Advertisement

Silica Protection–Sacrifice Functionalization of Magnetic Graphene with a Metal–Organic Framework (ZIF-8) to Provide a Solid-Phase Extraction Composite for Recognization of Phthalate Easers from Human Plasma Samples

  • Yujie Lu
  • Baichun Wang
  • Yinghua Yan
  • Hongze Liang
  • Dapeng Wu
Original
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

The integration of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and functionalized magnetic graphene (magG) to form composites has attracted growing attention due to the superimposed properties and extensive applications. However, so far it has not been possible to functionalize but only uncover magnetic graphene to protect its own properties with MOFs. In this work, a template protection–sacrifice (TPS) strategy has been successfully developed to functionalize but also uncover magnetic graphene. SiO2 was used not only a protective shell for magnetic graphene, but also as a sacrificial template to form a two-layer structure. The obtained zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 functionalized magnetic graphene (magG@ZIF-8) composites showed excellent extraction efficiency and promising reusability for phthalate esters with linearity that was between 50 and 8000 ng mL−1, recoveries that varied from 92.1 to 105.3%, relative standard deviation (RSDs) for intra-day and inter-day that was 1.8–4.2% and 3.5–6.5%, limit of detection (LOD) that was in the range of 0.003–0.01 ng mL−1 (S/N = 3), and LOQ that varied from 0.1 to 0.5 ng mL−1 (S/N = 10). More encouragingly, the new synthesized composites were used to analyze nine phthalates in human plasma samples. Our TPS strategy may also provide a new avenue for functionalizing and/or uncovering substrate support materials.

Keywords

GC–MS Magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) Detection Phthalic acid esters (PAEs) magG@ZIF-8 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by research funds of NBU (No. 401708090), the K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21475131).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Author Yinghua Yan declares that she has no confict of interest. Author Yujie Lu declares that she has no confict of interest. Author Baichun Wang declares that he has no confict of interest. Author Hongze Liang declares that he has no confict of interest. Author Dapeng Wu declares that he has no confict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

10337_2018_3673_MOESM1_ESM.docx (999 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 998 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Zhou HC, Kitagawa S (2014) Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Chem Soc Rev 43:5415–5418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moran CM, Joshi JN, Marti RM, Hayes SE, Walton KS (2018) Structured growth of metal–organic framework MIL-53(Al) from solid aluminum carbide precursor. J Am Chem Soc 140:9148–9153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Otake K, Cui YX, Buru CT, Li ZY, Hupp JT, Farha OK (2018) Single-atom-based vanadium oxide catalysts supported on metal–organic frameworks: selective alcohol oxidation and structure-activity relationship. J Am Chem Soc 140:8652–8656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee S, Bürgi HB, Alshmimri SA, Yaghi OM (2018) Impact of disordered guest-framework interactions on the crystallography of metal–organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 140:8958–8964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen KJ, Yang QY, Sen S, Madden DG, Kumar A, Pham T, Forrest KA, Hosono N, Space B, Kitagawa S, Zaworotko MJ (2018) Efficient CO2 removal for ultra-pure CO production by two hybrid ultramicroporous materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 57:3332–3336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xiang L, Sheng LQ, Wang CQ, Zhang LX, Pan YC, Li YS (2017) Amino-functionalized ZIF-7 nanocrystals: improved intrinsic separation ability and interfacial compatibility in mixed-matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. Adv Mater 29:1606999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adil K, Bhatt PM, Belmabkhout Y, Abtab SMT, Jiang H, Assen AH, Mallick A, Cadiau A, Aqil J, Eddaoudi M (2017) Valuing metal–organic frameworks for postcombustion carbon capture: a benchmark study for evaluating physical adsorbents. Adv Mater 29:1702953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bloch ED, Queen WL, Hudson MR, Mason JA, Xiao DJ, Murray LJ, Flacau R, Brown CM, Long JR (2016) Hydrogen storage and selective, reversible O2 adsorption in a metal–organic framework with open chromium(II) sites. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:8605–8609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahn S, Nauert SL, Buru CT, Rimoldi M, Choi H, Schweitzer NM, Hupp JT, Farha OK, Notestein JM (2018) Pushing the limits on metal–organic frameworks as a catalyst support: NU-1000 supported tungsten catalysts for o-xylene isomerization and disproportionation. J Am Chem Soc 140:8535–8543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang N, Drake H, Li JL, Pang JD, Wang Y, Yuan S, Wang Q, Cai PY, Qin JS, Zhou HC (2018) Flexible and hierarchical metal–organic framework composites for high-performance catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 57:8916–8920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lan GX, Ni KY, Xu ZW, Veroneau SS, Song Y, Lin WB (2018) Nanoscale metal–organic framework overcomes hypoxia for photodynamic therapy primed cancer immunotherapy. J Am Chem Soc 140:5670–5673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dong ZY, Sun YZS, Chu J, Zhang XZ, Deng HX (2017) Multivariate metal–organic frameworks for dialing-in the binding and programming the release of drug molecules. J Am Chem Soc 139:14209–14216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jang JS, Koo WT, Choi SJ, Kim ID (2017) Metal organic framework-templated chemiresistor: sensing type transition from PtoN using hollow metal oxide polyhedron via galvanic replacement. J Am Chem Soc 139:11868–11876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ullman AM, Jones CG, Doty FP, Stavila V, Talin AA, Allendorf MD (2018) Hybrid polymer/metal–organic framework films for colorimetric water sensing over a wide concentration range. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:24201–24208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yuan K, Song TQ, Wang DW, Zhang XT, Gao X, Zou Y, Dong HL, Tang ZY, Hu WP (2018) Effective and selective catalysts for cinnamaldehyde hydrogenation: hydrophobic hybrids of metal–organic frameworks, metal nanoparticles, and micro- and mesoporous polymers. Angew Chem Int Ed 57:5708–5713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhao YB, Lee SY, Becknell N, Yaghi OM, Angell CA (2016) Nanoporous transparent MOF glasses with accessible internal surface. J Am Chem Soc 138:10818–10821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yi FY, Chen JL, Wang SC, Gua ML, Han L (2018) A heterobimetallic metal–organic framework as a “turn-on” sensor toward DMF. Chem Commun 54:8233–8236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang CL, Zhou W, Liao XY, Wang XM, Chen ZL (2018) Covalent immobilization of metal organic frameworks onto chemical resistant poly (ether ether ketone) jacket for stir bar extraction. Anal Chim Acta 1025:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang ZM, Zhang T, Wang C, Lin Z, Long LS, Lin W (2015) Photosensitizing metal–organic framework enabling visible-light-driven proton reduction by a wells–dawson-type polyoxometalate. J Am Chem Soc 137:3197–3200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tian Y, Sun M, Wang XQ, Luo CN, Feng JJ (2018) A nanospherical metal–organic framework UiO-66 for solid-phase microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chromatographia 81:1053–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu XQ, Ma JG, Li H, Chen DM, Gu W, Yang GM, Cheng P (2015) Metal–organic framework biosensor with high stability and selectivity in a bio-mimic environment. Chem Commun 51:9161–9164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boontongto T, Siriwong K, Burakham R (2018) Aminefunctionalized metal–organic framework as a new sorbent for vortexassisted dispersive microsolid phase extraction of phenol residues in water samples prior to HPLC analysis: experimental and computational studies. Chromatographia 81:735–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu M, Chen K, Luo C, Song GX, Hu YM, Cheng HF (2017) Synthesis of Fe3O4@mSiO2/PSA@ZrMOF nanocomposites for bifenthrin determination in water samples. Chromatographia 80:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smit B, Maesen TLM (2008) Towards a molecular understanding of shape selectivity. Nature 451:671–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang W, Li Y, Zhang R, He D, Liu H, Liao S (2011) Metal–organic framework as a host for synthesis of nanoscale Co3O4, as an active catalyst for CO oxidation. Catal Commun 12:875–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang H, Revia R, Wang K, Kant RJ, Mu QX, Gai Z, Hong KL, Zhang MQ (2017) Paramagnetic properties of metal-free boron-doped graphene quantum dots and their application for safe magnetic resonance imaging. Adv Mater 29:1605416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gu WX, Zhu XS (2017) Nanoparticles of type Fe3O4–SiO2–graphene oxide and coated with an amino acid-derived ionic liquid for extraction of Al(III), Cr(III), Cu(II), Pb(II) prior to their determination by ICP-OES. Microchim Acta 184:4279–4286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zang XH, Chang QY, Liang WQ, Wu T, Wang C, Wang Z (2018) Micro-solid phase extraction of chlorophenols using reduced graphene oxide functionalized with magnetic nanoparticles and graphitic carbon nitride as the adsorbent. Microchim Acta 185:18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peng J, Guo YQ, Lv HF, Dou XY, Chen Q, Zhao JY, Wu CZ, Zhu XJ, Lin Y, Lu W, Wu XJ, Xie Y (2016) Superparamagnetic reduced graphene oxide with large magnetoresistance: a surface modulation strategy. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:3176–3180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peng J, Tian HR, Du QZ, Hui XH, He H (2018) A regenerable sorbent composed of a zeolite imidazolate framework (ZIF-8), Fe3O4 and grapheneoxide for enrichment of atorvastatin and simvastatin prior to their determination by HPLC. Microchim Acta 185:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jiang HL, Lin YL, Li N, Wang ZW, Liu M, Zhao RS, Lin JM (2018) Application of magnetic N-doped carbon nanotubes in solid-phase extraction of trace bisphenols from fruit juices. Food Chem 269:413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li N, Jiang HL, Wang XL, Wang X, Xu GJ, Zhang BB, Wang LJ, Zhao RS, Lin JM (2018) Recent advances in graphene-based magnetic composites for magnetic solid-phase extraction. Trends Anal Chem 102:60–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li QL, Wang LL, Wang X, Wang ML, Zhao RS (2016) Magnetic metal-organic nanotubes: an adsorbent for magnetic solid-phase extraction of polychlorinated biphenyls from environmental and biological samples. J Chromatogr A 1449:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Musa M, Ibrahim WAW, Marsin FM, Keyon ASA, Nodeh HR (2018) Graphene-magnetite as adsorbent for magnetic solid phase extraction of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid in stingless bee honey. Food Chem 265:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ma JB, Qiu HW, Rui QH, Liao YF, Chen YM, Xu J, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Zhao YG (2018) Enhanced cleanup efficiency hydroxy functionalized-magnetic graphene oxide and its comparison with magnetic carboxyl-graphene for PRiME pass-through cleanup of strychnine and brucine in human plasma samples. Anal Chim Acta 1020:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu GY, Li LY, Xu DH, Huang XD, Xu XM, Zheng SN, Zhang YG, Lin H (2017) Metal–organic framework preparation using magnetic graphene oxide-β-cyclodextrin for neonicotinoid pesticide adsorption and removal. Carbohyd Polym 175:584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cheng G, Wang ZG, Denagamage S, Zheng SY (2016) Graphene-templated synthesis of magnetic metal organic framework nanocomposites for selective enrichment of biomolecules. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:10234–10242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang J, Wang Y, Gao M, Zhang X, Yang P (2016) Versatile metal-organic framework-functionalized magnetic graphene nanoporous composites: as deft matrix for high-effective extraction and purification of the n-linked glycans. Anal Chim Acta 932:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li B, Ma JG, Cheng P (2018) Silica-protection-assisted encapsulation of Cu2O nanocubes into a metal–organic framework (ZIF-8) to provide a composite catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed 57:6834–6837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Eskandarpour N, Sereshti H (2018) Electrospun polycaprolactam-manganese oxide fiber for headspace-solid phase microextraction of phthalate esters in water samples. Chemosphere 191:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dargahi R, Ebrahimzadeh H, Asgharinezhad AA, Hashemzadeh A, Amini MM (2018) Dispersive magnetic solid-phase extraction of phthalate esters from water samples and human plasma based on a nanosorbent composed of MIL-101(Cr) metal–organic framework and magnetite nanoparticles before their determination by GC–MS. J Sep Sci 41:948–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liu G, Su P, Zhou L, Yang Y (2017) Microwave-assisted preparation of poly(ionic liquids)-modified polystyrene magnetic nanospheres for phthalate esters extraction from beverages. J Sep Sci 40:2603–2611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xu M, Liu M, Sun M, Chen K, Cao X, Hu Y (2016) Magnetic solid-phase extraction of phthalate esters (PAEs) in apparel textile by core-shell structured Fe3O4@silica@triblock-copolymer magnetic microspheres. Talanta 150:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhou Q, Zheng Z, Xiao J, Fan H, Yan X (2016) Determination of phthalate esters at trace level from environmental water samples by magnetic solid-phase extraction with Fe@SiO2@polyethyleneimine magnetic nanoparticles as adsorbent prior to high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem 408:5211–5220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Liu XL, Wang C, Wu QH, Wang Z (2015) Porous carbon derived from a metal–organic framework as an efficient adsorbent for the solid-phase extraction of phthalate esters. J Sep Sci 38:3928–3935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Liang WQ, Wang JT, Zang XH, Wang C, Wang Z (2016) A porous carbon derived from amino-functionalized material of Institut Lavoisier as a solid-phase microextraction fiber coating for the extraction of phthalate esters from tea. J Sep Sci 39:1331–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liang XY, Wang JT, Wu JJ, Wu QH, Wang C, Wang Z (2017) Phytic acid induced three-dimensional graphene for the enrichment of phthalate esters from bottled water and sports beverage samples. J Sep Sci 40:3710–3717CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and Chemical EngineeringNingbo UniversityNingboChina

Personalised recommendations