Advertisement

Cognitive Processing

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 473–479 | Cite as

Functioning of cognitive codes in autobiographical memory and the self—Is the self visual?

  • Paweł Błaszczyński
Research Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

The main goal was to test the relationship between types of cognitive codes (perceptual–imaginative and verbal–propositional) and autobiographical memory. The purpose of this research was to evaluate whether there are independent processes serving the self, depending on separate cognitive codes. Sixty adult participants completed the NEO-FFI inventory using two kinds of procedure: perceptual–imaginative code or verbal–propositional code. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used for analysis. The study has shown the dynamic of the self, depending on two cognitive perspectives. The results indicate that the reflection of the self in autobiographical memory brings different knowledge about the self and its motives.

Keywords

Self Autobiographical memory Personality 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10339_2018_873_MOESM1_ESM.xls (36 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLS 35 kb)

References

  1. Barclay CR, Subramaniam G (1987) Autobiographical memories and self-schemata. Appl Cogn Psychol 1:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister RF (1998) The self. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (eds) The handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Cervone D (2008) Explanatory models of personality: social-cognitive theories and the knowledge-and-appraisal model of personality architecture. In: Boyle GJ, Matthews GM, Saklofske DH (eds) The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment. Personality theories and models, vol 1. SAGE, London, pp 80–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conway MA (1997a) The inventory of experience: memory and identity. In: Jodelef D, Pennebaker J, Paez D (eds) Political events and collective memories. Routledge, London, pp 21–46Google Scholar
  5. Conway MA (1997b) Recovered memories and false memories. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conway MA (2005) Memory and the self. J Mem Lang 53:594–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conway MA (2009) Episodic memories. Neuropsychologia 47:2305–2313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Conway MA, Pleydell-Pearce CW (2000) The construction of autobiographical memories in self-memory system. Psychol Rev 107:261–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Conway MA, Singer JA, Tagini A (2004a) The self and autobiographical memory: correspondence and coherence. Soc Cogn 22:491–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conway MA, Meares K, Standart S (2004b) Images and goals. Memory 12:525–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Conway MA, Meares K, Standart S (2006) The self memory system and memories of trauma. Soc Cogn 22:491–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craik FIM, Moroz TM, Moscovitch M, Stuss DT, Winocur G, Tulving E, Kapur S (1999) In search of the self: a positron emission tomography study. Psychol Sci 10:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gazzaniga MS (2000) Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain 123:1296–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klein SB, Cosmides L, Tooby J, Chance S (2001) Priming exceptions: a test of the scope hypothesis in naturalistic trait judgments. Soc Cogn 17:413–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kosslyn SM (1995) Mental imagery. In: Kosslyn SM, Osherson DN (eds) A bradford book, vol 2, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Kosslyn SM (2005) Mental images and the brain. Cogn Neuropsychol 22:333–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Langens TA, Schmalt H-D (2008) Motivational traits: new directions and measuring motives with the multi-motive grid (MMG). In: Boyle GJ, Matthews GM, Saklofske DH (eds) The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment. Personality theories and models, vol 1. SAGE, London, pp 523–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McAdams DP (2001) The psychology of life stories. Rev Gen Psychol 5:100–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mischel W (2004) Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychol Rev 80(4):252–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paunonen SV (1998) Hierarchical organization of personality and prediction of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:538–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmalt H-D (2005) Validity of a short form of the achievement-motive grid (AMG-S): evidence for the three-factor structure emphasizing active and passive forms of fear of failure. J Pers Assess 84(2):172–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Shoda Y (1999) Behavioral expressions of personality system: generation and perception of behavioral signatures. In: Cervone D, Shoda Y (eds) The coherence of personality: social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization. Guilford, New York, pp 155–181Google Scholar
  23. Sokolowski K, Schmalt H-D, Langens Th, Puca RM (2000) Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once- the multi-motive grid (MMG). J Pers Assess 74(1):126–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPirogow Regional Hospital in LodzLodzPoland

Personalised recommendations