Cognitive Processing

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 228–231 | Cite as

Subvocalization in auditory-verbal imagery: just a form of motor imagery?

  • André Aleman
  • Mascha van’t Wout
Research Report


Previous studies have provided evidence for subvocal rehearsal (“inner voice”) and phonological storage (“inner ear”) in auditory-verbal imagery. The question remains to be answered whether the inner voice mainly involves higher-order language systems, or primarily relies on motor systems associated with articulatory-kinesthetic processing. On the basis of models of auditory imagery and working memory, we predicted that, if auditory-verbal imagery is a form of motor imagery, performance on a novel auditory-verbal imagery task would be affected by concurrent articulatory suppression as well as by concurrent finger tapping. In contrast, we predicted that performance on a visuospatial control task would be significantly affected by concurrent tapping only. The auditory imagery task consisted of indicating, for bisyllabic words, the syllable that carried the stress. A significant interaction was observed between task (verbal vs. visual) and type of interference (articulatory suppression vs. tapping). Tapping affected reaction times on the visual task significantly more than articulatory suppression. However, both interference conditions affected the verbal task to an equal extent. The present findings confirm the role of subvocalization in auditory-verbal imagery and provide evidence for a strong involvement of articulatory-kinesthetic motor processing.


Motor Imagery Articulatory Suppression Interference Condition Superior Parietal Lobe Imagery Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aleman A, Van Lee L, Mantione M, Verkoijen I, De Haan EHF (2001) Visual imagery without visual experience: evidence from congenitally totally blind people. Neuroreport 12:2601–1604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aleman A, Böcker KBE, Hijman R, de Haan EHF, Kahn RS (2003) Cognitive basis of hallucinations in schizophrenia: top-down mechanisms. Schizophr Res 64:175–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aleman A, Formisano E, Koppenhagen H, Hagoort P, de Haan EHF, Kahn RS (2004) The functional neuroanatomy of metrical stress evaluation of perceived and imagined spoken words. Cereb Cort (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Baddeley A (1986) Working memory. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Baddeley A, Hitch G (1974) Working memory. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Baddeley A, Logie R (1992) Auditory imagery and working memory. In: Reisberg D (ed) Auditory imagery. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  7. Benson DF (1993) Aphasia. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E (eds) Clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchsbaum BR, Hickok G, Humphries C (2001) Role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in phonological processing for speech perception and production. Cogn Sci 25:663–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dogil G, Ackermann H, Grodd W, Haider H, Kamp H, Mayer J, Riecker A, Wildgruber D (2002) The speaking brain: a tutorial introduction to fMRI experiments in the production of speech, prosody and syntax. J Neuroling 15:59–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galante E, Tralli A, Zuffi M, Avanzi S (2000) Primary progressive aphasia: a patient with stress assignment impairment in reading aloud. Neurol Sci 21:39–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kosslyn SM (1994) Image and brain; the resolution of the imagery debate. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Reisberg D (ed) (1992) Auditory imagery. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  13. Reisberg D, Smith JD, Baxter AD, Sonenshine M (1989) Enacted auditory images are ambigous; pure auditory images are not. Q J Exp Psychol 41A:619–641Google Scholar
  14. Richardson JTE (1999) Imagery. Psychology Press, HoveGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith JD, Wilson M, Reisberg D (1995) The role of subvocalization in auditory imagery. Neuropsychology 33:1433–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vitevitch, MS, Luce, PA, Charles-Luce, J, Kemmerer, D 1997Phonotactics and syllable stress: implications for the processing of spoken nonsense wordsLang Speech4047PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychological LaboratoryHelmholtz Research Instituut, Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, Division of NeuroscienceUniversity Medical CenterUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations