Comparison of Solid-Phase Microextraction Using Classical Fibers Versus Mini-Arrows Applying Multiple Headspace Extraction and Various Agitation Techniques
- 32 Downloads
Multiple headspace extraction allowed the comparison of extraction efficiencies for solid-phase microextraction (SPME) using classical fiber-type sorbents versus the relatively novel mini-Arrows. A hydro-alcoholic matrix and two wine aroma compounds (1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (TDN) and 2,10,10-trimethyl-6-methylen-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-7-ene (vitispirane)) were exemplarily chosen for the evaluation. SPME fiber coating materials were compared with their corresponding SPME mini-Arrow counterparts. With chemically equivalent sorption phases, higher extraction efficiencies were found for the SPME mini-Arrow system due to the larger sorption volume. The comparison of diverse agitation devices revealed a significant influence of the agitation mode on extraction kinetics and extracted analyte amount in non-equilibrium conditions. Furthermore, the evaluation of SPME fibers or SPME mini-Arrow coatings containing a carboxen-type material revealed the importance of an appropriate desorption (injection) temperature. If not chosen carefully, analyte injection may not be complete, possibly resulting in reduced detection limits or generation of carryover problems. Also noteworthy is the construction of the SPME mini-Arrow device as such, as this is more robust compared to the classical SPME fiber, enhancing the lifetime of the extraction device.
KeywordsSPME SPME arrow Multiple headspace extraction Boundary layer Agitation Extraction efficiency
The authors are thankful to CTC Analytics AG for the supply of SPME fibers and SPME mini-Arrows, and Beat Schilling (BGB Analytik AG) for technical support. We are also thankful to CHROMTECH for the supply of the SMM and the conditioning station. We appreciate the donation of TDN and vitispirane samples by Dr. Recep Gök. Part of this research project was supported by the German Ministry of Economics and Technology (via AiF) and the FEI (Forschungskreis der Ernährungsindustrie.V., Bonn, Germany); Project AiF 16680N.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies involving human or animal participants.
- 4.CTC Analytics AG (2016) PAL SPME Arrow—the better SPME. Manufacturer publication, CTC Analytics AG, ZwingenGoogle Scholar
- 7.Pawliszyn J (2010) Theory of extraction. In: Pawliszyn J, Lord HL (eds) Handbook of sample preparation. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp 3–24Google Scholar
- 14.Pawliszyn J (1999) Quantitative aspects of SPME. In: Pawliszyn J (ed) Applications of solid phase microextraction. RSC chromatography monographs. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 3–21Google Scholar
- 18.Ai J (1999) Quantitation by SPME before reaching a partition equilibrium. In: Pawliszyn J (ed) Applications of solid phase microextraction. RSC Chromatography Monographs. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 22–37Google Scholar