Cognitive Processing

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 43–49 | Cite as

Do people access meaning when they name banknotes?

Research Report

Abstract

Do people access the monetary value of banknotes when they say them aloud? In this study, we evaluated this question by asking people to name sequences of euro banknotes blocked by category or mixed with exemplars of other categories. The participants did not show an interference effect in the blocked context. The absence of semantic interference effect was also observed when participants named euro banknotes that did not have imprinted monetary value. These results suggest a direct connection between perceiving banknotes and accessing their names.

Keywords

Cognitive processing of currency Naming banknotes Number cognition Blocking paradigm 

References

  1. Belke E, Meyer AS, Damian MF (2005) Refractory effects in semantic processing as assessed in a blocking paradigm. Q J Exp Psychol 58:667–692. doi:10.1080/02724980443000142 Google Scholar
  2. Campbell JID, Thompson VA (2002) More power to you: simple power calculations for treatment effects with one degree of freedom. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 34:332–337. doi:10.3758/BF03195460 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costantini M, Ambrosini E, Scorolli C, Borghi AM (2011) When objects are close to me: affordances in the perpersonal space. Psychon Bull Rev 18:302–308. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0054-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuetos F, González–Nosti M, Barbón A, Brysbaert M (2011) Spanish word frequency based on film subtitles. Psicológica 32:133–143Google Scholar
  5. Damian MF, Als LC (2005) Long–lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:1372–1384. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1372 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Damian MF, Vigliocco G, Levelt WJM (2001) Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cogn 81:B77–B86. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01),00135-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glaser WR (1992) Picture naming. Cognition 42:61–105. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90040-O PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herrera A, Macizo P (2011) Naming digits in a semantic blocking paradigm. Q J Exp Psychol 64:328–338. doi:10(1080/17470218),2010,508532 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herrera A, Macizo P (2012) Semantic processing in the production of numerals across notations. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 28:40–51. doi:10.1037/a0024884 Google Scholar
  10. Kalénine S, Bonthoux F (2008) Object manipulability affects chindren’s and adults’ conceptual processing. Psychon Bull Rev 15:667–672. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.667 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kroll JF, Stewart E (1994) Category interference in translation and picture naming: evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. J Mem Lang 33:149–174. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. La Heij W, Dirkx J, Kramer P (1990) Categorial interference and associative priming in picture naming. Br J Psychol 81:511–525. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02376.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levelt WJM (1992) Accessing words in speech production: stages, processes and representations. Cogn 42:1–22. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McRae K, Cree GS, Seidenberg MS, McNorgan C (2005) Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behav Res Method 37:547–559. doi:10.3758/BF03192726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moss HE, Ostrin RK, Tyler LK, Marslen–Wilson WD, (1995) Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: evidence from priming. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21:863–883. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Navarrete E, del Prato P, Mahon BZ (2012) Factors determining semantic facilitation and interference in the cyclic naming paradigm. Front Psychol 3:38. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00038 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pérez MA, Navalón C (2003) Normas españolas de 290 nuevos dibujos: acuerdo en la denominación, concordancia de la imagen, familiaridad, complejidad visual y variabilidad de la imagen [Spanish norms of 290 new pictures: naming agreement, picture agreement, familiarity, visual complexity and picture variability]. Psicol 24:215–241Google Scholar
  18. Price HL, Connolly DA (2006) BatMon II: children’s category norms for 33 categories. Behav Res Method 38:529–531. doi:10.3758/BF03192808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roelofs A (2006) Functional architecture of naming dice, digits, and number words. Lang Cogn Process 21:78–111. doi:10.1080/01690960400001846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E–Prime user’s guide (Version 1.1) Psychology Software Tools, PittsburgGoogle Scholar
  21. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M (1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol: Human Learn Mem 6:174–215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vigliocco G, Vinson DP, Damian MF, Levelt WJM (2002) Semantic distance effects on object and action naming. Cogn 85:B61–B69. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02),00107-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vitkovitch M, Tyrrell L (1995) Sources of disagreement in object naming. Q J Exp Psychol 48A:822–848. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401419 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de PsicologíaUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.University of MurciaMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations