Journal of Ornithology

, 152:1045 | Cite as

A new passerine bird from the early Oligocene of Poland

  • Zbigniew M. BocheńskiEmail author
  • Teresa Tomek
  • Małgorzata Bujoczek
  • Krzysztof Wertz
Open Access
Original Article


We describe a nearly complete articulated specimen representing a new species and genus, Jamna szybiaki gen. et sp. nov., of an early Oligocene passeriform bird from Poland. In overall osteology, the specimen resembles extant Passeriformes but it differs from that group in several characters including the not bifurcated spina externa (sternum) and the absence of a hooked processus acrocoracoideus (coracoid). Its affinities within Passeriformes cannot be resolved at the moment due to the lack of characters that would support its position within either Oscines or Suboscines. For the first time in Paleogene passerines, wing and tail feathers are visible which provide new information on the external appearance of the bird. Its morphology suggests that it was a frugivorous/insectivorous bird that lived in shrubs and forests.


Fossil birds Feathers Menilite shales Carpathian flysch Oligocene Paleogene 


Wir beschreiben ein fast vollständig artikuliertes Exemplar einer neuen Sperlingsvogel-Art und -Gattung, Jamna szybiaki gen. et sp. nov., aus dem frühen Oligozän in Polen. In seinem Knochenbau erinnert das Exemplar an heutige Sperlingsartige, unterscheidet sich jedoch von dieser Gruppe in einigen Merkmalen wie z.B. dem ungegabelten Brustbein (sternum) und dem nicht vorhandenen eingehakten Rabenschnabelfortsatz processus acrocoracoideus (coracoid). Die Verwandtschaft mit den Sperlingsvögeln ist derzeit noch nicht ganz klar, weil Merkmale fehlen, die seine Stellung innerhalb entweder der Oscines, oder der Suboscines festlegen würden. Zum ersten Mal sind hier bei einem Sperlingsvogel aus dem Paläogen Hand- und Schwanzfedern sichtbar; sie geben neue Informationen über das äußere Aussehen des Vogels. Seine Morphologie lässt vermuten, dass er ein Früchte- und Insektenfresser war und in Sträuchern und Wäldern lebte.


Avian remains dated to the Paleogene are very rare in Poland. All of them come from marine deposits of SE Poland. So far, two specimens have been described: a hummingbird Eurotrochilus noniewiczi (Bocheński and Bocheński 2008) and an unspecified taxon with a columbid-like foot (Bocheński et al. 2010). Several other specimens are under study.

Passeriformes include more than half of all extant avian species. Their Neogene fossil record is very abundant but their remains from the Paleogene are very scarce (Mayr 2005, 2009). The oldest findings that include two isolated bones of possible Passeriformes are dated to the early Eocene of Australia (Boles 1995, 1997). The remaining passerine remains are from the Oligocene of Europe. They include several dozen isolated bones from various localities of France and Germany (Manegold 2008; Mourer-Chauviré 2006; Mourer-Chauviré et al. 1989), an articulated wing from France (Mayr and Manegold 2006b), two so far undescribed articulated legs from Poland (Bocheński 1989, 1993, 1996), one nearly complete specimen (preserved on two slabs in separate collections) and a skull of Wieslochia weissi from Germany (Mayr and Manegold 2004, 2006a), and a so far undescribed specimen from France (Roux 2002). The remains represent both Oscines and Suboscines (Manegold 2008; Mayr 2009; Mourer-Chauviré 2006).

The phylogenetic relationship of Passeriformes has been much debated in the last years (see Mayr 2009 for summary). Taxa that have been proposed as the closest relatives of the passerine birds include Piciformes and the polyphyletic “Coraciiformes” (Livezey and Zusi 2007; Manegold 2005 after Mayr 2009), Psittaciformes (Ericson et al. 2006; Hackett et al. 2008) and the extinct family Zygodactylidae (“Primoscenidae”; Mayr 2008). According to both molecular and morphological analyses, the Acanthisittidae are the sister taxon of all other extant Passeriformes (Barker et al. 2004; Ericson et al. 2003; Worthy et al. 2010). Phylogenies based on molecular data indicate that Oscines originated on the Australian continental plate (Barker et al. 2002; Ericson et al. 2002).

In this paper, we describe a nearly complete articulated specimen found in SE Poland. It provides many new details of the osteology of passerine birds that lived in Europe in the early Oligocene. The specimen also shows relatively well-preserved wing and tail feathers that for the first time cast light on the external appearance of Paleogene Passeriformes.


Osteological terminology follows Baumel and Witmer (1993). Dimensions are given in millimeters and refer to the greatest length along the longitudinal axis of the bone. In the case of feathers, the measurements are approximations of their probable length. The term Pan–Passeriformes denotes the clade including stem group and crown group Passeriformes. The fossil was compared with comparative specimens from the osteological collection of the ISEA, and with published data on the osteology of extant and fossil Acanthisittidae, Oscines and Suboscines as well as extinct Zygodactylidae that are morphologically very similar to Passeriformes (Mayr 2008, 2009). The fossiliferous horizon of Jamna Dolna has been dated on the basis of the fish assemblage (Jerzmańska and Kotlarczyk 1968; Kotlarczyk et al. 2006).

Institutional abbreviations: ISEA, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland; MSMD, Muzeum Skamieniałości i Minerałów, Dubiecko, Poland; SMF, Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; SMNS, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Germany.

Systematic paleontology

Aves Linnaeus, 1758

Pan-Passeriformes (Linnaeus, 1758)

Genus Jamna nov.

Type species: Jamna szybiaki sp. nov.

Etymology: The genus name refers to the type locality, Jamna Dolna.

Remarks: The specimen resembles Passeriformes in overall morphology and derived features. In particular, the humerus bears a large processus supracondylaris dorsalis just above the condylus dorsalis, and a prominent processus flexorius that projects far distally; the carpometacarpus bears the processus intermetacarpalis that projects caudally slightly behind the os metacarpale minus, broad distal end of the os metacarpale minus that protrudes far distally, and a fossa in the ventral surface of the synostosis metacarpalis distalis.

Differential diagnosis: Small passerine, approximately the size of a Dipper Cinclus cinclus. The specimen differs from:
  • All extant Passeriformes in the unique combination of the following characters: sternum with spina externa rod-like and not bifurcated, and with short processus craniolateralis; coracoid with a rounded and not hooked processus acrocoracoideus; very stout humerus with elongated crista deltopectoralis that reaches about one-third of the total length of the bone; carpometacarpus with very stout os metacarpale majus, and phalanx proximalis digiti majoris that widens a little cranio-caudally toward its distal end.

  • The early Oligocene Wieslochia weissi in: the sternum with the spina externa rod-like and not bifurcated; the carpometacarpus with broad distal end of the os metacarpale minus that protrudes far distally.

  • The extinct passerine-like family Zygodactylidae in the following characters: there are seven caudal vertebrae; the processus lateralis (coracoid) is short and rounded; the sternum bears only a single pair of the incisurae in its caudal part; the ulna bears a prominent olecranon that projects far proximally and tapers; on the carpometacarpus the distal end of the os metacarpale minus is broad and protrudes far distally, and there is a fossa in the ventral surface of the synostosis metacarpalis distalis; the phalanx distalis digiti majoris is much shorter than the phalanx proximalis; tail feathers seem to have relatively thin and delicate rachises; the width of the tail feathers remains approximately constant throughout their length.

Jamna szybiaki gen. et sp. nov.

Etymology: The species is named after Robert Szybiak who collected the specimen.

Holotype: MSMD Av JAM-6 (Figs. 1 and 2), almost complete articulated skeleton preserved on one slab only, deposited in the Muzeum Skamieniałości i Minerałów at Dubiecko, Poland. Found in 2003.
Fig. 1

Jamna szybiaki gen. et sp. nov., holotype, specimen MSMD Av JAM-6 from Jamna Dolna, Poland, early Oligocene (top) and interpretative drawing (bottom). Left (L) and right (R) elements are indicated. al Phalanx digiti alulae, dmj phalanx distalis digiti majoris, mn phalanx digiti minoris, pmj phalanx proximalis digiti majoris

Fig. 2

Jamna szybiaki gen. et sp. nov., holotype, specimen MSMD Av JAM-6 from Jamna Dolna, Poland, early Oligocene. a Left carpometacarpus; b right coracoid; c right humerus; om os metacarpale minus (distal end), pa processus acrocoracoideus, pf processus flexorius, pi processus intermetacarpalis (visible as a feeble imprint of its ventral surface); psd processus supracondylaris dorsalis. Scale bars 5 mm

Type locality and horizon: Jamna Dolna, ca. 8 km south-east of Bircza, Podkarpackie Voivodeship, SE Poland, high bank of Jamninka stream, a tributary of the river Wiar; geographical coordinates of the site: 49°38.667′N, 022°33.515′E; Rupelian, early Oligocene, ca. 30–31 MYA, marine deposits of the Menilite Formation of Outer Carpathians, specimen found in the horizon called “pakiet E” (Jerzmańska and Kotlarczyk 1968: fig. 4), correlated with the calcareous nannoplankton of the NP 23 zone sensu Berggren et al. (1995) (see Kotlarczyk et al. 2006).

Diagnosis: As for the genus.

Measurements (maximum length in mm): skull, from tip of beak to posterior end of braincase, 30.0; beak, from tip to posterior end of narial opening, 11.4; mandible, 21.9; sternum, 15.5; coracoid, ~14.9 (left), 15.2 (right); humerus, 17.1 (left), 17.4 (right); ulna, ~18.8 (left), 18.2 (right); radius, ~16.0 (left), ~15.6 (right); carpometacarpus, ~9.7 (left), ~9.2 (right); phalanx proximalis digiti majoris, 5.5 (left), ~5.1 (right); phalanx distalis digiti majoris, 3.1 (left), ~2.9 (right); pelvis, 12.9; femur, >8.8 (right); tibiotarsus, 30.6 (left), 31.6 (right).

Description and comparison


The head is seen in lateral view. The straight, moderately long beak generally resembles that in such extant passeriform genera as Motacilla, Turdus or Anthus, and therefore it is also similar to the Eocene Primozygodactylus and Eozygodactylus (Zygodactylidae) (Mayr 1998; Weidig 2010). It is not clear whether its tip is blunt or pointed because it is still hidden in the matrix. The narial opening is long, measuring more than half the total length of the beak, which markedly differs from the condition observed in many extant taxa with small narial openings (e.g. Coraciiformes, Piciformes). The dorsal and ventral bars of the os nasale are straight; the ventral bar is wider than the dorsal. The relatively thin ramus mandibulae is straight, also in the fragment close to its tip. The fenestra mandibulae cannot be discerned and is therefore either absent or very small. As noticed by Mayr and Manegold (2006a), this fenestra is small or absent in the fossil Wieslochia weissi and small in extant Acanthisittidae and most Suboscines but large in Oscines. The caudal end of the ramus mandibulae and the quadratum are too poorly preserved for meaningful comparisons. The border between the os nasale (beak) and the os frontale (braincase) is not clear, but assuming that the narial openings reach almost to that border as in many extant taxa, we may expect that the os ectethmoidale is large, as in Wieslochia weissi (Mayr and Manegold 2006a) and many extant Passeriformes. The upper part of the braincase is missing and the lower with a portion of the orbit is poorly preserved.


The vertebrae are poorly preserved and probable not all are visible. At least 15 presacral vertebrae can be counted, of which at least 3 bear ribs. The thoracic vertebrae are not fused to a notarium. As in most extant Passeriformes, there are seven caudal vertebrae, each with recognizable processus transversus and processus dorsalis. The Eocene Primozygodactylus danielsi had only five caudal vertebrae (Mayr 1998). The large pygostyle is in the shape of a blade with one edge semi-circular and the other straight.


The coracoid is long and slender as in extant Passeriformes. The right coracoid is somewhat better preserved than the left. From both coracoids, fragments of the extremitas omalis and the sternal end are preserved, whereas most of the shaft is an impression of the ventral side. Unlike most Eupasseres (Oscines and Suboscines) but nevertheless similar to some of them (e.g. Hirundinidae) as well as Acanthisittidae, Primozygodactylus (Mayr 1998; Mayr and Zelenkov 2009) and Zygodactylus (Mayr 2008), the processus acrocoracoideus (visible in the right bone only) is small and rounded and it is not hooked. Absence of a hooked processus acrocoracoideus, yet more elongated medially, was also observed in Wieslochia weissi (Mayr and Manegold 2006a). The processus procoracoideus, cotyla scapularis and facies articularis humeralis are not visible. However, it seems likely that the processus procoracoideus was reduced as in Acanthisittidae and Oscines rather than enlarged as in Wieslochia weissi and some extant Suboscines (see Mayr and Manegold 2006a) because otherwise it would have been visible, at least on the right coracoid. The processus lateralis of the sternal end is short and rounded as in Passeriformes and not elongated laterally as in Primozygodactylus (Mayr 1998; Mayr and Zelenkov 2009). The linea intermuscularis ventralis is clearly visible on the right coracoid.


The furcula is U-shaped. The scapus claviculae is slender, the extremitas omalis is not visible, and the apophysis furculae seems to form a median projecting knob or blade as in extant Passeriformes.


Details of the articular end are not visible. The corpus scapulae is blade-like and almost straight throughout its length; its width does not change with length.


The sternum is oriented with the dorsal side up but mainly the imprint of its ventral side is preserved, with the carina sterni penetrating deep into the matrix. Small bone fragments of its cranial end, where it articulates with the coracoids, are preserved. The right side of the sternum is better preserved than the left side. As in Acanthisittidae (Millener 1989; Millener and Worthy 1991), the sternum is relatively short and broad. The processus craniolateralis is pointed and short and, contrary to Piciformes, Acanthisittidae, most Suboscines (Mayr and Manegold 2006a) and Primozygodactylus (Mayr 1998; Mayr and Zelenkov 2009), it does not project further anterior than the labrum dorsale. The spina externa is rod-like and not bifurcated. In this respect, it differs from Wieslochia, Acanthisittidae and most extant Eupasseres (Oscines and Suboscines) and is similar to most Eurylaimidae, some Cotingidae (Mayr and Manegold 2006a; Millener 1989; Olson 1971; Prum 1993) and to Primozygodactylus (Mayr 1998) and Zygodactylus (Mayr 2008). As in most extant Passeriformes and the early Oligocene Wieslochia (Mayr and Manegold 2006a), there is only a single pair of incisions, the incisurae laterales, in the caudal part of the corpus sterni. All Zygodactylidae have a four-notched sternum (Mayr 1998; Weidig 2010). As noted by Feduccia and Olson (1982) “the sternum is four-notched in almost all non-passerine land birds that might be closely related to the Passeriformes, e.g., Coliiformes, Piciformes, and most Coraciiformes (…), and the early Eocene family Primobucconidae”. The trabecula lateralis widens at its caudal end and it does not project further caudally than the corpus sterni. The caudal edge of the trabecula mediana is moderately wide.


The humerus is stout, its shaft almost straight and its proximal end is broad dorso-ventrally. Both the left and the right bones are imprints of the anterior side, with fragments of bone present. The crista deltopectoralis reaches about one-third of the total length of the bone and forms an angular connection with the shaft. Similar to Primozygodactylus (Mayr 1998: fig. 25C), Piciformes and Hirundinidae, but contrary to most Passeriformes, it reaches proximally almost as far as the caput humeri, meeting with it almost at right angles. The crista bicipitalis begins proximal to the crista deltopectoralis and forms a wide angle with the shaft. The foramen pneumaticum cannot be discerned which may be due to the fact that the posterior surface of the bone is missing. The distal end is wide; the condylus dorsalis projects dorsally. The exact shape and size of the processus supracondylaris dorsalis cannot be discerned but it is clear that the process is just above the condylus dorsalis, which agrees with the condition in Passeriformes (Manegold 2008) and Zygodactylidae (Mayr 1998, 2008; Weidig 2010). The processus flexorius is prominent and it projects distinctly distally, which is in agreement with extant Passeriformes, the Oligocene Wieslochia (Mayr and Manegold 2006a) and the extinct Zygodactylidae (Mayr 1998, 2008).


Most of the left ulna is covered with a thin layer of matrix but some details of the proximal end are impressed in the matrix and are visible when looking at an angle rather than directly from above. The outlines of the right ulna are mostly clear but fragmented bone remains obscure the view of the bone surface. The ulna is a little longer than the humerus, which agrees with Zygodactylidae (Mayr 1998; Weidig 2010) and many Passeriformes. As in most Passeriformes, the olecranon is prominent, projects far proximally, tapers, and there is a saddle in the posterior margin of the bone between the olecranon and the shaft. In Primozygodactylus and Zygodactylus, the olecranon is shorter and stockier (Mayr 1998, 2008). The cotyla ventralis is round and upright, almost parallel to the long axis of the bone, as in Turdus. The cotyla dorsalis is not visible. The papillae remigiales caudales cannot be discerned and it seems that they were absent or small as in many Passeriformes and Zygodactylidae (Mayr 1998, 2008; Weidig 2010), but contrary to Piciformes. The distal ulna is too poorly preserved to allow meaningful comparison.


No closer details of the radius are visible.


Both carpometacarpi are visible in dorsal view but the dorsal surface of the bone is missing. Proximal end of the right carpometacarpus and distal end of the left are partly imprints of the ventral side. The os metacarpale majus is very stout. The processus intermetacarpalis projects caudally slightly behind the os metacarpale minus. Its presence, indicated by the imprint of its ventral surface on the left and right carpometacarpi and by small fragments of bone between the os metacarpale major and os metacarapale minus on the left carpometacarpus, is a derived feature of passerines (Mayr and Manegold 2004, 2006a, b); it is also present in Piciformes and Zygodactylidae (Mayr 1998, 2008; Weidig 2010). The processus dentiformis is not visible, which can be explained by the fact that the dorsal surface of the bone is missing. The distal end of the os metacarpale major is bulging cranially and forms the tuberositas metacarpi. As in Oscines, the distal end of the os metacarpale minus is square, broad and protrudes relatively far distally. In extant Suboscines, Wieslochia weissi and in all Oligocene specimens of suboscine affinities (SMF Av 504, SMF Av 509, SMF Av 510; SMNS 59466/1, SMNS 59466/2), the distal end of the os metacarpale minus is only moderately protruding and its cranial portion reaches farther distally than the facies articularis digitalis minor (Mayr and Manegold 2004, 2006a, b; Mourer-Chauviré et al. 1989). The latter condition is also observed in Acanthisittidae, although their distal end of the os metacarpale minus protrudes farther distally (Mayr and Manegold 2006b; Millener and Worthy 1991: fig. 12). In Zygodactylidae, the os metacarpale minus is only a little longer than the os metacarpale majus—the difference in length is larger in Eozygodactylus and Zygodactylus than in Primozygodactylus (Mayr 1998, 2008; Weidig 2010). As in most extant Oscines, the ventral surface of the synostosis metacarpalis distalis bears a fossa (Mourer-Chauviré et al. 1989). Such a distal depression is also present only in a few Suboscines, which is best explained as convergence (Manegold 2008).

Other elements of the wing

Phalanges of the left wing are better preserved, while those of the right wing are covered with a thin layer of matrix and only their general outlines are visible. As in other passerines, the phalanx digiti alulae is short. The phalanx proximalis digiti majoris is intermediate between that in the Oscines and Suboscines in that it only widens a little cranio-caudally toward its distal end. This phalanx widens considerably cranio-caudally in the suboscine-like specimen SMF Av 504 of the early Oligocene of France whereas it is of approximately equal width in Acanthisittidae and Oscines (Mayr and Manegold 2006b). In the Eocene Primozygodactylus, it resembles the condition in Suboscines (Mayr 1998: fig. 26). Both articular ends of this phalanx—the proximal and the distal—are straight, without any bigger projections, which agrees with Passeriformes. As in extant Passeriformes, the phalanx distalis digiti majoris is much shorter than the phalanx proximalis (the ratio of their lengths calculated from the better preserved left bones is 0.56), and therefore it differs from the suboscine-like specimen SMF Av 504 of the early Oligocene of France whose both phalanges are approximately equal in length (Mayr and Manegold 2006b) and from the Zygodactylidae species whose phalanx distalis digiti majoris is relatively long (Mayr 1998; Weidig 2010). The phalanx digiti minoris narrows cranio-caudally toward its distal end.


The pelvis is oriented with the dorsal side up but what is preserved is mainly the imprint of its ventral side with small fragments of bone. It is relatively short and broad. As in extant Tyrannidae (Suboscines), margo cranialis and margo lateralis of the ala preacetabularis ilii meet approximately at right angles, and the margo caudalis of the ala postacetabularis ilii is roughly perpendicular to the long axis of the pelvis. At least two pairs of foramina intertransversaria are discernable in the caudal end of the synsacrum.


Both femora are poorly preserved and the shaft of the right one is broken near its distal end; they are seen in cranial view. The right bone is articulated to the pelvis, with its distal end penetrating into the matrix and therefore it seems shorter. The proximal end is not visible in any of the femora. In general proportions, the femur is similar to that of extant Passeriformes, particularly Sturnus vulgaris (Sturnidae).


As in extant Passeriformes but also extinct Zygodactylidae (Mayr 1998, 2008; Weidig 2010), the tibiotarsus is slender and straight and it is clearly the longest limb element. Also as in Passeriformes, the crista cranialis lateralis (right bone) projects far laterally and is relatively narrow. The medial edge of the proximal tibiotarsus is straight. The crista fibularis reaches far laterally; its distal end is missing. The right fibula is attached to the crista cnemialis lateralis and the crista fibularis; its distal end is missing. The crista cnemialis cranialis (left bone) is long proximo-distally and it joins with the shaft almost at right angles. On the distal end (right bone), the medial edge of the shaft curves slightly medially toward the condylus medialis. As in extant Passeriformes, the condyli medialis and lateralis are of similar size.


The small fragment of the proximal right tarsometatarsus that is articulated to the tibiotarsus is too poorly preserved to allow meaningful comparisons.


Barbs and barbules of flight and tail feathers are visible under higher magnification. Flight feathers overlap with each other because the left wing is only partly stretched and the right wing is folded. Nevertheless, four primaries and five secondaries can be discerned on the left wing. The right wing, which is ca. 56 mm long, allows the recognition of at least four primaries, two secondaries and one tertial. Wing coverts and alula are not preserved. The lengths (in mm) of the visible left wing primaries from left to right are as follows: 44, 47, 46, 45. Left wing secondaries measure 40–43 mm. The two outermost left wing primaries have their tips elongated and rounded, they lack outer and inner emargination, and they are asymmetrical (outer vane is 2 mm wide and inner vane is 5 mm). The tips of the two subsequent left wing primaries show a slanting inner vane (Fig. 3). The above-mentioned tips of primaries are common in most extant taxa. The five secondaries of the left wing have heart-shaped tips (with a small indentation) and their outer vane is slanting. Similar tips of flight feathers are observed in, e.g., extant Skylark Alauda arvensis. The single tertial visible on the right wing is relatively wide and has a rounded tip, and therefore differs from such extant taxa with long and pointed tertials as, e.g., Motacilla or Anthus (Jenni and Winkler 1994; Svensson 1992; own data). Five tail feathers are visible—two central rectrices, two rectrices on the left and one on the right side. As in extant Passeriformes but contrary to an Eocene member of the Zygodactylidae, Primozygodactylus eunjooae (Mayr 2009: fig. 16.10d; Mayr and Zelenkov 2009: fig. 1A), all tail feathers seem to have relatively thin and delicate rachises. Also, all tail feathers show rounded tips. The two central rectrices are symmetrical, their width is about 8 mm throughout their length, which is ca. 48 mm—their size is similar to tail feathers of, e.g., the Nuthatch Sitta europaea. The adjoining rectrice on the left is a little shorter (42 mm) which indicates that the subsequent rectrices were shorter toward the tail edges and therefore the tail must have been rounded as, e.g., in extant warblers of the genus Acrocephalus (Jenni and Winkler 1994; Svensson 1992; own data). The tail of Jamna szybiaki differs considerably from that in P. eunjooae (Mayr and Zelenkov 2009) in that the central rectrices are only a little longer—in P. eunjooae they are four times as long as the outer tail feathers, and in extant Piciformes the outer rectrices are also much shorter (Ginn and Melville 2007). A striking difference also concerns the shape of tail feathers (Fig. 3). In Jamna szybiaki and extant Passeriformes, the width of rectrices does not change with their length whereas in P. eunjooae rectrices are clearly narrower at the base and wider at the tip. Extant Piciformes are in a way similar to P.eunjooae in that their rectrices are narrower at the base, widest at two-thirds length and becoming narrower again toward the end. The exception is the Wryneck Jynx torquilla whose rectrices more closely resemble those of P. eunjooae. Although the differences were not mentioned in the original description of P. eunjooae, they can be observed on the published photographs (Mayr 2009: fig. 16.10d; Mayr and Zelenkov 2009: fig. 1A). The rectrices of Zygodactylus luberonensis are likely to be of similar shape to those of P. eunjooae but such details are not visible in the photographs (Mayr 2008: fig. 2, 2009: fig. 16.9) and probably neither on the specimen.
Fig. 3

Flight feathers and a rectrix of Jamna szybiaki gen. et sp. nov. in comparison with rectrices of Primozygodactylus eunjooae (a) and chosen extant taxa: Dendrocopos/Picus (b), Jynx torquilla (c), Sitta europaea (d). Arrows indicate slanting inner vane of a primary and outer vane of a secondary of Jamna szybiaki


As shown above, Jamna szybiaki can be assigned to Passeriformes. However, its more precise affinities are difficult to determine because there are no univocal features that would support its position within either Oscines or Suboscines. Likewise, we are unable to identify character(s) that are derived for Eupasseres but absent in the fossil, and that would indicate a position of J. szybiaki outside the crown group Eupasseres. Therefore, the affinities of J. szybiaki within Passeriformes cannot be resolved at the moment. Although J. szybiaki is in many aspects similar to the early Oligocene Weislochia weissi, it differs from it in, among others, significant features such as the unbifurcated spina externa of the sternum—a character that shows little variation within particular groups of extant Passeriformes. This suggests that the two early Oligocene passerine species—Wieslochia and Jamna—are probably not closely related, and indicates a higher diversity of early Oligocene passerines in Europe.

Jamna szybiaki was a small bird the size of a Dipper Cinclus cinclus or a Skylark Alauda arvensis. The straight, moderately long, thrush-like beak suggests a frugivorous or insectivorous diet. The short and broad pelvis and sternum must have made a stocky trunk which is typical for birds living on the forest floor rather than in grasslands or reed beds. The shape and size of the flight feathers indicate a rather short and broad wing with a rounded tip, and the tail feathers suggest a relatively short and rounded tail. Such feathering is typical for strongly flying birds that live in shrubs and forests. The long legs suggest that the bird spent much time on the ground, probably hopping or walking when foraging among trees like modern thrushes or wrens (Cramp 1988).

As noticed in previous studies (Manegold 2008; Mayr 2009; Mayr and Manegold 2006a), all passerine remains from the Oligocene represent small and very small taxa, which may indeed reflect their real proportion in the avifauna. Our results confirm the observation by adding another small species to the Oligocene passerines. Unlike isolated passerine bones collected from fissure fillings at Herrlingen in southern Germany (Manegold 2008), whose accumulation may have also been the result of predators’ selective hunting, J. szybiaki is an articulated specimen found in marine deposits and therefore it is unlikely that it was deposited by a predator. It may have fallen into the water while flying over it, especially if it had been injured which is suggested by the broken right femur. Such a scenario was postulated to explain the abundance of birds in deposits of larger lakes and coastal environments (e.g. Messel or Green River Formation) where relatively many specimens show fractures of their limb bones (Mayr 2000; Mayr et al. 2004).



We thank Ewa Świdnicka (University of Wrocław) for providing us the geological data of the specimen and the site of Jamna Dolna, Robert Szybiak (MSMD) and Piotr Wojtal (ISEA) for taking photographs of the specimen, and Gerald Mayr (SMF) and an anonymous referee for constructive comments on the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. Barker FK, Barrowclough GF, Groth JG (2002) A phylogenetic hypothesis for passerine birds: taxonomic and biogeographic implications of an analysis of nuclear DNA sequence data. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:295–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker FK, Cibois A, Schikler P, Feinstein J, Cracraft J (2004) Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11040–11045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumel JJ, Witmer LM (1993) Osteologia. In: Baumel JJ, King AS, Breazile JE, Evans HE, Vanden Berge JC (eds) Handbook of avian anatomy: nomina anatomica avium. Nuttall Ornithol Club 23:45–132Google Scholar
  4. Berggren WA, Kent DV, Swisher CC, Aubry M-P (1995) A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy. In: Berggren WA, Kent DV, Aubry M-P, Hardenbol J (eds) Geochronology, time scales and stratigraphic correlation. Society for Sedimentary Geology. (SEPM). Spec Publ 54:129–212Google Scholar
  5. Bocheński Z (1989) Ptaki–Aves. In: Kowalski K (ed) Historia i ewolucja lądowej fauny Polski [History and evolution of the terrestrial fauna of Poland]. Folia Quatern 59–60:89–108Google Scholar
  6. Bocheński Z (1993) Catalogue of fossil and subfossil birds of Poland. Acta Zool Cracov 36:329–460Google Scholar
  7. Bocheński Z (1996) Ptaki kopalne [Fossil birds]. Pro Natura, Kraków. ISBN 83-85222-50-2Google Scholar
  8. Bocheński Z, Bocheński ZM (2008) An Old World hummingbird from the Oligocene: a new fossil from Polish Carpathians. J Ornithol 149:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bocheński ZM, Tomek T, Świdnicka E (2010) A columbid-like avian foot from the Oligocene of Poland. Acta Ornithol 45:233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boles WE (1995) The world’s oldest songbird. Nature 374:21–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boles WE (1997) Fossil songbirds (Passeriformes) from the Eocene of Australia. Emu 97:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramp S (1988) The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol 5. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Ericson PGP, Christidis L, Cooper A, Irestedt M, Jackson J, Johansson US, Norman JA (2002) A Gondwanan origin of passerine birds supported by DNA sequences of the endemic New Zealand wrens. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ericson PGP, Irestedt M, Johansson US (2003) Evolution, biogeography, and patterns of diversification in passerine birds. J Avian Biol 34:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ericson PGP, Anderson CL, Britton T, Elzanowski A, Johansson US, Källersjö M, Ohlson JI, Parsons TJ, Zuccon D, Mayr G (2006) Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils. Biol Lett 2:543–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feduccia A, Olson SL (1982) Morphological similarities between the Menurae and the Rhinocryptidae, relict passerine birds of the southern hemisphere. Smithson Contrib Zool 366:1–22Google Scholar
  17. Ginn HB, Melville DS (2007) Moult in birds. BTO Guide 19. Page Bros, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  18. Hackett SJ, Kimball RT, Reddy S, Bowie RCK, Braun EL, Braun MJ, Chojnowski JL, Cox WA, Han K-L, Harshman J, Huddleston CJ, Marks BD, Miglia KJ, Moore WS, Sheldon FH, Steadman DW, Witt CC, Yuri T (2008) A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320:1763–1767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jenni L, Winkler R (1994) Moult and ageing of European passerines. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Jerzmańska A, Kotlarczyk J (1968) Ichthyofaunal assemblages in the Menilite Beds of the Carpathians as indicators of sedimentary environment. (In Polish, English summary). Ann Soc Geol Pol 38:39–66Google Scholar
  21. Kotlarczyk J, Jerzmańska A, Świdnicka E, Wiszniowska T (2006) A framework of ichthyofaunal ecostratigraphy of the Oligocene-Early Miocene strata of the Polish Outer Carpathian basin. Ann Soc Geol Pol 76:1–111Google Scholar
  22. Livezey BC, Zusi RL (2007) Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy: II—analysis and discussion. Zool J Linn Soc 149:1–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manegold A (2008) Passerine diversity in the late Oligocene of Germany: earliest evidence for the sympatric coexistence of Suboscines and Oscines. Ibis 150:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mayr G (1998) “Coraciiforme” und “piciforme” Kleinvögel aus dem Mittel-Eozän der Grube Messel (Hessen, Deutschland). Cour Forsch Senckenberg 205:1–101Google Scholar
  25. Mayr G (2000) Die Vögel der Grube Messel–ein Einblick in die Vogelwelt Mitteleuropas vor 49 Millionen Jahren. Natur und Museum 130:365–378Google Scholar
  26. Mayr G (2005) The Paleogene fossil record of birds in Europe. Biol Rev 80:515–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayr G (2008) Phylogenetic affinities of the enigmatic avian taxon Zygodactylus based on new material from the early Oligocene of France. J Syst Palaeontol 6:333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayr G (2009) Paleogene fossil birds. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mayr G, Manegold A (2004) The oldest Europaean fossil songbird from the early Oligocene of Germany. Naturwissenschaften 91:173–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayr G, Manegold A (2006a) New specimens of the earliest European passeriform bird. Acta Paleontol Pol 51:315–323Google Scholar
  31. Mayr G, Manegold A (2006b) A small suboscine-like passeriform bird from the early Oligocene of France. Condor 108:717–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mayr G, Zelenkov N (2009) New specimens of zygodactylid birds from the middle Eocene of Messel, with description of a new species of Primozygodactylus. Acta Palaeontol Pol 54:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mayr G, Mourer-Chauviré C, Weidig I (2004) Osteology and systematic position of the Eocene Primobucconidae (Aves, Coraciiformes sensu stricto), with first records from Europe. J Syst Palaeontol 2:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Millener PR (1989) The only flightless passerine; the Stephens Island wren. Notornis 36:280–284Google Scholar
  35. Millener PR, Worthy TH (1991) Contributions to New Zealand’s Late Quaternary avifauna. II: Dendroscansor decurvirostris, a new genus and species of wren (Aves: Acanthisittidae). J R Soc NZ 21:179–200Google Scholar
  36. Mourer-Chauviré C (2006) The avifauna of the Eocene and Oligocene phosphorites du Quercy (France): an updated list. Strata Ser 1 13:135–149Google Scholar
  37. Mourer-Chauviré C, Hugeney H, Jonet P (1989) Découverte de Passeriformes dans l’Oligocène supérieur de France. CR Acad Sci Ser II 309:843–849Google Scholar
  38. Olson SL (1971) Taxonomic comments on the Eurylaimidae. Ibis 113:507–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prum RO (1993) Phylogeny, biogeography, and evolution of the broadbills (Eurylaimidae) and asities (Philepittidae) based on morphology. Auk 110:304–324Google Scholar
  40. Roux T (2002) Deux fossiles d’oiseaux de l’Oligocène inférieur du Luberon. Courr Sci Parc Nat Rég Luberon 6:38–57Google Scholar
  41. Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European Passerines, 4th edn. Svensson, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  42. Weidig I (2010) New birds from the Lower Eocene Green River Formation, North America. Rec Aust Mus 62:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Worthy TH, Hand SJ, Nguyen JM, Tennyson AJD, Worthy JP, Scofield RP, Boles W, Archer M (2010) Biogeographical and phylogenetic implications of an early Miocene wren (Aves: Passeriformes: Acanthisittidae) from New Zealand. J Vertebr Paleontol 30:479–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zbigniew M. Bocheński
    • 1
    Email author
  • Teresa Tomek
    • 1
  • Małgorzata Bujoczek
    • 2
  • Krzysztof Wertz
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Systematics and Evolution of AnimalsPolish Academy of SciencesKrakowPoland
  2. 2.Department of Natural and Cultural Heritage, Animal Ecology and Wildlife Management, Faculty of ForestryUniversity of AgricultureKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations