Cognitive Processing

, Volume 13, Supplement 1, pp 137–140 | Cite as

How do spatial representations enhance cognitive numerical processing?

Short Report

Abstract

Several philosophical theories attempt to explain how actions performed in the world enhance cognitive processing: internalism, active externalism, and cognitive integration. The aim of this paper is to examine whether the use of spatial representations in arithmetic can shed light on this debate. Relying on philosophical analysis, on a discussion of empirical work in the cognitive neuroscience of number, and on a historical case study, I will show that spatial representations of number indicate an integration between internal and external cognitive processes.

Keywords

Spatial representations Numerical cognition Cognitive integration Chinese algebra 

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 2478 kb)

References

  1. Adams F, Aizawa K (2001) The bounds of cognition. Philos Psychol 14:43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barabashev AG (1997) In support of significant modernization of original mathematical texts (in defense of presentism). Philos Math 5:21–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chemla K, Guo S (2004) Les neuf chapitres. Le classique mathématique de la Chine ancienne et ses commentaires. Dunod, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark A, Chalmers D (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58:7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen Kadosh R, Walsh V (2009) Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: abstract or not abstract? Behav Brain Sci 32:313–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Cruz H, De Smedt J (2010) The innateness hypothesis and mathematical concepts. Topoi 29:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Cruz H, De Smedt J (in press) Mathematical symbols as epistemic actions. SyntheseGoogle Scholar
  8. Dehaene S, Izard V, Spelke ES, Pica P (2008) Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science 320:1217–1220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart R (2010) The Chinese roots of linear algebra. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  10. Menary R (2007) Cognitive integration: attacking the bounds of cognition. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  11. Siegler R, Ramani G (2008) Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children’s numerical development. Dev Sci 11:655–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sparrow B, Liu J, Wegner D (2011) Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 333:776–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tudusciuc O, Nieder A (2007) Neuronal population coding of continuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:14513–14518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyCatholic University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations