Advertisement

Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 151, Issue 4, pp 945–950 | Cite as

A new exploratory approach to the study of the spatio-temporal distribution of ring recoveries: the example of Teal (Anas crecca) ringed in Camargue, Southern France

  • Clément CalengeEmail author
  • Matthieu Guillemain
  • Michel Gauthier-Clerc
  • Géraldine Simon
Original Article

Abstract

We use a new method called “product kernel estimator” to explore the spatial and temporal distribution of 9,114 recoveries of Teal (Anas crecca) ringed in Camargue, southern France, and recovered over the whole of Europe. This method allows exploration of the changes in time of the probability density to recover a ringed bird over a grid covering the study area. We thus identified two migration corridors for this species to the north and south of the Alps, whereas earlier analyses mostly suggested a southern route from Camargue, especially in spring. The northern route seems to be used to a greater extent in autumn than in spring, indicating a frequent abmigration (animals switching from one corridor to the other). Moreover, migration of the population seems faster in spring than in autumn. The simultaneous presence of Teal recoveries in many distinct geographical areas in spring is consistent with the idea that these ducks are not limited by their migratory speed in spring, nor do they wait until favorable environmental conditions before colonizing their breeding areas.

Keywords

Product kernel algorithm Spatial distribution Time effect Eurasian Teal Ring recoveries 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are most grateful to Luc Hoffmann, Hubert Kowalski, Heinz Hafner, Alan Johnson, and the other people who ringed Teal at Tour du Valat for over 25 years. We would especially like to thank Marc Lutz, Paul Isenmann and the Centre de Recherche sur la Biologie des Populations d’Oiseaux (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris) for their help while computerizing the French Teal database. This work was partially funded by the French “Agence Nationale de la Recherche” (ANR) “Santé-Environnement/Santé au travail”, the “European Union’s Framework Program for Research and Technological Development (FP6)” and the “Région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur”.

Supplementary material

10336_2010_534_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (83 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 83 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (AVI 876 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (AVI 773 kb)

10336_2010_534_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (5 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 5 kb)
10336_2010_534_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (5 kb)
Supplementary material 5(PDF 4 kb)

References

  1. Alerstam T (1990) Bird migration. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DR, Burnham KP (1976) Population ecology of the mallard VI. The effect of exploitation on survival. United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MG, Rhymer JM, Rohwer FC (1992) Philopatry, dispersal, and the genetic structure of waterfowl populations. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL (eds) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson PW, Robinson RA, Clark JA, Miyar T, Downie IS, du Feu CR, Fiedler W, Fransson T, Grantham MJ, Gschweng M, Spina F, Crick HQP (2007) Migratory movements of waterfowl: a web-based mapping tool. EURING report to the EU Commission. (http://www.blx1.bto.org/ai-eu/).
  5. Bub H (1991) Bird trapping and bird banding. A handbook for trapping methods all over the world. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Calenge C (2006) The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleveland W (1993) Visualizing data. Hobart Press. SummitGoogle Scholar
  8. Delany S, Scott DA (2006) Waterbird population estimates, 4th edn. Wetlands International, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  9. Devineau O (2007) Dynamique et gestion des populations exploitées: l’exemple de la sarcelle d’hiver. PhD thesis, University of Montpellier II, FranceGoogle Scholar
  10. Devineau O, Guillemain M, Johnson AD, Lebreton JD (2010) A comparison of green-winged teal survival and harvest between Europe and North America. Wildl Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Elmberg J, Nummi P, Pöysä H, Gunnarsson G, Sjöberg K (2005). Early breeding teal Anas crecca use the best lakes and have the highest reproductive success. Ann Zool Fenn 42:37–43Google Scholar
  12. Fouque C, Caizergues A, Guillemain M, Fournier JY, Benmergui M, Mondain-Monval JY, Schricke V (2005) Distribution des effectifs hivernaux du fuligule milouin en France et tendances d’évolution sur les 16 derniers hivers. Faune sauvage 268:4–17Google Scholar
  13. Gauthier G, Pradel R, Menu S, Lebreton JD (2001) Seasonal survival of Greater Snow Geese and effect of hunting under dependence in sighting probability. Ecology 82: 3105–3119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guillemain M, Sadoul N, Simon G (2005) European flyway permeability and abmigration in Teal Anas crecca, an anlysis based on ringing recoveries. Ibis 147:688–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guillemain M, Hearn R, King R, Gauthier-Clerc M, Simon G, Caizergues A (2009) Comparing migration of Teal from two main wintering areas of Western Europe: a long term study from Essex, England, and Camargue, France. Ringing Migr (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Jespersen P, Veden TåningÅ (1950) Studies in bird migration being the collected papers of H. Chr. C. Mortensen 1856–1921. Munksgaard, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson K (1995) Green-winged Teal. In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The Birds of North America, No. 193. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and The American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Keating KA, Cherry S (2009) Modelling utilization distributions in space and time. Ecology 90:1971–1980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lampio T, Michaelis HK (1972) Hunting seasons and methods in Europe 1969–1970. In: Carp E (ed) Proceedings of the International Conference on the conservation of wetlands and watezrfowl, Ramsar, Iran, 30 January-3 February 1971. IWRB, Slimbridge, UK, pp 157–172Google Scholar
  20. Mooij JH (2005) Protection and use of waterbirds in the European Union. Beiträge zur Jagd und Wildfoschung 30:49–76Google Scholar
  21. Newton I (2008) The migration ecology of birds. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Nichols JD, Blohm RJ, Reynolds RE, Trost R, Hines JE, Bladen JP (1991) Band reporting rates for mallards with reward bands of different dollar values. J Wildl Manage 55:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nichols JD, Reynolds RE, Blohm RJ, Trost R, Hines JE, Bladen JP (1995) Geographic variation in band reporting rates for mallards based on reward banding. J Wildl Manage 59:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ogilvie MA (1983) A migration study of the Teal (Anas crecca) in Europe using ringing recoveries. PhD Thesis, University of BristolGoogle Scholar
  25. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (http://www.R-project.org), Vienna, Austria
  26. Robinson RA, Grantham MJ, Clark JA (2009) Declining rates of ring recovery in British birds. Ringing Migr 24:266–272Google Scholar
  27. Scott DA, Rose PM (1996) Atlas of Anatidae populations in Africa and Western Eurasia. Wetlands International Publication 41. Wetlands International, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  28. Schüz E, Weigold H (1931) Atlas des Vogelzugs nach den Beringungsergebnissen bei palaearktischen Vögeln. R Friedländer and Sohn, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Wand MP, Jones MC (1995) Kernel smoothing. Chapman and Hall/CRC, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clément Calenge
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthieu Guillemain
    • 2
  • Michel Gauthier-Clerc
    • 3
  • Géraldine Simon
    • 3
  1. 1.Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Direction des Etudes et de la RechercheAuffargisFrance
  2. 2.Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune SauvageCNERA Avifaune MigratriceArlesFrance
  3. 3.Centre de Recherche de la Tour du ValatArlesFrance

Personalised recommendations