Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system
- 4.9k Downloads
Is it possible to understand the intentions of other people by simply observing their actions? Many believe that this ability is made possible by the brain’s mirror neuron system through its direct link between action and observation. However, precisely how intentions can be inferred through action observation has provoked much debate. Here we suggest that the function of the mirror system can be understood within a predictive coding framework that appeals to the statistical approach known as empirical Bayes. Within this scheme the most likely cause of an observed action can be inferred by minimizing the prediction error at all levels of the cortical hierarchy that are engaged during action observation. This account identifies a precise role for the mirror system in our ability to infer intentions from actions and provides the outline of the underlying computational mechanisms.
KeywordsMirror neurons Action observation Bayesian inference Predictive coding
The Wellcome Trust funded this work.
- Gallese V (2006) Embodied simulation: from mirror neuron systems to interpersonal relations. In: Bock G, Goode J (eds) Empathy and fairness. Novartis Foundation, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Gallese V, Fogassi L, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (2002) Action representation and the inferior parietal lobule. In: Prinz W, Hommel B (eds) Attention and performance XIX. Common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 247–266Google Scholar
- Hamilton AF, Grafton ST (2007) The motor hierarchy: from kinematics to goals and intentions. In: Rosetti Y, Kawato M, Haggard P (eds) Attention and performance xxii (in press)Google Scholar
- James W (1890) Principles of psychology. Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Schütz-Bosbach and Wolfgang Prinz (2007) Prospective coding in event representation (this issue)Google Scholar
- Wolpert DM, Doya K, Kawato M (2003) A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 29:358:593–02Google Scholar