Cognitive Processing

, Volume 10, Supplement 2, pp 322–324 | Cite as

Contrast sets in spatial and temporal language

  • Thora TenbrinkEmail author
  • Christian Freksa
Extended Abstract


Lexical Item Spatial Term Temporal Term Geographic Object Linguistic Item 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Coventry KR, Garrod SC (2004) Saying, seeing and acting: the psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Essays in Cognitive Psychology series, Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Freksa C (1999) Links vor—Prototyp oder Gebiet? Probabilistische und possibilistische Raumbeschreibung. In: Rickheit G (Hg) Richtungen im Raum. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 231–246Google Scholar
  3. Freksa C, Barkowsky T (1996) On the relation between spatial concepts and geographic objects. In: Burrough P, Frank A (eds) Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 109–121Google Scholar
  4. Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn Sci 7(2):55–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan J (eds) Syntax and semantics. Academic Press, New York, vol 3, pp 41–58Google Scholar
  6. Halliday MAK (1985) An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn, 1994. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Heinämäki O (1974) Semantics of English temporal connectives. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar
  8. Herskovits A (1986) Language and spatial cognition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin JR, Rose D (2003) Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause. Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Randell DA, Cui Z, Cohn A (1992) A spatial logic based on regions and connection. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on knowledge representation and reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp 165–176Google Scholar
  11. Rooth M (1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Nat Lang Semant 1:75–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Tenbrink T (2007) Space, time, and the use of language: an investigation of relationships. Mouton de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. Nemo F (1999) The pragmatics of signs, the semantics of relevance, and the semantic/pragmatic interface. In Turner K (ed) The semantics-pragmatics interface from different points of view. CRiSPI Series, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 343–417Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations