Advertisement

Cognitive Processing

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 51–62 | Cite as

Magnitude representation in sequential comparison of two-digit numbers is not holistic either

  • Korbinian Moeller
  • Elise Klein
  • Hans-Christoph Nuerk
  • Klaus Willmes
Research Report

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence suggesting that two-digit number magnitude is represented in a decomposed fashion into tens and units rather than holistically as one integrated entity. However, recently, it has been claimed that this property does not hold for the case when two to-be-compared numbers are presented sequentially. In the present study, we pursued this issue in two experiments by evaluating perceptual as well as strategic aspects arising for sequential stimulus presentation in a magnitude comparison task. We observed reliable unit-decade compatibility effects indicating decomposed processing of tens and units in a magnitude comparison task with sequential presentation of the to-be-compared numbers. In particular, we found that both confounding low-level perceptual features and stimulus set characteristics determining cue validity of the units influenced the compatibility effect. Taken together, our results clearly indicate that decomposed representations of tens and units seem to be a general characteristic of multi-digit number magnitude processing, rather than an exception occurring under very specific conditions only. Implications of these results for the understanding of number magnitude representations are discussed.

Keywords

Number magnitude Compatibility effect Decomposed Holistic 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by the German Research Foundation (DFG) for project 2 within the Research Group (Forschergruppe) Analyse und Förderung effektiver Lehr-Lern-Prozesse (FOR 738/2/) granted to Ulrike Cress and Hans-Christoph Nuerk supporting Korbinian Moeller. Additionally, part of this research was supported by a project in the ScienceCampus (WissenschaftsCampus) Tuebingen (Cluster 1/TP 1). We are grateful to Ian Mackenzie for language editing.

References

  1. Castronovo J, Crollen V (2011) Numerical comparison of two-digit numbers: how differences at encoding can involve differences in processing. J Cogn Psychol 23:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dehaene S (1989) The psychophysics of numerical comparison: a reexamination of apparently incompatible data. Percept Psychophys 45:557–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dehaene S, Dupoux E, Mehler J (1990) Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:626–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ganor-Stern D, Tzelgov J, Ellenbogen R (2007) Automaticity of two-digit numbers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:483–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ganor-Stern D, Pinhas M, Tzelgov J (2009) Comparing two-digit numbers: the importance of being presented together. Q J Exp Psychol 62:444–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. García-Orza J, Damas J (2011) Sequential processing of two-digit numbers: evidence of decomposition from a perceptual number matching task. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/J Psychol 219:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kallai AY, Tzelgov J (2012) The place-value of a digit in multi-digit numbers is processed automatically. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 38:1221–1233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knops A (2006) On the structure and neural correlates of the numerical magnitude representation and its influence in the assessment of verbal working memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Aachen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  9. Korvorst M, Damian MF (2008) The differential influence of decades and units on multidigit number comparison. Q J Exp Psychol 61:1250–1264Google Scholar
  10. Macizo P, Herrera A (2010) Two-digit number comparison: decade-unit and unit-decade produce the same compatibility effect with number words. Can J Exp Psychol 64:17–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Macizo P, Herrera A (2011) Cognitive control in number processing: evidence from the unit-decade compatibility effect. Acta Psychologia 136:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Macizo P, Herrera A (2012) The processing of Arabic numbers is under cognitive control. Psychol Res. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0456-6 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mann A, Moeller K, Pixner S, Kaufmann L, Nuerk H-C (2011) Attentional strategies in place–value integration: a longitudinal study on two-digit number comparison. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/J Psychol 219:42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meyerhoff HS, Moeller K, Debus K, Nuerk H-C (2012) Multi-digit number processing beyond the two-digit number range: a combination of sequential and parallel processes. Acta Psychol 140:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moeller K, Nuerk H-C, Willmes K (2009) Internal magnitude representation is not holistic, either. Eur J Cogn Psychol 21:672–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moeller K, Huber S, Nuerk H-C, Willmes K (2011) Two-digit number processing—holistic, decomposed or hybrid? A computational modelling approach. Psychol Res 75:290–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moeller K, Klein E, Nuerk H-C (in press) Influences of cognitive control in numerical cognition—adaptation by binding for implicit learning. Topics Cogn SciGoogle Scholar
  18. Moyer RS, Landauer TK (1967) Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature 215:1519–1520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nuerk H-C, Willmes K (2005) On the magnitude representations of two-digit numbers. Psychol Sci 47:52–72Google Scholar
  20. Nuerk H-C, Weger U, Willmes K (2001) Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition 82:B25–B33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nuerk H-C, Weger U, Willmes K (2004) On the perceptual generality of the unit-decade-compatibility effect. Exp Psychol 51:72–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nuerk H-C, Weger U, Willmes K (2005) Language effects in magnitude comparison: small, but not irrelevant. Brain Lang 92:262–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nuerk H-C, Moeller K, Klein E, Willmes K, Fischer MH (2011) Extending the mental number line—a review of multi-digit number processing. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/J Psychol 219:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pixner S, Moeller K, Zuber J, Nuerk H-C (2009) Decomposed but parallel processing of two-digit numbers in 1st graders. The Open Psychology Journal 2:40–48Google Scholar
  25. Posner MI, Snyder CRR, Davidson JR (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:160–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984) Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG (eds) Attention & performance X: control of language processes. Erlbaum Associates, London, pp 532–556Google Scholar
  27. Ratinckx E, Nuerk H-C, van Dijck J-P, Willmes K (2006) Effects of interhemispheric communication on two-digit arabic number processing. Cortex 42:1128–1137Google Scholar
  28. Restle F (1970) Speed of adding and comparing numbers. J Exp Psychol 83:32–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wood G, Mahr M, Nuerk H-C (2005) Deconstructing and reconstructing the base-10 structure of Arabic numbers. Psychol Sci 47:84–95Google Scholar
  30. Zhang J, Wang H (2005) The effect of external representation on numeric tasks. Q J Exp Psychol 58:817–838Google Scholar
  31. Zhou X, Chen C, Chen L, Dong Q (2008) Holistic or compositional representation of two-digit numbers? Evidence from the distance, magnitude, and SNARC effects in a number-matching task. Cognition 106:1525–1536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Korbinian Moeller
    • 1
  • Elise Klein
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Hans-Christoph Nuerk
    • 1
    • 2
  • Klaus Willmes
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Knowledge Media Research Center, IWM-KMRCTuebingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
  3. 3.Section Neuropsychology, Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital, RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  4. 4.Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Aachen, RWTHAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations