Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 79, Issue 1, pp 9–10 | Cite as

Chrysolina fastuosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) a biological control agent or a possible pest?

  • András Bozsik
Original Article


A poorly known chrysomelid beetle, Chrysolina fastuosa (Scopoli) has been found in a strikingly great number on black horehound (Ballota nigra L.), a soft caulescent plant belonging to the Lamiaceae family. B. nigra can be found from April to August commonly on roadsides, along walls or at the border of gardens and orchards in Hungary and continental Europe. It can be called a minor weed. The glistering tiny adults that feed voraciously on leaves cause apparently significant damage. The subsequent investigation, which focuses on the number of feeding individuals and the loss of plant tissue, showed 1–24 beetles on a plant and the consumed leave surface which amounted to 8–94%. The repeated damage assessment, a week later showed a significantly unimportant increase in the number of individuals but a significant 20–31% increase in the plant surface loss. According to the literature, Ch. fastuosa has been found in association with other Labiatae plants such as Galeopsis pubescens Besser, Lamium album L. and Urtica dioica L. (Urticaceae). Thus, considering its efficiency mentioned above, it could be used to augment and maintain its populations as a biological control agent for these weeds. However, taking into consideration the growing importance of the production of medicinal plants among which Lamiaceae species are numerous, Ch. fastuosa can cause damage that cannot be neglected.


Ballota Biological control agent Chrysolina Lamiaceae Pest Urticaceae 


  1. Bozsik A (1996) Studies on aphicidal efficiency of different stinging nettle extracts. Anz Schädlingskd, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz 69:21–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Daels-Rakotoarison DA, Seidel V, Gressier B, Brunet C, Tillequin F, Luyckx M, Bailleul F, Cazin M, Cazin JC (2000) Neurosedative and antioxidant activities of phenylpropanoids from Ballota nigra. Arzneim Forsch 50:16–23Google Scholar
  3. Danielsson R (2004) Chrysomelinae. Google Scholar
  4. Dreyer J, Dreyling G, Feldmann F (1996) Cultivation of singing nettle Urtica dioica L. with high fibre content as a raw material for the production of fibre and cellulose: qualitative and quantitative differentation of ancient clones. J Appl Bot 70:28–39Google Scholar
  5. Hoffmann D (1990) The new holistic herbal. Shaftesbury, DorsetGoogle Scholar
  6. Rehounek J (2002) Comparative study of the leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in chosen localities in the district of Nymburk. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis, Facultas Rerum Naturalium (2001–2002), Biologica 39–40:123–130Google Scholar
  7. Rozner I (1997) Hargita megye levélbogár-faunájának alapvetése (Fauna of Chrysomelidae in the county of Hargita (Transsylvania)).
  8. Sváb J (1981) Biometriai móódszerek a kutatásban (Biometrical methods in research work). Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  9. Varlez S (1988) Écologie des relations entre trois chrysomeles et leurs plantes-hotes. Ann Soc R Zool Belg 118:89Google Scholar
  10. Víg K (1997) Leaf beetle collections at the Mátra Museum, Gyöngyös, Hungary (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae sensu lato). Folia Hist Nat Mus Matraensis 22:175–201Google Scholar
  11. Víg K (2001) Somogy megye levélbogár és zsizsikfaunája (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Bruchidae) [Fauna of Chrysomelidae and Bruchidae in the county of Somogy (Hungary)]. Nat Somogyiensis 1:221–236Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant ProtectionUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary

Personalised recommendations