The experience of virtual reality: are individual differences in mental imagery associated with sense of presence?
The concept of “presence” describes the quality of subjective experience in immersive virtual reality (IVR). Presence refers to a specific state of consciousness: we behave and feel as if we actually were in the virtual world even though we know there is nothing there. In their handbook of Virtual Reality, Burdea and Coiffet (Virtual reality technology, Wiley, New York, 2003) suggested that the experience of presence in IVR would emerge from the combination of three Is: Immersion or capacity to isolate from the external world, Interaction or capacity to naturally exploring the virtual environment, and Imagination or individual aptitudes with mental imagery. So far, several studies have investigated the technological and psychological factors affecting the degree of immersion and interaction. However, no study has explored the relationship between perceived presence and mental imagery. Here we aim at filling this gap through a correlational study comparing self-reports about sense of presence and mental imagery abilities. After experiencing two IVR scenarios (an art gallery and a living room), 142 male and female users were administered with questionnaires assessing the degree of presence (Igroup Presence Questionnaire), the degree of vividness (Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire) and control (Test of Visual Imagery Control) of subjective mental images. Results showed a clear positive correlation between presence and vividness: the higher the vividness of mental images the stronger the reported sense of presence felt in IVR scenarios. Instead, the capacity to control mental imagery showed a weaker association with presence. We may conclude that individual differences in the degree of perceived presence and mental imagery ability are associated.
KeywordsImmersive virtual reality Presence Mental imagery ability Vividness of mental imagery Control of mental imagery Individual differences
This study was not supported by grant or funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
We know of no conflicts of interest associated with this publication, and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. As Corresponding Author, I confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved for submission by all the named authors.
All procedures performed in the present study involving healthy participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of the Department of Psychology (University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli) and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Ahsen A (1990) AA-VVIQ and imagery paradigm: vividness and unvividness issue in VVIQ research programs. J Ment Imag 14(3–4):1–58Google Scholar
- Ashton R, White KD (1980) Sex differences in imagery vividness: an artifact of the test. Br J Psychol 71(1):35–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1980.tb02726.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Antonietti A, Crespi, M (1995) Analisi di tre questionari per la valutazione della vividezza dell’immagine mentale (Analysis of three questionnaires for assessing the vividness of mental image). Department of Psychology, Catholic University of The Sacred Heart. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc 57:289–300Google Scholar
- Felnhofer A, Kothgassner OD, Hauk N, Beutl L, Hlavacs H, Kryspin-Exner I (2014) Physical and social presence in collaborative virtual environments: exploring age and gender differences with respect to empathy. Comput Hum Behav 31:272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gordon R (1949) An investigation into some of the factors that favour the formation of stereotyped images. Br J Psychol 39:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1949.tb00215.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hendrix CM (1994) Exploratory studies on the sense of presence in virtual environments as a function of visual and auditory display parameters. Unpublished master’s thesis, Human Interface Technology Laboratory of the Washington Technology Center at the University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Iachini T (2011) Mental imagery and embodied cognition: a multimodal approach. J Ment Imag 35(3–4):1–28Google Scholar
- Isaac AR, Marks DF (1994) Individual differences in mental imagery experience: developmental changes and specialization. Br J Psychol 85(4):479–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02536.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kihlstrom JF, Glisky ML, Peterson MA, Harvey EM (1991) Vividness and control of mental imagery: a psychometric analysis. J Ment Imag 15(3–4):133–142Google Scholar
- Kosslyn SM (1994) Image and brain: the resolution of the imagery debate. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Marks DF (1973) Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. Br J Psychol 64(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McKelvie SJ (1995) The VVIQ as a psychometric test of individual differences in visual imagery vividness: a critical quantitative review and plea for direction. J Ment Imag 19(3–4):1–106Google Scholar
- Richardson JT (1995) Gender differences in the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire: a meta-analysis. J Ment Imag 19(3–4):177–187Google Scholar
- Riva G, Vatalaro F, Davide F, Alcaniz M (eds) (2005) Ambient intelligence: the evolution of technology, communication and cognition towards the future of human-computer interaction, vol 6. IOS press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H (1999) Decomposing the sense of presence: factor analytic insights. Presented at the 2nd international workshop on presence, University of Essex, UKGoogle Scholar
- Steuer J (1992) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun 42(4):73–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996) Using multivariate statistics, 3rd edn. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1994) Measuring immersion in virtual environments. ARI technical report 1014. Alexandria, VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social SciencesGoogle Scholar