Cognitive Processing

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 187–205 | Cite as

A model for production, perception, and acquisition of actions in face-to-face communication

Review

Abstract

The concept of action as basic motor control unit for goal-directed movement behavior has been used primarily for private or non-communicative actions like walking, reaching, or grasping. In this paper, literature is reviewed indicating that this concept can also be used in all domains of face-to-face communication like speech, co-verbal facial expression, and co-verbal gesturing. Three domain-specific types of actions, i.e. speech actions, facial actions, and hand-arm actions, are defined in this paper and a model is proposed that elucidates the underlying biological mechanisms of action production, action perception, and action acquisition in all domains of face-to-face communication. This model can be used as theoretical framework for empirical analysis or simulation with embodied conversational agents, and thus for advanced human–computer interaction technologies.

Keywords

Face-to-face communication Speech Co-verbal behavior Action Facial expression Hand-arm gesture Production Motor behavior Multimodal perception Acquisition of action Embodied conversational agents Human–computer interaction 

References

  1. Abbs JH (1979) Speech motor equivalence: the need for a multi-level control model. In: Proceedings of the ninth international congress of phonetic sciences, Institute of Phonetics, Copenhagen, pp 318–324Google Scholar
  2. Alibali MW, Heat DC, Myers HJ (2001) Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production. J Memory Lang 44:169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allwood J (1976) Linguistic communication as action and cooperation. Gothenburg monographs in linguistics 2. Göteborg University, Department of Linguistics, GöteborgGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambadar Z, Schooler J, Cohn JF (2005) Deciphering the enigmatic face: the importance of facial dynamics to interpreting subtle facial expressions. Psychol Sci 16:403–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arbib MA, Billard A, Iacoboni M, Oztop E (2000) Synthetic brain imaging: grasping, mirror neurons and imitation. Neural Netw 13:975–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailly G (1997) Learning to speak: sensory-motor control of speech movements. Speech Commun 22:251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassili JN (1978) Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 4:373–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergmann K, Kopp S (2009) Increasing the expressiveness of virtual agents—autonomous generation of speech and gesture for spatial description tasks. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2009), pp 361–368Google Scholar
  9. Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movement. Pergamon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Blakemore SJ, Decety J (2001) From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:561–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brass M, Schmitt RM, Spengler S, Gergely G (2007) Investigating action understanding: inferential processes versus action simulation. Curr Biol 17:2117–2121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Browman C, Goldstein L (1989) Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6:201–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Browman C, Goldstein L (1992) Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49:155–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng S, Sabes PN (2006) Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems. Neural Comput 18:760–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohn JF (2007) Foundations of human computing: facial expression and emotion. In: Huang TS, Nijholt A, Pantic M, Pentland A (eds) Artificial intelligence for human computing (LNAI 4451. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohn JF, Ambadar Z, Ekman P (2007) Observer-based measurement of facial expression with the facial action coding system. In: Coan JA, Allen JJB (eds) Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 203–221Google Scholar
  17. Cooper F, Delattre P, Liberman A, Borst J, Gerstman L (1952) Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 24:597–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cunnington R, Windischberger C, Robinson S, Moser E (2006) The selection of intended actions and the observation of others’ actions: a time-resolved fMRI study. NeuroImage 29:1294–1302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dang J, Honda K (2004) Construction and control of a physiological articulatory model. J Acoust Soc Am 115:853–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De la Torre F, Campoy J, Ambadar Z, Cohn JF (2007) Temporal segmentation of facial behavior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 11th international conference on computer vision (ICCV 2007), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  21. De Ruiter JP (1998) Gesture and gesture production. Doctoral dissertation at Catholic University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands (now called Radboud University Nijmegen)Google Scholar
  22. Demiris Y, Dearden A (2005) From motor babbling to hierarchical learning by imitation: a robot developmental pathway. In: Berthouze L, Kaplan F, Kozima H, Yano H, Konczak J, Metta G, Nadel J, Sandini G, Stojanov G, Balkenius C (eds) Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on epigenetic robotics: modeling cognitive development in robotic systems, Lund University Cognitive Studies 123, Lund, Sweden, pp 31–37Google Scholar
  23. Der R, Martinus G (2006) From motor babbling to purposive actions: emerging self-exploration in a dynamical systems approach to early robot development. In: S Nolfi, G Baldassarre, R Calabretta, JCT Hallam, D Marocco, JA Meyer, O Miglino, D Parisi (eds) From animals to Animats 9. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior (SAB 2006, Rome, Italy) LNAI 4905, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 406–421Google Scholar
  24. Desmurget M, Grafton ST (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4:423–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diehl RL, Lotto AJ, Holt LL (2004) Speech perception. Annu Rev Psychol 55:149–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1976) Measuring facial movement. Env Psychol Nonverbal Behav 1:56–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1978) Facial action coding system. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  28. Ekman P, Oster H (1979) Facial expressions of emotion. Annu Rev Psychol 30:527–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fadiga L, Craighero L (2004) Electrophysiology of action representation. J Clin Neurophysiol 21:157–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feldman AG (1986) Once more on equilibrium point hypothesis for motor control. J Mot Behav 18:17–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Field TM, Woodson R, Greenberg R, Cohen D (1984) Discrimination and imitation of facial expressions by neonates. In: Chess S, Thomas A (eds) Annual progress in child psychiatry and child development. Brunner, Mazel, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Flash T, Hogan KN (1985) The coordinate of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1688–1703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fowler CA, Turvey MT (1981) Immediate compensation in bite-block speech. Phonetica 37:306–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gallese V (2000) The inner sense of action: agency and motor representations. J Conscious Stud 7:23–40Google Scholar
  35. Girin L, Schwartz JL, Feng G (2001) Audio-visual enhancement of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 109:3007–3020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goldstein L, Byrd D, Saltzman E (2006) The role of vocal tract action units in understanding the evolution of phonology. In: Arbib MA (ed) Action to language via the mirror neuron system. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 215–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goldstein L, Pouplier M, Chen L, Saltzman L, Byrd D (2007) Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition 103:386–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grafton ST, Hamilton AF (2007) Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum Mov Sci 26:590–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grosjean M, Shiffrar M, Knoblich G (2007) Fitts’ law holds for action perception. Psychol Sci 18:95–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Guenther FH (2006) Cortical interaction underlying the production of speech sounds. J Commun Disord 39:350–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Guenther FH, Hampson M, Johnson D (1998) A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychol Rev 105:611–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Guenther FH, Ghosh SS, Tourville JA (2006) Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang 96:280–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guidetti M, Nicoladis E (2008) Introduction to special issue: gestures and communicative development. First Language 28:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hickok G, Poeppel D (2007) Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci 4:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hogan N (1984) An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4:2745–2754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Houde JF, Jordan MI (2002) Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: compensation and adaptation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45:295–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Iacoboni M (2005) Neural mechanisms of imitation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:632–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Indefrey W, Level PJM (2004) The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92:101–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ito T, Gomi H, Honda M (2004) Dynamical simulation of speech cooperative articulation by muscle linkages. Biol Cybern 91:275–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jahanshahi M, Frith CD (1998) Willed action and its impairments. Cogn Neuropsychol 15:483–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jastorff J, Kourtzi Z, Giese MA (2006) Learning to discriminate complex movements: biological versus artificial trajectories. J Vis 6:791–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jeannerad M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage 14:S103–S109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jeannerod M (1999) The 25th Bartlett lecture: to act or not to act: perspectives on the representation of actions. Q J Exp Psychol 52A:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jordan MI (1995) Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. In: Heuer H, Prinz W, Keele SW, Bridgeman B (eds) Handbook of perception and action: motor skills. Academic Press, London, pp 71–120Google Scholar
  55. Kawato M (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:718–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kawato M, Maeda Y, Uno Y, Suzuki R (1990) Trajectory formation of arm movement by cascade neural network model based on minimum torque-change criterion. Biol Cybern 62:275–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kelso JAS, Tuller BT, Vatikiotis-Baetson E, Fowler CA (1984) Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10:812–832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kelso JAS, Saltzman E, Tuller B (1986) The dynamical perspective on speech production: data and theory. J Phon 14:29–59Google Scholar
  59. Kendon A (2004) Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Kohler E, Keysers C, Umilta MA, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (2002) Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science 297:846–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kopp S (to appear) Social resonance and embodied coordination in face-to-face conversational with artificial interlocutors, speech communication (special issue on speech and face-to-face communication)Google Scholar
  62. Kopp S, Wachsmuth I (2004) Synthesizing multimodal utterances for conversational agents. J Comput Anim Virtual Worlds 15:39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kopp S, Krenn B, Marsella S, Marshall AN, Pelachaud C, Pirker H, Thórisson KR, Vilhjálmsson H (2006) Towards a common framework for multimodal generation: the behavior markup language. In: Gratch J, Young M, Aylett R, Ballin D, Olivier P (eds) Intelligent virtual agents (LNCS 4133. Springer, Berlin, pp 205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kopp S, Tepper P, Ferriman K, Cassell J (2007) Trading spaces—how humans and humanoids use speech and gesture to give directions. In: Nishida T (ed) Conversational informatics. Wiley, Oxford, pp 133–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kopp S, Allwood J, Ahlsen E, Grammer K, Stocksmeier T (2008) Modeling embodied feedback in a virtual human. In: Wachsmuth I, Knoblich G (eds) Modeling communication with robots and virtual humans (LNAI 4930. Springer, Berlin, pp 18–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kröger BJ (1993) A gestural production model and its application to reduction in German. Phonetica 50:213–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kröger BJ, Birkholz P (2007) A gesture-based concept for speech movement control in articulatory speech synthesis. In: Esposito A, Faundez-Zanuy M, Keller E, Marinaro M (eds) Verbal and nonverbal communication behaviours, LNAI 4775. Springer, Berlin, pp 174–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kröger BJ, Schröder G, Opgen-Rhein C (1995) A gesture-based dynamic model describing articulatory movement data. J Acoust Soc Am 98:1878–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kröger BJ, Kannampuzha J, Neuschaefer-Rube C (2009a) Towards a neurocomputational model of speech production and perception. Speech Commun 51:793–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kröger BJ, Kannampuzha J, Lowit A, Neuschaefer-Rube C (2009b) Phonetotopy within a neurocomputational model of speech production and speech acquisition. In: Fuchs S, Loevenbruck H, Pape D, Perrier P (eds) Some aspects of speech and the brain. Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp 59–90Google Scholar
  71. Kurowski K, Blumstein SE (1984) Perceptual integration of the murmur and formant transitions for place of articulation in nasal consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 73:383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Latash ML (2008) Evolution of motor control: from reflexes and motor programs to the equilibrium-point hypothesis. J Hum Kinet 19:3–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Latash ML, Gorniak S, Zatsiorsky VM (2008) Hierarchies of synergies in human movements. Kinesiology 40:29–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Lestou V, Pollick FE, Kourtzi Z (2008) Neural substrates for action understanding at different description levels in the human brain. J Cogn Neurosci 20:324–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Levelt WJM, Richardson G, Heij WL (1985) Pointing and voicing in deictic expressions. J Memory Lang 24:133–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Levelt WJM, Roelofs A, Meyer AS (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav Brain Sci 22:1–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Liberman AM, Mattingly IG (1985) The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21:1–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lindblom B (1963) Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. J Acoust Soc Am 35:1773–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lindblom B (1983) Economy of speech gestures. In: McNeilage PF (ed) The production of speech. Springer, New York, pp 217–245Google Scholar
  80. McNeill D (1992) Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  81. Meltzoff AN, Moore MK (1977) Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198:75–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Meltzoff AN, Moore MK (1989) Imitation in newborn infants: exploring the range of gestures imitted and the underlying mechanisms. Dev Psychol 25:954–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nasir SM, Ostry DJ (2006) Somatosensory precision in speech production. Curr Biol 16:1918–1923PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nasir SM, Ostry DJ (2008) Speech motor learning in profoundly deaf adults. Nat Neurosci 11:1217–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Nearey T, Assmann P (1986) Modeling the role of inherent spectral change in vowel identification. J Acoust Soc Am 80:1297–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Neel AT (2004) Formant detail needed for vowel identification. Acoust Res Lett Online 5:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nelson WL (1983) Physical principles for economics of skilled movements. Biol Cybern 46:135–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nowak DA, Topka H, Timmann D, Boecker H, Hermsdörfer J (2007) The role of the cerebellum or predictive control of grasping. Cerebellum 6:7–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pantic M, Rothkrantz LJM (2000) Expert system for automatic analysis of facial expressions. Image Vis Comput 18:881–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Payan Y, Perrier P (1997) Synthesis of V-V sequences with a 2D biomechanical tongue model controlled by the equilibrium point hypothesis. Speech Commun 22:185–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Perkell J, Matthies M, Lane H, Guenther F, Wilhelms-Tricarico R, Wozniak J, Guiod P (1997) Speech motor control: acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models. Speech Commun 22:227–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Perrier P (2005) Control and representation in speech production. ZAS Pap Linguist 40:109–132Google Scholar
  93. Perrier P, Ma L (2008) Speech planning for VCV sequences: influence of the planned sequence. In: Proceedings of the 8th international seminar on speech production, Strasbourg, France, pp 69–72Google Scholar
  94. Perrier P, Ostry DJ, Laboissiere R (1996) The equilibrium point hypothesis and its application to speech motor control. J Speech Hear Res 39:365–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Perrier P, Payan Y, Zandipour M, Perkell J (2003) Influence of tongue biomechanics on speech movements during the production of velar stop consonants: a modeling study. J Acoust Soc Am 114:1582–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Poizner H, Bellugi U, Lutes-Driscoll V (1981) Perception of American sign language in dynamic point-light displays. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7:430–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Purcell DW, Munhall KG (2006) Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: evidence from real-time formant manipulation. J Acoust Soc Am 120:966–977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Rasmussen J, Damsgaard M, Voigt M (2001) Muscle recruitment by the min/max criterion—a comparative numerical study. J Biomech 34:409–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rochet-Capellan A, Laboissiere R, Galvan A, Schwartz JL (2008) The speech focus position effect on jaw-finger coordination in a pointing task. J Speech Lang Hear Res 51:1507–1521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rodrigo MJ, Gonzalez A, de Vega M, Muneton-Ayala M, Rodriguez G (2004) From gestural to verbal deixis: a longitudinal study with Spanish infants and toddlers. First Lang 24:71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rosenblum LD, Johnson JA, Saldana HM (1996) Point-light displays enhance comprehension of speech in noise. J Speech Hear Res 39:1159–1170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Sabes PN (2000) The planning and control of reaching movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:740–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sabes PN, Jordan MI (1997) Obstacle avoidance and a perturbation sensitivity model for motor planning. J Neurosci 17:7119–7128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Sadeghipour A, Kopp S (2009) A probabilistic model of motor resonance for embodied gesture perception. In: Proceedings of intelligent virtual agents (IVA09), pp 80–103Google Scholar
  106. Saltzman E (1979) Levels of sensorimotor representation. J Math Psychol 20:91–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Saltzman E, Byrd D (2000) Task-dynamics of gestural timing: phase windows and multifrequency rhythms. Hum Mov Sci 19:499–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Saltzman E, Kelso JAS (1987) Skilled actions: a task dynamic approach. Psychol Rev 94:84–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Saltzman E, Munhall KG (1989) A dynamic approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecol Psychol 1:333–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schaal S (1999) Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots? Trends Cogn Sci 3:233–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Schmidt KL, Cohn JF (2002) Human facial expressions as adaptations: evolutionary questions in facial expression research. Am J Phys Anthropol 116(S33):3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schmidt KL, Cohn JF, Tian Y (2003) Signal characteristics of spontaneous facial expressions: automatic movement in solitary and social smiles. Biol Psychol 65:49–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Schmidt KL, Ambadar Z, Cohn JF, Reed LI (2006) Movement differences between deliberate and spontaneous facial expressions: zygomaticus major action in smiling. J Nonverbal Behav 30:37–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Schmidt KL, Bhattacharya S, Denlinger R (2009) Comparison of deliberate and spontaneous facial movement in smiles and eyebrow raises. J Nonverbal Behav 33:35–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Scholz JP, SChöner G, Hsu WL, Jeka JJ, Horak F, Martin V (2007) Motor equivalent control of the center of mass in response to support surface perturbations. Exp Brain Res 80:163–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Schwartz JL, Boe LJ, Abry C (2007) Linking dispersion-focalization theory and the maximum utilization of the available distance features principle in a perception-for-action-control theory. In: Sole MJ (ed) Experimental approaches to phonology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  117. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Smeets JB, Brenner EA (1999) A new view on grasping. Mot Control 3:237–271Google Scholar
  119. Sober SJ, Sabes PN (2003) Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci 23:6982–6992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Sober SJ, Sabes PN (2005) Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Nat Neurosci 8:490–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Steels L, Spranger M (2008) The robot in the mirror. Connect Sci 20:337–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Strange W, Jenkins J, Johnson T (1983) Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 74:695–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Summerfield Q (1987) Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. In: Dodd B, Campbell R (eds) Hearing by eye: the psychology of lipreading. Lawrence Erlbaum, London, pp 3–51Google Scholar
  124. Tian YL, Kanade T, Cohn JF (2005) Facial expression analysis. In: Li SZ, Jain AK (eds) Handbook of face recognition. Springer, New York, pp 247–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Todorov E (2004) Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7:907–915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Todorov E, Ghahramani Z (2003) Unsupervised learning of sensory-motor primitives. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 1750–1753Google Scholar
  127. Todorov E, Jordan MI (1998) Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. J Neurophysiol 80:696–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Liszkowski U (2007) A new look at infant pointing. Child Dev 78:705–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Turvey MT (1977) Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In: Shaw R, Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, acting and knowing: towards an ecological psychology. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 211–266Google Scholar
  130. Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2001) Motor prediction. Curr Biol 11:R729–R732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Flanagan JR (2001) Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends Cogn Sci 5:487–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Phoniatrics, Pedaudiology, and Communication DisordersUniversity Hospital Aachen and RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Sociable Agents Group, Center of Excellence “Cognitive Interaction Technology”Bielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
  3. 3.Speech and Language Therapy Division, Department of Educational and Professional StudiesUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations