Advertisement

Chromatographia

, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp 771–781 | Cite as

Possibilities and Limitations of Computer-Assisted Method Development in HILIC: A Case Study

  • Eva TytecaEmail author
  • Stefan Bieber
  • Thomas Letzel
  • Gert Desmet
Original
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Young Investigators in Separation Science

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the possibilities and limitations of computer-assisted method development (CAMD) for the HILIC separation optimization of a mixture of 13 isomeric hydroxy- and aminobenzoic acids on a ZIC-HILIC column. The isocratically obtained Neue and Kuss retention parameters enabled the accurate gradient retention modeling for peaks eluting well within the gradient (mean error of 2.7 %). The prediction errors for peaks eluting at the end of the gradient could be reduced from 8.8 to 6.1 % by implementing the isocratic regime after the gradient into the expression for the gradient retention factor. The prediction of the corresponding peak widths improved significantly for certain compounds and gradient profiles using individual gradient N values for each compound compared to employing a single N value for all compounds and gradient profiles. Two gradient optimization strategies (constructing the R s map based on individual retention modeling and predictive elution stretching and shifting, PEWS2) resulted in a reasonable separation of the challenging mixture of 13 isomeric hydroxy- and aminobenzoic acids on the ZIC-HILIC column. Overall, the optimization was limited by the steep decrease in N (dropping to the isocratic N value) and corresponding increase in peak width when increasing the gradient time. The discrimination factors d 0 were used to assess the resolution between peaks varying widely in height. The best separation was found to be obtained via the PEWS2 approach. Both the individual retention modeling and PEWS2 strategies corresponded to a total instrument time less than 12 h (including equilibration). Finally, it was found that the salt concentration had a significant effect on both the retention and the peak shape of the compounds, resulting in a small “solution domain” at 10 mM. Coupled columns with higher efficiencies are suggested to improve the resolution and robustness of the separation.

Keywords

Computer-assisted method development Retention modeling Benzoic acids ZIC-HILIC 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

Dr. Eva Tyteca was awarded a post-doctoral fellowship from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen).

Conflict of interest

Dr. Eva Tyteca declares that she has no conflict of interest. Stefan Bieber declares that he has no conflict of interest. Prof. Thomas Letzel declares that he has no conflict of interest. Prof. Gert Desmet declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Alpert AJ (1990) J Chromatogr 499:177–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kokotou MG, Thomaidis NS (2012) Chromatographia 75:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Périat A, Kohler I, Veuthey J-L, Guillarme D (2013) LCGC Eur 26:17–23Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou T, Lucy CA (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCalley D (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3408–3417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kahsay G, Song H, Van Schepdael A, Cabooter D, Adams E (2014) J Pharm Biomed Anal 87:142–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valette JC, Demesmay C, Rocca JL, Verdon E (2004) Chromatographia 59:55–60Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kohler I, Derks RJE, Giera M (2016) LCGC Eur 30:60–75Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duarte RMBO, Duarte AC (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:7556–7563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis JM, Giddings JC (1985) Anal Chem 57:2168–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beinert W, Eckert V, Kgaa M, Galushko S, Tanchuk V, Shishkina I (2001) LC-GC Europe on-line supplementary, pp 34–38Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molnar I (2002) J Chromatogr A 965:175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Snyder LR, Dolan JW (1998) Adv Chromatogr 38:115–187Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schoenmakers PJ, Billiet HAH, Tijssen R, De Galan L (1978) J Chromatogr 149:519–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neue UD, Mendeze A (2007) J Sep Sci 30:949–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baeza-Baeza JJ, Garcia-Alvarez-Coque MC (2014) J Sep Sci 37:2269–2277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neue UD, Kuss H-J (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3794–3803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tyteca E, Periat A, Rudaz S, Desmet G, Guillarme D (2014) J Chromatogr A 1337:116–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tyteca E, Guillarme D, Desmet G (2014) J Chromatogr A 1368:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noga S, Jandera P, Buszewski B (2013) Chromatographia 76:929–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cheng X-D, Peng X-T, Yu Q-W, Yuan B-F, Feng Y-Q (2013) Chromatographia 76:1569–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jandera P (2011) Anal Chim Acta 692:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Skeriková V, Jandera P (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:7981–7989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Periat A, Debrus B, Rudaz S, Guillarme D (2013) J Chromatogr A 1282:72–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guo Y, Srinivasan S, Gaiki S (2007) Chromatographia 66:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Greco G, Grosse S, Letzel T (2012) J Chromatogr A 1235:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guo Y, Gaiki S (2011) J Chromatogr A 1218:5920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McCalley DV (2007) J Chromatogr A 1171:46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tyteca E, Liekens A, Clicq D, Fanigliulo A, Debrus B, Rudaz S, Guillarme D, Desmet G (2012) Anal Chem 84:7823–7830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    El Fallah MZ, Martin M (1987) Chromatographia 24:116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Karatapanis AE, Fiamegos YC, Stalikas CD (2011) J Chromatogr A 1218:2871–2879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baeza-Baeza JJ, Garcia-Alvarez-Coque MC (2014) J Chromatogr A 1022:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Tyteca
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefan Bieber
    • 2
  • Thomas Letzel
    • 2
  • Gert Desmet
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering (CHIS)Vrije Universiteit BrusselElseneBelgium
  2. 2.Analytical Research Group, Chair of Urban Water Systems EngineeringTechnical University of MunichGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations