Cognitive Processing

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 491–501 | Cite as

Synchronising movements with the sounds of a virtual partner enhances partner likeability

  • Jacques Launay
  • Roger T. Dean
  • Freya Bailes
Research Report


Previous studies have demonstrated that synchronising movements with other people can influence affiliative behaviour towards them. While research has focused on synchronisation with visually observed movement, synchronisation with a partner who is heard may have similar effects. We replicate findings showing that synchronisation can influence ratings of likeability of a partner, but demonstrate that this is possible with virtual interaction, involving a video of a partner. Participants performed instructed synchrony in time to sounds instead of the observable actions of another person. Results show significantly higher ratings of likeability of a partner after moving at the same time as sounds attributed to that partner, compared with moving in between sounds. Objectively quantified synchrony also correlated with ratings of likeability. Belief that sounds were made by another person was manipulated in Experiment 2, and results demonstrate that when sounds are attributed to a computer, ratings of likeability are not affected by moving in or out of time. These findings demonstrate that interaction with sound can be experienced as social interaction in the absence of genuine interpersonal contact, which may help explain why people enjoy engaging with recorded music.


Synchronisation Virtual interaction Rhythm Affiliation 


  1. Baron-Cohen S (1997) Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G, Freund HJ (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13(2):400–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (1999) The Chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(6):893–910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chartrand TL, Maddux WW, Lakin JL (2005) Beyond the perception-behavior link: the ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. In: Hassin RR, Uleman JS, Bargh JA (eds) The new unconscious. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 334–361Google Scholar
  5. Demos AP, Chaffin R, Begosh KT, Daniels JR, Marsh KL (2012) Rocking to the beat: effects of music and partner’s movements on spontaneous interpersonal coordination. J Exp Psychol Gen 141(1):49–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eitan Z, Granot RY (2006) How music moves. Music Percept 23(3):221–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engel LR, Frum C, Puce A, Walker NA, Lewis JW (2009) Different categories of living and non-living sound-sources activate distinct cortical networks. Neuroimage 47(4):1778–1791PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73(6):2608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Filippin L (2011) T2T Package.
  10. Freedberg D, Gallese V (2007) Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends Cogn Sci 11(5):197–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gazzola V, Aziz-Zadeh L, Keysers C (2006) Empathy and the somatotopic auditory mirror system in humans. Curr Biol 16(18):1824–1829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guastella AJ, Mitchell PB, Dadds MR (2008a) Oxytocin increases gaze to the eye region of human faces. Biol Psychiat 63(1):3–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guastella AJ, Mitchell PB, Mathews F (2008b) Oxytocin enhances the encoding of positive social memories in humans. Biol Psychiat 64(3):256–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagen EH, Bryant GA (2003) Music and dance as a coalition signaling system. Hum Nat Int Bios 14(1):21–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hove MJ, Risen JL (2009) It’s all in the timing: interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Soc Cogn 27(6):949–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iacoboni M (2005) Neural mechanisms of imitation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15(6):632–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Isen AM (1970) Success, failure, attention, and reaction to others: the warm glow of success. J Pers Soc Psychol 15(4):294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Issartel J, Marin L, Cadopi M (2007) Unintended interpersonal co-ordination: “Can we march to the beat of our own drum?”. Neurosci Lett 411(3):174–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirschner S, Tomasello M (2009) Joint drumming: social context facilitates synchronization in preschool children. J Exp Child Psychol 102(3):299–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleinke CL (1986) Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychol Bull 100(1):78–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kokal I, Engel A, Kirschner S, Keysers C (2011) Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates prosocial commitment-if the rhythm comes easy. PLoS ONE 6(11):e27272. doi: 10.21371/journal.pone.0027272 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Konvalinka I, Vuust P, Roepstorff A, Frith CD (2010) Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Q J Exp Psychol 63(11):2220–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LaFrance M (1979) Nonverbal synchrony and rapport—analysis by the cross-lag panel technique. Soc Psychol 42(1):66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lakens D (2010) Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. J Exp Soc Psychol 46(5):701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lakin JL, Jefferis VE, Cheng CM, Chartrand TL (2003) The chameleon effect as social glue: evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. J Nonverbal Behav 27(3):145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Launay J, Dean RT, Bailes F (2013) Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction. Exp Psychol 60(1):53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Madison G, Merker B (2002) On the limits of anisochrony in pulse attribution. Psychol Res 66(3):201–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mardia KV, Jupp PE (2000) Directional statistics. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  29. Miles LK, Griffiths JL, Richardson MJ, Macrae CN (2009a) Too late to coordinate: contextual influences on behavioral synchrony. Eur J Soc Psychol 40(1):52–60Google Scholar
  30. Miles LK, Nind LK, Macrae CN (2009b) The rhythm of rapport: interpersonal synchrony and social perception. J Exp Soc Psychol 45(3):585–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miles LK, Lumsden J, Richardson MJ, Macrae NC (2011) Do birds of a feather move together? Group membership and behavioral synchrony. Exp Brain Res 211(3–4):495–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Modigliani A (1971) Embarrassment, facework, and eye contact: testing a theory of embarrassment. J Pers Soc Psychol 17(1):15–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moukheiber A, Rautureau G, Perez-Diaz F, Soussignan R, Dubal S, Jouvent R, Pelissolo A (2009) Gaze avoidance in social phobia: objective measure and correlates. Behav Res Ther 48(2):147–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ollen J (2006) A criterion-related validity test of selected indicators of musical sophistication using expert ratings. The Ohio State University
  35. Oullier O, De Guzman GC, Jantzen KJ, Lagarde J, Kelso JAS (2008) Social coordination dynamics: measuring human bonding. Soc Neurosci 3(2):178–192PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Overy K, Molnar-Szakacs I (2009) Being together in time: musical experience and the mirror neuron system. Music Percept 26(5):489–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pinkham AE, Hopfinger JB, Pelphrey KA, Piven J, Penn DL (2008) Neural bases for impaired social cognition in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res 99(1–3):164–175PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Rizzolatti G (2005) The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anat Embryol 210(5):419–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci 10(2):70–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Semin GR, Cacioppo JT (2008) Grounding social cognition: synchronization, coordination and co-regulation. In: Semin GR, Smith ER (eds) Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective and neuroscientific approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 119–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shimojo S, Simion C, Shimojo E, Scheier C (2003) Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nat Neurosci 6(12):1317–1322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sommerville JA, Decety J (2006) Weaving the fabric of social interaction: articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 13(2):179–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steinbeis N, Koelsch S (2009) Understanding the intentions behind man-made products elicits neural activity in areas dedicated to mental state attribution. Cereb Cortex 19(3):619–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tognoli E, Lagarde J, DeGuzman GC, Kelso JAS (2007) The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104(19):8190–8195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valdesolo P, DeSteno D (2011) Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion 11(2):262–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watkins K, Strafella A, Paus T (2003) Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 41(8):989–994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wiltermuth SS (2012) Synchrony and destructive obedience. Soc Influ 7(2):78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiltermuth SS, Heath C (2009) Synchrony and cooperation. Psychol Sci 20(1):1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques Launay
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roger T. Dean
    • 1
  • Freya Bailes
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.MARCS InstituteUniversity of Western SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.School of Drama, Music and ScreenUniversity of HullKingston upon HullUK

Personalised recommendations