Advertisement

Cognitive Processing

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 375–378 | Cite as

Could positive affect help engineer robot control systems?

  • Markus Quirin
  • Joachim Hertzberg
  • Julius Kuhl
  • Achim Stephan
Letter to the Editor

Abstract

Emotions have long been seen as counteracting rational thought, but over the last decades, they have been viewed as adaptive processes to optimize human (but also animal) behaviour. In particular, positive affect appears to be a functional aspect of emotions closely related to that. We argue that positive affect as understood in Kuhl’s PSI model of the human cognitive architecture appears to have an interpretation in state-of-the-art hybrid robot control architectures, which might help tackle some open questions in the field.

Keywords

Positive Affect Planning System Behavioural Control Planning Layer Robot Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arbib MA, Fellous J-M (2004) Emotions: from brain to robot. Trend Cogn Sci 8(12):554–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breazeal C, Brooks R (2005) Robot emotion: a functional perspective. In: Fellous J-M, Arbib MA (eds) Who needs emotions? The brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 271–310Google Scholar
  3. Goschke T, Kuhl J (1993) Representation of intentions: persisting activation in memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Memory Cogn 19(5):1211–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gros C (2010) Cognition and emotion: perspectives of a closing gap. Cogn Comput 2:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Holmes NP, Spence C, Giard M-H, Wallace M (2004) The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cogn Process 5(2):94–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24(5):849–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson JE, Petzel TP, Hartney LM, Morgan RA (1983) Recall of importance ratings of completed and uncompleted tasks as a function of depression. Cogn Therapy Res 7:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kortenkamp D, Simmons R (2008) Robotic systems architectures and programming. In: Siciliano B, Khatib O (eds) Handbook of robotics, chap 8. Springer, Berlin, pp 187–206Google Scholar
  9. Kuhl J (2000) A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: the dynamics of personality systems and interactions. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR (eds) Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 111–169Google Scholar
  10. Kuhl J, Kazén M (1999) Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes strop interference. J Exp Psychol General 128(3):382–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pfeifer R, Bongard J (2007) How the body shapes the way we think: a new view of intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Schutter DJLG, Peper JS, Koppeschaar HPF, Kahn RS, van Honk J (2005) Administration of testosterone increases functional connectivity in a cortico-cortical depression circuit. J Neuropsychiat Clin Neurosci 17(3):372–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schwarz N, Clore GL (1983) Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. J Personal Social Psychol 45:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Trappl R, Petta P, Payr S (2002) Emotions in humans and artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Zeigarnik B (1927) Über das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen. Psychologische Forschung 9:1–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ziemke T, Lowe R (2009) On the role of emotion in embodied cognitive architectures: from organisms to robots. Cognitive Comput 1:104–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Quirin
    • 1
  • Joachim Hertzberg
    • 2
  • Julius Kuhl
    • 3
  • Achim Stephan
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany
  3. 3.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Cognitive ScienceUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations