Does finger sense predict addition performance?
- 373 Downloads
The impact of fingers on numerical and mathematical cognition has received a great deal of attention recently. However, the precise role that fingers play in numerical cognition is unknown. The current study explores the relationship between finger sense, arithmetic and general cognitive ability. Seventy-six children between the ages of 5 and 12 participated in the study. The results of stepwise multiple regression analyses demonstrated that while general cognitive ability including language processing was a predictor of addition performance, finger sense was not. The impact of age on the relationship between finger sense, and addition was further examined. The participants were separated into two groups based on age. The results showed that finger gnosia score impacted addition performance in the older group but not the younger group. These results appear to support the hypothesis that fingers provide a scaffold for calculation and that if that scaffold is not properly built, it has continued differential consequences to mathematical cognition.
KeywordsFinger gnosia Cognition Number Arithmetic
This research was funded by a Grant from Indiana University (FRSP). I would like to thank Roy Seo, Jessica Denton, Galen Hartman, Priyanka Ghosh and Taylor Hurst for the assistance with data collection.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Burns M (1996) How to make the most of math manipulatives. Instructor 105(7):45–51Google Scholar
- Butterworth B (1999b) What counts: how every brain is hardwired for math. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- De La Cruz V, Di Nuovo A, Di Nuovo S, Cangelosi A (2014) Making fingers and words count in a cognitive robot. Front Behav Neurosci 8:1–12Google Scholar
- Fayol M, Seron X (2005) About numerical representations: insights from neuropsychological, experimental, and developmental studies. In: Campbell JID (ed) Handbook of mathematical cognition, Psychology Press, NewYork, pp 3–22Google Scholar
- Fias W, Fischer M (2005) Spatial representation of numbers. In: Handbook of mathematical cognition, Psychology Press, New York, pp 43–54Google Scholar
- Fuson KC, Richards J, Briars DJ (1982) The acquisition and elaboration of the number word sequence. In: Brainerd CJ (ed) Children’s logical and mathematical cognition. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Krajewski K, Schneider W (2009) Exploring the impact of phonological awareness, visual–spatial working memory, and preschool quantity–number competencies on mathematics achievement in elementary school: findings from a 3-year longitudinal study. J Exp Child Psychol 103(4):516–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Penner-Wilger M, Fast L, LeFevre J, Smith-Chant BL, Skwarchuk S, Kamawar D, Bisanz J (2007) The foundations of numeracy: subitizing, finger gnosia, and fine-motor ability. In: McNamara DS, Trafton JG (eds) Proceedings of the 29th annual Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, pp 1385–1390Google Scholar
- Penner-Wilger M, Fast L, Lefevre JA, Smith-Chant BL, Skwarchuk SL, Kamawar D, Bisanz J, Deslauriers WA (2008) Investigating the building blocks of numerical representations: subitizing and finger gnosis. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, AustinGoogle Scholar
- Reeves R, Humberstone J (2011) Five- to 7-year olds’ finger gnosia and calculation abilities. Front Psychol 2:1–10Google Scholar
- Suh JM (2007) Tying it all together: building mathematics proficiency for all students. Teach Child Math 14(3):163–169Google Scholar
- Thompson PW (1994) Concrete materials and teaching for mathematical understanding. Arith Teach 41(9):556–558Google Scholar
- Treiman R, Zukowski A (1991) Levels of phonological awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., LondonGoogle Scholar
- Woodcock RW, McGrew KS, Mather N (2001) Woodcock–Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Riverside Pub, HalifaxGoogle Scholar