Non-target effects of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam on Chrysoperla carnea when employed as sunflower seed treatments
- 602 Downloads
The use of systemic insecticides as seed treatments has raised concern about the possible impacts of these products on natural enemies. This study assessed the effects of sunflower seed treatments with chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam on Chrysoperla carnea by exposing larvae and adults to sunflower stem segments grown from treated seeds and the nectar secreted by their extrafloral nectaries. Confinement of larvae with stem segments for their entire developmental period had no effect on their survival or any life history parameter, except that the sex ratio of resulting adults was lower in the thiamethoxam treatment than in chlorantraniliprole. However, when adult pairs of C. carnea were exposed to treated stem segments during their maturation period, their subsequent survival and fecundity was significantly reduced by both materials, with thiamethoxam reducing median survival (LT50) and fecundity to a greater degree than chlorantraniliprole. Insufficient offspring were obtained from adults exposed to thiamethoxam to permit assessment of their fitness, but the offspring in the chlorantraniliprole-exposed adults had reduced larval survival relative to controls. The greater impact of seed treatments on adult lacewings may be partly attributable to their greater consumption of extra-floral nectar. Our results indicate that seed treatment with systemic insecticides can cause negative effects on beneficial insects, potentially disrupting their population dynamics, and should not be assumed compatible with biological control and IPM simply because this mode of application limits direct exposure.
KeywordsExtrafloral nectar Systemic insecticides IPM Green lacewings Environmental risk assessment
The authors are grateful to the CAPES Foundation (Brazilian Ministry of Education), the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and the Minas Gerais State Foundation for Research Aid (FAPEMIG) for scholarship support from CAPES—no 3363-13-9 (PCG) and CAPES—no 3362-13-2 (VFM). This is contribution no. 14-294 of the Kansas State Experiment Station.
- Gurr GM, Scarratt SL, Wratten SD, Berndt L, Irvin NA (2004) Ecological engineering, habitat manipulation and pest management. In: Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Altieri MA (eds) Ecological engineering for pest management. Comstock Press, Ithaca, pp 1–12Google Scholar
- Hagen KS (1986) Ecosystem analysis: plant cultivars (HPR), entomophagous species and food supplements. In: Boethel DJ, Eikenbarrey RD (eds) Interactions of plant resistance and prasitoids and predators of insects. Wiley, New York, pp 151–197Google Scholar
- Institute SAS (2008) SAS for Windows Version 90 SAS. Institute Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
- Lahm GP, Stevenson TM, Selby TP, Freudenberger JH, Cordova D, Flexner L, Bellin CA, Dubas CM, Smith BK, Hughes KA, Hollingshaus JG, Clark CE, Benner EA (2007) Rynaxypyr: a new insecticidal anthranilic diamide that acts as a potent and selective ryanodine receptor activator. Bioorgan Med Chem Lett 17:6274–6279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lundgren JG (2009) Relationships of natural enemies and non-prey foods. Springer International, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Ohkawara Y, Akayama A, Matsuda K, Andersch W (2002) Clothianidin: a novel broad spectrum neonicotinoid insecticide. In: Proc Brighton Crop Protection Conference (ed) Pests and Diseases. Brighton, UK, pp 51–58Google Scholar
- Principi MM, Canard M (1984) Feeding habits. In: Canard M, Semeria Y, New TR (ed) Biology of Chrysopidae. The Hague, pp 76–92Google Scholar
- Royer TA, Walgenbach DD (1991) Predacious arthropods of cultivated sunflower in eastern South Dakota. J Kans Entomol Soc 64:112–116Google Scholar
- Sanchez-Bayo F, Tennekes HA, Goka K (2013) Impact of systemic insecticides on organisms and ecosystems. In: Trdan S (ed) Insecticides - development of safer and more effective technologies. InTech, Croatia, pp 365–414Google Scholar
- Schwarz M, Christie D, Andersch W, Kemper K, Fellmann K, Altmann R (2002) Control of corn rootworms (Diabrotica spp) and of secondary pests of corn (Zea mays) using seed treatment of clothianidin. In: Proc Brighton Crop Protection Conference (ed) Pests and Diseases. Brighton, UK, pp 59–64Google Scholar