Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 152, Supplement 2, pp 445–455

Spatially explicit capture–recapture methods to estimate minke whale density from data collected at bottom-mounted hydrophones

  • Tiago A. Marques
  • Len Thomas
  • Stephen W. Martin
  • David K. Mellinger
  • Susan Jarvis
  • Ronald P. Morrissey
  • Carroll-Anne Ciminello
  • Nancy DiMarzio
EURING Proceedings

Abstract

Estimation of cetacean abundance or density using visual methods can be cost-ineffective under many scenarios. Methods based on acoustic data have recently been proposed as an alternative, and could potentially be more effective for visually elusive species that produce loud sounds. Motivated by a dataset of minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) “boing” sounds detected at multiple hydrophones at the U.S. Navy’s Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), we present an approach to estimate density or abundance based on spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) methods. We implement the proposed methods in both a likelihood and a Bayesian framework. The point estimates for abundance and detection parameters from both implementation methods are very similar and agree well with current knowledge about the species. The two implementation approaches are compared in a small simulation study. While the Bayesian approach might be easier to generalize, the likelihood approach is faster to implement (at least in simple cases like the one presented here) and more readily amenable to model selection. SECR methods seem to be a strong candidate for estimating density from acoustic data where recaptures of sound at multiple acoustic sensors are available, and we anticipate further development of related methodologies.

Keywords

Minke whale Passive acoustic monitoring Proximity detector Spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR) OpenBUGS 

References

  1. Barlow J, Taylor B (2005) Estimates of sperm whale abundance in the northeastern temperate Pacific from a combined acoustic and visual survey. Mar Mamm Sci 21:429–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borchers D, Efford M (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 64:377–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borchers DL (this volume) A non-technical overview of spatially explicit capture-recapture models. J OrnitholGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling—estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham KP, Buckland ST, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Marques TA, Bishop JRB, Thomas L (2004) Further topics in distance sampling. In: Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (eds) Advanced distance sampling. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 307–392Google Scholar
  6. Dawson DK, Efford MG (2009) Bird population density estimated from acoustic signals. J App Ecol 46:1201–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Efford MG (2009) secr—spatially explicit capture-recapture in R, version 1.2.10. Department of Zoology, University of Otago, DunedinGoogle Scholar
  8. Efford MG, Borchers DL, Byrom AE (2008) Density estimation by spatially explicit capture-recapture: likelihood-based methods. In: Modeling demographic processes in marked populations. Environmental and Ecological Statistics. Springer, New York, pp 255–269Google Scholar
  9. Efford MG, Dawson DK, Borchers DL (2009) Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array. Ecology 90:2676–2682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans PGH, Hammond PS (2004) Monitoring cetaceans in european waters. Mamm Rev 34:131–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marques TA, Thomas L, Ward J, DiMarzio N, Tyack PL (2009) Estimating cetacean population density using fixed passive acoustic sensors: an example with Blainville’s beaked whales. J Ac Soc Am 125:1982–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mellinger DK, Stafford KM, Moore SE, Dziak RP, Matsumoto H (2007) An overview of fixed passive acoustic observation methods for cetaceans. Oceanography 20:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mobley Jr JR, Grotefendt RA, Forestell HP, Frankel AS (1999) Results of aerial surveys of marine mammals in the major Hawaiian Islands (1993–98). Tech. rep., Final Report to the Acoustic Thermometry of Ocean Climate Program (ATOC MMRP)Google Scholar
  14. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing http://www.R-project.org, ISBN 3-900051-07-0
  15. Rankin S, Norris TF, Smultea MA, Oedekoven C, Zoidis AM, Silva E, Rivers J (2007) A visual sighting and acoustic detections of minke whales, Balaenoptera acutorostrata (Cetacea: Balaenopteridae), in nearshore Hawaiian waters. Pac Sci 61:395–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Royle JA (2009) Analysis of capture–recapture models with individual covariates using data augmentation. Biometrics 65:267–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Royle JA, Young KV (2008) A hierarchical model for spatial capture–recapture data. Ecology 89:2281–2289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Royle JA, Dorazio RM, Link WA (2007) Analysis of multinomial models with unknown index using data augmentation. J Comp Graph Stat 16:67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Royle JA, Karanth KU, Gopalaswamy AM, Kumar NS (2009a) Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture–recapture models. Ecology 90:3233–3244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Royle JA, Nichols JD, Karanth KU, Gopalaswamy AM (2009b) A hierarchical model for estimating density in camera-trap studies. J App Ecol 46:118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomas A, OHara B, Ligges U, Sturtz S (2006) Making BUGS open. R News 6:12–17Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiago A. Marques
    • 1
  • Len Thomas
    • 1
  • Stephen W. Martin
    • 2
  • David K. Mellinger
    • 3
  • Susan Jarvis
    • 4
  • Ronald P. Morrissey
    • 4
  • Carroll-Anne Ciminello
    • 4
  • Nancy DiMarzio
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental ModellingUniversity of St AndrewsFifeScotland
  2. 2.Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center PacificSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources StudiesOregon State UniversityNewportUSA
  4. 4.Naval Undersea Warfare Center DivisionNewportUSA

Personalised recommendations