Advertisement

Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 169–174 | Cite as

Strawberry blossom weevil Anthonomus rubi Herbst (Col.: Curculionidae): relationships between bud damage, weevil density, insecticide use, and yield

  • Solveig Sørbu Aasen
  • Nina TrandemEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The activity of overwintered strawberry blossom weevils, Anthonomus rubi Herbst, measured as cut buds and adult weevils, was recorded weekly in sprayed and unsprayed quadrats in young and old strawberry plantings. The study was done in nine ‘Korona’ fields in a district with high A. rubi density, in the southeast of Norway, in 2000. During the period of study, the cumulative number of cut buds and adult weevils found by tapping whole plants above a bowl were highly correlated. An increase in sampled weevils was followed by an increase in cut buds 1–2 weeks later. Thus, sampling adults has potential for predicting the bud damage. In five of the six fields where yield was measured, a negative relationship between cut buds and the saleable yield was found. The effect of spraying was relatively low: A. rubi activity was reduced by 21% and the saleable yield increased by 16%. We conclude that present spraying practices are not very efficient in preventing A. rubi damage in the area studied.

Keywords

Anthonomus rubi Norway Pesticide resistance Strawberries Strawberry blossom weevil 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the growers who let us study their fields. A. Sønsteby, the staff at Planteforsk Kise, S. Kråkevik and T. Våge helped with equipment and/or practical advice during the field-work. We are also grateful to E. Hågvar and T. Hofsvang for commenting on various drafts of the manuscript, to T. Rafoss and A. Aastveit for valuable statistical discussions, to T. Kvamme for identification of weevils, to M. Aasen and two reviewers for improving the English and to R. Faby and K. Jensen for information on A. rubi in Germany and Sweden. The study was financially supported by the strawberry grower association of Ringsaker, and Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research (formerly The Norwegian Crop Research Institute).

References

  1. Aasen S, Hågvar EB, Trandem N (2004) Oviposition pattern of the strawberry blossom weevil Anthonomus rubi Herbst (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Eastern Norway. Norw J Entomol 51:175–182Google Scholar
  2. Anon (1997) Quarantine pests for Europe. 2nd edn. CABI and EPPO, University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bichão H, Borg-Karlson A-K, Araújo J, Mustaparta H (2005) Five Types of olfactory receptor neurons in the strawberry blossom Weevil Anthonomus rubi: selective responses to inducible host-plant volatiles. Chem Senses 30:153–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blümel S (1998) Efficacy of various insecticides for the control of Anthonomus rubi. IOBC WPRS Bull 21(10):103–106Google Scholar
  5. Bostanian NJ, Binns M, Kovach J, Racette G, Mailloux G (1999) Predictive model for strawberry bud weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) adults in strawberry fields. Environ Entomol 28:398–406Google Scholar
  6. Cross JV, Burgess CM (1998): Strawberry fruit yield and quality responses to flower bud removal: a simulation of damage by strawberry blossom weevil (Anthonomus rubi). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 73:676–680Google Scholar
  7. Cross JV, Easterbrook MA (1998) Integrated management of flower pests of strawberry. IOBC WPRS Bull 21(10):81–87Google Scholar
  8. Cross JV, Hall DR, Innocenzi PJ, Hesketh H, Jay CN, Burgess CM (2005a) Exploiting the aggregation pheromone of strawberry blossom weevil Anthonomus rubi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): part 1. Pest monitoring and control. Crop Prot 25:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cross JV, Hall DR, Innocenzi PJ, Hesketh H, Jay CN, Burgess CM (2005b) Exploiting the aggregation pheromone of strawberry blossom weevil Anthonomus rubi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): part 2. Pest monitoring and control. Crop Prot 25:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easterbrook MA, Fitzgerald JD, Pinch C, Tooley J, Xu J-U (2003) Development times and fecundity of three important arthropod pests of strawberry in the United Kingdom. Ann Appl Biol 143:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. English-Loeb G, Pritts M, Kovach J, Rieckenberg R, Kelly MJ (1999) Compensatory ability of strawberries to bud and flower removal: implications for managing the strawberry bud weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Econ Entomol 92:915–921Google Scholar
  12. Faby R, Svensson B, Trandem N, Tuovinen T (2004) The strawberry blossom weevil: simulation of damage. Acta Hortic 649:233–236Google Scholar
  13. Höhn H, Neuweiler R (1993) Erdbeerblütenstecher: Befall und Auswirkungen auf den Ertrag (in German). Schweiz Z Obst Weinbau 129:270–275Google Scholar
  14. Jary SG (1931) A note on the strawberry and raspberry bud weevil, Anthonomus rubi (Herbst). J South East Agric Col Wye 28:147–152Google Scholar
  15. Jary SG (1932) The strawberry blossom weevil, Anthonomus rubi (Herbst). J South East Agric Col Wye 30:171–182Google Scholar
  16. Khanizadeh S, Lareau M, Lamarre M, Buszard D (1992) Simulating the effect of spring frost and clipper weevil on yield of strawberry. J Small Fruit Vitic 1:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kidmose U, Andersen H, Vang Petersen O (1996) Yield and quality attributes of strawberry cultivars grown in Denmark 1990–1991. Fruit Varieties J 50:160–166Google Scholar
  18. Kovach J, Rieckenberg R, English-Loeb G, Pritts M (1999) Oviposition patterns of the strawberry bud weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) at two spatial scales and implications for management. J Econ Entomol 92:1358–1363Google Scholar
  19. Kovanci OB, Kovanci B, Nimet GS (2005) Sampling and development of economic injury levels for Anthonomus rubi Herbst adults. Crop Prot 24:1035–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lekic M (1962) Razvojni ciklus i ekologija jagodinog cvetojeda. (Development cycle and ecology of Anthonomus rubi Herbst) (in Hungarian). Zast Bilja 67–68:87–100Google Scholar
  21. Mailloux G, Bostanian JN (1993) Development of the strawberry bud weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in strawberry fields. Ann Entomol Soc Am 86:384–393Google Scholar
  22. Minitab (1997) User’s guide 2: data analysis and quality tools. Minitab Inc State College, PAGoogle Scholar
  23. Popov SY (1996) Possibility of monitoring the population density of the strawberry blossom weevil, Anthonomus rubi Herbst (Coleoptera, Curculionidae), on strawberry by using two methods: counting clipped buds and using pheromones. Entomol Rev (Engl Transl Entomol Obozr) 75:104–109Google Scholar
  24. Pritts M, Kelly MJ, English-Loeb G (1999) Strawberry cultivars compensate for simulated bud weevil damage in matted row plantings. HortScience 34:109–111Google Scholar
  25. Schaefers GA, Shanks CH (1981) Pest management systems for strawberry insects. In: Pimentel D (eds) CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture vol III, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 535–552Google Scholar
  26. Soderlund DM, Knipple DC (2003) The molecular biology of knockdown resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 33:563–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stenseth C (1970): Jordbærsnutebille Anthonomus rubi (Herbst)—angrep, skade og bekjempelse i jordbær. (The attack, effect of bud damage and control measures of Anthonomus rubi (Herbst) in strawberry) (in Norwegian). Forskning og Forsøk i Landbruket 21:357–366Google Scholar
  28. Sæthre M-G, Ørpen HM, Hofsvang T (1999) Action programmes for pesticide risk reduction and pesticide use in different crops in Norway. Crop Prot 18:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trandem N, Aasen S, Hågvar EB, Haslestad J, Salinas SH, Sønsteby A (2004) Strawberry blossom weevil—recent research in Norway. IOBC WPRS Bull 27(4):145–152Google Scholar
  30. Tuovinen T, Parikka P (1997) Monitoring strawberry pests and diseases: practical applications for decision-making. Acta Hortic 439(2):931–940Google Scholar
  31. Zurawicz E, Labanowska BH, Bielenin A (1997) Integrated strawberry production in Poland. Acta Hortic 439(2):957–961Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Natural Resource ManagementThe Norwegian University of Life SciencesÅsNorway
  2. 2.Plant Health and Plant Protection DivisionNorwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental ResearchÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations