Advertisement

Cognitive Processing

, Volume 7, Supplement 1, pp 52–54 | Cite as

Geographic event conceptualization

  • Alexander KlippelEmail author
  • Mike Worboys
  • Matt Duckham
Oral Paper
  • 82 Downloads

Introduction

Dynamic aspects of geographic-scale phenomena form a growing topic in spatial sciences. As the technology advances, for example, in monitoring such phenomena using sensor networks (Worboys and Duckham 2006), the need for a basic understanding of the conceptualization of dynamic processes by cognitive agents becomes pertinent. The formal characterization of these conceptualizations is necessary to automate the identification and characterization of conceptual structures that discretize continuous dynamic processes into conceptual units. This research addresses the issue of transducing data, such as recorded by sensor networks into conceptual knowledge.

While research on the characterization of cognitive events has a long history within several sciences (for an overview see, Casati and Varzi 1996; Zacks and Tversky 2001), we still lack a good understanding of the conceptualization of geographic events. Our research, therefore, aims at the core of conceptual structures of...

Keywords

Geographic event conceptualization Dynamic processes Multimodality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Alexander Klippel is funded by the Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information, whose activities are funded by the Australian Commonwealth Cooperative Research Centres Programme. Mike Worboys’ work is supported by the US National Science Foundation under grant numbers IIS-0429644, IIS-0534429, DGE-0504494, and BCS-0327615. Matt Duckham’s work is supported by ARC Discovery Project grant no DP0662906 and by a University of Melbourne International Collaborative Research Grant. Mike and Matt are grateful for the support of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain.

References

  1. Casati R, Varzi A (eds) (1996) Events. Dartmouth, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooke NJ (1999) Knowledge elicitation. In: Durso FT (ed) Applied cognition. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  3. Egenhofer MJ, Al-Taha KK (1992) Reasoning about gradual changes of topological relationships. In: Frank AU, Campari I, Formentini U (eds) Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 196–219Google Scholar
  4. Egenhofer MJ, Franzosa RD (1991) Point-set topological spatial relations. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 5:161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freksa C (1992) Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals. Artif Intell 54:199–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harper ME, Jentsch FG, Berry D, Lau HD, Bowers C, Salas E (2003) TPL-KATS-card sort: a tool for assessing structural knowledge. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 35:577–584PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackendoff R (1997) The architecture of the language faculty. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Klippel A, Tappe T, Kulik L, Lee PU (2005) Wayfinding choremes—a language for modeling conceptual route knowledge. J Vis Lang Comput 16:311–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Knauff M, Rauh R, Renz J (1997) A cognitive assessment of topological spatial relations: results from an empirical investigation. In: Hirtle SC, Frank AU (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Randell DA, Cui Z, Cohn AG (1992) A spatial logic based on regions and connections. In: Proceedings 3rd international conference on knowledge representation and reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp 165–176Google Scholar
  11. Tversky B, Lee PU (1999) Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In: Freksa C, Mark DM (eds) Spatial information theory. Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Worboys M, Duckham M (2006) Monitoring qualitative spatiotemporal change for geosensor networks. Int J Geogr Inf Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Zacks JM, Tversky B (2001) Event structure in perception and conception. Psychol Bull 127:3–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zacks JM, Tversky B, Iyer G (2001) Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. J Exp Psychol Gen 130:29–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geomatics Department, CRC SIThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Spatial Information Science and EngineeringUniversity of MaineOronoUSA
  3. 3.Geomatics DepartmentThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations