Advertisement

Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 83–91 | Cite as

Eradication and containment of non-native forest insects: successes and failures

  • Andrew M. LiebholdEmail author
  • John M. Kean
Review

Abstract

The problem of forest insect invasions is intensifying. Non-native forest insects are invading virtually every world region, and many are causing severe ecological and economic impacts. Biosecurity programs provide for intervention at various stages of the invasion process in order to mitigate the invasion problem. While preventing initial arrival of non-native insect species is a sound approach, such prevention is not always possible so additional measures are needed to manage invasions. Surveillance coupled with eradication is a valuable strategy for preventing the establishment of many new and potentially damaging species. Once non-native species are established, containment measures can be implemented to stop or slow the spread of these species in their non-native habitat. Here, we review how eradication and containment can be carried out as strategies for managing forest insect invasions. Several hundred programs have been implemented to eradicate non-native forest insects, with most programs proving successful. The vast majority of these eradication programs were implemented from 1970 onward. Pheromone-baited traps play a key role for detection and delimitation in most successful eradication programs. The isolation and synthesis of pheromones provided a key technology that facilitated forest insect eradications starting in the 1970s. Several examples are provided that illustrate both successful and failed eradication and containment programs. Consideration of historical experiences suggests the conditions that may lead to either success or failure of eradication and containment efforts.

Keywords

Biological invasion Biosecurity Extinction Barrier zone Exclusion Slow the spread 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Laura Blackburn for assistance with figures. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their input and the many contributors to the GERDA database.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Allen E, Noseworthy M, Ormsby M (2017) Phytosanitary measures to reduce the movement of forest pests with the international trade of wood products. Biol Invasions 19:3365–3376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aukema JE, McCullough DG, Von Holle B, Liebhold AM, Britton K, Frankel SJ (2010) Historical accumulation of nonindigenous forest pests in the continental United States. Bioscience 60:886–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aukema JE, Leung B, Kovacs K, Chivers C, Britton KO, Englin J, Frankel SJ, Haight RG, Holmes TP, Liebhold AM, McCullough DG (2011) Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States. PLoS ONE 6(9):e24587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackwood JC, Berec L, Yamanaka T, Epanchin-Niell RS, Hastings A, Liebhold AM (2012) Bioeconomic synergy between tactics for insect eradication in the presence of Allee effects. Proc Roy Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 279:2807–2815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd IL, Freer-Smith PH, Gilligan CA, Godfray HCJ (2013) The consequence of tree pests and diseases for ecosystem services. Science 342:1235773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brockerhoff EG, Liebhold AM (2017) Ecology of forest insect invasions. Biol Invasions 19:3141–3159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brockerhoff EG, Liebhold AM, Richardson B, Suckling DM (2010) Eradication of invasive forest insects: concepts, methods, costs and benefits. N Z J For Sci 40(suppl):S117–S135Google Scholar
  8. Burgman M, Roberts B, Sansford C, Griffin R, Mengersen K (2014) The role of pest risk analysis in plant biosecurity. In: Gordh G, McKirdy S (eds) The handbook of plant biosecurity. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 235–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2017) “Firewood” http://www.inspection.gc.ca/plants/forestry/don-t-move-firewood/firewood/eng/1330963478693/1330963579986. Accessed 15 Feb 2018
  10. Carnegie AJ, Matsuki M, Haugen DA, Hurley BP, Ahumada R, Klasmer P, Sun J, Iede ET (2006) Predicting the potential distribution of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae), a significant exotic pest of Pinus plantations. Ann For Sci 63:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corley JC, Villacide JM, Liebhold A (2014) Can entomophagous nematodes slow the spread of invasive pest populations? The case study of Beddingia siricidicola released for the management of Sirex noctilio. J Pest Sci 87:551–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidson H, Mecklenburg R, Peterson C (2000) Nursery management: administration and culture. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodds KJ, Orwig DA (2011) An invasive urban forest pest invades natural environments—Asian longhorned beetle in northeastern US hardwood forests. Can J For Res 41:1729–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Epanchin-Niell RS (2017) Economics of invasive species policy and management. Biol Invasionsions 19:3333–3354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Epanchin-Niell RS, Liebhold AM (2015) Benefits of invasion prevention: effect of time lags, spread rates, and damage persistence. Ecol Econ 116:146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Epanchin-Niell RS, Haight RG, Berec L, Kean JM, Liebhold AM (2012) Optimal surveillance and eradication of invasive species in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecol Lett 15:803–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forbush EH, Fernald CH (1896) The gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (Linn). Wright and Potter, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Gadgil PD, Bulman LS, Dick MA, Bajn J (2000) Dutch elm disease in New Zealand. In: Dunn CP (ed) The Elms: breeding, conservation, and disease management. Springer, Boston, pp 189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gandhi KJ, Herms DA (2010) Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biol Invasionsions 12:389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haack RA, Hérard F, Sun J, Turgeon JJ (2010) Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: a worldwide perspective. Ann Rev Entomol 55:521–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hajek AE, Tobin PC (2010) Micro-managing arthropod invasions: eradication and control of invasive arthropods with microbes. Biol Invasions 12:2895–2912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herms DA, McCullough DG (2014) Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Ann Rev Entomol 59:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hilker FM, Lewis MA, Seno H, Langlais M, Malchow H (2005) Pathogens can slow down or reverse invasion fronts of their hosts. Biol Invasionsions 7:817–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hulme PE (2014) An introduction to plant biosecurity: past, present and future. In: Gordh G, McKirdy S (eds) The handbook of plant biosecurity. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  25. Javal M, Roques A, Haran J, Hérard F, Keena M, Roux G (2018) Complex invasion history of the Asian long-horned beetle: fifteen years after first detection in Europe. J Pest Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s1034 Google Scholar
  26. Kean JM, Suckling DM, Sullivan NJ, Tobin PC, Stringer LD, Smith GR, Kimber B, Lee DC, Flores Vargas R, Fletcher J, Macbeth F, McCullough DG, Herms DA et al (2018) Global eradication and response database. http://b3.net.nz/gerda. Accessed 15 Feb 2018
  27. Kovacs KF, Mercader RJ, Haight RG, Siegert NW, McCullough DG, Liebhold AM (2011) The influence of satellite populations of emerald ash borer on projected economic costs in US communities, 2010–2020. J Environ Manag 92:2170–2181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kramer AM, Berec L, Drake JM (2018) Allee effects in ecology and evolution. J Anim Ecol 87:7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lande R (1998) Demographic stochasticity and Allee effect on a scale with isotropic noise. Oikos 83:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis MA, Lamberti G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc Roy Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 269:2407–2413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liebhold A, Bascompte J (2003) The Allee effect, stochastic dynamics and the eradication of alien species. Ecol Lett 6:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liebhold AM, Tobin PC (2008) Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annu Rev Entomol 53:387–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liebhold A, Mastro V, Schaefer PW (1989) Learning from the legacy of Leopold Trouvelot. Bull Ent Soc Am 35:20–22Google Scholar
  34. Liebhold AM, Berec L, Brockerhoff EG, Epanchin-Niell RS, Hastings A, Herms DA, Kean JM, McCullough DG, Suckling DM, Tobin PC, Yamanaka T (2016) Eradication of invading insect populations: from concepts to applications. Annu Rev Entomol 61:335–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liebhold AM, Brockerhoff EG, Kalisz S, Nuñez MA, Wardle DA, Wingfield MJ (2017) Biological invasions in forest ecosystems. Biol Invasions 19:3437–3458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Linderman N (2013) Subjectivized knowledge and grassroots advocacy: An analysis of an environmental controversy in Northern California. J Buss Tech Commun 27:62–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marchant KR (2007) Managing the emerald ash borer in Canada. In: Mastro VC, Lance D, Reardon R, Parra G (Compilers), Emerald ash borer research and development meeting, 23–24 October. Pittsburgh, PA. U.S. Department of Agriculture FS, FTET-2007-08Google Scholar
  38. Maynard GV, Hamilton JG, Grimshaw JF (2004) Quarantine-Phytosanitary, sanitary and incursion management: an Australian entomological perspective. Aust Entomol 43:318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCullough DG, Mercader RJ, Siegert NW (2015) Developing and integrating tactics to slow ash (Oleaceae) mortality caused by emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Can Entomol 147:349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McKnight TL (1969) Barrier fencing for vermin control in Australia. Geog Rev 59:330–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mercader RJ, McCullough DG, Storer AJ, Bedford JM, Heyd R, Poland TM, Katovich S (2015) Evaluation of the potential use of a systemic insecticide and girdled trees in area wide management of the emerald ash borer. For Ecol Manag 350:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Olson LJ, Roy S (2002) The economics of controlling a stochastic biological invasion. Am J Agric Econ 84:1311–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paap T, Burgess TI, Wingfield MJ (2017) Urban trees: bridge-heads for forest pest invasions and sentinels for early detection. Biol Invasions 19:3515–3526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Poland TM, McCullough DG (2006) Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. J For 104:118–124Google Scholar
  45. Roques A, Rabitsch W, Rasplus J-Y et al (2009) Alien terrestrial invertebrates of Europe. In: Nentwig W, Hulme P, Pysek P, Vila M (eds) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 63–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sharov AA, Liebhold AM (1998a) Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecol Appl 8:833–845Google Scholar
  47. Sharov AA, Liebhold AM (1998b) Model of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecol Appl 8:1170–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharov AA, Leonard D, Liebhold AM, Roberts EA, Dickerson W (2002) “Slow The Spread”: a national program to contain the gypsy moth. J For 100:30–36Google Scholar
  49. Shigesada N, Kawasaki K, Takeda Y (1995) Modeling stratified diffusion in biological invasions. Am Nat 146:229–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Siegert NW, McCullough DG, Liebhold AM, Telewski FW (2014) Dendrochronological reconstruction of the epicentre and early spread of emerald ash borer in North America. Divers Distrib 20:847–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Silk P, Ryall K (2015) Semiochemistry and chemical ecology of the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Can Entomol 147:277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suckling DM, Barrington AM, Chhagan A, Stephens AEA, Burnip GM, Charles JG, Wee SL (2007) Eradication of the Australian painted apple moth Teia anartoides in New Zealand: trapping, inherited sterility, and male competitiveness. In: Vreysen MJB, Robinson AS, Hendrichs J (eds) Area-wide control of insect pests. Springer, Cham, pp 603–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suckling DM, Stringer LD, Stephens AE, Woods B, Williams DG, Baker G, El-Sayed AM (2014a) From integrated pest management to integrated pest eradication: technologies and future needs. Pest Manag Sci 70:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Suckling DM, Stringer LD, Baird DB, Butler RC, Sullivan TES, Lance DR, Simmons GS (2014b) Light brown apple moth (Epiphyas postvittana)(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) colonization of California. Biol Invasions 16:1851–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tobin PC, Bai BB, Eggen DA, Leonard DS (2012) The ecology, geopolitics, and economics of managing Lymantria dispar in the United States. Inter J Pest Manag 58:195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tobin PC, Kean JM, Suckling DM, McCullough DG, Herms DA, Stringer LD (2014) Determinants of successful arthropod eradication programs. Biol Invas 16:401–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yamanaka T, Liebhold AM (2009) Spatially implicit approaches to understand the manipulation of mating success for insect invasion management. Popul Ecol 51:427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.US Forest Service Northern Research StationMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.AgResearch LimitedHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations