Synthetic blend of larval frass volatiles repel oviposition in the invasive box tree moth, Cydalima perspectalis
- 378 Downloads
Insects find their oviposition sites using visual, contact and olfactory cues. Volatile stimuli emitted by an intact or herbivore-occupied host plant, non-host plants or the herbivore itself can all influence the final decision of females concerning where to lay eggs. Volatile substances surrounding larval excreted pellets, i.e., frass of the invasive box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis Walker) were collected, and the physiological activity was investigated by coupled gas chromatographic–electroantennographic detection. Based on structural elucidation, two aromatic derivates and one terpene alcohol were identified to be physiologically active on the antennae of the adults: guaiacol, (±)-linalool and veratrol. For all compounds, antennal responses were found to be dose dependent with EAG amplitudes being the highest at the highest dose levels. Females were also more sensitive to all three compounds compared to males. Single sensillum recordings on mated female antennae revealed that these frass compounds triggered 22% of the tested olfactory sensory neurons housed in trichoid sensilla. Behavioral bioassays indicated that the blend of these compounds had an oviposition-repellent effect on conspecific females: individuals laid significantly fewer eggs on boxwood plants equipped with dispensers loaded with the synthetic blend compared to those treated with natural frass or the control plants. This difference likely originated from the measured rapid changes in the volatile profile of larval excrement when exposed to the air at room temperature. Our findings have the potential to unravel the complex ecology of this invasive moth species characterized by rapid range expansion and extensive damage in Europe.
KeywordsOviposition preference Frass volatiles Electrophysiology Single sensillum recording Invasive pest Crambidae
We are grateful to Pál Vági (Department of Plant Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary) for his contribution in taking scanning electron microscopy images and to Kistie B. Brunsell for the linguistic corrections.
This study was supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA, PD1041310), the Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (PCIG12-GA-2012-333980) and the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences to ZK. During the study, ZT was supported by the ‘Lendület’ programme of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA, LP2012-24/2012) and a Hungarian Scientific Research Fund grant (OTKA, PD108938) and Postdoctoral Research Program of HAS (Grant No. SZ-029/2013).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human and animals
The invertebrate insect species (box tree moth, C. perspectalis) used in the present study has a horticultural pest status and is not protected in Hungary. Therefore, individuals can be freely collected and used in laboratory experiments without permit or approval from the institutional ethics committee or national authorities under Hungarian law (348/2006, paragraph 10/3). Collecting sites were either owned by the research institute (Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest) or were publicly accessible; therefore, no permit was needed to access them. During experimentation, we avoided causing any unnecessary harm, suffering or distress to the study subjects. The insect collection was exclusively focused on the experimental species and did not involve endangered or protected species.
Informed consent does not apply to these studies.
- Agelopoulos NG, Dicke M, Posthumus MA (1995) Role of volatile inforchemicals emitted by feces of larvae in host-searching behavior of parasitoid Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): a behavioral and chemical study. J Chem Ecol 21:1789–1811. doi: 10.1007/BF02033677 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson P (2002) Oviposition pheromones in herbivorous and carnivorous insects. In: Hilker M, Meiners T (eds) Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell Verlag, Berlin, pp 235–256Google Scholar
- Anderson P, Hilker M, Klein B, Schildknecht H (1993) Oviposition deterring components in larval frass of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae): a behavioural and electrophysiological. Evaluation 39:129–137Google Scholar
- CABI (2016) Cydalima perspectalis. In: Invasive species compendium. http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/118433. Accessed 1 Jan 2016
- Courtney SP, Kibota TT (1990) Mother doesn’t know best: selection of hosts by ovipositig insects. In: Bernays EA (ed) Insect-plant interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 161–188Google Scholar
- Dodson HEM (1993) Floral volatiles in insect biology. In: Bernays EA (ed) Insect-plant interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 47–81Google Scholar
- Ignell R, Hansson B (2004) Insect olfactory neuroethology—an electrophysiological perspective. In: Thomas A. Christensen (ed) Methods in insect sensory neuroscience. CRC Press, New York, pp 319–347Google Scholar
- Kenis M, Nacambo S, Leuthardt FLG et al (2013) The box tree moth, Cydalima perspectalis, in Europe: horticultural pest or environmental disaster? Aliens Invasive Species Bull 33:38–41Google Scholar
- Klein B, Schildknecht H, Hilker M, Bombosch S (1990) Oviposition-deterring compounds from larval frass of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). Zeitschrift für NaturforschungSection C Biosci 45:895–901Google Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S et al (2015) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-121Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
- Ramachandran R, Norris DM, Phillips JK, Phillips TW (1991) Volatiles mediating plant-herbivore-natural enemy interactions: soybean looper frass volatiles, 3-octanone and guaiacol, as kairomones for the parasitoid Microplitis demolitor. J Agric Food Chem 39:2310–2317. doi: 10.1021/jf00012a044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reinecke A, Hilker M (2014) Annual plant reviews. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Salvesen PH, Kanz B, Moe D (2009) Historical cultivars of Buxus sempervirens L. revealed in a preserved 17th century garden by biometry and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Eur J Hortic Sci 74:130–136Google Scholar
- Schöni R, Städler E, Renwick JAA, Radke CD (1987) Host and non-host plant chemical influencing the oviposition behavior of several herbivorous insects. In: Labeyrie V, Fabres G, Lachaise D (eds) Proc 6th Int Symp Insect-Plant relation. Dordrecht, pp 31–36Google Scholar
- Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology: paperback. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- She D-S, Feng F-J (2006) Bionomics and control of Diaphania perspectalis (Walker). J Zhejiang Univ Sci Technol 26:47–51Google Scholar
- Thibout E, Guillot JF, Auger J (1993) Microorganisms are involved in the production of volatile kairomones affecting the host seeking behaviour of Diadromus pulchellus, a parasitoid of Acrolepiopsis assectella. Physiol Entomol 18:176–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1993.tb00465.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zimmermann O, Wührer B (2010) Initial investigations on the ability of the indigenous larval parasitoid Bracon brevicornis to control the box-tree pyralid Diaphania perspectalis in Germany. DGaaE-Nachrichten 24:25–26Google Scholar