, Volume 80, Issue 8, pp 1249–1256 | Cite as

Quantification of BTEX in Soil by Headspace SPME–GC–MS Using Combined Standard Addition and Internal Standard Calibration

  • Dina Orazbayeva
  • Bulat Kenessov
  • Jacek A. Koziel
  • Dayana Nassyrova
  • Nadezhda V. Lyabukhova


There is a great demand for simple, fast and accurate methods for quantification of volatile organic contaminants in soil samples. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has a huge potential for this purpose, but its application is limited by insufficient accuracy caused by a matrix effect. The aim of this research was to develop the method for BTEX quantification in soil using combined standard addition (SA) and internal standard (IS) calibration. Deuterated benzene (benzene-d6) was used as the internal standard for all analytes. The optimized method includes spiking replicate samples with different concentrations of BTEX standards and the same concentration of benzene-d6, equilibration of soil samples at 40 °C during 2 h, and SPME–GC–MS analysis. Precision and accuracy of IS and SA methods were compared on different soil matrices. Combined SA + IS method provided more precise calibration plots compared to the conventional SA calibration. The SA + IS calibration provided more precise and accurate results compared with a reference method based on solvent extraction followed by GC–MS when applied to BTEX quantification in real soil samples (spiked with diesel fuel and aged). Recoveries of BTEX from soil samples spiked with known concentrations of analytes using the developed method were in the range of 73–130% with RSD values less than 15% for all BTEX. The proposed simultaneous standard addition and internal standard approach can be advantageous and adopted for improved quantification of other toxic VOCs in soil.


SPME BTEX quantification Soil analysis Matrix effect Standard addition Internal standard 



This work was conducted under the project 3661/GF4 “Development and implementation of “green” methods for determination of organic pollutants in soils” and Ph.D. project of Ms. Dina Orazbayeva both funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Kazakhstan.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this research.

Supplementary material

10337_2017_3340_MOESM1_ESM.docx (175 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 174 kb)


  1. 1.
    Bolden AL, Kwiatkowski CF, Colborn T (2015) New look at BTEX: are ambient levels a problem? Environ Sci Technol 49:5261–5276. doi: 10.1021/es505316f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Durmusoglu E, Taspinar F, Karademir A (2010) Health risk assessment of BTEX emissions in the landfill environment. J Hazard Mater 176:870–877. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosell M, Lacorte S, Barceló D (2006) Simultaneous determination of methyl tert-butyl ether, its degradation products and other gasoline additives in soil samples by closed-system purge-and-trap gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1132:28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.07.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Couch MW, Schmidt CJ, Wasdo SC (2000) A comparison of sampling techniques for VOCs in soil. Adv Environ Res 4:91–96. doi: 10.1016/S1093-0191(00)00007-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esteve-Turrillas F, Armenta S, Garrigues S et al (2007) Headspace-mass spectrometry determination of benzene, toluene and the mixture of ethylbenzene and xylene isomers in soil samples using chemometrics. Anal Chim Acta 587:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.01.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pavón JLP, Martín SH, Pinto CG, Cordero BM (2009) Programmed temperature vaporizer based method for the sensitive determination of trihalomethanes and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes in soils. J Chromatogr A 1216:6063–6070. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.06.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou Y-Y, Yu J-F, Yan Z-G et al (2013) Application of portable gas chromatography-photo ionization detector combined with headspace sampling for field analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene in soils. Environ Monit Assess 185:3037–3048. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2771-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Llompart M, Li K, Fingas M (1999) Headspace solid phase microextraction (HSSPME) for the determination of volatile and semivolatile pollutants in soils. Talanta 48:451–459. doi: 10.1016/S0039-9140(98)00263-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ezquerro Ó, Ortiz G, Pons B, Tena MT (2004) Determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes in soils by multiple headspace solid-phase microextraction. J Chromatogr A 1035:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.02.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang Z, Pawliszyn J (1995) Quantitative extraction using an internally cooled solid phase microextraction device. Anal Chem 67:34–43. doi: 10.1021/ac00097a007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zygmunt B, Namiesnik J (2001) Solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatographic determination of volatile monoaromatic hydrocarbons in soil. Fresenius J Anal Chem 370:1096–1099. doi: 10.1007/s002160100918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kenessov B, Koziel JA, Bakaikina NV, Orazbayeva D (2016) Perspectives and challenges of on-site quantification of organic pollutants in soils using solid-phase microextraction. Trends Anal Chem 85:111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franco MS, Ribeiro da Silva M, José dos Santos-Neto Á, Lanças FM (2015) SPME determination of low concentration levels of monoaromatic chemical markers in soils after remediation by supercritical fluid extraction. Anal Methods 7:4901–4907. doi: 10.1039/C5AY00467E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farhadi K, Mamaghanian M, Maleki R (2008) A sol-gel based solid phase microextraction fiber for analysis of aromatic hydrocarbons. J Hazard Mater 152:677–682. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    James KJ, Stack M (1996) The determination of volatile organic compounds in soils using solid phase microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J High Resolut Chromatogr 19:515–519. doi: 10.1002/jhrc.1240190908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang L, Mester Z, Sturgeon RE (2002) Improvement in measurement precision with SPME by use of isotope dilution mass spectrometry and its application to the determination of tributyltin in sediment using SPME GC-ICP-MS. J Anal At Spectrom 17:944–949. doi: 10.1039/b204157j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yegemova S, Bakaikina NV, Kenessov B et al (2015) Determination of 1-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole in soils contaminated by rocket fuel using solid-phase microextraction, isotope dilution and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Talanta 143:226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.05.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dina Orazbayeva
    • 1
  • Bulat Kenessov
    • 1
  • Jacek A. Koziel
    • 2
  • Dayana Nassyrova
    • 1
  • Nadezhda V. Lyabukhova
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Center of Physical Chemical Methods of Research and AnalysisAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Biosystems EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations