Cognitive Processing

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 317–328 | Cite as

Aspects of situated cognition in embodied numerosity: the case of finger counting

  • Mirjam Wasner
  • Korbinian Moeller
  • Martin H. Fischer
  • Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Research Report


Numerical cognitions such as spatial-numerical associations have been observed to be influenced by grounded, embodied and situated factors. For the case of finger counting, grounded and embodied influences have been reported. However, situated influences, e.g., that reported counting habits change with perception and action within a given situation, have not been systematically examined. To pursue the issue of situatedness of reported finger-counting habits, 458 participants were tested in three separate groups: (1) spontaneous condition: counting with both hands available, (2) perceptual condition: counting with horizontal (left-to-right) perceptual arrangement of fingers (3) perceptual and proprioceptive condition: counting with horizontal (left-to-right) perceptual arrangement of fingers and with busy dominant hand. Report of typical counting habits differed strongly between the three conditions. 28 % reported to start counting with the left hand in the spontaneous counting condition (1), 54 % in the perceptual condition (2) and 62 % in the perceptual and proprioceptive condition (3). Additionally, all participants in the spontaneous counting group showed a symmetry-based counting pattern (with the thumb as number 6), while in the two other groups, a considerable number of participants exhibited a spatially continuous counting pattern (with the pinkie as number 6). Taken together, the study shows that reported finger-counting habits depend on the perceptual and proprioceptive situation and thus are strongly influenced by situated cognition. We suggest that this account reconciles apparently contradictory previous findings of different counting preferences regarding the starting hand in different examination situations.


Finger counting Situated cognition Number processing Finger-digit mapping 



Mirjam Wasner, Korbinian Moeller and Hans-Christoph Nuerk are members of the “Cooperative Research Training Group” of the University of Education, Ludwigsburg and the University of Tuebingen, which is supported by the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts in Baden-Württemberg. They are also  associated with the LEAD Graduate School of the University of Tuebingen, which is funded within the framework of the Excellence Initiative via the German Research Foundation. Martin H. Fischer was supported through DFG Grant FI 1915/2-1 on "Manumerical cognition".


  1. Andres M, Seron X, Olivier E (2007) Contribution of motor circuits to counting. J Cogn Neurosci 19(4):563–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bächtold B, Baumüller M, Brugger P (1998) Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia 36:731–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:617–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butterworth B (1999) The mathematical brain. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Conant LL (1896) The number concept: its origin and development. Macmillan and co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J Exp Psychol Gen 122:371–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dehaene S, Piazza M, Pinel P, Cohen L (2003) Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cogn Neuropsychol 20:487–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Luca S, Granà A, Semenza C, Seron X, Pesenti M (2006) Finger-digit compatibility in Arabic numeral processing. Q J Exp Psychol 59:1648–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Luca S, Lefèvre N, Pesenti M (2010) Place and summation coding for canonical and non-canonical finger numeral representations. Cognition 117:95–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Domahs F, Moeller K, Huber S, Willmes K, Nuerk H-C (2010) Embodied numerosity: implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures. Cognition 116:251–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fayol M, Barrouillet P, Marinthe C (1998) Predicting arithmetical achievement from neuropsychological performance: a longitudinal study. Cognition 68:B63–B70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer MH (2008) Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex 44:386–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischer MH (2012) A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied, and situated numerical cognition. Cogn Process. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0477-5 Google Scholar
  14. Fischer MH, Brugger P (2011) When digits help digits: spatial-number associations point to finger counting as prime examples of embodied cognition. Front Psychol 2:260PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer MH, Shaki S, Cruise A (2009) It takes just one word to quash a SNARC. Exp Psychol 56(5):361–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gracia-Bafalluy M, Noël MP (2008) Does finger training increase young children’s numerical performance? Cortex 44:368–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hager W (2002) The examination of psychological hypotheses by planned contrasts referring to two-factor interactions in fixed-effects ANOVA. Method Psychol Res Online 7:49–77Google Scholar
  18. Ifrah G (1981) The universal history of numbers: from prehistory to the invention of the computer. The Harvill Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindemann O, Alipour A, Fischer MH (2011) Finger counting habits in middle eastern and western individuals: an online survey. J Cross Cult Psychol 42:566–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loetscher T, Schwarz U, Schubiger M, Brugger P (2008) Head turns bias the brain’s random number generator. Curr Biol 18(2):R60–R62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moeller K, Martignon L, Wessolowski S, Engel J, Nuerk H-C (2011) Effects of finger counting on numerical development—the opposing views of neurocognition and mathematics education. Front Psychol 2:328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00328 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moeller K, Fischer U, Link T, Wasner M, Huber S, Cress U, Nuerk H-C (2012) Learning and development of embodied numerosity. Cogn Process. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0457-9 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Noël MP (2005) Finger gnosia: a predictor of numerical abilities in children? Child Neuropsychol 11:413–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nuerk H-C, Wood G, Willmes K (2005) The universal SNARC effect. The association between number magnitude and space is a modal. Exp Psychol 52:187–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Opfer JE, Furlong EE (2011) How numbers bias preschoolers’ spatial search. J Cross Cult Psychol 42(4):682–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Patro K, Haman M (2012) The spatial-numerical congruity effect in preschoolers. J Exp Child Psychol 111(3):534–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pika S, Nicoladis E, Marentette P (2009) How to order a beer. Cultural differences in the use of conventional gestures for numbers. J Cross Cult Psychol 40(1):70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Previtali P, Rinaldi L, Girelli L (2011) Nature or nurture in finger counting: a review on the determinants of the direction of number-finger mapping. Front Psychol. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00363 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Riello M, Rusconi E (2011) Unimanual SNARC effect: hand matters. Front Psychol. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00372 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Robbins P, Aydede M (2009) Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Sato M, Lalain M (2008) On the relationship between handedness and hand-digit-mapping in finger counting. Cortex 44:393–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sato M, Cattaneo L, Rizzolatti G, Gallese V (2007) Numbers within our hands: modulation of corticospinal excitability of hand muscles during numerical judgment. J Cogn Neurosci 19:684–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaki S, Fischer MH (2008) Reading space into numbers—a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition 108(2):590–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shaki S, Fischer MH (2012) Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition. J Exp Psychol Hum 38(3):804–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shaki S, Fischer MH, Petrusic WM (2009) Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychon Bull Rev 16(2):328–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shaki S, Fischer MH, Göbel SM (2012) The origin of number-space associations: a comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions. J Exp Child Psychol 112(2):275–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9:625–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wood G, Nuerk H-C, Willmes K (2006) Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: a failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux, 1993. Cortex 42:1069–1079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zebian S (2005) Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: the SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. J Cogn Cult 5(1):165–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mirjam Wasner
    • 1
  • Korbinian Moeller
    • 2
  • Martin H. Fischer
    • 3
  • Hans-Christoph Nuerk
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyEberhard Karls University, TuebingenTuebingenGermany
  2. 2.Knowledge Media Research CenterTuebingenGermany
  3. 3.Division of Cognitive SciencesUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations