Cognitive Processing

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 227–231 | Cite as

Self-reported craft expertise predicts maintenance of spatial ability in old age

  • Shannon K. T. BaileyEmail author
  • Valerie K. Sims
Letter to the Editor


Three hundred and three female participants between the ages of 18 and 77 reported their experience in crafting (sewing, knitting, and crocheting) and completed a measure of spatial ability: The Paper Folding Test. To investigate the connection between spatial ability performance, age, and craft expertise, an ANOVA was conducted for the Paper Folding Test using two levels of crafting expertise (High and Low) and three age categories (younger adults: 18–39, middle-aged adults: 40–59, and older adults: 60–77). Performance on the spatial ability test declined with age as predicted from previous literature. However, there was a significant Age by Expertise interaction. No difference was found between High and Low craft expertise groups in younger adults (18–39), but there was a growing difference between expertise groups in middle-aged adults (40–59) and older adults (60–77). The results suggest that continued hands-on experience in spatial domains is a predictor of maintenance of spatial ability across the life span.


Spatial ability Crafting Expertise Older adults Aging 


  1. Carroll JB (1993) Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Craft and Yarn Council (2011) 2009 research: 5,000 passionate knitters and crocheters speak out. Retrieved from
  3. CraftPR (2011) CHA (Craft and Hobby Association) announces 2010 craft industry statistics. Retrieved from
  4. Ekstrom R, French J, Harman H, Dermen D (1976) Kit of factor referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  5. Geda YE, Topazian HM, Lewis RA, Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Pankratz V et al (2011) Engaging in cognitive activities, aging, and mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 23(2):149–154PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Linn M, Petersen A (1985) Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 56(6):1479–1498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lithfous S, Dufour A, Després O (2013) Spatial navigation in normal aging and the prodromal stage of Alzheimer’s disease: insights from imaging and behavioral studies. Ageing Res Rev 12(1):201–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Maitland SB, Intrieri RC, Schaie KW, Willis SL (2000) Gender differences and changes in cognitive abilities across the adult life span. Aging Neuropsychol Cognit 7:32–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Salthouse TA, Mitchell DR (1990) Effects of age and naturally occurring experience on spatial visualization performance. Dev Psychol 26(5):845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Salthouse TA, Babcock RL, Skovronek E, Mitchell DD, Palmon R (1990) Age and experience effects in spatial visualization. Dev Psychol 26(1):128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sims V, Mayer R (2002) Domain specificity of spatial expertise: the case of video game players. Appl Cognit Psychol 16(1):97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tran US, Formann AK (2008) Piaget’s water-level tasks: performance across the lifespan with emphasis on the elderly. Personal Individ Differ 45(3):232–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Verhaeghen P, Salthouse TA (1997) Meta-analyses of age–cognition relations in adulthood: estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. Psychol Bull 122(3):231–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations