Cognitive Processing

, Volume 13, Supplement 1, pp 193–197 | Cite as

Processing motion implied in language: eye-movement differences during aspect comprehension

  • Stephanie Huette
  • Bodo Winter
  • Teenie Matlock
  • Michael Spivey
Short Report

Abstract

Previous research on language comprehension has used the eyes as a window into processing. However, these methods are entirely reliant upon using visual or orthographic stimuli that map onto the linguistic stimuli being used. The potential danger of this method is that the pictures used may not perfectly match the internal aspects of language processing. Thus, a method was developed in which participants listened to stories while wearing a head-mounted eyetracker. Preliminary results demonstrate that this method is uniquely suited to measure responses to stimuli in the absence of visual stimulation.

Keywords

Spoken language processing Eyetracking Grammatical aspect 

References

  1. Altmann G (2004) Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: the ‘blank screen paradigm’. Cognition 93:B79–B87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann G, Kamide Y (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73:247–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dahan D, Magnuson J, Tanenhaus MK (2001) Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: evidence from eye movements. Cogn Psychol 42:317–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eberhard KM, Spivey-Knowlton MJ, Sedivy JC, Tanenhaus MK (1995) Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. J Psycholinguist Res 24:409–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fausey CM, Matlock T (2011) Can grammar win elections? Polit Psychol 32:563–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferretti TR, Kutas M, McRae K (2007) Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 33:182–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris CL, Ayçiçegi A, Gleason JB (2003) Taboo words and reprimands elicit greater autonomic reactivity in a first language than in a second language. Appl Psycholinguist 24:561–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyönäa J, Tommola J, Alaja AM (1995) Pupil dilation as a measure of processing load in simultaneous interpretation and other language tasks. Q J Exp Psychol A Hum Exp Psychol 48:598–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Konvalinka I, Xygalatas D, Bulbulia J, Schjødt U, Jegindø EM, Wallot S, van Orden G, Roepstorff A (2011) Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. Proc Nat Acad Sci 108:8514–8519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Madden CJ, Zwaan RA (2003) How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Mem Cogn 31:663–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Matlock T (2011) The conceptual motivation of aspect. In: Panther K, Radden G (eds) Motivation in grammar and the lexicon. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 133–147Google Scholar
  12. Mulder G, Mulder LJM (1981) Information processing and cardiovascular control. Psychophysiology 18:392–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paxton A, Dale R (under review). Argument disrupts interpersonal alignmentGoogle Scholar
  14. Rayner K, Clifton C (2009) Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: implication for event-related potential research. Biol Psychol 80:4–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Salverda AP, Brown M, Tanenhaus MK (2011) A goal-based perspective on eye movements in visual-world studies. Acta Psychol 137:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Spivey MJ, Geng J (2001) Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: eye movements to absent objects. Psychol Res 24:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Huette
    • 1
  • Bodo Winter
    • 1
  • Teenie Matlock
    • 1
  • Michael Spivey
    • 1
  1. 1.Cognitive and Information SciencesUniversity of California, MercedMercedUSA

Personalised recommendations