When do spatial abilities support student comprehension of STEM visualizations?
- 614 Downloads
Spatial visualization abilities are positively related to performance on science, technology, engineering, and math tasks, but this relationship is influenced by task demands and learner strategies. In two studies, we illustrate these interactions by demonstrating situations in which greater spatial ability leads to problematic performance. In Study 1, chemistry students observed and explained sets of simultaneously presented displays depicting chemical phenomena at macroscopic and particulate levels of representation. Prior to viewing, the students were asked to make predictions at the macroscopic level. Eye movement analyses revealed that greater spatial ability was associated with greater focus on the prediction-relevant macroscopic level. Unfortunately, that restricted focus was also associated with lower-quality explanations of the phenomena. In Study 2, we presented the same displays but manipulated whether participants were asked to make predictions prior to viewing. Spatial ability was again associated with restricted focus, but only for students who completed the prediction task. Eliminating the prediction task encouraged attempts to integrate the displays that related positively to performance, especially for participants with high spatial ability. Spatial abilities can be recruited in effective or ineffective ways depending on alignments between the demands of a task and the approaches individuals adopt for completing that task.
KeywordsSpatial cognition STEM Visualizations Learning
This work was funded by REESE grants #0907780 and #0908130 from the National Science Foundation to PIs Dr. David N. Rapp and Dr. Mary Jane Shultz.
- Bodner G (1991) I have found you an argument: the conceptual knowledge of beginning chemistry graduate students. J Chem Educ 68:385–388. Retrieved from http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed068p385
- Bransford JD, Schwartz DL (1999) Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications. Rev Res Educ 24:61–100Google Scholar
- Bunce DM, Hutchinson KD (1993) The use of the GALT (Group Assessment of Logical Thinking) as a prediction of academic success in college chemistry. J Chem Educ 70:183–187Google Scholar
- Cordova DI, Lepper MR (1996) Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. J Educ Psychol 88:715–730Google Scholar
- Ekstrom RB, French JW, Harmon HH (1976) Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Guay R, McDaniels RE (1976) The visualization of viewpoints. The Purdue Research Foundation, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
- Johnson CI, Mayer RE (2012) An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. J Exp Psychol Appl. doi: 10.1037/a0026923. (Advance online publication)
- Kozhevnikov M, Motes M, Hegarty M (2007) Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cogn Sci 31:549e579Google Scholar
- Linn MC, Peterson AC (1985) Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 56:1479–1498Google Scholar
- Newcombe NS, Shipley TF (2012) Thinking about spatial thinking: new typology, new assessments. In Gero JS (ed) Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity. Springer, New York (in press)Google Scholar
- Pellegrino JW, Kail RV (1982) Process analyses of spatial aptitude. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, vol 1. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 311–365Google Scholar
- Rapp DN, Mensink MC (2011) Focusing effects from online and offline reading tasks. In: McCrudden MT, Magliano JP, Schraw G (eds) Text relevance and learning from text. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, pp 141–164Google Scholar
- Stieff M, Ryu M, Dixon BL, Hegarty M (in press) Problem solving strategies used by organic chemistry undergraduates. J Chem EducGoogle Scholar
- Thurstone LL (1938) Primary mental abilities. Psychom Monogr 1Google Scholar
- van Gog T, Scheiter K (eds) (2010) Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning [special issue]. Learn Instr 20Google Scholar
- Williamson VM, Jose TJ (2009) Using visualization techniques in chemistry teaching. In: Pienta NJ, Cooper MM, Greenbowe TJ (eds) Chemists guide to effective teaching, vol 2. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar