Chromatographia

, Volume 76, Issue 7–8, pp 329–334 | Cite as

Isolation of Xis Gen Fragment of λ Phage from Agarose Gel Using Magnetic Particles for Subsequent Enzymatic DNA Sequencing

  • Kristyna Smerkova
  • Simona Dostalova
  • Helena Skutkova
  • Marketa Ryvolova
  • Vojtech Adam
  • Ivo Provaznik
  • Rene Kizek
Original

Abstract

Gel electrophoresis is one of the most important methods used in biochemistry and molecular biology. The recovery of analytes from the gel required for subsequent analysis including amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or DNA sequencing is an issue due to the gel contamination. Among the other methods used for sample recovery, the application of nanomaterials is also being investigated. In this study, the applicability of magnetic particles (1 μm) for isolation of DNA fragment from agarose gel with subsequent DNA sequencing was investigated. Electrochemical analysis and DNA sequencing was used to investigate the recovery yield. The influence of dilution of the gel prior to the purification was investigated and the linear dependence with regression coefficient R 2 = 0.9972 was obtained using square wave voltammetry. Moreover, bioinformatic analysis was used for comparison of obtained sequences, and simple and easy identification of non-systematic errors caused by both fluorescence labeling reaction and electrophoretic separation. It was found that magnetic nanoparticles based isolation markedly lowered the errors occurring during sequencing of the isolated DNA fragment from 7 to 1 %.

Keywords

Gel electrophoresis Electrochemical analysis DNA sequencing DNA purification Magnetic particles 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the following projects IGA IP 19/2012, NanoBioTECell GACR P102/11/1068 and CEITEC CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068 is highly acknowledged. The author M.R. wishes to express her thanks to project CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.039 for financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Smithies O (1959) Adv Protein Chem 14:65–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ogden RC, Adams DA (1987) Method Enzymol. 152:61–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kallmeyer J, Smith DC (2009) FEMS Microbiol Ecol 69:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu SB, Yang SX, Zhou P, Zhou K, Wang J, Chen XD (2009) Electrophoresis 30:2110–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim WS (1995) Methods Mol Cell Biol 5:242–244Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen CW, Thomas CA (1980) Anal Biochem 101:339–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gubin AN, Kincaid RL (1998) Anal Biochem 258:150–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pramatarova A, Yelle J, Damours B, Hamelin C (1994) J Virol Methods 46:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weichenhan D (1991) Trends Genet 7:109–109Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu W, Welsh MJ (1995) Anal Biochem 229:350–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matitashvili E, Zavizion B (1997) Anal Biochem 246:260–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saiyed ZM, Parasramka M, Telang SD, Ramchand CN (2007) Anal Biochem 363:288–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Intorasoot S, Srirung R, Intorasoot A, Ngamratanapaiboon S (2009) Anal Biochem 386:291–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu D, Zhu GL, Tang WQ, Yang JQ, Guo HY (2012) Int J Mol Sci 13:2048–2062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trachtova S, Obermajer T, Spanova A, Matijasic BB, Rogelj I, Horak D, Rittich B (2012) Mol. Cryst. Liquid Cryst. 555:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Branton D, Deamer DW, Marziali A, Bayley H, Benner SA, Butler T, Di Ventra M, Garaj S, Hibbs A, Huang XH, Jovanovich SB, Krstic PS, Lindsay S, Ling XSS, Mastrangelo CH, Meller A, Oliver JS, Pershin YV, Ramsey JM, Riehn R, Soni GV, Tabard-Cossa V, Wanunu M, Wiggin M, Schloss JA (2008) Nat Biotechnol 26:1146–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clarke J, Wu HC, Jayasinghe L, Patel A, Reid S, Bayley H (2009) Nat Nanotechnol 4:265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huska D, Adam V, Trnkova L, Kizek R (2009) J Magn Magn Mater 321:1474–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huska D, Hubalek J, Adam V, Vajtr D, Horna A, Trnkova L, Havel L, Kizek R (2009) Talanta 79:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huska D, Adam V, Babula P, Trnkova L, Hubalek J, Zehnalek J, Havel L, Kizek R (2011) Microchim Acta 173:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Court DL, Oppertheim AB, Adhya SL (2007) J Bacteriol 189:298–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meyer JR, Dobias DT, Weitz JS, Barrick JE, Quick RT, Lenski RE (2012) Science 335:428–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rajagopala SV, Casjens S, Uetz P (2011) BMC Microbiol 11:1–15Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sam MD, Papagiannis CV, Connolly KM, Corselli L, Iwahara J, Lee J, Phillips M, Wojciak JM, Johnson RC, Clubb RT (2002) J Mol Biol 324:791–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Papagiannis CV, Sam MD, Abbani MA, Yoo D, Cascio D, Clubb RT, Johnson RC (2007) J Mol Biol 367:328–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Palecek E, Bartosik M (2012) Chem Rev 112:3427–3481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Palecek E (2002) Talanta 56:809–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hocek M, Fojta M (2011) Chem Soc Rev 40:5802–5814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sarkar TR, Irudayaraj J (2008) Anal Biochem 379:130–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristyna Smerkova
    • 1
  • Simona Dostalova
    • 1
    • 2
  • Helena Skutkova
    • 2
  • Marketa Ryvolova
    • 1
    • 3
  • Vojtech Adam
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ivo Provaznik
    • 2
  • Rene Kizek
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of AgronomyMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and CommunicationBrno University of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.Central European Institute of TechnologyBrno University of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations