Advertisement

Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 299–308 | Cite as

Trap deployment along linear transects perpendicular to forest edges: impact on capture of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

  • Jeremy AllisonEmail author
  • Brian Strom
  • Jon Sweeney
  • Peter Mayo
Original Paper

Abstract

Forests provide important ecosystem services, and the need for these services is expected to increase. Although disturbances are often important components of management plans for forest ecosystems, management efforts often target the prevention and mitigation of disturbances that threaten these services. Exotic insects are an increasingly important disturbance agent in terms of ecological and economic impacts, particularly large woodborers in the family Cerambycidae. Semiochemical-baited traps are important components of management programs. This study looked at the effect of trap location along a horizontal edge—forest gradient with traps deployed in forest clearings adjacent to forests, at the forest—clearing edge and in the forest. Nine species were captured in high enough numbers for analysis, and significant effects of trap location relative to the edge were observed in all but one. Three patterns of edge effects were observed. In general, Acmaeops proteus proteus (Kirby) was more abundant at the edge than in the forest interior; male and female Monochamus mutator LeConte and Monochamus scutellatus (Say) were more abundant in the clearing adjacent to the forest than in the forest; and Anelaphus pumilus (Newman), Euderces pini (Fabricius), Neoclytus acuminatus (Fabricius), male and female Monochamus carolinensis (Olivier) and female Monochamus titillator (Fabricius) were more abundant in the forest than the adjacent clearing. These results demonstrate that non-targeted surveys for Cerambycidae should deploy traps in multiple locations along the forest edge-interior gradient and that taxa-specific surveys should be developed based on knowledge of how this gradient impacts trap performance.

Keywords

Woodborer Pest management Survey and detection Sampling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Natural Resources Canada, the US Department of Agriculture—Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture—Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service—Plant Protection Quarantine, and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. The authors thank Nick Boyonoski, Isabelle Ochoa, Matt Cloud, Karen Reed and Steven Walters for field assistance and processing and identification of insects in the laboratory, and Deepa Abeysekara for work on the synthesis of the syn-2,3-hexanediols.

Funding

This work was supported in part by funding from Natural Resources Canada, the US Department of Agriculture—Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture—Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service—Plant Protection Quarantine, and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Allison JD, Redak RA (2017) The impact of trap type and design features on survey and detection of bark and woodboring beetles and their associates: a review and meta-analysis. Ann Rev Entomol 62:127–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison JD, Borden JH, McIntosh RL, de Groot P, Gries R (2001) Kairomonal responses by four Monochamus species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to bark beetle pheromones. J Chem Ecol 27:633–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison JD, Morewood WD, Borden JH, Hein KE, Wilson IM (2003) Differential bioactivity of Ips and Dendroctonus pheromone components for Monochamus clamator and M. scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environ Entomol 32:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison JD, Borden JH, Seybold SJ (2004) A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). Chemoecology 14:123–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allison JD, Johnson CW, Meeker JR, Strom BL, Butler SM (2011) Effect of aerosol surface lubricants on the abundance and richness of selected forest insects captured in multiple-funnel and panel traps. J Econ Entomol 104:1258–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allison JD, McKenney JL, Millar JG, McElfresh JS, Mitchell RF, Hanks LM (2012) Response of the woodborers Monochamus carolinensis and Monochamus titillator (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to known cerambycid pheromones in the presence and absence of the host plant volatile α-pinene. Environ Entomol 41:1587–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Allison JD, McKenney JL, Miller DR, Gimmel ML (2013) Kairomonal responses of natural enemies and associates of the southern Ips (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to ipsdienol, ipsenol and cis-verbenol. J Insect Behav 26:321–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Allison JD, Bhandari BD, McKenney JL, Millar JG (2014) Design factors that influence the performance of flight intercept traps for the capture of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) from the subfamilies Lamiinae and Cerambycinae. PLoS ONE 9:e93203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Allison JD, Graham EE, Poland TM, Strom BL (2016) Dilution of fluon before trap surface treatment has no effect on longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) captures. J Econ Entomol 109:1215–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aukema JE, McCullough DG, von Holle B, Liebhold AM, Britton K, Frankel SJ (2010) Historical accumulation of nonindigenous forest pests in the continental United States. Bioscience 60:886–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Aukema JE, Leung B, Kovacs K, Chivers C, Britton KO, Englin J, Frankel SJ, Haight RG, Holmes TP, Liebhold AM, McCullough DG, von Holle B (2011) Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States. PLoS ONE 6:e24587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balmford A, Green MJB, Murray G (1996a) Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness. I. Regional tests. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1571–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Balmford A, Jayasuriya HM, Green MJB (1996b) Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness. II. Local applications. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1571–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bedford SE, Usher MB (1994) Distribution of arthropod species across the margins of farm woodlands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 48:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boone CK, Sweeney J, Silk P, Hughes C, Webster RP, Stephen F, Maclauchlan L, Bentz B, Drumont A, Zhao B, Berkvens N, Casteels H, Gregoire JC (2018) Monochamus species from different continents can be effectively detected with the same trapping protocol. J Pest Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-0954-4 Google Scholar
  16. Boyd IL, Freer-Smith PH, Gilligan CA, Godfray HCJ (2013) The consequence of tree pests and diseases for ecosystem services. Science 342:1235773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buse A, Good JEG (1993) The effects of conifer forest design and management on abundance and diversity of rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae): implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 64:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Constanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hanna B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystems services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis AJ, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Wood S (1998) Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391:783–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deans AM, Malcolm JR, Smith SM, Bellocq MI (2005) Edge effects and the responses of aerial insect assemblages to structural-retention harvesting in Canadian boreal peatland forests. For Ecol Manag 204:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dodds KJ (2011) Effects of habitat type and trap placement on captures of bark (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and longhorned (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) beetles in semiochemical-baited traps. J Econ Entomol 104:879–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dodds KJ (2014) Effect of trap height on captures of arboreal insects in pine stands of northeastern United States of America. Can Entomol 146:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dodds KJ, Allison JD, Miller DR, Hanavan RP, Sweeney J (2015) Considering species richness and rarity when selecting optimal survey traps: Comparisons of semiochemical baited flight intercept traps for Cerambycidae in eastern North America. Agric For Entomol 17:36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunn E, Hough-Goldstein J, Hanks LM, Millar JG, D’Amico V (2016) Range of attraction of pheromone lures and dispersal behavior of cerambycid beetles. Ann Entomol Soc Am 109:872–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fetcher N, Oberbauer SF, Strain BR (1985) Vegetation effects on microclimate in lowland tropical forest in Costa Rica. Int J Biometeorol 29:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gandhi JKJ, Herms DA (2010a) Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biol Invasions 12:389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gandhi JKJ, Herms DA (2010b) North American arthropods at risk due to widespread Fraxinus mortality caused by the alien emerald ash borer. Biol Invasions 12:1839–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graham EE, Poland TM (2012) Efficacy of fluon conditioning for capturing cerambycid beetles in different trap designs and persistence on panel traps over time. J Econ Entomol 105:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Graham EE, Mitchell PF, Reagel PF, Barbour JD, Millar JG, Hanks LM (2010) Treating panel traps with a fluoropolymer enhances their efficiency in capturing cerambycid beetles. J Econ Entomol 103:641–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham EE, Poland TM, McCullough DG, Millar JG (2012) A comparison of trap type and height for capturing cerambycid beetles (Coleoptera). J Econ Entomol 105:837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grove SJ (2002) Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guimarães C, Viana J, Cornelissen T (2014) A meta-analysis of the effects of fragmentation on herbivorous insects. Environ Entomol 43:537–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hanks LM, Millar JG (2016) Sex and aggregation-sex pheromones of cerambycid beetles: basic science and practical applications. J Chem Ecol 42:631–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harman DM, Harman AL (1987) Distribution pattern of adult locust borers, (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on nearby goldenrod, Solidago spp. (Asteraceae), at a forest-field edge. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 89:706–710Google Scholar
  36. Jokimäki J, Huhta E, Itämies J, Rahko P (1998) Distribution of arthropods in relation to forest patch size, edge, and stand characteristics. Can J For Res 28:1068–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li Y, Meng Q, Silk P, Gao W, Mayo P, Sweeney J (2017) Effect of semiochemicals and trap height on catch of Neocerambyx raddei in Jilin province, China. Entomol Exp Appl 164:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liebhold AM, Bascompte J (2003) The Allee effect, stochastic dynamics and the eradication of alien species. Ecol Lett 6:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liebhold AM, Tobin PC (2008) Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Ann Rev Entomol 53:387–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lingafelter SW (2007) Illustrated key to the longhorned woodboring beetles of the eastern United States. Coleopterists Society, North PotomacGoogle Scholar
  41. Maguire DY, Robert K, Brochu K, Larrivee M, Buddle CM, Wheeler TA (2014) Vertical stratification of beetles (Coleoptera) and flies (Diptera) in temperate forest canopies. Environ Entomol 43:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Magura T, Tothmeresz B, Molnar T (2001) Forest edge and diversity: carabids along forest-grassland transects. Biodivers Conserv 10:287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matlack GR (1993) Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biol Conserv 66:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Matlack GR (1994) Vegetation dynamics of the forest edge—trends in space and successional time. J Ecol 82:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCann JM, Harman DM (1990) Influence of the intrastand position of black locust trees on attack rate of the locust borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:705–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McGeoch MA, Gaston KJ (2000) Edge effects on the prevalence and mortality factors of Phytomyza ilicis (Diptera, Agromyzidae) in a suburban woodland. Ecol Lett 3:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McIntosh RL, Katinic PJ, Allison JD, Borden JH, Downey DL (2001) Comparative efficacy of five types of trap for woodborers in the Cerambycidae, Buprestidae and Siricidae. Agric For Entomol 3:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller DR, Allison JD, Crowe CM, Dickinson DM, Eglitis A, Hofstetter RW, Munson AS, Poland TM, Reid LS, Steed BE, Sweeney JD (2016) Pine sawyers (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) attracted to α-pinene, monochamol, and ipsenol in North America. J Econ Entomol 109:1205–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morewood WD, Hein KE, Katinic PJ, Borden JH (2002) An improved trap for large wood-boring insects with special reference to Monochamus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Can J For Res 32:519–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Myers JH, Simberloff D, Kuris AM, Carey JR (2000) Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends Ecol Evol 15:316–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ninan KN, Inoue M (2013) Valuing forest ecosystem services: what we know and what we don’t. Ecol Econ 93:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nowak DJ, Pasek JE, Sequeira RA, Crane DE, Mastro VC (2001) Potential effect of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on urban trees in the United States. J Econ Entomol 94:116–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pajares JA, Álvarez G, Ibeas F, Gallego D, Hall DR, Farman DI (2010) Identification and field activity of a male-produced aggregation pheromone in the pine sawyer beetle, Monochamus galloprovincialis. J Chem Ecol 36:570–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Palik BJ, Murphy PG (1990) Disturbance versus edge effects in sugar-maple/beech forest fragments. For Ecol Manag 32:187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peltonen M, Heliövaara K (1998) Incidence of Xylechinus pilosus and Cryphalus saltuarius (Scolytidae) in forest-clearcut edges. For Ecol Manag 103:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Phillips ID, Cobb TP, Spence JR, Brigham RM (2006) Salvage logging, edge effects, and carabid beetles: connections to conservation and sustainable forest management. Environ Entomol 35:950–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pimentel D, Wilson C, McCullum C, Huang R, Dwen P, Flack J, Tran Q, Saltman T, Cliff B (1997) Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. Bioscience 47:747–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rassati D, Marini L, Marchioro M, Rapuzzi P, Magnani G, Poloni R, Di Giovanni F, Mayo P, Sweeney J (2018) Developing trapping protocols for wood-boring beetles associated with broadleaf trees. J Pest Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-0984-y Google Scholar
  60. Roy BA, Alexander HM, Davidson J, Campbell FT, Burdon JJ, Sniezko R, Brasier C (2014) Increasing forest loss worldwide from invasive pests requires new trade regulations. Front Ecol Environ 12:457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schmeelk TC, Millar JG, Hanks LM (2016) Influence of trap height and bait type on abundance and species diversity of cerambycid beetles captured in forest of east-central Illinois. J Econ Entomol 109:1750–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Siitonen J (2001) Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull 49:11–42Google Scholar
  63. Spies TA, Franklin JF, Thomas TB (1988) Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69:1689–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Su JC, Woods SA (2014) Importance of sampling along a vertical gradient to compare the insect fauna in managed forests. Environ Entomol 30:400–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ulyshen MD, Sheehan TN (2017) Trap height considerations for detecting two economically important forest beetle guilds in southeastern US forests. J Pest Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0883-7 Google Scholar
  66. Ulyshen MD, Hanula JL, Horn S, Kilgo JC, Moorman CE (2004) Spatial and temporal patterns of beetles associated with coarse woody debris in managed bottomland hardwood forests. For Ecol Manage 199:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vance CC, Kirby KR, Malcolm JR, Smith SM (2003) Community composition of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in the canopy and understory of sugar maple and white pine stands in south-central Ontario. Environ Entomol 32:1066–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vira B, Wildburger C, Mansourian S (2015) Forests, trees and landscapes for food security and nutrition. IUFRO World Ser 33:1–172Google Scholar
  69. Vodka Š, Cizek L (2013) The effects of edge-interior and understory-canopy gradients on the distribution of saproxylic beetles in a temperate lowland forest. For Ecol Manage 304:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wallace AR (1869) The Malay Archipelago: the land of the orang-utan, and the bird of paradise. MacMillan and Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. Wermelinger B, Flückiger PF, Obrist MK, Duelli P (2007) Horizontal and vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles (Col., Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytinae) across sections of forest edges. J Appl Entomol 131:104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Werner RA (2002) Effect of ecosystem disturbance on diversity of bark and wood-boring beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) ecosystems of Alaska. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Research Paper PNW-RP-546Google Scholar
  73. Williams PH, Gaston KJ (1994) Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biol Conserv 67:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  75. Wingfield MJ, Brockerhoff EG, Wingfield BD, Slippers B (2015) Planted forest health: the need for a global strategy. Science 349:832–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yanega D (1996) Field guide to northeastern longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Illinois Natural History Survey, Manual 6, ChampaignGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural Resources Canada-Canadian Forest ServiceGreat Lakes Forestry CentreSault Ste. MarieCanada
  2. 2.USDA-FS, Southern Research StationPinevilleUSA
  3. 3.Natural Resources Canada-Canadian Forest ServiceAtlantic Forestry CentreFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations