Advertisement

Cognitive Processing

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 133–142 | Cite as

Complex problem solving: a case for complex cognition?

  • Joachim FunkeEmail author
Research Report

Abstract

Complex problem solving (CPS) emerged in the last 30 years in Europe as a new part of the psychology of thinking and problem solving. This paper introduces into the field and provides a personal view. Also, related concepts like macrocognition or operative intelligence will be explained in this context. Two examples for the assessment of CPS, Tailorshop and MicroDYN, are presented to illustrate the concept by means of their measurement devices. Also, the relation of complex cognition and emotion in the CPS context is discussed. The question if CPS requires complex cognition is answered with a tentative “yes.”

Keywords

Complex problem solving Operative intelligence Macrocognition Emotion Complex cognition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Carola Barth, Christine Blech, Sven Brüssow, Samuel Greiff, Daniel Holt and Sabrina Zinke for helpful comments on a draft version. Two anonymous reviewers gave further valuable comments and hints for improvements; the comments of one of them were so useful that they found their way directly into the manuscript. Thanks! Finally, Ann Wolf helped to improve the quality of my English. Part of this research was funded by a grant from the DFG to the author (Az. Fu 173/11-1).

References

  1. Anderson JR (2002) Spanning seven orders of magnitude: a challenge for cognitive modeling. Cogn Sci 26:85–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JR (2005) Cognitive psychology and its implications, 6th edn. Worth, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Anzai Y, Simon HA (1979) The theory of learning by doing. Psychol Rev 86:124–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bach J (2003) The MicroPsi agent architecture. In: Detje F, Dörner D, Schaub H (eds) Proceedings of the fifth European conference on cognitive modelling. Universitäts-Verlag Bamberg, Bamberg, pp 15–20Google Scholar
  5. Barth C, Funke J (2009) Negative affective environments improve complex solving performance. Cogn Emot (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Bechtel W, Abrahamsen A (2001) Connectionism and the mind: parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Brehmer B, Dörner D (1993) Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study. Comput Hum Behav 9:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchner A (1995) Basic topics and approaches to the study of complex problem solving. In: Frensch PA, Funke J (eds) Complex problem solving: the European perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 27–63Google Scholar
  9. Cacciabue PC, Hollnagel E (1995) Simulation of cognition: applications. In: Hoc JM, Cacciabue PC, Hollnagel E (eds) Expertise and technology: cognition and human-computer cooperation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 55–73Google Scholar
  10. Chi MTH, Glaser R, Rees E (1982) Expertise in problem solving. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, vol 1. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 7–75Google Scholar
  11. Crandall B, Klein G, Hoffman RR (2006) Working minds: a practitioner’s guide to cognitive task analysis. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Dörner D (1980) On the difficulty people have in dealing with complexity. Simul Games 11:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dörner D (1986) Diagnostik der operativen Intelligenz. Diagnostica 32:290–308Google Scholar
  14. Dörner D (1996) The logic of failure. Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  15. Dörner D, Kreuzig HW (1983) Problemlösefähigkeit und Intelligenz. Psychologische Rundschau 34:185–192Google Scholar
  16. Dörner D, Reither F (1978) Über das Problemlösen in sehr komplexen Realitätsbereichen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 25:527–551Google Scholar
  17. Dörner D, Schaub H (1994) Errors in planning and decision-making and the nature of human information processing. Appl Psychol Int Rev 43:433–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dörner D, Wearing AJ (1995) Complex problem solving: toward a (computersimulated) theory. In: Frensch PA, Funke J (eds) Complex problem solving: the European perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 65–99Google Scholar
  19. Dörner D, Kreuzig HW, Reither F et al (1983) Lohhausen. Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität, Hans HuberGoogle Scholar
  20. Embretson SE, Reise SP (2000) Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  21. Endres J, Putz-Osterloh W (1994) Komplexes Problemlösen in Kleingruppen: Effekte des Vorwissens, der Gruppenstruktur und der Gruppeninteraktion. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 25:54–70Google Scholar
  22. Endsley MR (1995a) Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37:65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Endsley MR (1995b) Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37:32–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fiedler K (2001) Affective states trigger processes of assimilation and accomodation. In: Martin LL, Clore GL (eds) Theories of mood and cognition: a user’s guidebook. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 85–98Google Scholar
  25. Forgas JP (2001) The affect infusion model (AIM): an integrative theory of mood effects on cognition and judgments. In: Martin LL, Clore GL (eds) Theories of mood and cognition. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 99–134Google Scholar
  26. Frensch PA, Funke J (1995a) Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving. In: Frensch PA, Funke J (eds) Complex problem solving: the European perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 3–25Google Scholar
  27. Frensch PA, Funke J (eds) (1995b) Complex problem solving: the European perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  28. Funke J (1983) Einige Bemerkungen zu Problemen der Problemlöseforschung oder: Ist Testintelligenz doch ein Prädiktor? Diagnostica 29:283–302Google Scholar
  29. Funke J (1986) Komplexes Problemlösen - Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  30. Funke J (1991) Solving complex problems: exploration and control of complex systems. In: Sternberg RJ, Frensch PA (eds) Complex problem solving: principles and mechanisms. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 185–222Google Scholar
  31. Funke J (1995) Experimental research on complex problem solving. In: Frensch PA, Funke J (eds) Complex problem solving: the European perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 243–268Google Scholar
  32. Funke J (2001) Dynamic systems as tools for analysing human judgement. Think Reason 7:69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Funke J, Frensch PA (2007) Complex problem solving: the European perspective—10 years after. In: Jonassen DH (ed) Learning to solve complex scientific problems. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, pp 25–47Google Scholar
  34. Gray WD (2002) Simulated task environments: the role of high-fidelity simulations, scaled worlds, synthetic environments, and laboratory tasks in basic and applied cognitive research. Cogn Sci Q 2:205–227Google Scholar
  35. Greiff S, Funke J (2009) Measuring complex problem solving: the MicroDYN approach. In: Scheuermann F (ed) The Transition to computer-based assessment—lessons learned from large-scale surveys and implications for testing. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  36. Halford GS, Wilson WH, Phillips S (1998) Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behav Brain Sci 21:803–865PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoppmann CA, Riediger M (2009) Ambulatory assessment in lifespan psychology: An overview of current status and new trends. European Psychologist (in press)Google Scholar
  38. Hörmann H-J, Thomas M (1989) Zum Zusammenhang zwischen Intelligenz und komplexem Problemlösen. Sprache & Kognition 8:23–31Google Scholar
  39. Hussy W (1991) Komplexes Problemlösen und Verarbeitungskapazität. Sprache & Kognition 10:208–220Google Scholar
  40. Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgement under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Kalis A, Mojzisch A, Schweizer TS et al (2008) Weakness of will, akrasia, and the neuropsychiatry of decision-making: an interdisciplinary perspective. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 8:402–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kersting M, Süß H-M (1995) Kontentvalide Wissensdiagnostik und Problemlösen: Zur Entwicklung, testtheoretischen Begründung und empirischen Bewährung eines problemspezifischen Diagnoseverfahrens. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 9:83–93Google Scholar
  44. Klein G (2008) Naturalistic decision making. Hum Factors 50:456–460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Klein G, Orasanu J, Calderwood R et al (eds) (1993) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  46. Klein G, Ross KG, Moon BM et al (2003) Macrocognition. IEEE Intell Syst 18:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klocke U (2004) Folgen von Machtausübung und Einflussnahme für Wissenszuwachs und Effektivität in Kleingruppen. In: Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät II. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  48. Kluwe RH, Misiak C, Haider H (1991) The control of complex systems and performance in intelligence tests. In: Rowe H (ed) Intelligence: reconceptualization and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 227–244Google Scholar
  49. Knauff M, Wolf AG (2010) Editorial. Complex Cognition this volumeGoogle Scholar
  50. Koole SL (2009) The psychology of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Cogn Emot 23:4–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kröner S, Plass JL, Leutner D (2005) Intelligence assessment with computer simulations. Intelligence 33:347–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leutner D (1988) Computersimulierte dynamische Systeme: Wissenserwerb unter verschiedenen Lehrmethoden und Sozialformen des Unterrichts. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 20:338–355Google Scholar
  53. Lewin K (1935) A dynamic theory of personality (selected papers). McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Lipshitz R, Klein G, Orasanu J et al (2001) Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. J Behav Decis Mak 14:331–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mayer RE (1992) Thinking, problem solving, cognition, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE (1985) Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. J Exp Psychol Gen 114:159–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Meyer B, Grütter J, Oertig M et al (2009) Women’s underperformance in complex problem solving: stereotype threat in microworld performance. Eur J Soc Psychol (under review)Google Scholar
  58. Moors A (2009) Theories of emotion causation: a review. Cogn Emot 23:625–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Müller H (1993) Komplexes Problemlösen: Reliabilität und Wissen. Holos, BonnGoogle Scholar
  60. Newell A (1990) Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Nisbett RE, Norenzayan A (2002) Culture and cognition. In: Pashler H, Medin D (eds) Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology. Third edition. Vol. 2: memory and cognitive processes. John Wiley, New York, pp 561–597Google Scholar
  62. Osman M (2009) Controlling uncertainty: a review of human behavior in complex dynamic environments. Psychol Bull (in press)Google Scholar
  63. Putz-Osterloh W (1981) Über die Beziehung zwischen Testintelligenz und Problemlöseerfolg. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 189:79–100Google Scholar
  64. Putz-Osterloh W (1983) Über Determinanten komplexer Problemlöseleistungen und Möglichkeiten zu ihrer Erfassung. Sprache & Kognition 2:100–116Google Scholar
  65. Putz-Osterloh W, Lüer G (1981) Über die Vorhersagbarkeit komplexer Problemlöseleistungen durch Ergebnisse in einem Intelligenztest. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 28:309–334Google Scholar
  66. Putz-Osterloh W, Bott B, Köster K (1990) Modes of learning in problem solving—are they transferable to tutorial systems? Comput Hum Behav 6:83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules, knowledge: signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 13:257–266Google Scholar
  68. Rigas G, Brehmer B (1999) Mental processes in intelligence tests and dynamic decision making tasks. In: Juslin P, Montgomery H (eds) Judgement and decision making: Neo-Brunswikean and process-tracing approaches. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 45–65Google Scholar
  69. Schwarz N (1990) Feelings as information: informational and motivational functions of affective states. In: Higgins ET, Sorrentino RM (eds) Handbook of motivation and cognition. Guilford Press, New York, pp 527–561Google Scholar
  70. Shadish WR, Cook TD (2009) The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions. Annu Rev Psychol 60:607–629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  72. Sternberg RJ (1995) Expertise in complex problem solving: a comparison of alternative conceptions. In: Frensch PA, Funke J (eds) Complex problem solving: the European perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 295–321Google Scholar
  73. Strauß B (1993) Konfundierungen beim Komplexen Problemlösen. Zum Einfluß des Anteils der richtigen Lösungen (ArL) auf das Problemlöseverhalten in komplexen Situationen. Holos, BonnGoogle Scholar
  74. Strohschneider S (1991) Problemlösen und Intelligenz: Über die Effekte der Konkretisierung komplexer Probleme. Diagnostica 37:353–371Google Scholar
  75. Süß H-M (1996) Intelligenz. Wissen und Problemlösen, Hogrefe, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  76. Süß H-M (1999) Intelligenz und komplexes Problemlösen—Perspektiven für eine Kooperation zwischen differentiell-psychometrischer und kognitionspsychologischer Forschung. Psychologische Rundschau 50:220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Süß H-M, Kersting M, Oberauer K (1991) Intelligenz und Wissen als Prädiktoren für Leistungen bei computersimulierten komplexen Problemen. Diagnostica 37:334–352Google Scholar
  78. von Ehrenfels C (1890) Über Gestaltqualitäten. Vierteljahrsschrift für Wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14:249–292Google Scholar
  79. Welford AT (ed) (1980) Reaction times. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Wenke D, Frensch PA (2003) Is success or failure at solving complex problems related to intellectual ability? In: Davidson JE, Sternberg RJ (eds) The psychology of problem solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 87–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wittmann WW, Hattrup K (2004) The relationship between performance in dynamic systems and intelligence. Syst Res Behav Sci 21:393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zsambok CE (1997) Naturalistic decision making: where are we now? In: Zsambok CE, Klein GA (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 3–16Google Scholar
  83. Zsambok CE, Klein GA (eds) (1997) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychologisches InstitutUniversität HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations