Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 91, Issue 2, pp 671–679 | Cite as

Vicia faba plants respond to oviposition by invasive Halyomorpha halys activating direct defences against offspring

  • Gabriele Rondoni
  • Valeria Bertoldi
  • Robert Malek
  • Khaled Djelouah
  • Chiaraluce Moretti
  • Roberto Buonaurio
  • Eric Conti
Original Paper


The invasive stink bug Halyomorpha halys is established in many European and American agro-ecosystems, where it causes severe crop losses. Potential control measures might include enhancement of plant defences. When attacked by herbivorous insects that oviposit on it, the plant may respond by priming direct defences, which might affect the development of future brood. Halyomorpha halys attacks numerous plant species in the invaded areas. Here, we investigated whether Vicia faba plants challenged by H. halys females can impair the development of its offspring through the activation of induced direct defences. We measured the weight and dimension of nymphs that developed on oviposition-experienced plants after 7 and 17 days from hatching. Nymphs that developed on oviposition-experienced plants weighed less compared to those that developed either on control plants or on plants solely subjected to H. halys feeding, and third instars showed shorter dimensions (tibia length). In addition, when oviposition-experienced plants were attacked by nymphs, higher and more rapid expression of two jasmonic acid-dependent genes (cysteine proteinase inhibitor gene and NAI1) was detected, possibly due to a mechanism of priming. Increased expression of the salicylic acid-responsive PR1 gene was also detected in egg-experienced plants, although the response was delayed compared to JA-dependent genes. Our results suggest that V. faba plants recognize H. halys oviposition as a warning signal and pre-activate defences against future nymphal herbivory.


Invasive species Vicia faba Herbivore-induced plant defences Direct defence Gene expression RT-qPCR Warning signals Offspring development 



This research was partially supported by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE) H2020-MSCA-RISE-2015 of the European Union with the project Impact of invasive alien true bug species in native trophic webs—INVASIoN (GA 690952) and by Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia Project 2015.0349.021. GR wishes to thank Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia for personal funding. The authors are grateful to Lara Maistrello, Elena Costi (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) and Giacomo Vaccari (Consorzio Fitosanitario Provinciale di Modena) for providing field-collected stink bugs, to Andrea Luchetti, Luciana Bartoli, Daniela Fortini and Cesare Dentini for maintaining the stink bug and egg parasitoid cultures and for helping in field collection, and to Luca Bonciarelli for technical assistance in the laboratory.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals (vertebrates) performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

10340_2018_955_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)


  1. Ali M, Sugimoto K, Ramadan A, Arimura G (2013) Memory of plant communications for priming anti-herbivore responses. Sci Rep 3:1872CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Austel N, Eilers EJ, Meiners T, Hilker M (2016) Elm leaves ‘warned’ by insect egg deposition reduce survival of hatching larvae by a shift in their quantitative leaf metabolite pattern. Plant Cell Environ 39:366–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandoly M, Hilker M, Steppuhn A (2015) Oviposition by Spodoptera exigua on Nicotiana attenuata primes induced plant defence against larval herbivory. Plant J 83:661–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300Google Scholar
  5. Beyaert I, Köpke D, Stiller J, Hammerbacher A, Yoneya K, Schmidt A, Gershenzon J, Hilker M (2012) Can insect egg deposition ‘warn’a plant of future feeding damage by herbivorous larvae? Proc R Soc Lond B 279:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Büchel K, McDowell E, Nelson W, Descour A, Gershenzon J, Hilker M, Soderlund C, Gang DR, Fenning T, Meiners T (2012) An elm EST database for identifying leaf beetle egg-induced defense genes. BMC Genom 13:242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen MS (2008) Inducible direct plant defense against insect herbivores: a review. Insect Sci 15:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng Y, Zhang H, Yao J, Wang X, Xu J, Han Q, Wei G, Huang L, Kang Z (2012) Characterization of non-host resistance in broad bean to the wheat stripe rust pathogen. BMC Plant Biol 12:96CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiappini E, Salerno G, Berzolla A, Iacovone A, Reguzzi MC, Conti E (2012) Role of volatile semiochemicals in host location by the egg parasitoid Anagrus breviphragma. Entomol Exp Appl 144:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colazza S, Fucarino A, Peri E, Salerno G, Conti E, Bin F (2004) Insect oviposition induces volatile emission in herbaceous plants that attracts egg parasitoids. J Exp Biol 207:47–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Conrath U (2011) Molecular aspects of defence priming. Trends Plant Sci 16:524–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Conrath U, Beckers GJ, Langenbach CJ, Jaskiewicz MR (2015) Priming for enhanced defense. Annu Rev Phytopathol 53:97–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Conti E, Colazza S (2012) Chemical ecology of egg parasitoids associated with true bugs. Psyche (Camb Mass) 2012:651015Google Scholar
  14. Conti E, Jones WA, Bin F, Vinson SB (1996) Physical and chemical factors involved in host recognition behavior of Anaphes iole Girault, an egg parasitoid of Lygus hesperus Knight (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae; Heteroptera: Miridae). Biol Control 7:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conti E, Jones WA, Bin F, Vinson SB (1997) Oviposition behavior of Anaphes iole, an egg parasitoid of Lygus hesperus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae; Heteroptera: Miridae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 90:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conti E, Zadra C, Salerno G, Leombruni B, Volpe D, Frati F, Marucchini C, Bin F (2008) Changes in the volatile profile of Brassica oleracea due to feeding and oviposition by Murgantia histrionica (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Eur J Entomol 105:839–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conti E, Salerno G, Leombruni B, Frati F, Bin F (2010) Short-range allelochemicals from a plant-herbivore association: a singular case of oviposition-induced synomone for an egg parasitoid. J Exp Biol 213:3911–3919CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Desurmont GA, Donoghue MJ, Clement WL, Agrawal AA (2011) Evolutionary history predicts plant defense against an invasive pest. P Natl Acad Sci 108:7070–7074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Desurmont GA, Harvey J, van Dam NM, Cristescu SM, Schiestl FP, Cozzolino S, Anderson P, Larsson MC, Kindlmann P, Danner H (2014) Alien interference: disruption of infochemical networks by invasive insect herbivores. Plant Cell Environ 37:1854–1865CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dicke M, van Poecke RM (2002) Signalling in plant–insect interactions: signal transduction in direct and indirect plant defence. In: Scheel D, Wasternack C (eds) Plant signal transduction, vol 38. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 289–316Google Scholar
  21. Digilio MC, Corrado G, Sasso R, Coppola V, Iodice L, Pasquariello M, Bossi S, Maffei ME, Coppola M, Pennacchio F, Rao R, Guerrieri E (2010) Molecular and chemical mechanisms involved in aphid resistance in cultivated tomato. New Phytol 187:1089–1101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Erb M, Meldau S, Howe GA (2012) Role of phytohormones in insect-specific plant reactions. Trends Plant Sci 17:250–259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Farmer E, Ryan C (1990) Interplant communication: airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:7713–7716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Geiselhardt S, Yoneya K, Blenn B, Drechsler N, Gershenzon J, Kunze R, Hilker M (2013) Egg laying of cabbage white butterfly (Pieris brassicae) on Arabidopsis thaliana affects subsequent performance of the larvae. PLoS ONE 8:e59661CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Giacometti R, Zavala JA (2016) Soybean response to pest attack. In: Fletcher B (ed) Soybeans: cultivation, nutritional properties and effects on health. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 35–62Google Scholar
  26. Giacometti R, Barneto J, Barriga LG, Sardoy PM, Balestrasse K, Andrade AM, Pagano EA, Alemano SG, Zavala JA (2016) Early perception of stink bug damage in developing seeds of field-grown soybean induces chemical defences and reduces bug attack. Pest Manag Sci 72:1585–1594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Goni R, García P, Foissac S (2009) The qPCR data statistical analysis. Integromics White Paper 1–9Google Scholar
  28. Gutierrez N, Giménez MJ, Palomino C, Avila CM (2011) Assessment of candidate reference genes for expression studies in Vicia faba L. by real-time quantitative PCR. Mol Breed 28:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heil M (2014) Herbivore-induced plant volatiles: targets, perception and unanswered questions. New Phytol 204:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hellemans J, Vandesompele J (2011) Quantitative PCR data analysis–unlocking the secret to successful results. In: Kennedy S, Oswald N (eds) PCR troubleshooting and optimization. The essential guide. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  31. Hilker M, Fatouros NE (2015) Plant responses to insect egg deposition. Annu Rev Entomol 60:493–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hilker M, Fatouros NE (2016) Resisting the onset of herbivore attack: plants perceive and respond to insect eggs. Curr Opin Plant Biol 32:9–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hilker M, Meiners T (2008) Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. Humann J, Jung S, Zheng P, Cheng C-H, Lee T, Frank M, McGaughey D, Scott K, Yu J, Ficklin S, Sanad M, Hough H, Coyne C, McGee R, Main D (2016) Cool Season Food Legume Genome Database: An up-to-date resource enabling genetics, genomics and breeding research in pea, lentil, faba bean and chickpea. In: Proceedings of the international plant and animal genome conference, January 2016, San Diego, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim J, Tooker JF, Luthe DS, De Moraes CM, Felton GW (2012) Insect eggs can enhance wound response in plants: a study system of tomato Solanum lycopersicum L. and Helicoverpa zea Boddie. PLoS ONE 7:e37420CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Kroes A, van Loon JJ, Dicke M (2014) Density-dependent interference of aphids with caterpillar-induced defenses in Arabidopsis: involvement of phytohormones and transcription factors. Plant Cell Physiol 56:98–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Leon-Reyes A, Spoel SH, De Lange ES, Abe H, Kobayashi M, Tsuda S, Millenaar FF, Welschen RA, Ritsema T, Pieterse CM (2009) Ethylene modulates the role of NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES1 in cross talk between salicylate and jasmonate signaling. Plant Physiol 149:1797–1809CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Leskey TC, Short BD, Butler BR, Wright SE (2012) Impact of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål), in mid-Atlantic tree fruit orchards in the United States: case studies of commercial management. Psyche (Camb Mass) 2012:535062Google Scholar
  39. Martorana L, Foti MC, Rondoni G, Conti E, Colazza S, Peri E (2017) An invasive insect herbivore disrupts plant volatile-mediated tritrophic signalling. J Pest Sci 90:1079–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matsushima R, Fukao Y, Nishimura M, Hara-Nishimura I (2004) NAI1 gene encodes a basic-helix-loop-helix-type putative transcription factor that regulates the formation of an endoplasmic reticulum–derived structure, the ER body. Plant Cell 16:1536–1549CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Moraes MCB, Laumann R, Sujii ER, Pires C, Borges M (2005) Induced volatiles in soybean and pigeon pea plants artificially infested with the neotropical brown stink bug, Euschistus heros, and their effect on the egg parasitoid, Telenomus podisi. Entomol Exp Appl 115:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moraes MC, Pareja M, Laumann RA, Hoffmann-Campo CB, Borges M (2008) Response of the parasitoid Telenomus podisi to induced volatiles from soybean damaged by stink bug herbivory and oviposition. J Plant Interact 3:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ocaña S, Seoane P, Bautista R, Palomino C, Claros GM, Torres AM, Madrid E (2015) Large-scale transcriptome analysis in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under Ascochyta fabae infection. PLoS ONE 10:e0135143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Pashalidou FG, Lucas-Barbosa D, van Loon JJ, Dicke M, Fatouros NE (2013) Phenotypic plasticity of plant response to herbivore eggs: effects on resistance to caterpillars and plant development. Ecology 94:702–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Peiffer M, Felton GW (2014) Insights into the saliva of the brown marmorated stink bug Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). PLoS ONE 9:e88483CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Peterson JA, Ode PJ, Oliveira-Hofman C, Harwood JD (2016) Integration of plant defense traits with biological control of arthropod pests: challenges and opportunities. Front Plant Sci 7:1794CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, the R Development Core Team (2012) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-104Google Scholar
  48. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  49. Rasband W (1997) ImageJ. US National Institutes of Health, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  50. Reymond P (2013) Perception, signaling and molecular basis of oviposition-mediated plant responses. Planta 238:247–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Reymond P, Farmer EE (1998) Jasmonate and salicylate as global signals for defense gene expression. Curr Opin Plant Biol 1:404–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rondoni G, Onofri A, Ricci C (2012) Differential susceptibility in a specialised aphidophagous ladybird, Platynaspis luteorubra (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), facing intraguild predation by exotic and native generalist predators. Biocontrol Sci Technol 22:1334–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rondoni G, Bertoldi V, Malek R, Foti MC, Peri E, Maistrello L, Haye T, Conti E (2017a) Native egg parasitoids recorded from the invasive Halyomorpha halys successfully exploit volatiles emitted by the plant–herbivore complex. J Pest Sci 80:1087–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rondoni G, Ielo F, Ricci C, Conti E (2017b) Behavioural and physiological responses to prey-related cues reflect higher competitiveness of invasive vs. native ladybirds. Sci Rep 7:3716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Salerno G, De Santis F, Iacovone A, Bin F, Conti E (2013) Short-range cues mediate parasitoid searching behavior on maize: the role of oviposition-induced plant synomones. Biol Control 64:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc 3:1101–1108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith JR, Hesler SP, Loeb GM (2014) Potential impact of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) on grape production in the Finger Lakes Region of New York. J Entomol Sci 49:290–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Staines K, Batra A, Mwangi W, Maier HJ, Van Borm S, Young JR, Fife M, Butter C (2016) A versatile panel of reference gene assays for the measurement of chicken mRNA by quantitative PCR. PLoS ONE 11:e0160173CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Terra WR, Ferreira C (1994) Insect digestive enzymes: properties, compartmentalization and function. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B Comp Biochem 109:1–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Timbó RV, Hermes-Lima M, Silva LP, Mehta A, Moraes MCB, Paula DP (2014) Biochemical aspects of the soybean response to herbivory injury by the brown stink bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). PLoS ONE 9:e109735CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Vet LEM, Dicke M (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu Rev Entomol 37:141–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. War AR, Paulraj MG, Ahmad T, Buhroo AA, Hussain B, Ignacimuthu S, Sharma HC (2012) Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal Behav 7:1306–1320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Willems E, Leyns L, Vandesompele J (2008) Standardization of real-time PCR gene expression data from independent biological replicates. Anal Biochem 379:127–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Woodard AM, Ervin GN, Marsico TD (2012) Host plant defense signaling in response to a coevolved herbivore combats introduced herbivore attack. Ecol Evol 2:1056–1064CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Zheng S-J, Dicke M (2008) Ecological genomics of plant-insect interactions: from gene to community. Plant Physiol 146:812–817CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhu-Salzman K, Zeng R (2015) Insect response to plant defensive protease inhibitors. Annu Rev Entomol 60:233–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental SciencesUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.Edmund Mach FoundationSan Michele all’AdigeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Civil, Mechanical and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly
  4. 4.CIHEAMMediterranean Agronomic InstituteValenzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations