Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp 125–132 | Cite as

Effects of neonicitinoid seed treatments on soybean aphid and its natural enemies

  • Michael P. Seagraves
  • Jonathan G. LundgrenEmail author
Original Paper


Insecticidal seed treatments are increasingly being applied to soybeans in North America, and several recent studies question what they add to current pest management. Here, we examine the effects of two neonicotinoid insecticidal seed treatments on insect populations (pest and natural enemies) in SD soybeans over 2 years. Moreover, we conducted laboratory experiments to determine the duration that seed treatments remained effective against the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines, Hemiptera: Aphididae) and how thiamethoxam affected survival of one of the aphid’s predators, Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on soybean. Soybean aphids, thrips, and grasshopper populations were unaffected by the insecticidal seed treatments in the field. The laboratory trial revealed that all bioactivity of the seed treatments against soybean aphids was gone within 46 days after planting, prior to aphid populations damaging the crop. Bean leaf beetles, a sporadic pest in our area, were reduced by the seed treatments. But, there were no yield benefits of insecticidal seed treatments over the 2 years of the study at this location. Natural enemy communities were significantly reduced by thiamethoxam seed treatments relative to the untreated control, particularly populations of Nabis americoferus (Hemiptera: Nabidae). Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) adults were reduced in the imidacloprid-treated plots. In the laboratory, rearing O. insidiosus on soybean plants treated with thiamethoxam resulted in higher mortality for both the nymphs and the adult stage. Offering the predator insect prey on the thiamethoxam-treated plants improved survival of the adult stage, but not the nymphal stage. This work confirms that insecticidal seed treatments offer little benefit to soybean producers of the Northern Great Plains and adds to the discussion by suggesting that generalist predators are adversely affected by the insecticides.


Aphis glycines Cerotoma trifurcata Generalist predators Omnivory Orius insidiosus Systemic insecticide Seed treatment Thrips 



We thank Janet Fergen, Michael Bredeson, Mallory Johnson, Chloe Kruse, and Ryan Schmid for technical assistance on this project. Matt O’Neal, Kelley Tilmon, and Walter Riedell gave helpful suggestions on earlier drafts of this manuscript. This research was supported in part by the South Dakota Soybean Research and Promotion Council. Mention of any proprietary products does not constitute endorsement by the USDA.


  1. Albajes R, Lopez C, Pons X (2003) Predatory fauna in cornfields and response to imidacloprid seed treatment. J Econ Entomol 96(6):1805–1813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Deeb MA, Wilde GE, Zhu KY (2001) Effect of insecticides used in corn, sorghum, and alfalfa on the predator Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). J Econ Entomol 94(6):1353–1360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw JD, Rice ME, Hill JH (2008) Evaluation of management strategies for bean leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and bean pod mottle virus (Comoviridae) in soybean. J Econ Entomol 101:1211–1227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canard M (2001) Natural food and feeding habits of lacewings. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington AE (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 116–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox WJ, Shields E, Cherney JH (2008) Planting date and seed treatment effects on soybean in the Northeastern United States. Agron J 100:1662–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Desneux N, O’Neil RJ, Yoo HJS (2006) Suppression of population growth of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, by predators: the identification of a key predator, and the effects of prey dispersion, predator density and temperature. Environ Entomol 35:1342–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elbert A, Haas M, Springer B, Thielert W, Nauen R (2008) Applied aspects of neonicotinoid uses in crop protection. Pest Manag Sci 64:1099–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feese H, Wilde GE (1975) Planting time applications of systemic insecticides on grain sorghum for greenbug control: interactions with herbicides and effect on predators (Hemiptera (Homoptera): Aphididae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 48(3):396–402Google Scholar
  9. Girolami V, Mazzon L, Squartini A, Mori N, Marzaro M, Di Bernardo A, Greatti M, Giorio C, Tapparo A (2009) Translocation of neonicotinoid insecticides from coated seeds to seedling guttation drops: a novel way of intoxication for bees. J Econ Entomol 102:1808–1815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gore J, Cook D, Catchot A, Leonard R, Lorenz G, Stewart S (2010) Bioassays and management of cotton aphids with neonicotinoids and sulfoxaflor. Proceedings of the 2010 Beltwide cotton conference: 1207–1210Google Scholar
  11. Harwood JD, Desneux N, Yoo HJS, Rowley DL, Greenstone MH, Obrycki JJ, O’ Neil RJ (2007) Tracking the role of alternative prey in soybean aphid predation by Orius insidiosus: a molecular approach. Mol Ecol 16:4390–4400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hutchins SH (2010) Indifference analysis: a practical method to assess uncertainty in IPM decision making. J Integr Pest Manag 1:doi: 10.1603/IPM10002
  13. Johnson KD, O’Neal ME, Bradshaw JD, Rice ME (2008) Is preventative, concurrent management of the soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and bean leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) possible? J Econ Entomol 101(3):801–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson KD, O’Neal ME, Ragsdale DW, DiFonzo CD, Swinton SM, Dixon PM, Potter BD, Hodgson EW, Costamagna AC (2009) Probability of cost-effective management of soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in North America. J Econ Entomol 102(6):2101–2108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krischik VA, Landmark AL, Heimpel GE (2007) Soil-applied imidacloprid is translocated to nectar and kills nectar-feeding Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault)(Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Environ Entomol 36(5):1238–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lundgren JG (2009) Relationships of natural enemies and non-prey foods. Springer International, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Lundgren JG, Fergen JK (2006) The oviposition behavior of the predator Orius insidiosus: acceptability and preference for different plants. BioControl 51:217–227Google Scholar
  18. Lundgren JG, Riedell WE (2008) Soybean nitrogen relations and root characteristics after Cerotoma trifurcata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) larval feeding injury. J Entomol Sci 43(1):107–116Google Scholar
  19. Lundgren JG, Fergen JK, Riedell WE (2008) The influence of plant anatomy on oviposition and reproductive success of the omnivorous bug, Orius insidiosus. Anim Behav 75:1495–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCornack BP, Ragsdale DW (2006) Efficacy of thiamethoxam to suppress soybean aphid populations in Minnesota soybean. Pest Manag Netw. doi: 10.1094/CM-2006-0915-01-RS
  21. Moser SE, Obrycki JJ (2009) Non-target effects of neonicotinoid seed treatments; mortality of coccinellid larvae related to zoophytophagy. Biol Control 51(3):487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mullin CA, Saunders MC II, Leslie TW, Biddinger DJ, Fleischer SJ (2005) Toxic and behavioral effects to Carabidae of seed treatments used on Cry3Bb1- and Cry1Ab/c-protected corn. Environ Entomol 34(6):1626–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nault BA, Taylor AG, Urwiler M, Rabaey TL, Hutchison WD (2004) Neonicotinoid seed treatments for managing potato leafhopper infestations in snap bean. Crop Prot 23:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohnesorg WJ, Johnson KD, O’Neal ME (2009) Impact of reduced-risk insecticides on soybean aphid and associated natural enemies. J Econ Entomol 102(5):1816–1826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ragsdale DW, McCornack BP, Venette RC, Potter BD, MacRae IV, Hodgson EW, O’Neal ME, Johnson KD, O’Neil RJ, DiFonzo CD, Hunt TE, Glogoza PA, Cullen EM (2007) Economic threshold for soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Econ Entomol 100(4):1258–1267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Riedell WE, Lundgren JG, Osborne SL, Pikul JL Jr (2005) Effects of soil nitrogen management on soybean nitrogen relations and bean leaf beetle biology. J Agric Urban Entomol 22(3 & 4):181–190Google Scholar
  27. Rogers MA, Krischik VA, Martin LA (2007) Effect of soil application of imidacloprid on survival of adult green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), used for biological control in greenhouse. Biol Control 42:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruppel RF (1983) Cumulative insect-days as an index of crop protection. J Econ Entomol 76:375–377Google Scholar
  29. Seagraves MP, Lundgren JG (2010) Oviposition response by Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to plant and prey availability. Biol Control 55(3):174–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith SF, Krischik VA (1999) Effects of systemic imidacloprid on Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environ Entomol 28(6):1189–1195Google Scholar
  31. Stapel JO, Cortesero AM, Lewis WJ (2000) Disruptive sublethal effects of insecticides on biological control: altered foraging ability and life span of a parasitoid after feeding on extrafloral nectar of cotton treated with systemic insecticides. Biol Control 17:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stoner A (1972) Plant feeding by Nabis, a predaceous genus. Environ Entomol 1(5):557–558Google Scholar
  33. Strausbaugh CA, Eujayl IA, Foote P (2010) Seed treatments for the control of insects and diseases in sugarbeet. J Sugar Beet Res 47:105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor AG, Eckenrode CJ, Straub RW (2001) Seed coating technologies and treatments for onion: Challenges and progress. HortScience 36:199–205Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag (outside the USA)  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDA-ARS, North Central Agricultural LaboratoryBrookingsUSA
  2. 2.Driscoll Strawberry AssociatesWatsonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations