Cognitive Processing

, Volume 16, Supplement 1, pp 209–213 | Cite as

How language impacts memory of motion events in English and French

  • Helen EngemannEmail author
  • Henriëtte Hendriks
  • Maya Hickmann
  • Efstathia Soroli
  • Coralie Vincent
Short Report


This paper examines whether cross-linguistic differences in motion encoding affect event processing, specifically memory performance. We compared speakers of two languages which differ strikingly in how they habitually encode Manner and Path of motion (Talmy in Toward a cognitive semantics: typology and process in concept structuring, 2nd edn, vol 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000). We tested French and English adult native speakers across three tasks that recruited and/or suppressed verbal processing to different extents: verbal event descriptions elicited on the basis of dynamic motion stimuli, a verbal memory task testing the impact of prior verbalisation on target recognition, and a non-verbal memory task, using a dual-task paradigm to suppress internal verbalisation. Results showed significant group differences in the verbal description task, which mirrored expected typological tendencies. English speakers more frequently expressed both Manner and Path information than French speakers, who produced more descriptions encoding either Path or Manner alone. However, these differences in linguistic encoding did not significantly affect speakers’ memory performance in the memory recognition tasks, neither in the verbal nor in the non-verbal condition. The findings contribute to current debates regarding the conditions under which language effects occur and the relative weight of language-specific and universal constraints on spatial cognition.


Spatial cognition Cross-linguistic variation Motion events Memory Language and thought 


  1. Athanasopoulos P, Bylund E (2013) Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cogn Sci 37:286–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Choi S, Hattrup K (2012) Relative contribution of cognition/perception and language on spatial categorization. Cogn Sci 36:102–129PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Filipović L (2011) Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: bilingual vs. monolingual Lexicalization and memory for motion events. Int J Biling 15:466–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gennari SP, Sloman SA, Malt BC, Fitch WT (2002) Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition 83:49–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hickmann M, Engemann H, Soroli E, Hendriks H, Vincent C (2015) Expressing and categorizing motion in French and English: verbal and non-verbal cognition across languages. In: Ibarretxe-Antuñano I (ed) Motion and space across languages and applications. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. Papafragou A, Massey C, Gleitman L (2002) Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84:189–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Papafragou A, Hulbert J, Trueswell J (2008) Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition 108:155–184PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Slobin DI (2004) How People move: Discourse effects of linguistic typology. In: Moder CL, Martinovic-Zic A (eds) Discourse across languages and cultures. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Talmy L (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics: typology and process in concept structuring, vol 2, 2nd edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Trueswell JC, Papafragou A (2010) Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: evidence from dual-task paradigms. J Mem Lang 63:64–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Engemann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Henriëtte Hendriks
    • 2
  • Maya Hickmann
    • 3
  • Efstathia Soroli
    • 4
  • Coralie Vincent
    • 3
  1. 1.Competence Centre for Language StudiesFree University of Bozen-BolzanoBozen/BolzanoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of MMLUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.CNRS - Laboratoire “Structures Formelles du Langage”University of Paris 8ParisFrance
  4. 4.CNRS - Laboratoire “Savoirs, Textes, Langage”University of Lille 3Villeneuve d’Ascq CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations