Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 155, Issue 4, pp 1083–1085 | Cite as

Response to comments by C. Palmer on my paper, Feather structure, biomechanics and biomimetics: the incredible lightness of being

Commentary

Keywords

Feather microstructure Cortex Medullary foam Biomechanics Engineering 

References

  1. Azuma A (2006) The biokinetics of flying and swimming, 2nd edn. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., BlacksburgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corning WR, Biewener AA (1998) In vivo strains in pigeon flight feather shafts: implications for structural design. J Exp Biol 201:3057–3065PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Elzanowski A (2002) Above the heads of dinosaurs. In: Chiappe LM, Witmer LM (eds) Mesozoic birds. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 129–159Google Scholar
  4. Homberger DG, de Silva KN (2000) Functional microanatomy of the feather-bearing integument: implications for the evolution of birds and avian flight. Am Zool 40:553–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lingham-Soliar T (2014) Feather structure, biomechanics and biomimetics: the incredible lightness of being. J Ornithol 155:323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nudds RL, Dyke GJ (2010) Narrow primary feather rachises in Confuciusornis and Archaeopteryx suggest poor flight ability. Science 328:887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Palmer C (2014) Response to Lingham-Soliar: Feather structure, biomechanics and biomimetics: the incredible lightness of being. J Ornithol. doi:10.1007/s10336-014-1090-4
  8. Weiss IM, Kirchner HOK (2010) The peacock’s train (Pavo cristatus and Pavo cristatus mut. alba) I. Structure, mechanics, and chemistry of the tail feather coverts. J Exp Zool 313A:690–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesNelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversityPort ElizabethSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations