Cognitive Processing

, Volume 10, Supplement 2, pp 294–296 | Cite as

Comparing distance perception in different virtual environments

  • Chiara Saracini
  • Ronny Franke
  • Eberhard Blümel
  • Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Extended Abstract


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Eriksen JR, Blirup D, Kristiansen VB, Funch-Jensen P, Darzi A (2006) An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 244:310–314Google Scholar
  2. Armbrüster C, Wolter M, Kuhlen T, Spijkers W, Fimm B (2008) Depth perception in virtual reality: distance estimations in peri- and extrapersonal space. CyberPsychol Behav 11(1):9–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bingham GP, Bradley A, Bailey M, Vinner R (2001) Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. Hum Percept Perform 27(6):1314–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bliss JP, Tidwell PD, Guest MA (1997) The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering spatial navigation training to firefighters. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 6:73–86Google Scholar
  5. Carey DP, Dijkerman HC, Milner AD (1998) Perception and action in depth. Consciousness Cogn 7:438–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen CJ, Toh SC, Wan MF (2003) Virtual Reality: a potential technology for providing novel perspective to novice driver education in Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information technology: research and education (CDROM). IEEE, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  7. Creem-Regehr SH, Willemsen P, Gooch AA, Thompson WB (2005) The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: implications for real and virtual environments. Perception 34(2):191–204Google Scholar
  8. Cutting JE (1997) How the eye measures reality and virtual reality. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 29(1):27–36Google Scholar
  9. Cutting JE, Vishton PM (1995) Perceiving layout: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W, Rogers S (eds) Handbook of perception and cognition. Perception of space and motion, vol 5. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 69–117Google Scholar
  10. Fröehlich T (1997) Das Virtuelle Ozeanarium, Zeitschrift Thema Forschung. Technische Universitat Darmstadt, Darmstadt, pp 50–57Google Scholar
  11. Gilinsky AS (1951) Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychol Rev 58:460–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knapp JM, Loomis JM (2004) Limited field of view of headmounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence 13:572–577Google Scholar
  13. Hue P, Delannay B, Berland JC (1997) Virtual reality training simulator for long time flight. In: Seidel RJ, Chantelier PR (eds) Virtual reality, training's future? Plenum Press, New York, pp␣69–76Google Scholar
  14. Lintern G, Roscoe SN, Koonce JM, Sivier JE (1990) Display principles, control dynamics and environmental factors in pilot training and transfer. Hum Factors 32:299–317Google Scholar
  15. Loomis JM, Da Silva JA, Philbeck JW, Fukusima SS (1996) Visual perception of location and distance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 5:72–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahoney DP (1997) Defensive driving. Comput Graph World 20:71Google Scholar
  17. Mohler BJ, Creem-Regehr SH, Thompson WD (2006) The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments. APGV 2006, Boston, Massachusetts, 28–29 July 2006Google Scholar
  18. Oddsson LI, Karlsson R, Konrad J, Ince S, Williams SR, Zemkova E (2007) A rehabilitation tool for functional balance using altered gravity and virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4:25Google Scholar
  19. Parsons TD, Larson P, Kratz K, Thiebaux M, Bluestein B, Buckwalter JG, Rizzo A (2004) Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial rotation in a virtual environment. Neuropsychol 42:555–562Google Scholar
  20. Parsons TD, Bowerly T, Buckwalter JG, Rizzo A (2007) A controlled clinical comparison of attention performance in children with ADHD in a virtual reality classroom compared to standard neuropsychological methods. Child Neuropsychol 13:363–381Google Scholar
  21. Plumert JM, Kearney JK, Cremer JF, Recker K (2005) Distance perception in real and virtual environments. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2:216–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Previc FH (1998) The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychol Bull 124:123–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Regian JW, Shebilske WL, Monk JM (1992) Virtual reality: an instructional medium for visual spatial tasks. J Commun 42:136–149Google Scholar
  24. Richardson AR, Waller D (2005) The effect of feedback training on distance estimation in virtual environments. Appl Cogn Psychol 19:1089–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Richardson AR, Waller D (2007) Interaction with an immersive virtual environment corrects users’ distance estimates. Hum Factors 49:507–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rolland JP, Gibson W, Ariely D (1994) Towards quantifying depth and size perception in virtual environments. Presence 4:24–49Google Scholar
  27. Sahm CS, Creem-Regehr SH, Thompson WB, Willemsen P (2005) Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments. ACM Trans App Percept 2:35–45Google Scholar
  28. Satava RM (2008) Historical review of surgical simulation—a personal perspective. World J Surg 32:141–148Google Scholar
  29. Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243(3):291–300Google Scholar
  30. Thompson WB, Willemsen P, Gooch AA, Creem-Regehr SH, Loomis JM, Beall AC (2004) Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence 13:560–571Google Scholar
  31. Waller D, Richardson AR (2008) Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information. J Exp Psychol 14(1):61–72Google Scholar
  32. William MM, Tresilian JR, McIntosh RD, Milner AD (2001) Monocular and binocular distance cues: insights from visual form agnosia I (of III). Exp Brain Res 139:127–136Google Scholar
  33. Witmer BG, Sadowski WJ (1998) Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Hum Factors 40:478–488Google Scholar
  34. Wolbers T, Weiller C, Buchel C (2004) Neural foundations of emerging route knowledge in complex spatial environments. Brain Res Cogn 21:401–411Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Saracini
    • 1
  • Ronny Franke
    • 2
  • Eberhard Blümel
    • 2
  • Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
    • 1
  1. 1.“Sapienza”, University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Fraunhofer InstitutMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations