Advertisement

Chromatographia

, Volume 73, Issue 9–10, pp 1021–1025 | Cite as

Determination of Cypermethrin Residues in Crucian Carp Tissues by MSPD/GC-ECD

  • Dongdong Zhao
  • Xiaoyu LiuEmail author
  • Wangrong Shi
  • Rongfei Liu
Full Short Communication

Abstract

A sensitive matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD)/gas chromatography-electron capture detector (GC-ECD) method was developed to determine cypermethrin residues in three tissues (muscle, liver, and gill) of crucian carp. Cypermethrin was simultaneously extracted by MSPD and determined by GC-ECD. The main parameters affecting extraction yield and selectivity, such as the type of solid adsorbent material, choice of elution solvents and their volume, were investigated to obtain interference-free extracts and quantitative cypermethrin recovery. Fortified recoveries in muscle, liver, and gill samples ranged from 84.9% to 106.1%, and relative standard deviations were <8% with fortification levels of 0.05–1 mg kg−1. Detection limits were 1.4–2.1 μg kg−1, and quantitation limits were 5.8–7.8 μg kg−1. The proposed method was successfully applied to determination of cypermethrin in fish tissue samples.

Keywords

Gas chromatography Matrix solid-phase dispersion Crucian carp Cypermethrin 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China (Grant Nos. 2006ABA165, 2009CDB410).

References

  1. 1.
    Saha S, Kaviraj A (2008) Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 80:49–52. doi: 10.1007/s00128-007-9314-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Macedo AN, Nogueira ARA, Govoni Brondi SH (2009) Chromatographia 69:571–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheng JH, Liu M, Yu Y, Wang XP, Zhang H, Ding L, Jin HY (2009) Meat Sci 82:407–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dawidowicz LA, Rado E (2010) J Pharm Biomed Anal 52:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barker SA, Long AR, Short CR (1989) J Chromatogr 475:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barker SA (2007) J Biochem Biophys Methods 70:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Capriotti AL, Cavaliere C, Giansanti P, Gubbiotti R, Samperi R, Laganà A (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:2521–2532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lisa PLCA (2010) Anal Bioanal Chem 397:799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aquino A, Navickiene S (2009) Chromatographia 70:1265–1269Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao M, Wielen VD, Voogt PD (1999) J Chromatogr A 837:129–138Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Navarro M, Pico Y (2002) J Chromatogr A 968:201–209Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pensado L, Casais MC (2005) J Chromatogr A 1077:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lott HM, Barker SA (1993) J AOAC Int 76:67–72Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ling Y-C, Huang I-P (1995) J Chromatogr A 695:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mekevri A, Crane DB (2008) Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 80:455–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whyatt RM, Barr DB (2001) Environ Health Perspect 109(4):417–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lehotay SJ, Lee CH (1997) J Chromatogr A 785:313–327. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00551-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang SL, Xu YJ, Pan CP, Jiang SR, Liu FM (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 387:673–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Campone L, Piccinelli AL, Östman C, Rastrelli L (2010) Anal Bioanal Chem 397:799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuang H, Miao H, Hou XL, Zhao YF, Shen JZ, Xu CL, Wu YN (2009) Chromatographia 70:995–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dongdong Zhao
    • 1
  • Xiaoyu Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wangrong Shi
    • 1
  • Rongfei Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Food Science and TechonolgyHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations