrival of non-native insect species is a sound approach, such prevention is not always possible so additional measures are needed to manage invasions. Surveillance coupled with eradication is a valuable strategy for preventing the establishment of many new and potentially damaging species. Once non-native species are established, containment measures can be implemented to stop or slow the spread of these species in their non-native habitat. Here, we review how eradication and containment can be carried out as strategies for managing forest insect invasions. Several hundred programs have been implemented to eradicate non-native forest insects, with most programs proving successful. The vast majority of these eradication programs were implemented from 1970 onward. Pheromone-baited traps play a key role for detection and delimitation in most successful eradication programs. The isolation and synthesis of pheromones provided a key technology that facilitated forest insect eradications starting in the 1970s. Several examples are provided that illustrate both successful and failed eradication and containment programs. Consideration of historical experiences suggests the conditions that may lead to either success or failure of eradication and containment efforts.
KeywordsBiological invasion Biosecurity Extinction Barrier zone Exclusion Slow the spread
We thank Laura Blackburn for assistance with figures. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their input and the many contributors to the GERDA database.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Brockerhoff EG, Liebhold AM, Richardson B, Suckling DM (2010) Eradication of invasive forest insects: concepts, methods, costs and benefits. N Z J For Sci 40(suppl):S117–S135Google Scholar
- Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2017) “Firewood” http://www.inspection.gc.ca/plants/forestry/don-t-move-firewood/firewood/eng/1330963478693/1330963579986. Accessed 15 Feb 2018
- Davidson H, Mecklenburg R, Peterson C (2000) Nursery management: administration and culture. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- Forbush EH, Fernald CH (1896) The gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (Linn). Wright and Potter, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Hulme PE (2014) An introduction to plant biosecurity: past, present and future. In: Gordh G, McKirdy S (eds) The handbook of plant biosecurity. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–25Google Scholar
- Kean JM, Suckling DM, Sullivan NJ, Tobin PC, Stringer LD, Smith GR, Kimber B, Lee DC, Flores Vargas R, Fletcher J, Macbeth F, McCullough DG, Herms DA et al (2018) Global eradication and response database. http://b3.net.nz/gerda. Accessed 15 Feb 2018
- Liebhold A, Mastro V, Schaefer PW (1989) Learning from the legacy of Leopold Trouvelot. Bull Ent Soc Am 35:20–22Google Scholar
- Marchant KR (2007) Managing the emerald ash borer in Canada. In: Mastro VC, Lance D, Reardon R, Parra G (Compilers), Emerald ash borer research and development meeting, 23–24 October. Pittsburgh, PA. U.S. Department of Agriculture FS, FTET-2007-08Google Scholar
- Poland TM, McCullough DG (2006) Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. J For 104:118–124Google Scholar
- Sharov AA, Liebhold AM (1998a) Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecol Appl 8:833–845Google Scholar
- Sharov AA, Leonard D, Liebhold AM, Roberts EA, Dickerson W (2002) “Slow The Spread”: a national program to contain the gypsy moth. J For 100:30–36Google Scholar
- Suckling DM, Barrington AM, Chhagan A, Stephens AEA, Burnip GM, Charles JG, Wee SL (2007) Eradication of the Australian painted apple moth Teia anartoides in New Zealand: trapping, inherited sterility, and male competitiveness. In: Vreysen MJB, Robinson AS, Hendrichs J (eds) Area-wide control of insect pests. Springer, Cham, pp 603–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar